CREAT: Census Research Exploration and Analysis Tool

Papers Containing Keywords(s): 'estimation'

The following papers contain search terms that you selected. From the papers listed below, you can navigate to the PDF, the profile page for that working paper, or see all the working papers written by an author. You can also explore tags, keywords, and authors that occur frequently within these papers.
Click here to search again

Frequently Occurring Concepts within this Search

Center for Economic Studies - 33

Ordinary Least Squares - 32

Annual Survey of Manufactures - 31

Longitudinal Research Database - 30

Total Factor Productivity - 25

Bureau of Labor Statistics - 24

National Science Foundation - 22

Census of Manufactures - 22

North American Industry Classification System - 21

Bureau of Economic Analysis - 20

Current Population Survey - 19

Longitudinal Business Database - 16

Standard Industrial Classification - 16

Internal Revenue Service - 15

National Bureau of Economic Research - 15

Cobb-Douglas - 14

Longitudinal Employer Household Dynamics - 12

Census Bureau Disclosure Review Board - 11

Metropolitan Statistical Area - 11

American Community Survey - 11

Federal Reserve Bank - 11

Cornell University - 9

Chicago Census Research Data Center - 9

Social Security Administration - 8

Census of Manufacturing Firms - 8

Economic Census - 8

Business Register - 7

University of Chicago - 7

Standard Statistical Establishment List - 7

Generalized Method of Moments - 7

Census Bureau Longitudinal Business Database - 7

Federal Statistical Research Data Center - 6

Disclosure Review Board - 6

Decennial Census - 6

Quarterly Workforce Indicators - 6

Department of Economics - 6

Federal Reserve System - 6

Alfred P Sloan Foundation - 6

Social Security - 5

Social Security Number - 5

Environmental Protection Agency - 5

Employer Identification Numbers - 5

Special Sworn Status - 5

United States Census Bureau - 5

Department of Commerce - 5

Survey of Income and Program Participation - 4

Research Data Center - 4

AKM - 4

Journal of Labor Economics - 4

Department of Agriculture - 4

Service Annual Survey - 4

Journal of Economic Literature - 4

Department of Labor - 4

Medical Expenditure Panel Survey - 4

Boston Research Data Center - 4

Detailed Earnings Records - 3

Protected Identification Key - 3

Social and Economic Supplement - 3

Organization for Economic Cooperation and Development - 3

Annual Business Survey - 3

Quarterly Census of Employment and Wages - 3

Accommodation and Food Services - 3

MIT Press - 3

Columbia University - 3

Energy Information Administration - 3

Housing and Urban Development - 3

National Research Council - 3

LEHD Program - 3

University of Maryland - 3

Economic Research Service - 3

Census Bureau Business Register - 3

American Immigration Council - 3

Center for Administrative Records Research - 3

IQR - 3

Federal Government - 3

Manufacturing Energy Consumption Survey - 3

Quarterly Journal of Economics - 3

American Economic Review - 3

Michigan Institute for Teaching and Research in Economics - 3

PAOC - 3

Pollution Abatement Costs and Expenditures - 3

New York University - 3

Permanent Plant Number - 3

estimating - 72

econometric - 36

production - 29

economist - 27

expenditure - 26

growth - 24

regression - 23

manufacturing - 20

estimator - 19

earnings - 19

demand - 19

macroeconomic - 18

statistical - 17

labor - 17

aggregate - 15

produce - 14

survey - 13

endogeneity - 13

revenue - 13

recession - 12

investment - 11

employed - 11

employ - 11

market - 11

data - 10

respondent - 10

salary - 10

industrial - 10

quarterly - 10

gdp - 10

sale - 10

payroll - 9

estimates production - 9

workforce - 9

economically - 9

census bureau - 8

spillover - 8

unobserved - 8

econometrician - 8

productivity growth - 8

depreciation - 8

efficiency - 8

average - 7

manufacturer - 7

regressing - 7

industry productivity - 7

productivity measures - 7

trend - 7

productive - 7

agency - 7

population - 6

innovation - 6

productivity dynamics - 6

estimates employment - 6

employee - 6

statistician - 6

elasticity - 6

data census - 6

microdata - 6

neighborhood - 6

imputation - 6

empirical - 6

inference - 6

survey data - 5

subsidy - 5

regressors - 5

technological - 5

growth productivity - 5

rates productivity - 5

report - 5

state - 5

regress - 5

sector - 5

measures productivity - 5

accounting - 5

incorporated - 5

metropolitan - 5

utilization - 5

endogenous - 5

census research - 5

aggregation - 5

plant productivity - 5

autoregressive - 5

estimates productivity - 5

sampling - 4

earner - 4

monopolistic - 4

exporter - 4

company - 4

factory - 4

wages productivity - 4

housing - 4

analysis - 4

bias - 4

econometrically - 4

disclosure - 4

factor productivity - 4

productivity estimates - 4

resident - 4

exogeneity - 4

industries estimate - 4

impact - 4

worker - 4

wage changes - 4

imputed - 4

quantity - 4

cost - 4

profit - 4

earn - 4

assessed - 4

regulation - 4

model - 4

establishment - 4

employment growth - 4

employment wages - 4

ssa - 3

sample - 3

survey income - 3

population survey - 3

export - 3

exporting - 3

exported - 3

inventory - 3

patent - 3

patenting - 3

employment estimates - 3

policymakers - 3

residence - 3

forecast - 3

productivity dispersion - 3

indicator - 3

productivity size - 3

firms productivity - 3

aggregate productivity - 3

manufacturing productivity - 3

confidentiality - 3

privacy - 3

competitor - 3

economic census - 3

finance - 3

larger firms - 3

wage regressions - 3

public - 3

spending - 3

regional - 3

heterogeneity - 3

wage data - 3

enterprise - 3

financial - 3

investing - 3

consumption - 3

emission - 3

employment data - 3

insurance - 3

employment count - 3

disadvantaged - 3

fiscal - 3

enrollment - 3

household income - 3

imputation model - 3

tax - 3

compensation - 3

earns - 3

regulatory - 3

pollution - 3

environmental regulation - 3

epa - 3

environmental - 3

pollutant - 3

merger - 3

labor productivity - 3

productivity wage - 3

substitute - 3

productivity plants - 3

labor statistics - 3

capital - 3

employment dynamics - 3

layoff - 3

profitability - 3

employing - 3

regulation productivity - 3

longitudinal - 3

observed productivity - 3

analysis productivity - 3

Viewing papers 61 through 70 of 91


  • Working Paper

    A Flexible Test for Agglomeration Economies in Two U.S. Manufacturing Industries

    August 2004

    Authors: Edward Feser

    Working Paper Number:

    CES-04-14

    This paper uses the inverse input demand function framework of Kim (1992) to test for economies of industry and urban size in two U.S. manufacturing sectors of differing technology intensity: farm and garden machinery (SIC 352) and measuring and controlling devices (SIC 382). The inverse input demand framework permits the estimation of the production function jointly with a set of cost shares without the imposition of prior economic restrictions. Tests using plant-level data suggest the presence of population scale (urbanization) economies in the moderate- to low-technology farm and garden machinery sector and industry scale (localization) economies in the higher technology measuring and controlling devices sector. The efficiency and generality of the inverse input demand approach are particularly appropriate for micro-level studies of agglomeration economies where prior assumptions regarding homogeneity and homotheticity are less appropriate.
    View Full Paper PDF
  • Working Paper

    The Effects of Low-Valued Transactions on the Quality of U.S. International Export Estimates: 1994-1998

    August 2004

    Authors: Charles Ian Mead

    Working Paper Number:

    CES-04-11

    This paper uses data from the U.S. Census Bureau Annual Survey of Manufactures (ASM) to examine the effects that a growth of low-valued transactions likely has on the quality of export estimates provided in the U.S. International Trade in Goods and Services (FT-990) series. These transactions, valued at less than $2,500, do not legally require the filing of export declarations. As a result, they are often not captured in the administrative records data used to construct FT-990 estimates. By comparing industry-level estimates created from the ASM to related FT-990 estimates, this paper estimates that the undercounting of low-valued transactions in the FT-990 export series increases by roughly $30 billion over the period of 1994-1997. It also finds that regression analysis provides little insight into the undercounting issue as results are primarily driven by industries whose contributions to total manufacturing exports are small.
    View Full Paper PDF
  • Working Paper

    Pollution Abatement Expenditures and Plant-Level Productivity: A Production Function Approach

    August 2003

    Working Paper Number:

    CES-03-16

    In this paper, we investigate the impact of environmental regulation on productivity using a Cobb-Douglas production function framework. Estimating the effects of regulation on productivity can be done with a top-down approach using data for broad sectors of the economy, or a more disaggregated bottom-up approach. Our study follows a bottom-up approach using data from the U.S. paper, steel, and oil industries. We measure environmental regulation using plant-level information on pollution abatement expenditures, which allows us to distinguish between productive and abatement expenditures on each input. We use annual Census Bureau information (1979-1990) on output, labor, capital, and material inputs, and pollution abatement operating costs and capital expenditures for 68 pulp and paper mills, 55 oil refineries, and 27 steel mills. We find that pollution abatement inputs generally contribute little or nothing to output, especially when compared to their '''productive''' equivalents. Adding an aggregate pollution abatement cost measure to a Cobb-Douglas production function, we find that a $1 increase in pollution abatement costs leads to an estimated productivity decline of $3.11, $1.80, and $5.98 in the paper, oil, and steel industries respectively. These findings imply substantial differences across industries in their sensitivity to pollution abatement costs, arguing for a bottom-up approach that can capture these differences. Further differentiating plants by their production technology, we find substantial differences in the impact of pollution abatement costs even within industries, with higher marginal costs at plants with more polluting technologies. Finally, in all three industries, plants concentrating on change-in-production-process abatement techniques have higher productivity than plants doing predominantly end-of-line abatement, but also seem to be more affected by pollution abatement operating costs. Overall, our results point to the importance using detailed, disaggregated analyses, even below the industry level, when trying to model the costs of forcing plants to reduce their emissions.
    View Full Paper PDF
  • Working Paper

    The Survival of Industrial Plants

    October 2002

    Working Paper Number:

    CES-02-25

    The study seeks to explain the attrition rate of new manufacturing plants in the United States in terms of three vectors of variables. The first explains how survival of the fittest proceeds through learning by firms (plants) about their own relative efficiency. The second explains how efficiency systematically changes over time and what augments or diminishes it. The third captures the opportunity cost of resources employed in a plant. The model is tested using maximum-likelihood probit analysis with very large samples for successive census years in the 1967-97 period. One sample consists of an unbalanced panel of about three-fourths of a million plants of single and multi-unit firms, or alternatively of about 300,000 plants if only the most reliable data are considered. The second is restricted to the plants of multi-unit firms in the same time span and consists of an unbalanced panel of more than 100,000 plants. The empirical analysis strongly confirms the predictions of the model.
    View Full Paper PDF
  • Working Paper

    Estimating Measurement Error in SIPP Annual Job Earnings: A Comparison of Census Survey and SSA Administrative Data

    September 2002

    Authors: Martha Stinson

    Working Paper Number:

    tp-2002-24

    The third chapter investigates measurement error in SIPP annual job earnings data linked to SSA administrative earnings data. The multiple earnings measures provided by the survey and administrative data enable the identification of components of true variation and variation due to measurement error. We find that 18% of the variation in SIPP annual job earnings can be attributed to measurement error. We also find that in both the SIPP and the DER, measurement error is persistent over time. A lower level of auto-correlation in the SIPP measurement error than in the economic error component leads to a lower reliability ratio of .62 for first-differenced earnings.
    View Full Paper PDF
  • Working Paper

    Computing Person and Firm Effects Using Linked Longitudinal Employer-Employee Data

    March 2002

    Working Paper Number:

    tp-2002-06

    In this paper we provide the exact formulas for the direct least squares estimation of statistical models that include both person and firm effects. We also provide an algorithm for determining the estimable functions of the person and firm effects (the identifiable effects). The computational techniques are also directly applicable to any linear two-factor analysis of covariance with two high-dimension non-orthogonal factors. We show that the application of the exact solution does not change the substantive conclusions about the relative importance of person and firm effects in the explanation of log real compensation; however, the correlation between person and firm effects is negative, not weakly positive, in the exact solution. We also provide guidance for using the methods developed in earlier work to obtain an accurate approximation.
    View Full Paper PDF
  • Working Paper

    An Economist's Primer on Survey Samples

    September 2000

    Working Paper Number:

    CES-00-15

    Survey data underlie most empirical work in economics, yet economists typically have little familiarity with survey sample design and its effects on inference. This paper describes how sample designs depart from the simple random sampling model implicit in most econometrics textbooks, points out where the effects of this departure are likely to be greatest, and describes the relationship between design-based estimators developed by survey statisticians and related econometric methods for regression. Its intent is to provide empirical economists with enough background in survey methods to make informed use of design-based estimators. It emphasizes surveys of households (the source of most public-use files), but also considers how surveys of businesses differ. Examples from the National Longitudinal Survey of Youth of 1979 and the Current Population Survey illustrate practical aspects of design-based estimation.
    View Full Paper PDF
  • Working Paper

    The Impact of Vintage and Survival on Productivity: Evidence from Cohorts of U.S. Manufacturing Plants

    May 2000

    Working Paper Number:

    CES-00-06

    This paper examines the evolution of productivity in U.S. manufacturing plants from 1963 to 1992. We define a 'vintage effect' as the change in productivity of recent cohorts of new plants relative to earlier cohorts of new plants, and a 'survival effect' as the change in productivity of a particular cohort of surviving plants as it ages. The data show that both factors contribute to industry productivity growth, but play offsetting roles in determining a cohort's relative position in the productivity distribution. Recent cohorts enter with significantly higher productivity than earlier entrants did, while surviving cohorts show significant increases in productivity as they age. These two effects roughly offset each other, however, so there is a rough convergence in productivity across cohorts in 1992 and 1987. (JEL Code: D24, L6)
    View Full Paper PDF
  • Working Paper

    ON THE SOURCES AND SIZE OF EMPLOYMENT ADJUSTMENT COSTS

    May 1999

    Authors: Lucia Foster

    Working Paper Number:

    CES-99-07

    Micro employment adjustment costs affect not only establishment-level dynamics but can also affect aggregate employment dynamics. The difficulties in directly observing and measuring these adjustment costs necessitate an indirect approach in order to learn more about the sources and size of these costs. This paper examines differences in employment adjustments by worker and establishment characteristics using micro-level data for approximately 11,000 U.S. manufacturing plants. Differences in the speed of adjustment within the organizing framework of the traditional partial adjustment model are used to identify the source and size of employment adjustment costs. The estimates are undertaken using three different techniques and under a variety of assumptions concerning market structure, worker heterogeneity, and degree of interrelation of inputs. The estimates show that employment adjustment speeds differ over worker and establishment characteristics in a manner that is consistent with the underlying adjustment cost stories. These differences suggest that systematic changes in the distribution of establishments over these characteristics can influence aggregate employment dynamics in response to a shock through compositional effects.
    View Full Paper PDF
  • Working Paper

    Large Plant Data in the LRD: Selection of a Sample for Estimation

    March 1999

    Working Paper Number:

    CES-99-06

    This paper describes preliminary work with the LRD during our tenure at the Census Bureau as participants in the ASA/NSF/Census Research Program. The objective of the work described here were two-fold. First, we wanted to examine the suitableness of these data for the calculation of plant-level productivity indexes, following procedures typically implemented with time series data. Second, we wanted to select a small number of 2-digit industry groups that would be well suited to the estimation of production functions and systems of factor share equations and factor demand forecasting equations with system-wide techniques. This description of our initial work may be useful to other researchers who are interested in the LRD for the analysis of productivity growth and/or the estimation of systems of factor equations, because the specific results reported in this memo suggest that the data are of good quality, or because the nature of the tasks undertaken provides insight into issues that arise in the analysis of longitudinal establishment data.
    View Full Paper PDF