CREAT: Census Research Exploration and Analysis Tool

Papers Containing Keywords(s): 'revenue'

The following papers contain search terms that you selected. From the papers listed below, you can navigate to the PDF, the profile page for that working paper, or see all the working papers written by an author. You can also explore tags, keywords, and authors that occur frequently within these papers.
Click here to search again

Frequently Occurring Concepts within this Search

Longitudinal Business Database - 62

North American Industry Classification System - 58

Total Factor Productivity - 49

Annual Survey of Manufactures - 47

Center for Economic Studies - 42

Bureau of Labor Statistics - 41

Census of Manufactures - 37

Internal Revenue Service - 36

Bureau of Economic Analysis - 36

Ordinary Least Squares - 36

National Bureau of Economic Research - 35

Economic Census - 34

Standard Industrial Classification - 33

Census Bureau Disclosure Review Board - 30

National Science Foundation - 29

Cobb-Douglas - 23

Longitudinal Research Database - 22

Employer Identification Numbers - 21

Chicago Census Research Data Center - 21

Federal Statistical Research Data Center - 20

Metropolitan Statistical Area - 20

Current Population Survey - 19

Census Bureau Longitudinal Business Database - 18

Census Bureau Business Register - 17

Federal Reserve Bank - 17

Longitudinal Employer Household Dynamics - 17

Disclosure Review Board - 16

Census of Manufacturing Firms - 16

Business Register - 15

University of Chicago - 14

Social Security - 13

TFPQ - 13

Business Dynamics Statistics - 12

Social Security Administration - 12

County Business Patterns - 11

Standard Statistical Establishment List - 11

American Community Survey - 10

Federal Reserve System - 10

University of Maryland - 10

Kauffman Foundation - 10

Decennial Census - 9

Social Security Number - 9

Herfindahl Hirschman Index - 9

Special Sworn Status - 9

Alfred P Sloan Foundation - 8

NBER Summer Institute - 8

Generalized Method of Moments - 8

TFPR - 8

Department of Commerce - 8

Retail Trade - 7

Protected Identification Key - 7

Journal of Economic Literature - 7

Service Annual Survey - 7

Research Data Center - 7

Census of Retail Trade - 6

Census of Services - 6

Department of Labor - 6

Securities and Exchange Commission - 6

2SLS - 6

Council of Economic Advisers - 6

Longitudinal Firm Trade Transactions Database - 6

Labor Productivity - 6

Federal Trade Commission - 6

Characteristics of Business Owners - 6

University of California Los Angeles - 6

Board of Governors - 6

American Economic Review - 6

Michigan Institute for Teaching and Research in Economics - 6

Survey of Business Owners - 5

Small Business Administration - 5

Office of Management and Budget - 5

Earned Income Tax Credit - 5

International Trade Commission - 5

Individual Characteristics File - 5

Department of Homeland Security - 5

Department of Economics - 5

COMPUSTAT - 5

UC Berkeley - 5

International Trade Research Report - 5

New York University - 5

Quarterly Journal of Economics - 5

Chicago RDC - 5

Securities Data Company - 5

Center for Research in Security Prices - 5

Permanent Plant Number - 5

National Income and Product Accounts - 4

Wholesale Trade - 4

Technical Services - 4

Arts, Entertainment - 4

Accommodation and Food Services - 4

IQR - 4

Occupational Employment Statistics - 4

Initial Public Offering - 4

Survey of Industrial Research and Development - 4

New York Times - 4

Department of Agriculture - 4

Herfindahl-Hirschman - 4

Patent and Trademark Office - 4

Retirement History Survey - 4

Harmonized System - 4

Integrated Longitudinal Business Database - 4

Commodity Flow Survey - 4

Financial, Insurance and Real Estate Industries - 4

Net Present Value - 4

American Economic Association - 4

Administrative Records - 4

Journal of Economic Perspectives - 4

Journal of International Economics - 4

Environmental Protection Agency - 4

MIT Press - 4

Medical Expenditure Panel Survey - 4

Boston Research Data Center - 4

Public Administration - 3

Federal Government - 3

Annual Business Survey - 3

IBM - 3

Census Bureau Business Dynamics Statistics - 3

National Center for Science and Engineering Statistics - 3

Business R&D and Innovation Survey - 3

Business Research and Development and Innovation Survey - 3

COVID-19 - 3

Economic Research Service - 3

Disability Insurance - 3

Federal Insurance Contribution Act - 3

W-2 - 3

Washington University - 3

Adjusted Gross Income - 3

Boston College - 3

Carnegie Mellon University - 3

Department of Housing and Urban Development - 3

Census Numident - 3

Organization for Economic Cooperation and Development - 3

World Trade Organization - 3

Data Management System - 3

Department of Justice - 3

University of Minnesota - 3

Information and Communication Technology Survey - 3

Quarterly Workforce Indicators - 3

AKM - 3

Ewing Marion Kauffman Foundation - 3

National Center for Health Statistics - 3

Management and Organizational Practices Survey - 3

Value Added - 3

2010 Census - 3

Federal Tax Information - 3

Journal of Political Economy - 3

World Bank - 3

Journal of Labor Economics - 3

Review of Economic Studies - 3

Manufacturing Energy Consumption Survey - 3

Bureau of Labor - 3

Harvard Business School - 3

Review of Economics and Statistics - 3

Harvard University - 3

E32 - 3

production - 50

sale - 45

market - 42

expenditure - 40

manufacturing - 37

growth - 34

earnings - 32

profit - 31

demand - 30

produce - 28

sector - 26

investment - 26

econometric - 24

efficiency - 23

gdp - 23

estimating - 21

economist - 19

enterprise - 19

economically - 19

macroeconomic - 19

payroll - 18

profitability - 18

productivity growth - 17

labor - 17

industrial - 17

tax - 17

incentive - 16

productive - 15

company - 15

proprietorship - 15

endogeneity - 15

salary - 14

recession - 14

competitor - 14

cost - 14

pricing - 14

acquisition - 13

irs - 13

export - 13

monopolistic - 13

estimation - 13

industry productivity - 13

firms productivity - 13

price - 13

quarterly - 12

employed - 12

depreciation - 12

corporation - 12

organizational - 12

workforce - 11

entrepreneurship - 11

innovation - 11

financial - 11

accounting - 11

aggregate - 10

aggregate productivity - 10

survey - 10

entrepreneur - 10

employee - 10

manufacturer - 10

exporter - 10

growth productivity - 10

agency - 10

proprietor - 10

employ - 9

productivity dispersion - 9

productivity measures - 9

consumer - 9

competitiveness - 9

respondent - 8

measures productivity - 8

factor productivity - 8

stock - 8

employment growth - 8

multinational - 8

productivity dynamics - 8

product - 8

heterogeneity - 8

trend - 8

regression - 8

producing - 8

merger - 8

statistical - 7

population - 7

productivity estimates - 7

finance - 7

establishment - 7

incorporated - 7

gain - 7

earner - 7

corporate - 7

subsidy - 7

consumption - 7

exporting - 7

profitable - 7

quantity - 7

wholesale - 7

inventory - 6

technological - 6

entrepreneurial - 6

labor productivity - 6

spillover - 6

practices productivity - 6

conglomerate - 6

level productivity - 6

productivity wage - 6

wages productivity - 6

oligopolistic - 6

tariff - 6

plant productivity - 6

productivity plants - 6

inflation - 6

specialization - 6

economic census - 5

fiscal - 5

customer - 5

productivity analysis - 5

regress - 5

manufacturing productivity - 5

monopolistically - 5

endogenous - 5

filing - 5

leverage - 5

earn - 5

investing - 5

equilibrium - 5

industry concentration - 5

report - 5

retailer - 5

taxation - 5

decline - 5

declining - 5

dispersion productivity - 5

commodity - 5

aggregation - 5

acquirer - 5

diversification - 5

efficient - 5

imputation - 4

estimates productivity - 4

commerce - 4

spending - 4

percentile - 4

labor statistics - 4

productivity variation - 4

venture - 4

patent - 4

sector productivity - 4

funding - 4

taxpayer - 4

productivity size - 4

welfare - 4

foreign - 4

firms size - 4

larger firms - 4

contract - 4

invest - 4

impact - 4

marketing - 4

wage growth - 4

import - 4

productivity firms - 4

compensation - 4

turnover - 4

estimator - 4

supplier - 4

census data - 4

economic growth - 4

good - 4

firms grow - 4

growth employment - 4

ownership - 4

buyer - 4

rate - 4

firms export - 4

security - 4

advantage - 4

average - 3

data census - 3

occupation - 3

census bureau - 3

investor - 3

productivity shocks - 3

prospect - 3

share - 3

lender - 3

fund - 3

restaurant - 3

poverty - 3

exogenous - 3

insurance - 3

bias - 3

coverage - 3

1040 - 3

earnings age - 3

plant investment - 3

plants firms - 3

externality - 3

federal - 3

employment earnings - 3

disclosure - 3

patenting - 3

industry variation - 3

effect wages - 3

shipment - 3

trading - 3

importer - 3

export market - 3

retail - 3

business survival - 3

opportunity - 3

younger firms - 3

firms young - 3

healthcare - 3

state - 3

regional - 3

regulatory - 3

emission - 3

regional economic - 3

reporting - 3

earnings inequality - 3

yield - 3

productivity increases - 3

oligopoly - 3

analysis productivity - 3

use census - 3

longitudinal - 3

productivity differences - 3

custom - 3

startup - 3

firms employment - 3

census business - 3

factory - 3

franchise - 3

regulation - 3

rates productivity - 3

equity - 3

sourcing - 3

liquidation - 3

asset - 3

exporting firms - 3

partnership - 3

trade costs - 3

prices products - 3

exported - 3

utilization - 3

downstream - 3

strategic - 3

diversify - 3

expense - 3

lawyer - 3

plants industry - 3

textile - 3

econometrically - 3

observed productivity - 3

Viewing papers 81 through 90 of 133


  • Working Paper

    A Guide to the MEPS-IC Government List Sample Microdata

    September 2011

    Authors: Alice Zawacki

    Working Paper Number:

    CES-11-27

    The Medical Expenditure Panel Survey-Insurance Component (MEPS-IC) is conducted to provide nationally representative estimates on employer sponsored health insurance. MEPSIC data are collected from private sector employers, as well as state and local governments. While similar information is gathered from these two sectors, differences in the survey process exist. The goal of this paper is to provide details on the public sector including types of state and local government employers, sample design, general information on the data collected in the MEPS-IC, and additional sources of information.
    View Full Paper PDF
  • Working Paper

    Wage Dynamics along the Life-Cycle of Manufacturing Plants

    August 2011

    Working Paper Number:

    CES-11-24R

    This paper explores the evolution of average wage paid to employees along the life-cycle of a manufacturing plant in U.S. Average wage starts out low for a new plant and increases along with labor productivity, as the plant survives and ages. As a plant experiences productivity decline and approaches exit, average wage falls, but more slowly than it rises in the case of surviving new plants. Moreover, average wage declines slower than productivity does in failing plants, while it rises relatively faster as productivity increases in surviving new plants. These empirical regularities are studied in a dynamic model of labor quality and quantity choice by plants, where labor quality is reflected in wages. The model's parameters are estimated to assess the costs a plant incurs as it alters its labor quality and quantity in response to changes in its productivity over its life-cycle.
    View Full Paper PDF
  • Working Paper

    Information and Industry Dynamics

    August 2010

    Working Paper Number:

    CES-10-16R

    This paper develops a dynamic industry model in which firms compete to acquire customers over time by disseminating information about themselves under the presence of random shocks to their efficiency. The properties of the model's stationary equilibrium are related to empirical regularities on firm and industry dynamics. As an application of the model, the effects of a decline in the cost of information dissemination on firm and industry dynamics are explored.
    View Full Paper PDF
  • Working Paper

    The Impact of Plant-Level Resource Reallocations and Technical Progress on U.S. Macroeconomic Growth

    December 2009

    Working Paper Number:

    CES-09-43

    We build up from the plant level an "aggregate(d) Solow residual" by estimating every U.S. manufacturing plant's contribution to the change in aggregate final demand between 1976 and 1996. We decompose these contributions into plant-level resource reallocations and plant-level technical efficiency changes. We allow for 459 different production technologies, one for each 4- digit SIC code. Our framework uses the Petrin and Levinsohn (2008) definition of aggregate productivity growth, which aggregates plant-level changes to changes in aggregate final demand in the presence of imperfect competition and other distortions and frictions. On average, we find that aggregate reallocation made a larger contribution than aggregate technical efficiency growth. Our estimates of the contribution of reallocation range from 1:7% to2:1% per year, while our estimates of the average contribution of aggregate technical efficiency growth range from 0:2% to 0:6% per year. In terms of cyclicality, the aggregate technical efficiency component has a standard deviation that is roughly 50% to 100% larger than that of aggregate total reallocation, pointing to an important role for technical efficiency in macroeconomic fluctuations. Aggregate reallocation is negative in only 3 of the 20 years of our sample, suggesting that the movement of inputs to more highly valued activities on average plays a stabilizing role in manufacturing growth.
    View Full Paper PDF
  • Working Paper

    IT for Information-Based Partnerships: Empirical Analysis of Environmental Contingencies to Value Co-Creation

    December 2009

    Working Paper Number:

    CES-09-42

    We empirically examine IT value co-creation in supply chains, incorporating key contingencies of the competitive environment. Prior research suggests that IT used for strategic informationbased partnerships may benefit supply chains facing higher volatility, enabling tightly coupled integration and enhanced strategic response to changing consumer preferences. Analyzing a unique dataset comprising over 6,000 U.S. manufacturing plants, we obtain three principal results. First, value co-creation using either IT for strategic information-based partnerships (ITIP) or merely IT for transaction efficiency (ITT) is positive and significant. Second, the co-created value from ITIP is larger than that for (ITT), suggesting that information-based partnerships, while perhaps requiring a greater investment, yield a higher return. Third and most importantly, co-created value from using IT for information-based partnerships is positively moderated by demand volatility, i.e., value is greater in higher demand volatility environments. However, we find the opposite is true for using IT for efficient transactions. This is a new contribution to the literature and has important theoretical and practical implications.
    View Full Paper PDF
  • Working Paper

    Information Technology, Capabilities and Asset Ownership: Evidence from Taxicab Fleets

    November 2009

    Working Paper Number:

    CES-09-39

    We examine how information technology (IT) influences asset ownership through its impact on firms' and agents' capabilities. In particular, we propose that when IT is a substitute for agents' industry-specific human capital, IT adoption leads to increased vertical integration. We test this prediction using micro data on vehicle ownership patterns from the Economic Census during a period when computerized dispatching systems were first adopted by taxicab firms. The empirical tests exploit exogenous variation in local market conditions, to identify the impact of dispatching technology on firm asset ownership. The results show that firms increase the proportion of taxicabs owned by 12% when they adopt new computerized dispatching systems. The findings suggest that firms increasingly vertically integrate when they acquire resources that substitute for their agents' capabilities.
    View Full Paper PDF
  • Working Paper

    Plant-Level Responses to Antidumping Duties: Evidence from U.S. Manufacturers

    October 2009

    Authors: Justin Pierce

    Working Paper Number:

    CES-09-38R

    This paper describes the effects of a temporary increase in tariffs on the performance and behavior of U.S. manufacturers. Using antidumping duties as an example of temporary protection, I compare the responses of protected manufacturers to those predicted by models of trade with heterogeneous firms. I find that apparent increases in revenue productivity associated with antidumping duties are primarily due to increases in prices and mark-ups, as physical productivity falls among protected plants. Moreover, antidumping duties slow the reallocation of resources from less productive to more productive uses by reducing product-switching behavior among protected plants.
    View Full Paper PDF
  • Working Paper

    Why Do Firms Own Production Chains?

    September 2009

    Working Paper Number:

    CES-09-31

    Many firms own links of production chains--i.e., they own both upstream and downstream plants in vertically linked industries. We use broad-based yet detailed data from the economy's goods-producing sectors to investigate the reasons for such vertical ownership. It does not appear that vertical ownership is usually used to facilitate transfers of goods along the production chain, as is often presumed. Shipments from firms' upstream units to their downstream units are surprisingly low, relative to both the firms' total upstream production and their downstream needs. Roughly one-third of upstream plants report no shipments to their firms' downstream units. Half ship less than three percent of their output internally. We do find that manufacturing plants in vertical ownership structures have high measures of 'type' (productivity, size, and capital intensity). These patterns primarily reflect selective sorting of high plant types into large firms; once we account for firm size, vertical structure per se matters much less. We propose an alternative explanation for vertical ownership that is consistent with these results. Namely, that rather than moderating goods transfers down production chains, it instead allows more efficient transfers of intangible inputs (e.g., managerial oversight) within the firm. We document some suggestive evidence of this mechanism.
    View Full Paper PDF
  • Working Paper

    Discretionary Disclosure in Financial Reporting: An Examination Comparing Internal Firm Data to Externally Reported Segment Data

    September 2009

    Working Paper Number:

    CES-09-28

    We use confidential, U.S. Census Bureau, plant-level data to investigate aggregation in external reporting. We compare firms' plant-level data to their published segment reports, conducting our tests by grouping a firm's plants that share the same four-digit SIC code into a 'pseudo-segment.' We then determine whether that pseudo-segment is disclosed as an external segment, or whether it is subsumed into a different business unit for external reporting purposes. We find pseudo-segments are more likely to be aggregated within a line-of-business segment when the agency and proprietary costs of separately reporting the pseudo-segment are higher and when firm and pseudo-segment characteristics allow for more discretion in the application of segment reporting rules. For firms reporting multiple external segments, aggregation of pseudo-segments is driven by both agency and proprietary costs. However, for firms reporting a single external segment, we find no evidence of an agency cost motive for aggregation.
    View Full Paper PDF
  • Working Paper

    Recent Trends in Top Income Shares in the USA: Reconciling Estimates from March CPS and IRS Tax Return Data

    September 2009

    Working Paper Number:

    CES-09-26

    Although the vast majority of US research on trends in the inequality of family income is based on public-use March Current Population Survey (CPS) data, a new wave of research based on Internal Revenue Service (IRS) tax return data reports substantially higher levels of inequality and faster growing trends. We show that these apparently inconsistent estimates can largely be reconciled once one uses internal CPS data (which better captures the top of the income distribution than public-use CPS data) and defines the income distribution in the same way. Using internal CPS data for 1967'2006, we closely match the IRS data-based estimates of top income shares reported by Piketty and Saez (2003), with the exception of the share of the top 1 percent of the distribution during 1993'2000. Our results imply that, if inequality has increased substantially since 1993, the increase is confined to income changes for those in the top 1 percent of the distribution.
    View Full Paper PDF