CREAT: Census Research Exploration and Analysis Tool

Papers Containing Keywords(s): 'agency'

The following papers contain search terms that you selected. From the papers listed below, you can navigate to the PDF, the profile page for that working paper, or see all the working papers written by an author. You can also explore tags, keywords, and authors that occur frequently within these papers.
Click here to search again

Frequently Occurring Concepts within this Search

Internal Revenue Service - 36

Center for Economic Studies - 36

Bureau of Labor Statistics - 33

National Science Foundation - 29

Longitudinal Business Database - 28

North American Industry Classification System - 28

American Community Survey - 27

Social Security Administration - 25

Business Register - 25

Employer Identification Numbers - 24

Economic Census - 24

Longitudinal Employer Household Dynamics - 23

Current Population Survey - 21

Census Bureau Disclosure Review Board - 20

Research Data Center - 18

Cornell University - 17

Service Annual Survey - 16

Survey of Income and Program Participation - 16

Protected Identification Key - 15

Standard Industrial Classification - 15

Standard Statistical Establishment List - 14

Federal Statistical Research Data Center - 14

Social Security Number - 14

County Business Patterns - 14

Business Dynamics Statistics - 13

Social Security - 13

Census Bureau Business Register - 13

Chicago Census Research Data Center - 13

Master Address File - 12

Decennial Census - 12

Longitudinal Research Database - 12

Bureau of Economic Analysis - 12

Annual Survey of Manufactures - 11

Quarterly Workforce Indicators - 11

Disclosure Review Board - 10

2010 Census - 10

Quarterly Census of Employment and Wages - 10

National Center for Health Statistics - 10

Alfred P Sloan Foundation - 10

Special Sworn Status - 10

Metropolitan Statistical Area - 9

Unemployment Insurance - 9

Administrative Records - 8

Department of Housing and Urban Development - 8

Person Validation System - 8

Office of Management and Budget - 8

Small Business Administration - 8

University of Chicago - 8

Medical Expenditure Panel Survey - 8

American Economic Association - 7

Census Bureau Longitudinal Business Database - 7

Computer Assisted Personal Interview - 7

Census of Manufactures - 7

Sloan Foundation - 6

Housing and Urban Development - 6

Federal Reserve Bank - 6

Bureau of Labor - 6

Employment History File - 6

Employer Characteristics File - 6

Company Organization Survey - 6

Local Employment Dynamics - 6

Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality - 6

Characteristics of Business Owners - 5

Securities and Exchange Commission - 5

Department of Homeland Security - 5

W-2 - 5

Federal Reserve System - 5

Indian Health Service - 5

General Accounting Office - 5

Individual Characteristics File - 5

American Housing Survey - 5

Financial, Insurance and Real Estate Industries - 5

Department of Labor - 5

Review of Economics and Statistics - 5

Probability Density Function - 5

Federal Tax Information - 5

National Bureau of Economic Research - 5

Public Use Micro Sample - 5

National Institute on Aging - 5

Medicaid Services - 5

LEHD Program - 5

Survey of Business Owners - 4

Annual Business Survey - 4

MAFID - 4

Postal Service - 4

Census Bureau Master Address File - 4

International Trade Research Report - 4

Retail Trade - 4

Business Employment Dynamics - 4

University of Maryland - 4

Duke University - 4

MIT Press - 4

American Economic Review - 4

Business Master File - 4

National Institutes of Health - 4

Center for Administrative Records Research and Applications - 4

Personally Identifiable Information - 4

Statistics Canada - 4

Computer Assisted Telephone Interviews and Computer Assisted Personal Interviews - 4

National Opinion Research Center - 4

CATI - 4

Department of Commerce - 4

Ordinary Least Squares - 4

Urban Institute - 4

Herfindahl Hirschman Index - 4

Cornell Institute for Social and Economic Research - 4

Adjusted Gross Income - 3

Disability Insurance - 3

Temporary Assistance for Needy Families - 3

Accommodation and Food Services - 3

Supplemental Nutrition Assistance Program - 3

SSA Numident - 3

Social Science Research Institute - 3

Occupational Employment Statistics - 3

Indian Housing Information Center - 3

Person Identification Validation System - 3

Census Numident - 3

Department of Agriculture - 3

Economic Research Service - 3

COVID-19 - 3

HHS - 3

Journal of Economic Literature - 3

PSID - 3

Census of Manufacturing Firms - 3

University of Michigan - 3

Journal of Labor Economics - 3

Core Based Statistical Area - 3

Office of Personnel Management - 3

North American Industry Classi - 3

Department of Education - 3

Federal Insurance Contribution Act - 3

American Statistical Association - 3

National Longitudinal Survey of Youth - 3

National Research Council - 3

Geographic Information Systems - 3

Patent and Trademark Office - 3

Total Factor Productivity - 3

Census 2000 - 3

Some Other Race - 3

Establishment Micro Properties - 3

University of Minnesota - 3

Organization for Economic Cooperation and Development - 3

Permanent Plant Number - 3

Census Bureau Center for Economic Studies - 3

National Income and Product Accounts - 3

survey - 38

data - 35

statistical - 27

respondent - 25

census bureau - 23

microdata - 22

data census - 20

employee - 19

report - 18

census data - 17

payroll - 17

datasets - 16

record - 15

disclosure - 14

population - 14

employed - 14

workforce - 14

enterprise - 14

economic census - 13

database - 13

confidentiality - 11

employ - 11

company - 10

coverage - 10

department - 10

revenue - 10

organizational - 10

sector - 10

economist - 10

statistician - 10

privacy - 9

longitudinal - 9

recession - 9

worker - 9

quarterly - 9

federal - 9

incorporated - 9

employee data - 9

aggregate - 9

statistical agencies - 9

public - 8

employment data - 8

information census - 8

use census - 8

labor - 8

expenditure - 8

policymakers - 8

censuses surveys - 8

census survey - 8

work census - 8

sale - 8

researcher - 8

information - 8

analysis - 8

establishment - 8

publicly - 7

census employment - 7

irs - 7

census use - 7

estimation - 7

business data - 7

surveys censuses - 7

census research - 7

market - 7

corporation - 6

survey data - 6

econometric - 6

research census - 6

establishments data - 6

reporting - 6

analyst - 6

research - 6

employer household - 6

industrial - 6

entrepreneur - 5

longitudinal employer - 5

survey income - 5

assessed - 5

imputation - 5

state - 5

insurance - 5

enrollment - 5

trend - 5

estimating - 5

earnings - 5

employment statistics - 5

2010 census - 5

study - 5

acquisition - 4

finance - 4

minority - 4

pandemic - 4

job - 4

assessing - 4

impact - 4

census years - 4

occupation - 4

statistical disclosure - 4

clerical - 4

consumer - 4

ssa - 4

model - 4

matching - 4

insured - 4

macroeconomic - 4

aggregation - 4

security - 3

1040 - 3

financial - 3

entrepreneurship - 3

household surveys - 3

medicaid - 3

population survey - 3

income data - 3

filing - 3

census responses - 3

bias - 3

hiring - 3

discrimination - 3

contract - 3

policy - 3

tax - 3

housing - 3

residential - 3

home - 3

accounting - 3

businesses census - 3

classified - 3

incentive - 3

tenure - 3

linked census - 3

workplace - 3

employment dynamics - 3

owner - 3

ownership - 3

census business - 3

corp - 3

census 2020 - 3

labor statistics - 3

proprietorship - 3

wholesale - 3

census records - 3

race census - 3

healthcare - 3

health insurance - 3

gdp - 3

Viewing papers 71 through 79 of 79


  • Working Paper

    Changing the Boundaries of the Firm: Changes in the Clustering of Human Capital

    January 2002

    Working Paper Number:

    tp-2002-02

    View Full Paper PDF
  • Working Paper

    Business Success: Factors Leading to Surviving and Closing Successfully

    January 2001

    Authors: Brian Headd

    Working Paper Number:

    CES-01-01

    This paper focuses on the startup factors that lead to new firms remaining open, and if they close, the factors leading to whether the owner considered the firm successful at closure. Two independent logit models were developed for closure and success characteristics using the Bureau of the Census' Characteristics of Business Owners (CBO). Business Information Tracking Series (BITS, formerly the LEEM), also from the Bureau of the Census, was used to evaluate business survival rates as the CBO had non-response bias with respect to closure. About half of new employer firms survive at least four years (an estimated one-third of non-employer firms survive this period), and of the firms that closed, owners of about a third felt the firm was successful at closure. Major factors leading to remaining open are having ample capital, having employees, having a good education, and starting for personal reasons (freedom for family life, or wanting to become one's own boss). If the firm closed, major factors leading to owners perceiving the business successful at closure are having no start-up capital or ample capital, having previous ownership experience, and avoiding the retail trade industry. Owners of firms with and without employees had similar rates of believing closed businesses were successful at closure. Owners who were young or started without capital had a higher likelihood of closure but when they closed, they were more likely to consider the firm successful. Gender, race and being older play a small, if any, role in survivability or in owners' perception that the closed firm was successful. Retail trade was the only variable that led to businesses being more likely to close, and more likely to be deemed unsuccessful by the owner at closure.
    View Full Paper PDF
  • Working Paper

    Measuring The Performance Of Government Technology Programs: Lessons From Manufacturing Extension

    December 1997

    Working Paper Number:

    CES-97-18

    Managers of government technology programs are under increasing pressure to demonstrate the effectiveness of their programs. In this paper we examine the issues involved in credibly evaluating such programs in the context of recent efforts to evaluate manufacturing extension programs in the U.S. We provide a stylized model of the dynamic competitive environment in which the plants and firms targeted by these programs operate and discuss its implications for evaluation. We compare and contrast the various methodologies and data sets used to evaluate manufacturing extension. We conclude that the best currently available method for measuring the overall effectiveness of programs such as manufacturing extension is to combine program administrative data with existing panel data sets.
    View Full Paper PDF
  • Working Paper

    Capital Structure And Product Market Rivalry: How Do We Reconcile Theory And Evidence?

    February 1995

    Working Paper Number:

    CES-95-03

    This paper presents empirical evidence on the interaction of capital structure decisions and product market behavior. We examine when firms recapitalize and increase the proportion of debt in their capital structure. The evidence in this paper shows that firms with low productivity plants in highly concentrated industries are more likely to recapitalize and increase debt financing. This finding suggests that debt plays a role in highly concentrated industries where agency costs are not significantly reduced by product market competition. Following the empirical evidence we introduce the "strategic investment" effects of debt and argue that this effect, in conjunction with agency costs, appears to fit the data.
    View Full Paper PDF
  • Working Paper

    Preferential Procurement Programs Do Not Necessarily Help Minority-Owned Business

    January 1995

    Working Paper Number:

    CES-95-01

    Some minority business enterprises (MBEs) benefit from their participation in government preferential procurement programs and some do not. A subset of minority vendors identified in this study behaves in ways suggesting sensitivity to penalties for violating minority business certification and procurement program regulations. These firms flourish in the absence of fraud penalties. A different group of minority vendors selling to government benefits from an environment in which MBE certification is comprehensive, bonding and working capital assistance are available, and assistance is delivered by a staff dedicated to aiding potential and actual MBE vendors. The preferential procurement program can serve as either a valuable economic development tool for fostering minority business development, or it can promote MBE front companies that pass on their procurement contracts to nonminority firms. Some governments choose to operate the former type of program; others opt for the latter.
    View Full Paper PDF
  • Working Paper

    The Importance of Establishment Data in Economic Research

    August 1993

    Working Paper Number:

    CES-93-10

    The importance and usefulness of establishment microdata for economic research and policy analysis is outlined and contrasted with traditional products of statistical agencies -- aggregate cross-section tabulations. It is argued that statistical agencies must begin to seriously rethink the way they view establishment data products.
    View Full Paper PDF
  • Working Paper

    Analytic Use Of Economic Microdata; A Model For Researcher Access With Confidentiality Protection

    August 1992

    Working Paper Number:

    CES-92-08

    A primary responsibility of the Center for Economic Studies (CES) of the U.S. Bureau of the Census is to facilitate researcher access to confidential economic microdata files. Benefits from this program accrue not only to policy makers--there is a growing awareness of the importance of microdata for analyzing both the descriptive and welfare implications of regulatory and environmental changes--but also and importantly to the statistical agencies themselves. In fact, there is substantial recent literature arguing for the proposition that the largest single improvement that the U.S. statistical system could make is to improve its analytic capabilities. In this paper I briefly discuss these benefits to greater access for analytical work and ways to achieve them. Due to the nature of business data, public use databases and masking technologies are not available as vehicles for releasing useful microdata files. I conclude that a combination of outside and inside research programs, carefully coordinated and integrated is the best model for ensuring that statistical agencies reap the gains from analytic data users. For the United States, at least, this is fortuitous with respect to justifying access since any direct research with confidential data by outsiders must have a "statistical purpose". Until the advent of CES, it was virtually impossible for researchers to work with the economic microdata collected by the various economic censuses. While the CES program is quite large, as it now stands, researchers, or their representatives, must come to the Census Bureau in Washington, D.C. to access the data. The success of the program has led to increasing demands for data access in facilities outside of the Washington, D.C. area. Two options are considered: 1) Establish Census Bureau facilities in various universities or similar nonprofit research facilities and 2) Develop CES regional operations in existing Census Bureau regional offices.
    View Full Paper PDF
  • Working Paper

    Multiple Classification Systems For Economic Data: Can A Thousand Flowers Bloom? And Should They?

    December 1991

    Working Paper Number:

    CES-91-08

    The principle that the statistical system should provide flexibility-- possibilities for generating multiple groupings of data to satisfy multiple objectives--if it is to satisfy users is universally accepted. Yet in practice, this goal has not been achieved. This paper discusses the feasibility of providing flexibility in the statistical system to accommodate multiple uses of the industrial data now primarily examined within the Standard Industrial Classification (SIC) system. In one sense, the question of feasibility is almost trivial. With today's computer technology, vast amounts of data can be manipulated and stored at very low cost. Reconfigurations of the basic data are very inexpensive compared to the cost of collecting the data. Flexibility in the statistical system implies more than the technical ability to regroup data. It requires that the basic data are sufficiently detailed to support user needs and are processed and maintained in a fashion that makes the use of a variety of aggregation rules possible. For this to happen, statistical agencies must recognize the need for high quality microdata and build this into their planning processes. Agencies need to view their missions from a multiple use perspective and move away from use of a primary reporting and collection vehicle. Although the categories used to report data must be flexible, practical considerations dictate that data collection proceed within a fixed classification system. It is simply too expensive for both respondents and statistical agencies to process survey responses in the absence of standardized forms, data entry programs, etc. I argue for a basic classification centered on commodities--products, services, raw materials and labor inputs--as the focus of data collection. The idea is to make the principle variables of interest--the commodities--the vehicle for the collection and processing of the data. For completeness, the basic classification should include labor usage through some form of occupational classification. In most economic surveys at the Census Bureau, the reporting unit and the classified unit have been the establishment. But there is no need for this to be so. The basic principle to be followed in data collection is that the data should be collected in the most efficient way--efficiency being defined jointly in terms of statistical agency collection costs and respondent burdens.
    View Full Paper PDF
  • Working Paper

    Public Use Microdata: Disclosure And Usefulness

    September 1988

    Working Paper Number:

    CES-88-03

    Official statistical agencies such as the Census Bureau and the Bureau of Labor Statistics collect enormous quantities of microdata in statistical surveys. These data are valuable for economic research and market and policy analysis. However, the data cannot be released to the public because of confidentiality commitments to individual respondents. These commitments, coupled with the strong research demand for microdata, have led the agencies to consider various proposals for releasing public use microdata. Most proposals for public use microdata call for the development of surrogate data that disguise the original data. Thus, they involve the addition of measurement errors to the data. In this paper, we examine disclosure issues and explore alternative masking methods for generating panels of useful economic microdata that can be released to researchers. While our analysis applies to all confidential microdata, applications using the Census Bureau's Longitudinal Research Data Base (LRD) are used for illustrative purposes throughout the discussion.
    View Full Paper PDF