CREAT: Census Research Exploration and Analysis Tool

Papers Containing Keywords(s): 'employ'

The following papers contain search terms that you selected. From the papers listed below, you can navigate to the PDF, the profile page for that working paper, or see all the working papers written by an author. You can also explore tags, keywords, and authors that occur frequently within these papers.
Click here to search again

Frequently Occurring Concepts within this Search

Longitudinal Employer Household Dynamics - 131

Bureau of Labor Statistics - 99

Longitudinal Business Database - 90

North American Industry Classification System - 89

Current Population Survey - 85

Center for Economic Studies - 77

Internal Revenue Service - 71

National Science Foundation - 66

Standard Industrial Classification - 65

Ordinary Least Squares - 65

American Community Survey - 64

Employer Identification Numbers - 61

Census Bureau Disclosure Review Board - 61

Alfred P Sloan Foundation - 56

Social Security Administration - 49

Decennial Census - 47

Quarterly Census of Employment and Wages - 46

Quarterly Workforce Indicators - 44

Federal Statistical Research Data Center - 40

National Bureau of Economic Research - 38

Metropolitan Statistical Area - 34

Census of Manufactures - 33

Annual Survey of Manufactures - 33

Business Register - 33

Disclosure Review Board - 32

Social Security - 32

Unemployment Insurance - 31

Protected Identification Key - 30

Federal Reserve Bank - 29

Chicago Census Research Data Center - 29

Bureau of Economic Analysis - 28

Survey of Income and Program Participation - 27

International Trade Research Report - 26

Department of Labor - 25

Cornell University - 25

Social Security Number - 25

Economic Census - 22

Census Bureau Business Register - 22

Longitudinal Research Database - 22

Standard Statistical Establishment List - 22

Individual Characteristics File - 21

Total Factor Productivity - 21

LEHD Program - 21

County Business Patterns - 20

Census Bureau Longitudinal Business Database - 20

Special Sworn Status - 19

Local Employment Dynamics - 19

University of Chicago - 19

AKM - 18

W-2 - 18

Research Data Center - 18

Business Dynamics Statistics - 17

National Institute on Aging - 17

PSID - 17

Federal Reserve System - 16

Employment History File - 15

Census of Manufacturing Firms - 15

Employer Characteristics File - 14

2010 Census - 13

Employer-Household Dynamics - 13

Occupational Employment Statistics - 13

National Longitudinal Survey of Youth - 13

University of Maryland - 13

Herfindahl Hirschman Index - 12

Cornell Institute for Social and Economic Research - 12

Financial, Insurance and Real Estate Industries - 12

American Economic Review - 12

Core Based Statistical Area - 11

Retail Trade - 11

Business Register Bridge - 11

Wholesale Trade - 10

Standard Occupational Classification - 10

Technical Services - 10

Department of Homeland Security - 10

Office of Personnel Management - 10

Successor Predecessor File - 10

Organization for Economic Cooperation and Development - 10

Journal of Labor Economics - 10

Journal of Economic Literature - 10

Master Address File - 9

National Employer Survey - 9

NBER Summer Institute - 9

Census Numident - 9

Business Employment Dynamics - 9

Russell Sage Foundation - 9

Board of Governors - 9

Council of Economic Advisers - 8

Accommodation and Food Services - 8

Agriculture, Forestry - 8

Integrated Longitudinal Business Database - 8

Department of Economics - 8

National Center for Health Statistics - 8

Sloan Foundation - 8

Person Validation System - 8

Columbia University - 8

American Economic Association - 8

Kauffman Foundation - 8

Department of Defense - 8

Sample Edited Detail File - 8

Small Business Administration - 7

Survey of Business Owners - 7

Integrated Public Use Microdata Series - 7

Composite Person Record - 7

Department of Health and Human Services - 7

University of Michigan - 7

Nonemployer Statistics - 7

Michigan Institute for Teaching and Research in Economics - 7

Office of Management and Budget - 7

Business Services - 7

Labor Turnover Survey - 7

JOLTS - 7

National Income and Product Accounts - 7

Service Annual Survey - 7

North American Industry Classi - 7

Census Bureau Business Dynamics Statistics - 7

Journal of Political Economy - 7

1940 Census - 7

Annual Business Survey - 6

Educational Services - 6

Arts, Entertainment - 6

Oil and Gas Extraction - 6

World Trade Organization - 6

COVID-19 - 6

Professional Services - 6

New York University - 6

IQR - 6

Company Organization Survey - 6

CDF - 6

Cumulative Density Function - 6

Ohio State University - 6

Health Care and Social Assistance - 6

Urban Institute - 6

National Establishment Time Series - 6

Geographic Information Systems - 6

Bureau of Labor - 6

IZA - 6

Society of Labor Economists - 6

Detailed Earnings Records - 6

Quarterly Journal of Economics - 6

Hypothesis 2 - 6

Current Employment Statistics - 6

New York Times - 6

BLS Handbook of Methods - 6

Characteristics of Business Owners - 6

Consolidated Metropolitan Statistical Areas - 6

Permanent Plant Number - 6

WECD - 6

North American Free Trade Agreement - 5

Ewing Marion Kauffman Foundation - 5

LODES - 5

Department of Education - 5

Stanford University - 5

Legal Form of Organization - 5

Census Bureau Center for Economic Studies - 5

Department of Housing and Urban Development - 5

MIT Press - 5

Center for Research in Security Prices - 5

Public Administration - 5

Harvard University - 5

Review of Economics and Statistics - 5

Business Master File - 5

American Housing Survey - 5

Labor Productivity - 5

NICHD - 5

American Statistical Association - 5

Duke University - 5

Postal Service - 5

Generalized Method of Moments - 5

Public Use Micro Sample - 5

Department of Commerce - 5

Form W-2 - 4

VAR - 4

University of Texas - 4

Multiple Worksite Report - 4

University of Toronto - 4

Harmonized System - 4

Social Security Disability Insurance - 4

Federal Emergency Management Agency - 4

Princeton University - 4

Cobb-Douglas - 4

Indian Health Service - 4

National Institutes of Health - 4

Patent and Trademark Office - 4

Retirement History Survey - 4

Medical Expenditure Panel Survey - 4

Federal Tax Information - 4

DOB - 4

Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality - 4

Center for Administrative Records Research - 4

Personally Identifiable Information - 4

Federal Reserve Board of Governors - 4

Pew Research Center - 4

Housing and Urban Development - 4

LEHD Origin-Destination Employment Statistics - 4

ASEC - 4

Census 2000 - 4

Initial Public Offering - 4

University of California Los Angeles - 4

SSA Numident - 4

Journal of Economic Perspectives - 4

Social and Economic Supplement - 4

Department of Agriculture - 4

Journal of Econometrics - 4

Heckscher-Ohlin - 4

Limited Liability Company - 3

Maximum Likelihood Estimation - 3

Department of Energy - 3

MAF-ARF - 3

United States Census Bureau - 3

Federal Trade Commission - 3

Department of Justice - 3

Boston College - 3

Longitudinal Firm Trade Transactions Database - 3

Kauffman Firm Survey - 3

Person Identification Validation System - 3

Research and Development - 3

Securities and Exchange Commission - 3

Probability Density Function - 3

Data Management System - 3

Federal Insurance Contribution Act - 3

Journal of Human Resources - 3

Disability Insurance - 3

2SLS - 3

UC Berkeley - 3

American Immigration Council - 3

Current Population Survey Annual Social and Economic Supplement - 3

HHS - 3

Census Industry Code - 3

Federal Reserve Bank of Chicago - 3

Supreme Court - 3

World Bank - 3

Census of Services - 3

Boston Research Data Center - 3

Cambridge University Press - 3

Survey of Manufacturing Technology - 3

employed - 158

workforce - 142

labor - 141

employee - 108

worker - 75

earnings - 72

payroll - 66

recession - 65

job - 52

hiring - 52

salary - 45

economist - 44

econometric - 42

occupation - 39

unemployed - 36

employment growth - 35

hire - 35

earner - 34

entrepreneurship - 34

workplace - 33

earn - 33

endogeneity - 33

employment dynamics - 33

heterogeneity - 31

quarterly - 30

industrial - 30

employing - 29

estimating - 28

macroeconomic - 28

survey - 28

growth - 28

establishment - 28

tenure - 28

shift - 27

census employment - 26

layoff - 25

employment statistics - 25

entrepreneur - 24

manufacturing - 24

sector - 22

longitudinal - 22

labor statistics - 21

entrepreneurial - 20

metropolitan - 20

labor markets - 18

venture - 18

turnover - 18

incentive - 17

longitudinal employer - 17

discrimination - 16

census bureau - 16

market - 16

employment estimates - 16

production - 16

estimates employment - 15

economically - 15

employment data - 15

employee data - 15

employment wages - 15

unemployment rates - 14

expenditure - 14

gdp - 14

econometrician - 14

immigrant - 14

proprietorship - 14

bias - 14

agency - 13

trend - 13

employment trends - 13

compensation - 13

relocation - 13

enterprise - 13

organizational - 13

ethnicity - 13

trends employment - 12

export - 12

regress - 12

migrant - 12

work census - 12

rent - 12

opportunity - 12

employment count - 12

employer household - 12

minority - 11

proprietor - 11

industry employment - 11

specialization - 11

immigration - 11

statistical - 11

report - 11

spillover - 11

workers earnings - 11

wage growth - 11

retirement - 11

estimation - 11

segregation - 11

mobility - 11

aging - 11

revenue - 10

earnings employees - 10

respondent - 10

research census - 10

recessionary - 10

effect wages - 10

employment earnings - 10

acquisition - 10

hispanic - 10

housing - 10

resident - 10

worker wages - 10

ethnic - 10

manager - 10

wage data - 10

union - 10

earnings workers - 9

exogeneity - 9

unobserved - 9

relocate - 9

employment effects - 9

company - 9

endogenous - 9

demand - 9

industry wages - 9

insurance - 9

residential - 9

residence - 9

state - 9

matching - 9

finance - 9

employment unemployment - 9

employment changes - 9

economic census - 9

disparity - 8

employment declines - 8

profit - 8

socioeconomic - 8

wage earnings - 8

career - 8

impact employment - 8

migration - 8

data census - 8

population - 8

effects employment - 8

worker demographics - 8

employment production - 8

woman - 8

geographically - 8

neighborhood - 8

productivity growth - 8

technological - 8

earnings growth - 8

educated - 8

wage industries - 8

workforce indicators - 8

disadvantaged - 8

wages employment - 8

racial - 7

decline - 7

wage variation - 7

employment firms - 7

employment increases - 7

employment distribution - 7

migrate - 7

employment flows - 7

efficiency - 7

census data - 7

investment - 7

decade - 7

job growth - 7

city - 7

increase employment - 7

innovation - 7

sale - 7

associate - 7

wage changes - 7

accounting - 7

aggregate - 7

employment measures - 7

recession employment - 7

poverty - 7

state employment - 7

wage regressions - 7

rates employment - 7

clerical - 7

labor productivity - 7

declining - 6

irs - 6

regressing - 6

welfare - 6

shock - 6

moving - 6

regional - 6

startup - 6

growth employment - 6

employment entrepreneurship - 6

immigrant workers - 6

prospect - 6

coverage - 6

earnings inequality - 6

pension - 6

microdata - 6

unemployment insurance - 6

wage differences - 6

rural - 6

merger - 6

department - 6

earnings mobility - 6

data - 6

restructuring - 6

discriminatory - 5

analyst - 5

regression - 5

migrating - 5

multinational - 5

paper census - 5

censuses surveys - 5

employed census - 5

startups employees - 5

enrollment - 5

import - 5

exporter - 5

ownership - 5

wealth - 5

home - 5

insured - 5

graduate - 5

refugee - 5

debt - 5

race - 5

federal - 5

productivity wage - 5

medicaid - 5

filing - 5

econometrically - 5

firms grow - 5

firm dynamics - 5

firms employment - 5

native - 5

firms young - 5

measures employment - 5

wages production - 5

employment recession - 5

bankruptcy - 5

heterogeneous - 5

relocating - 5

financial - 5

mexican - 5

factory - 5

white - 5

tax - 4

measures productivity - 4

information census - 4

monopolistic - 4

benefit - 4

autoregressive - 4

international trade - 4

nonemployer businesses - 4

urban - 4

growth productivity - 4

transition - 4

impact - 4

advancement - 4

insurance employer - 4

analysis - 4

statistician - 4

financing - 4

executive - 4

productive - 4

saving - 4

model - 4

coverage employer - 4

disability - 4

wage effects - 4

founder - 4

younger firms - 4

earnings age - 4

gender - 4

record - 4

citizen - 4

startup firms - 4

census research - 4

leverage - 4

wages productivity - 4

discrepancy - 4

inference - 4

sociology - 4

corporate - 4

segregated - 4

black - 4

technology - 4

census business - 3

2010 census - 3

midwest - 3

forecast - 3

applicant - 3

immigrant entrepreneurs - 3

assimilation - 3

percentile - 3

assessed - 3

preschool - 3

wage gap - 3

earnings gap - 3

takeover - 3

wholesale - 3

employees startups - 3

subsidy - 3

industry heterogeneity - 3

exporting - 3

exporters multinationals - 3

warehousing - 3

outsourced - 3

renter - 3

town - 3

suburb - 3

commute - 3

researcher - 3

funding - 3

firms census - 3

industry concentration - 3

medicare - 3

healthcare - 3

health insurance - 3

insurance premiums - 3

estimator - 3

earns - 3

women earnings - 3

managerial - 3

industry variation - 3

ssa - 3

area - 3

volatility - 3

imputation - 3

gain - 3

profitability - 3

trends labor - 3

census file - 3

geographic - 3

household surveys - 3

use census - 3

fiscal - 3

trade models - 3

firms plants - 3

capital - 3

network - 3

matched - 3

immigrant population - 3

produce - 3

plant employment - 3

firm growth - 3

characteristics businesses - 3

owned businesses - 3

tech - 3

owner - 3

plants industry - 3

factor productivity - 3

Viewing papers 81 through 90 of 253


  • Working Paper

    Fraudulent Financial Reporting and the Consequences for Employees

    March 2019

    Working Paper Number:

    CES-19-12

    We examine employment effects, such as wages and employee turnover, before, during, and after periods of fraudulent financial reporting. To analyze these effects, we combine U.S. Census data with SEC enforcement actions against firms with serious misreporting ('fraud'). We find compared to a matched sample that fraud firms' employee wages decline by 9% and the separation rate is higher by 12% during and after fraud periods while employment growth at fraud firms is positive during fraud periods and negative afterward. We discuss several reasons that plausibly drive these findings. (i) Frauds cause informational opacity, misleading employees to still join or continue to work at the firm. (ii) During fraud, managers overinvest in labor changing employee mix, and after fraud the overemployment is unwound causing effects from displacement. (iii) Fraud is misconduct; association with misconduct can affect workers in the labor market. We explore the heterogeneous effects of fraudulent financial reporting, including thin and thick labor markets, bankruptcy and non-bankruptcy firms, worker movements, pre-fraud wage levels, and period of hire. Negative wage effects are prevalent across these sample cuts, indicating that fraudulent financial reporting appears to create meaningful and negative consequences for employees possibly through channels such as labor market disruptions, punishment, and stigma.
    View Full Paper PDF
  • Working Paper

    Downward Nominal Wage Rigidity in the United States: New Evidence from Worker-Firm Linked Data

    February 2019

    Working Paper Number:

    CES-19-07

    This paper examines the extent and consequences of Downward Nominal Wage Rigidity (DNWR) using administrative worker-firm linked data from the Longitudinal Employer Household Dynamics (LEHD) program for a large representative U.S. state. Prior to the Great Recession, only 7-8% of job stayers are paid the same nominal hourly wage rate as one year earlier - substantially less than previously found in survey-based data - and about 20% of job stayers experience a wage cut. During the Great Recession, the incidence of wage cuts increases to 30%, followed by a large rise in the proportion of wage freezes to 16% as the economy recovers. Total earnings of job stayers exhibit even fewer zero changes and a larger incidence of reductions than hourly wage rates, due to systematic variations in hours worked. The results are consistent with concurrent findings in the literature that reductions in base pay are exceedingly rare but that firms use different forms of non-base pay and variations in hours worked to flexibilize labor cost. We then exploit the worker-firm link of the LEHD and find that during the Great Recession, firms with indicators of DNWR reduced employment by about 1.2% more per year. This negative effect is driven by significantly lower hiring rates and persists into the recovery. Our results suggest that despite the relatively large incidence of wage cuts in the aggregate, DNWR has sizable allocative consequences.
    View Full Paper PDF
  • Working Paper

    Predictive Analytics and Organizational Architecture: Plant-Level Evidence from Census Data

    January 2019

    Working Paper Number:

    CES-19-02

    We examine trends in the use of predictive analytics for a sample of more than 25,000 manufacturing plants using proprietary data from the US Census Bureau. Comparing 2010 and 2015, we find that use of predictive analytics has increased markedly, with the greatest use in younger plants, professionally-managed firms, more educated workforces, and stable industries. Decisions on data to be gathered originate from headquarters and are associated with less delegation of decision-making and more widespread awareness of quantitative targets among plant employees. Performance targets become more accurate, long-term oriented, and linked to company-wide performance, and management incentives strengthen, both in terms of monetary bonuses and career outcomes. Plants increasing predictive analytics become more efficient, with lower inventory, increased volume of shipments, narrower product mix, reduced management payroll and increased use of flexible and temporary employees. Results are robust to a specification based on increased government demand for data.
    View Full Paper PDF
  • Working Paper

    Nonemployer Statistics by Demographics (NES-D): Using Administrative and Census Records Data in Business Statistics

    January 2019

    Working Paper Number:

    CES-19-01

    The quinquennial Survey of Business Owners or SBO provided the only comprehensive source of information in the United States on employer and nonemployer businesses by the sex, race, ethnicity and veteran status of the business owners. The annual Nonemployer Statistics series (NES) provides establishment counts and receipts for nonemployers but contains no demographic information on the business owners. With the transition of the employer component of the SBO to the Annual Business Survey, the Nonemployer Statistics by Demographics series or NES-D represents the continuation of demographics estimates for nonemployer businesses. NES-D will leverage existing administrative and census records to assign demographic characteristics to the universe of approximately 24 million nonemployer businesses (as of 2015). Demographic characteristics include key demographics measured by the SBO (sex, race, Hispanic origin and veteran status) as well as other demographics (age, place of birth and citizenship status) collected but not imputed by the SBO if missing. A spectrum of administrative and census data sources will provide the nonemployer universe and demographics information. Specifically, the nonemployer universe originates in the Business Register; the Census Numident will provide sex, age, place of birth and citizenship status; race and Hispanic origin information will be obtained from multiple years of the decennial census and the American Community Survey; and the Department of Veteran Affairs will provide administrative records data on veteran status. The use of blended data in this manner will make possible the production of NES-D, an annual series that will become the only source of detailed and comprehensive statistics on the scope, nature and activities of U.S. businesses with no paid employment by the demographic characteristics of the business owner. Using the 2015 vintage of nonemployers, initial results indicate that demographic information is available for the overwhelming majority of the universe of nonemployers. For instance, information on sex, age, place of birth and citizenship status is available for over 95 percent of the 24 million nonemployers while race and Hispanic origin are available for about 90 percent of them. These results exclude owners of C-corporations, which represent only 2 percent of nonemployer firms. Among other things, future work will entail imputation of missing demographics information (including that of C-corporations), testing the longitudinal consistency of the estimates, and expanding the set of characteristics beyond the demographics mentioned above. Without added respondent burden and at lower imputation rates and costs, NES-D will meet the needs of stakeholders as well as the economy as a whole by providing reliable estimates at a higher frequency (annual vs. every 5 years) and with a more timely dissemination schedule than the SBO.
    View Full Paper PDF
  • Working Paper

    Hiring through Startup Acquisitions: Preference Mismatch and Employee Departures

    September 2018

    Authors: J. Daniel Kim

    Working Paper Number:

    CES-18-41

    This paper investigates the effectiveness of startup acquisitions as a hiring strategy. Unlike conventional hires who choose to join a new firm on their own volition, most acquired employees do not have a voice in the decision to be acquired, much less by whom to be acquired. The lack of worker agency may result in a preference mismatch between the acquired employees and the acquiring firm, leading to elevated rates of turnover. Using comprehensive employee-employer matched data from the US Census, I document that acquired workers are significantly more likely to leave compared to regular hires. By constructing a novel peer-based proxy for worker preferences, I show that acquired employees who prefer to work for startups ' rather than established firms ' are the most likely to leave after the acquisition, lending support to the preference mismatch theory. Moreover, these departures suggest a deeper strategic cost of competitive spawning: upon leaving, acquired workers are more likely to found their own companies, many of which appear to be competitive threats that impair the acquirer's long-run performance.
    View Full Paper PDF
  • Working Paper

    LEHD Infrastructure S2014 files in the FSRDC

    September 2018

    Authors: Lars Vilhuber

    Working Paper Number:

    CES-18-27R

    The Longitudinal Employer-Household Dynamics (LEHD) Program at the U.S. Census Bureau, with the support of several national research agencies, maintains a set of infrastructure files using administrative data provided by state agencies, enhanced with information from other administrative data sources, demographic and economic (business) surveys and censuses. The LEHD Infrastructure Files provide a detailed and comprehensive picture of workers, employers, and their interaction in the U.S. economy. This document describes the structure and content of the 2014 Snapshot of the LEHD Infrastructure files as they are made available in the Census Bureau's secure and restricted-access Research Data Center network. The document attempts to provide a comprehensive description of all researcher-accessible files, of their creation, and of any modifications made to the files to facilitate researcher access.
    View Full Paper PDF
  • Working Paper

    Labor Market Concentration, Earnings Inequality, and Earnings Mobility

    September 2018

    Authors: Kevin Rinz

    Working Paper Number:

    carra-2018-10

    Using data from the Longitudinal Business Database and Form W-2, I document trends in local industrial concentration from 1976 through 2015 and estimate the effects of that concentration on earnings outcomes within and across demographic groups. Local industrial concentration has generally been declining throughout its distribution over that period, unlike national industrial concentration, which declined sharply in the early 1980s before increasing steadily to nearly its original level beginning around 1990. Estimates indicate that increased local concentration reduces earnings and increases inequality, but observed changes in concentration have been in the opposite direction, and the magnitude of these effects has been modest relative to broader trends; back-of-the-envelope calculations suggest that the 90/10 earnings ratio was about six percent lower and earnings were about one percent higher in 2015 than they would have been if local concentration were at its 1976 level. Within demographic subgroups, most experience mean earnings reductions and all experience increases in inequality. Estimates of the effects of concentration on earnings mobility are sensitive to specification.
    View Full Paper PDF
  • Working Paper

    Firm Leverage, Labor Market Size, and Employee Pay

    August 2018

    Working Paper Number:

    CES-18-36

    We provide new estimates of the wage costs of firms' debt using an empirical approach that exploits within-firm geographical variation in workers' expected unemployment costs due to variation in local labor market in a large sample of public firms. We find that, following an increase in firm leverage, workers with higher unemployment costs experience higher wage growth relative to workers at the same firm with lower unemployment costs. Overall, our estimates suggest wage costs are an important component in the overall cost of debt, but are not as large as implied by estimates based on ex post employee wage losses due to bankruptcy; we estimate that a 10 percentage point increase in firm leverage increases wage compensation for the median worker by 1.9% and total firm wage costs by 17 basis points of firm value.
    View Full Paper PDF
  • Working Paper

    Punctuated Entrepreneurship (Among Women)

    May 2018

    Authors: Matt Marx

    Working Paper Number:

    CES-18-26

    The gender gap in entrepreneurship may be explained in part by employee non-compete agreements. Exploiting exogenous state-level variation in non-compete policy, I find that women more strictly subject to non-competes are 11-17% more likely to start companies after their employers dissolve. This result is not explained by the incidence of non-competes or lawsuits; however, women face higher relative costs in defending against potential litigation and in returning to paid employment after abandoning their ventures. Thus entrepreneurship among women may be 'punctuated' in that would-be female founders are throttled by non-competes, their potential unleashed only by the failure of their employers.
    View Full Paper PDF
  • Working Paper

    Strong Employers and Weak Employees: How Does Employer Concentration Affect Wages?

    April 2018

    Working Paper Number:

    CES-18-15

    We analyze the effect of local-level labor market concentration on wages. Using plant-level U.S. Census data over the period 1977'2009, we find that: (1) local-level employer concentration exhibits substantial cross-sectional and time-series variation and increases over time; (2) consistent with labor market monopsony power, there is a negative relation between local-level employer concentration and wages that is more pronounced at high levels of concentration and increases over time; (3) the negative relation between labor market concentration and wages is stronger when unionization rates are low; (4) the link between productivity growth and wage growth is stronger when labor markets are less concentrated; and (5) exposure to greater import competition from China (the 'China Shock') is associated with more concentrated labor markets. These five results emphasize the role of local-level labor market monopsonies in influencing firm wage-setting.
    View Full Paper PDF