CREAT: Census Research Exploration and Analysis Tool

Papers Containing Keywords(s): 'payroll'

The following papers contain search terms that you selected. From the papers listed below, you can navigate to the PDF, the profile page for that working paper, or see all the working papers written by an author. You can also explore tags, keywords, and authors that occur frequently within these papers.
Click here to search again

Frequently Occurring Concepts within this Search

Bureau of Labor Statistics - 71

Longitudinal Employer Household Dynamics - 61

North American Industry Classification System - 56

Center for Economic Studies - 53

Employer Identification Numbers - 49

Longitudinal Business Database - 47

Current Population Survey - 47

Internal Revenue Service - 44

Standard Industrial Classification - 39

National Science Foundation - 39

Census Bureau Disclosure Review Board - 30

American Community Survey - 30

Annual Survey of Manufactures - 29

Quarterly Census of Employment and Wages - 28

Economic Census - 27

Social Security Administration - 25

Alfred P Sloan Foundation - 25

Business Register - 24

Quarterly Workforce Indicators - 24

Protected Identification Key - 24

Metropolitan Statistical Area - 22

Ordinary Least Squares - 22

Census of Manufactures - 21

Unemployment Insurance - 21

Social Security Number - 21

Social Security - 21

Standard Statistical Establishment List - 21

National Bureau of Economic Research - 19

Federal Statistical Research Data Center - 18

Decennial Census - 18

Disclosure Review Board - 18

Cornell University - 18

Census Bureau Business Register - 17

Service Annual Survey - 17

Research Data Center - 17

Department of Labor - 16

Federal Reserve Bank - 15

LEHD Program - 14

Individual Characteristics File - 14

Chicago Census Research Data Center - 13

Bureau of Economic Analysis - 13

University of Maryland - 12

Longitudinal Research Database - 12

County Business Patterns - 11

Employment History File - 11

Total Factor Productivity - 10

Occupational Employment Statistics - 10

Employer Characteristics File - 10

Local Employment Dynamics - 10

Business Dynamics Statistics - 10

W-2 - 10

University of Chicago - 10

International Trade Research Report - 9

Survey of Income and Program Participation - 9

Cornell Institute for Social and Economic Research - 9

Census of Manufacturing Firms - 9

National Institute on Aging - 9

Medical Expenditure Panel Survey - 9

Company Organization Survey - 8

Financial, Insurance and Real Estate Industries - 8

Department of Homeland Security - 8

Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality - 8

Small Business Administration - 8

Business Employment Dynamics - 8

Permanent Plant Number - 8

Office of Personnel Management - 7

Master Address File - 7

Special Sworn Status - 7

Core Based Statistical Area - 7

COVID-19 - 7

Herfindahl Hirschman Index - 7

American Economic Review - 7

Business Master File - 7

Journal of Economic Literature - 7

Retail Trade - 7

Standard Occupational Classification - 6

Composite Person Record - 6

2010 Census - 6

United States Census Bureau - 6

National Center for Health Statistics - 6

AKM - 6

Federal Insurance Contribution Act - 6

Employer-Household Dynamics - 6

Census Bureau Longitudinal Business Database - 6

Successor Predecessor File - 6

Journal of Labor Economics - 6

Business Register Bridge - 6

Characteristics of Business Owners - 5

Postal Service - 5

Management and Organizational Practices Survey - 5

Current Employment Statistics - 5

Labor Turnover Survey - 5

Person Validation System - 5

Personally Identifiable Information - 5

Organization for Economic Cooperation and Development - 5

Bureau of Labor - 5

Sloan Foundation - 5

Labor Productivity - 5

WECD - 5

Survey of Manufacturing Technology - 5

CDF - 4

Cumulative Density Function - 4

Integrated Longitudinal Business Database - 4

Office of Management and Budget - 4

Census Numident - 4

Department of Economics - 4

NBER Summer Institute - 4

Federal Reserve System - 4

Federal Tax Information - 4

Data Management System - 4

Cobb-Douglas - 4

Information and Communication Technology Survey - 4

Kauffman Foundation - 4

North American Industry Classi - 4

American Economic Association - 4

American Housing Survey - 4

Supreme Court - 4

Wholesale Trade - 4

Computer Network Use Supplement - 4

New York Times - 4

Department of Commerce - 4

IQR - 3

Annual Business Survey - 3

Cell Mean Public Use - 3

Agriculture, Forestry - 3

Stanford University - 3

Technical Services - 3

Accommodation and Food Services - 3

Educational Services - 3

Urban Institute - 3

Federal Register - 3

Disability Insurance - 3

Earned Income Tax Credit - 3

SSA Numident - 3

Society of Labor Economists - 3

National Institutes of Health - 3

JOLTS - 3

Probability Density Function - 3

Administrative Records - 3

Center for Administrative Records Research - 3

Journal of Human Resources - 3

Russell Sage Foundation - 3

National Establishment Time Series - 3

National Income and Product Accounts - 3

Adjusted Gross Income - 3

Boston College - 3

University of California Los Angeles - 3

Review of Economics and Statistics - 3

University of Michigan - 3

Department of Defense - 3

Person Identification Validation System - 3

Center for Administrative Records Research and Applications - 3

Center for Research in Security Prices - 3

Census Industry Code - 3

Census 2000 - 3

Federal Poverty Level - 3

Establishment Micro Properties - 3

Sample Edited Detail File - 3

Environmental Protection Agency - 3

Electronic Data Interchange - 3

MIT Press - 3

BLS Handbook of Methods - 3

Consolidated Metropolitan Statistical Areas - 3

American Statistical Association - 3

workforce - 72

employed - 71

employ - 65

labor - 64

employee - 59

earnings - 42

worker - 35

quarterly - 29

survey - 26

economist - 23

recession - 20

job - 20

salary - 20

expenditure - 19

census employment - 19

revenue - 18

report - 18

agency - 18

establishment - 18

hiring - 18

manufacturing - 18

econometric - 18

employment dynamics - 17

incentive - 17

layoff - 17

industrial - 17

employing - 16

estimating - 15

labor statistics - 15

employment data - 15

employment statistics - 14

employee data - 14

hire - 14

endogeneity - 14

employment growth - 14

estimates employment - 14

enterprise - 14

occupation - 13

irs - 13

sector - 13

longitudinal - 13

insurance - 13

statistical - 12

census bureau - 12

longitudinal employer - 12

tax - 12

coverage - 12

respondent - 11

work census - 11

employment estimates - 11

workplace - 11

production - 11

microdata - 11

employment count - 11

growth - 11

data - 11

census data - 10

earner - 10

aggregate - 10

employer household - 10

employment measures - 10

organizational - 10

economic census - 10

data census - 9

macroeconomic - 9

turnover - 9

compensation - 9

estimation - 9

unemployed - 9

workforce indicators - 9

employment flows - 9

research census - 8

demand - 8

federal - 8

employment wages - 8

earn - 8

labor productivity - 8

healthcare - 8

insured - 8

health insurance - 8

tenure - 8

associate - 8

wages productivity - 8

department - 8

accounting - 8

measures employment - 8

proprietorship - 8

regress - 7

shift - 7

wage growth - 7

gdp - 7

unemployment rates - 7

medicare - 7

effect wages - 7

wage data - 7

sale - 7

union - 7

rates employment - 7

clerical - 7

program census - 6

worker demographics - 6

employment trends - 6

wages employment - 6

state - 6

subsidy - 6

heterogeneity - 6

regression - 6

company - 6

information census - 5

welfare - 5

labor markets - 5

wage regressions - 5

employment effects - 5

taxation - 5

earnings growth - 5

productive - 5

premium - 5

manager - 5

wage changes - 5

wage industries - 5

profit - 5

filing - 5

matching - 5

record - 5

acquisition - 5

establishments data - 5

analysis - 5

finance - 5

wage variation - 5

enrollment - 5

proprietor - 5

residential - 5

state employment - 5

discrimination - 5

efficiency - 4

measures productivity - 4

population - 4

views census - 4

censuses surveys - 4

assessed - 4

recessionary - 4

trends employment - 4

employment unemployment - 4

taxpayer - 4

employment earnings - 4

researcher - 4

retirement - 4

productivity measures - 4

insurance employer - 4

insurance premiums - 4

bias - 4

econometrician - 4

medicaid - 4

recession employment - 4

incorporated - 4

business data - 4

businesses census - 4

decline - 4

employment production - 4

wages production - 4

pension - 4

enrollee - 4

insurance coverage - 4

census research - 4

industry employment - 4

metropolitan - 4

wage differences - 4

ssa - 4

manufacturer - 4

policy - 4

uninsured - 4

exemption - 4

unobserved - 4

aging - 4

productivity growth - 4

technology - 4

unemployment insurance - 4

census business - 4

job growth - 4

2010 census - 3

employed census - 3

spillover - 3

employment distribution - 3

benefit - 3

younger firms - 3

firms employment - 3

prospect - 3

firms young - 3

exogeneity - 3

worker wages - 3

workers earnings - 3

rent - 3

firms census - 3

corporate - 3

outsourcing - 3

insurer - 3

market - 3

productivity wage - 3

industry productivity - 3

investment - 3

productivity estimates - 3

managerial - 3

reporting - 3

regressing - 3

database - 3

use census - 3

disclosure - 3

computer - 3

imputation - 3

entrepreneur - 3

entrepreneurship - 3

fiscal - 3

census file - 3

earnings inequality - 3

leverage - 3

surveys censuses - 3

profitability - 3

executive - 3

coverage employer - 3

produce - 3

estimator - 3

regulation - 3

insurance plans - 3

statistician - 3

productivity increases - 3

citizen - 3

housing - 3

merger - 3

Viewing papers 71 through 80 of 128


  • Working Paper

    Testing for Wage Discrimination in U.S. Manufacturing

    September 2012

    Authors: Joyce Burnette

    Working Paper Number:

    CES-12-23

    In spite of the large literature on labor market discrimination, the quantity of solid evidence on discrimination is relatively limited. This is because evidence of discrimination is difficult to obtain. Two individuals may be treated equally, but this does not prove discrimination unless we can show that the differences in treatment were not justified by differences in productivity. The method most commonly used to identify wage discrimination, the Oaxaca decomposition, is flawed because any omitted variables that are correlated with gender will contribute to the unexplained portion of the wage gap, leading to an over- or under-estimation of wage discrimination. Audit studies provide more direct evidence of differential treatment, but are costly to carry out. Only a small number of studies attempt to measure worker productivity to see if wage differences are justified. This may be because the data needed to measure productivity are difficult to obtain. This paper tests for wage discrimination by gender and race by estimating relative productivity from 2002 Census of Manufacturing data linked to demographic information on workers from Longitudinal Employer-Household Dynamics (LEHD) files. Comparing the estimated productivity ratios to the observed wage ratios, I conclude that females and blacks face wage discrimination in US manufacturing.
    View Full Paper PDF
  • Working Paper

    Dynamically Consistent Noise Infusion and Partially Synthetic Data as Confidentiality Protection Measures for Related Time Series

    July 2012

    Working Paper Number:

    CES-12-13

    The Census Bureau's Quarterly Workforce Indicators (QWI) provide detailed quarterly statistics on employment measures such as worker and job flows, tabulated by worker characteristics in various combinations. The data are released for several levels of NAICS industries and geography, the lowest aggregation of the latter being counties. Disclosure avoidance methods are required to protect the information about individuals and businesses that contribute to the underlying data. The QWI disclosure avoidance mechanism we describe here relies heavily on the use of noise infusion through a permanent multiplicative noise distortion factor, used for magnitudes, counts, differences and ratios. There is minimal suppression and no complementary suppressions. To our knowledge, the release in 2003 of the QWI was the first large-scale use of noise infusion in any official statistical product. We show that the released statistics are analytically valid along several critical dimensions { measures are unbiased and time series properties are preserved. We provide an analysis of the degree to which confidentiality is protected. Furthermore, we show how the judicious use of synthetic data, injected into the tabulation process, can completely eliminate suppressions, maintain analytical validity, and increase the protection of the underlying confidential data.
    View Full Paper PDF
  • Working Paper

    The Transitional Costs of Sectoral Reallocation: Evidence from the Clean Air Act and the Workforce

    January 2012

    Authors: William Walker

    Working Paper Number:

    CES-12-02

    New environmental regulations lead to a rearrangement of production away from polluting industries, and workers in those industries are adversely affected. This paper uses linked worker-firm data in the United States to estimate the transitional costs associated with reallocating workers from newly regulated industries to other sectors of the economy. The focus on workers rather than industries as the unit of analysis allows me to examine previously unobserved economic outcomes such as non-employment and long run earnings losses from job transitions, both of which are critical to understanding the reallocative costs associated with these policies. Using panel variation induced by the 1990 Clean Air Act Amendments (CAAA), I find that the reallocative costs of environmental policy are significant. Workers in newly regulated plants experienced, in aggregate, more than $9 billion inforegone earnings for the years after the change in policy. Most of these costs are driven by non-employment and lower earnings in future employment, while earnings of workers who remain with their firm change little. Relative to the estimated benefits of the 1990 CAAA, these one-time transitional costs are small. However, the estimated costs far exceed the workforce compensation policies designed to mitigate some of these earnings losses.
    View Full Paper PDF
  • Working Paper

    Changes in Firm Pension Policy: Trends Away from Traditional Defined Benefit Plans

    November 2011

    Authors: Kandice Kapinos

    Working Paper Number:

    CES-11-36

    In light of the recent concerns regarding the solvency of Social Security's Old-Age, Survivors and Disability Insurance (OASDI), private pensions may play an increasingly important role in retirement welfare of US retirees. However, the private pension landscape has evolved in ways that may result in lower private pension wealth for retirees. One recent such phenomenon involves the conversion of traditional defined benefit pension plans to cash balance plans, which resulted in lower pension benefits for many workers. In this study, I investigate how characteristics of the firm's workforce influenced whether the firm converted their traditional pension plan to a cash balance plan and how these characteristics related to the firm's pension plan policy more generally. Using the Longitudinal Employer-Household Data and pension plan data from the Department of Labor/Internal Revenue Service and the Pension Benefit Guaranty Corporation, I found little evidence of workforce age distribution effects on the likelihood of DB plan conversion to a cash balance plan in the 1990s. More generally, I consistently find positive associations between firms with older and more female workforces and defined contribution plans during the same time.
    View Full Paper PDF
  • Working Paper

    A Guide to the MEPS-IC Government List Sample Microdata

    September 2011

    Authors: Alice Zawacki

    Working Paper Number:

    CES-11-27

    The Medical Expenditure Panel Survey-Insurance Component (MEPS-IC) is conducted to provide nationally representative estimates on employer sponsored health insurance. MEPSIC data are collected from private sector employers, as well as state and local governments. While similar information is gathered from these two sectors, differences in the survey process exist. The goal of this paper is to provide details on the public sector including types of state and local government employers, sample design, general information on the data collected in the MEPS-IC, and additional sources of information.
    View Full Paper PDF
  • Working Paper

    Raising the Barcode Scanner: Technology and Productivity in the Retail Sector

    May 2011

    Authors: Emek Basker

    Working Paper Number:

    CES-11-16R

    Barcodes and barcode scanners transformed the grocery industry in the 1970s. I use store-level data from the 1972, 1977, and 1982 Census of Retail Trade, matched to data on store scanner installations, to estimate scanners' effect on labor productivity. I find that early scanners increased a store's labor productivity, on average, by approximately 4.5 percent in the first few years. The effect was larger in stores carrying more packaged products, consistent with the presence of network externalities. Short-run gains were small relative to fixed costs, suggesting that the impediment to widespread adoption of the new technology was profitability, not coordination problems.
    View Full Paper PDF
  • Working Paper

    LEHD Infrastructure Files in the Census RDC: Overview of S2004 Snapshot

    April 2011

    Working Paper Number:

    CES-11-13

    The Longitudinal Employer-Household Dynamics (LEHD) Program at the U.S. Census Bureau, with the support of several national research agencies, has built a set of infrastructure files using administrative data provided by state agencies, enhanced with information from other administrative data sources, demographic and economic (business) surveys and censuses. The LEHD Infrastructure Files provide a detailed and comprehensive picture of workers, employers, and their interaction in the U.S. economy. This document describes the structure and content of the 2004 Snapshot of the LEHD Infrastructure files as they are made available in the Census Bureau's Research Data Center network.
    View Full Paper PDF
  • Working Paper

    Computer Networks and Productivity Revisited: Does Plant Size Matter? Evidence and Implications

    September 2010

    Working Paper Number:

    CES-10-25

    Numerous studies have documented a positive association between information technology (IT) investments and business- and establishment-level productivity, but these studies usually pay sole or disporportionate attention to small- or medium-sized entities. In this paper, we revisit the evidence for manufacturing plants presented in Atrostic and Nguyen (2005) and show that the positive relationship between computer networks and labor productivity is only found among small- and medium-sized plants. Indeed, for larger plants the relationship is negative, and employment-weighted estimates indicate computer networks have a negative relationship with the productivity of employees, on average. These findings indicate that computer network investments may have an ambiguous relationship with aggregate labor productivity growth.
    View Full Paper PDF
  • Working Paper

    Professional Employer Organizations: What Are They, Who Uses Them and Why Should We Care?

    September 2010

    Working Paper Number:

    CES-10-22

    More and more U.S. workers are counted as employees of firms that they do not actually work for. Among such workers are those who staffed by temporary help service (THS) agencies and leased employees who are on the payroll of professional employment organizations (PEOs) but work for PEOs' client firms. While several papers study firms' use of THS services, few examine firms' use of PEO services. In this article, we summarize PEOs' business practices and examine how the intensity of their use varies across industries, geographic areas, and establishment characteristics using both public and confidential data.
    View Full Paper PDF
  • Working Paper

    National Estimates of Gross Employment and Job Flows from the Quarterly Workforce Indicators with Demographic and Industry Detail

    June 2010

    Working Paper Number:

    CES-10-11

    The Quarterly Workforce Indicators (QWI) are local labor market data produced and released every quarter by the United States Census Bureau. Unlike any other local labor market series produced in the U.S. or the rest of the world, the QWI measure employment flows for workers (accession and separations), jobs (creations and destructions) and earnings for demographic subgroups (age and gender), economic industry (NAICS industry groups), detailed geography (block (experimental), county, Core- Based Statistical Area, and Workforce Investment Area), and ownership (private, all) with fully interacted publication tables. The current QWI data cover 47 states, about 98% of the private workforce in those states, and about 92% of all private employment in the entire economy. State participation is sufficiently extensive to permit us to present the first national estimates constructed from these data. We focus on worker, job, and excess (churning) reallocation rates, rather than on levels of the basic variables. This permits comparison to existing series from the Job Openings and Labor Turnover Survey and the Business Employment Dynamics Series from the Bureau of Labor Statistics. The national estimates from the QWI are an important enhancement to existing series because they include demographic and industry detail for both worker and job flow data compiled from underlying micro-data that have been integrated at the job and establishment levels by the Longitudinal Employer-Household Dynamics Program at the Census Bureau. The estimates presented herein were compiled exclusively from public-use data series and are available for download.
    View Full Paper PDF