CREAT: Census Research Exploration and Analysis Tool

Papers Containing Keywords(s): 'resident'

The following papers contain search terms that you selected. From the papers listed below, you can navigate to the PDF, the profile page for that working paper, or see all the working papers written by an author. You can also explore tags, keywords, and authors that occur frequently within these papers.
Click here to search again

Frequently Occurring Concepts within this Search

American Community Survey - 45

Decennial Census - 27

Census Bureau Disclosure Review Board - 26

Current Population Survey - 21

2010 Census - 21

Internal Revenue Service - 21

Metropolitan Statistical Area - 21

Protected Identification Key - 20

Federal Statistical Research Data Center - 19

Social Security Administration - 18

Social Security Number - 18

Center for Economic Studies - 16

Disclosure Review Board - 16

Ordinary Least Squares - 16

National Science Foundation - 13

Bureau of Labor Statistics - 12

Social Security - 12

Master Address File - 12

Department of Housing and Urban Development - 12

American Housing Survey - 12

Housing and Urban Development - 12

Individual Taxpayer Identification Numbers - 11

Person Validation System - 11

Research Data Center - 11

Chicago Census Research Data Center - 10

Survey of Income and Program Participation - 10

Personally Identifiable Information - 9

Longitudinal Employer Household Dynamics - 9

Person Identification Validation System - 8

1940 Census - 7

Federal Reserve Bank - 7

Office of Management and Budget - 7

Department of Agriculture - 6

Supplemental Nutrition Assistance Program - 6

Postal Service - 6

Temporary Assistance for Needy Families - 6

Computer Assisted Personal Interview - 6

Administrative Records - 6

National Bureau of Economic Research - 6

Core Based Statistical Area - 5

Special Sworn Status - 5

NUMIDENT - 5

Census Bureau Master Address File - 5

Census Numident - 5

Adjusted Gross Income - 5

Citizenship and Immigration Services - 5

Indian Health Service - 5

Bureau of Economic Analysis - 5

Quarterly Census of Employment and Wages - 5

PSID - 5

Standard Statistical Establishment List - 5

Economic Research Service - 4

National Institute on Aging - 4

COVID-19 - 4

Integrated Public Use Microdata Series - 4

PIKed - 4

New York University - 4

Alfred P Sloan Foundation - 4

Supreme Court - 4

Some Other Race - 4

Computer Assisted Telephone Interviews and Computer Assisted Personal Interviews - 4

CATI - 4

Cornell Institute for Social and Economic Research - 4

Census Edited File - 4

Consolidated Metropolitan Statistical Areas - 4

General Accounting Office - 4

Public Use Micro Sample - 4

Longitudinal Business Database - 4

Centers for Disease Control and Prevention - 3

National Institutes of Health - 3

Earned Income Tax Credit - 3

Data Management System - 3

Geographic Information Systems - 3

American Economic Association - 3

MTO - 3

MWTP - 3

Employer Identification Numbers - 3

North American Industry Classification System - 3

Customs and Border Protection - 3

Census Household Composition Key - 3

Department of Justice - 3

Department of Homeland Security - 3

Medicaid Services - 3

Centers for Medicare - 3

Urban Institute - 3

County Business Patterns - 3

National Opinion Research Center - 3

Unemployment Insurance - 3

Quarterly Workforce Indicators - 3

Department of Economics - 3

Center for Administrative Records Research and Applications - 3

Economic Census - 3

Annual Survey of Manufactures - 3

population - 47

neighborhood - 44

housing - 38

residential - 36

residence - 36

metropolitan - 35

ethnicity - 24

census data - 20

rural - 19

disadvantaged - 19

urban - 19

poverty - 19

disparity - 18

migrant - 18

survey - 17

hispanic - 17

respondent - 17

segregation - 17

racial - 17

ethnic - 17

immigrant - 16

migration - 16

minority - 16

socioeconomic - 15

reside - 15

census bureau - 14

city - 13

citizen - 13

suburb - 13

state - 13

race - 13

neighbor - 13

rent - 12

immigration - 12

community - 11

town - 10

geographic - 10

migrating - 10

data census - 10

employ - 10

home - 10

renter - 10

segregated - 10

census responses - 10

white - 10

geographically - 9

data - 9

estimating - 9

black - 9

prevalence - 8

suburbanization - 8

suburban - 8

moving - 8

migrate - 8

relocate - 8

amenity - 8

census survey - 8

recession - 8

workforce - 8

residing - 8

2010 census - 8

statistical - 8

census research - 8

relocation - 7

mobility - 7

use census - 7

homeowner - 7

relocating - 7

income neighborhoods - 7

residential segregation - 7

house - 7

employed - 7

urbanization - 6

health - 6

area - 6

citizenship - 6

microdata - 6

unemployed - 6

labor - 6

discrimination - 6

census 2020 - 6

urbanized - 5

enrollment - 5

geography - 5

census records - 5

environmental - 5

neighborhood income - 5

locality - 5

census household - 5

federal - 5

district - 5

census use - 5

country - 4

impact - 4

worker - 4

affluent - 4

imputation - 4

record - 4

assimilation - 4

midwest - 4

heterogeneity - 4

percentile - 4

estimation - 4

individuals census - 4

economically - 4

medicaid - 4

social - 4

race census - 4

expenditure - 4

demand - 4

job - 4

economic census - 4

benefit - 3

eligibility - 3

sociology - 3

aging - 3

report - 3

linked census - 3

census linked - 3

endogeneity - 3

welfare - 3

subsidized - 3

coverage - 3

unobserved - 3

sampling - 3

mexican - 3

latino - 3

pollution - 3

pollutant - 3

disclosure - 3

earnings - 3

regional - 3

crime - 3

local economic - 3

poorer - 3

research census - 3

statistician - 3

records census - 3

datasets - 3

assessed - 3

work census - 3

census employment - 3

commute - 3

native - 3

econometric - 3

incorporated - 3

Viewing papers 71 through 80 of 86


  • Working Paper

    Who Moves to Mixed-Income Neighborhoods?

    August 2010

    Working Paper Number:

    CES-10-18

    This paper uses confidential Census data, specifically the 1990 and 2000 Census Long Form data, to study the income dispersion of recent cohorts of migrants to mixed-income neighborhoods. If recent in-migrants to mixed-income neighborhoods exhibit high levels of income heterogeneity, this is consistent with stable mixed-income neighborhoods. If, however, mixed-income neighborhoods are comprised of older homogeneous lower-income (higher income) cohorts combined with newer homogeneous higher-income (lower-income) cohorts, this is consistent with neighborhood transition. Our results indicate that neighborhoods with high levels of income dispersion do in fact attract a much more heterogeneous set of in-migrants, particularly from the tails of the income distribution, but that income heterogeneity does tend to erode over time. Our results also suggest that the residents of mixed-income neighborhoods may be less heterogeneous with respect to lifetime income.
    View Full Paper PDF
  • Working Paper

    Wage Premia in Employment Clusters: Agglomeration or Worker Heterogeneity?

    February 2010

    Working Paper Number:

    CES-10-04

    This paper tests whether the correlation between wages and the spatial concentration of employment can be explained by unobserved worker productivity differences. Residential location is used as a proxy for a worker's unobserved productivity, and average workplace commute time is used to test whether location based productivity differences are compensated away by longer commutes. Analyses using confidential data from the 2000 Decennial Census Long Form find that the agglomeration estimates are robust to comparisons within residential location and that the estimates do not persist after controlling for commutes suggesting that the productivity differences across locations are due to agglomeration, rather than productivity differences across individuals.
    View Full Paper PDF
  • Working Paper

    Who Gentrifies Low Income Neighborhoods?

    January 2008

    Working Paper Number:

    CES-08-02

    This paper uses confidential Census data, specifically the 1990 and 2000 Census Long- Form data, to study the demographic processes underlying the gentrification of low income urban neighborhoods during the 1990's. In contrast to previous studies, the analysis is conducted at the more refined census-tract level with a narrower definition of gentrification and more narrowly defined comparison neighborhoods. The analysis is also richly disaggregated by demographic characteristic, uncovering differential patterns by race, education, age and family structure that would not have emerged in the more aggregate analysis in previous studies. The results provide little evidence of displacement of low-income non-white households in gentrifying neighborhoods. The bulk of the income gains in gentrifying neighborhoods are attributed to white college graduates and black high school graduates. It is the disproportionate in-migration of the former and the disproportionate retention and income gains of the latter that appear to be the main engines of gentrification.
    View Full Paper PDF
  • Working Paper

    Resident Perceptions of Crime: How Similar are They to Official Crime Rates?

    March 2007

    Authors: John Hipp

    Working Paper Number:

    CES-07-10

    This study compares the relationship between official crime rates and residents' perceptions of crime in census tracts. Employing a unique dataset that links household level data from the American Housing Survey metro samples over a period of 25 years (1976-2000) with official crime rate data for census tracts in selected cities during selected years, this large sample provides considerable ability to generalize the findings. I find that residents' perception of crime is most strongly related to official rates of tract violent crime. Models simultaneously taking into account both violent and property crime consistently found that property crime actually has a negative effect on perceived crime. Among types of violent crime, the robbery rate is consistently related to higher levels of perceived crime in the tract, whereas it appears a structural shift occurred in the mid-1980s in which aggravated assault and murder rates now impact perceptions of crime, even when taking into account the robbery rate.
    View Full Paper PDF
  • Working Paper

    Identifying Individual and Group Effects in the Presence of Sorting: A Neighborhood Effects Application

    January 2007

    Working Paper Number:

    CES-07-03

    Researchers have long recognized that the non-random sorting of individuals into groups generates correlation between individual and group attributes that is likely to bias naive estimates of both individual and group effects. This paper proposes a non-parametric strategy for identifying these effects in a model that allows for both individual and group unobservables, applying this strategy to the estimation of neighborhood effects on labor market outcomes. The first part of this strategy is guided by a robust feature of the equilibrium in the canonical vertical sorting model of Epple and Platt (1998), that there is a monotonic relationship between neighborhood housing prices and neighborhood quality. This implies that under certain conditions a non-parametric function of neighborhood housing prices serves as a suitable control function for the neighborhood unobservable in the labor market outcome regression. This control function converts the problem to a model with one unobservable so that traditional instrumental variables solutions may be applied. In our application, we instrument for each individual.s observed neighborhood attributes with the average neighborhood attributes of a set of observationally identical individuals. The neighborhood effects model is estimated using confidential microdata from the 1990 Decennial Census for the Boston MSA. The results imply that the direct effects of geographic proximity to jobs, neighborhood poverty rates, and average neighborhood education are substantially larger than the conditional correlations identified using OLS, although the net effect of neighborhood quality on labor market outcomes remains small. These findings are robust across a wide variety of specifications and robustness checks.
    View Full Paper PDF
  • Working Paper

    Stability and Change in Individual Determinants of Migration: Evidence from 1985-1990 and 1995 to 2000

    November 2006

    Working Paper Number:

    CES-06-27

    In this paper, we compare the reliability of migration estimates from two rather different macroeconomic periods in recent U.S. history. One of these periods, 1985-1990 coincides with the culmination of a vast industrial restructuring which saw a significant decline in manufacturing employment. The other period, 1995-2000, encompasses a time of robust economic growth and tight labor markets driven by productivity gains associated with new technologies. Our interest here is in the stability of common individual-level predictors of migration in these rather disparate macroeconomic contexts. Using confidential internal versions of the 1990 and 2000 Census long-form data, we estimate logistic models of the likelihood that individuals will migrate. The geographic detail in the internal Census data permits us to measure migration in ways that are not possible with public-domain Census data on persons. We develop migration definitions that distinguish between local residential mobility likely associated with life course transitions from migration out of the labor market area that may be driven more by employment and other socioeconomic considerations. Using logistic modeling, we find that the same individual attributes predict migration reasonably well during both periods. We also compute some illustrative probabilities of migration that show temporal stability in migration predictors could be lessened by certain changes in population composition.
    View Full Paper PDF
  • Working Paper

    What Has Been Capitalized into Property Values: Human Capital, Social Capital, or Cultural Capital?

    October 2005

    Authors: Shihe Fu

    Working Paper Number:

    CES-05-25

    Urban amenities can be capitalized into land values or property values. However, little attention has been paid to the capitalization of social amenities. This paper classifies three types of social-interaction-based social amenities: human capital, social capital, and cultural capital at residential neighborhood levels. We use the restricted version of the 1990 Massachusetts Census data and estimate hedonic housing models with social amenities. The findings are as follows: (1) Human capital has significant positive effects on property values. This tests the Lucas conjecture. (2) Different types of social capital have different effects on property values: an increase in the percentage of new residents has significant positive effects on property values, probably due to the strength of weak ties. However, an increase in the percentage of single-parent households has negative effects on property values. An increase in the home ownership rate has positive effects at large geographic levels. (3) Cultural capital effects vary from high to low geographic levels, the effects of English proficiency and racial homogeneity are positive at and beyond the tract level, but insignificant at the block level. This may imply that cultural capital is more important in social interactions at large geographic scale.
    View Full Paper PDF
  • Working Paper

    Place of Work and Place of Residence: Informal Hiring Networks and Labor Market Outcomes

    October 2005

    Working Paper Number:

    CES-05-23

    We use a novel dataset and research design to empirically detect the effect of social interactions among neighbors on labor market outcomes. Specifically, using Census data that characterize residential and employment locations down to the city block, we examine whether individuals residing in the same block are more likely to work together than those in nearby blocks. We find evidence of significant social interactions operating at the block level: residing on the same versus nearby blocks increases the probability of working together by over 33 percent. The results also indicate that this referral effect is stronger when individuals are similar in sociodemographic characteristics (e.g., both have children of similar ages) and when at least one individual is well attached to the labor market. These findings are robust across various specifications intended to address concerns related to sorting and reverse causation. Further, having determined the characteristics of a pair of individuals that lead to an especially strong referral effect, we provide evidence that the increased availability of neighborhood referrals has a significant impact on a wide range of labor market outcomes including employment and wages.
    View Full Paper PDF
  • Working Paper

    Is the Melting Pot Still Hot? Explaining the Resurgence of Immigrant Segregation

    August 2004

    Working Paper Number:

    CES-04-10

    This paper uses decennial Census data to examine trends in immigrant segregation in the United States between 1910 and 2000. Immigrant segregation declined in the first half of the century, but has been rising steadily over the past three decades. Analysis of restricted access 1990 Census microdata suggests that this rise would be even more striking if the native-born children of immigrants could be consistently excluded from the analysis. We analyze panel and cross-sectional variation in immigrant segregation, as well as housing price patterns across metropolitan areas, to test four hypotheses of immigrant segregation. Immigration itself has surged in recent decades, but the tendency for newly arrived immigrants to be younger and of lower socioeconomic status explains very little of the recent rise in immigrant segregation. We also find no evidence of increased nativism in the housing market. Evidence instead points to changes in urban form, particularly the tendency for ethnic enclaves to form as suburbanizing households leave older neighborhoods, as a central explanation for the new immigrant segregation.
    View Full Paper PDF
  • Working Paper

    Location, Location, Location: The 3L Approach to House Price Determination

    May 2004

    Working Paper Number:

    CES-04-06

    The immobility of houses means that their location affects their values. This explains the common belief that three things determine the price of a house: location, location, and location. We use this notion to develop the 3L Approach to house price determination. That is, prices are determined by the Metropolitan Statistical Area (MSA), town, and street where the house is located. This study creates a unique data set based on data from the American Housing Survey (AHS) consisting of small 'clusters' of housing units with information on their housing characteristics and resident characteristics that is merged with census tract-level attributes. We use this data to verify the 3L Approach: we find that all three levels of location are significant when estimating the house price hedonic equation. This indicates that individuals care about their local neighborhood, i.e. the general upkeep of their street and possibly their neighbors' characteristics (cluster variables), a broader area such as the school district and/or the town (tract variables) that account for school quality and crime rates, and the particular amenities found in their MSA.
    View Full Paper PDF