CREAT: Census Research Exploration and Analysis Tool

Papers Containing Keywords(s): 'agency'

The following papers contain search terms that you selected. From the papers listed below, you can navigate to the PDF, the profile page for that working paper, or see all the working papers written by an author. You can also explore tags, keywords, and authors that occur frequently within these papers.
Click here to search again

Frequently Occurring Concepts within this Search

Internal Revenue Service - 36

Center for Economic Studies - 36

Bureau of Labor Statistics - 33

National Science Foundation - 29

Longitudinal Business Database - 28

North American Industry Classification System - 28

American Community Survey - 27

Social Security Administration - 25

Business Register - 25

Employer Identification Numbers - 24

Economic Census - 24

Longitudinal Employer Household Dynamics - 23

Current Population Survey - 21

Census Bureau Disclosure Review Board - 20

Research Data Center - 18

Cornell University - 17

Service Annual Survey - 16

Survey of Income and Program Participation - 16

Protected Identification Key - 15

Standard Industrial Classification - 15

Standard Statistical Establishment List - 14

Federal Statistical Research Data Center - 14

Social Security Number - 14

County Business Patterns - 14

Business Dynamics Statistics - 13

Social Security - 13

Census Bureau Business Register - 13

Chicago Census Research Data Center - 13

Master Address File - 12

Decennial Census - 12

Longitudinal Research Database - 12

Bureau of Economic Analysis - 12

Annual Survey of Manufactures - 11

Quarterly Workforce Indicators - 11

Disclosure Review Board - 10

2010 Census - 10

Quarterly Census of Employment and Wages - 10

National Center for Health Statistics - 10

Alfred P Sloan Foundation - 10

Special Sworn Status - 10

Metropolitan Statistical Area - 9

Unemployment Insurance - 9

Administrative Records - 8

Department of Housing and Urban Development - 8

Person Validation System - 8

Office of Management and Budget - 8

Small Business Administration - 8

University of Chicago - 8

Medical Expenditure Panel Survey - 8

American Economic Association - 7

Census Bureau Longitudinal Business Database - 7

Computer Assisted Personal Interview - 7

Census of Manufactures - 7

Sloan Foundation - 6

Housing and Urban Development - 6

Federal Reserve Bank - 6

Bureau of Labor - 6

Employment History File - 6

Employer Characteristics File - 6

Company Organization Survey - 6

Local Employment Dynamics - 6

Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality - 6

Characteristics of Business Owners - 5

Securities and Exchange Commission - 5

Department of Homeland Security - 5

W-2 - 5

Federal Reserve System - 5

Indian Health Service - 5

General Accounting Office - 5

Individual Characteristics File - 5

American Housing Survey - 5

Financial, Insurance and Real Estate Industries - 5

Department of Labor - 5

Review of Economics and Statistics - 5

Probability Density Function - 5

Federal Tax Information - 5

National Bureau of Economic Research - 5

Public Use Micro Sample - 5

National Institute on Aging - 5

Medicaid Services - 5

LEHD Program - 5

Survey of Business Owners - 4

Annual Business Survey - 4

MAFID - 4

Postal Service - 4

Census Bureau Master Address File - 4

International Trade Research Report - 4

Retail Trade - 4

Business Employment Dynamics - 4

University of Maryland - 4

Duke University - 4

MIT Press - 4

American Economic Review - 4

Business Master File - 4

National Institutes of Health - 4

Center for Administrative Records Research and Applications - 4

Personally Identifiable Information - 4

Statistics Canada - 4

Computer Assisted Telephone Interviews and Computer Assisted Personal Interviews - 4

National Opinion Research Center - 4

CATI - 4

Department of Commerce - 4

Ordinary Least Squares - 4

Urban Institute - 4

Herfindahl Hirschman Index - 4

Cornell Institute for Social and Economic Research - 4

Adjusted Gross Income - 3

Disability Insurance - 3

Temporary Assistance for Needy Families - 3

Accommodation and Food Services - 3

Supplemental Nutrition Assistance Program - 3

SSA Numident - 3

Social Science Research Institute - 3

Occupational Employment Statistics - 3

Indian Housing Information Center - 3

Person Identification Validation System - 3

Census Numident - 3

Department of Agriculture - 3

Economic Research Service - 3

COVID-19 - 3

HHS - 3

Journal of Economic Literature - 3

PSID - 3

Census of Manufacturing Firms - 3

University of Michigan - 3

Journal of Labor Economics - 3

Core Based Statistical Area - 3

Office of Personnel Management - 3

North American Industry Classi - 3

Department of Education - 3

Federal Insurance Contribution Act - 3

American Statistical Association - 3

National Longitudinal Survey of Youth - 3

National Research Council - 3

Geographic Information Systems - 3

Patent and Trademark Office - 3

Total Factor Productivity - 3

Census 2000 - 3

Some Other Race - 3

Establishment Micro Properties - 3

University of Minnesota - 3

Organization for Economic Cooperation and Development - 3

Permanent Plant Number - 3

Census Bureau Center for Economic Studies - 3

National Income and Product Accounts - 3

survey - 38

data - 35

statistical - 27

respondent - 25

census bureau - 23

microdata - 22

data census - 20

employee - 19

report - 18

census data - 17

payroll - 17

datasets - 16

record - 15

disclosure - 14

population - 14

employed - 14

workforce - 14

enterprise - 14

economic census - 13

database - 13

confidentiality - 11

employ - 11

company - 10

coverage - 10

department - 10

revenue - 10

organizational - 10

sector - 10

economist - 10

statistician - 10

privacy - 9

longitudinal - 9

recession - 9

worker - 9

quarterly - 9

federal - 9

incorporated - 9

employee data - 9

aggregate - 9

statistical agencies - 9

public - 8

employment data - 8

information census - 8

use census - 8

labor - 8

expenditure - 8

policymakers - 8

censuses surveys - 8

census survey - 8

work census - 8

sale - 8

researcher - 8

information - 8

analysis - 8

establishment - 8

publicly - 7

census employment - 7

irs - 7

census use - 7

estimation - 7

business data - 7

surveys censuses - 7

census research - 7

market - 7

corporation - 6

survey data - 6

econometric - 6

research census - 6

establishments data - 6

reporting - 6

analyst - 6

research - 6

employer household - 6

industrial - 6

entrepreneur - 5

longitudinal employer - 5

survey income - 5

assessed - 5

imputation - 5

state - 5

insurance - 5

enrollment - 5

trend - 5

estimating - 5

earnings - 5

employment statistics - 5

2010 census - 5

study - 5

acquisition - 4

finance - 4

minority - 4

pandemic - 4

job - 4

assessing - 4

impact - 4

census years - 4

occupation - 4

statistical disclosure - 4

clerical - 4

consumer - 4

ssa - 4

model - 4

matching - 4

insured - 4

macroeconomic - 4

aggregation - 4

security - 3

1040 - 3

financial - 3

entrepreneurship - 3

household surveys - 3

medicaid - 3

population survey - 3

income data - 3

filing - 3

census responses - 3

bias - 3

hiring - 3

discrimination - 3

contract - 3

policy - 3

tax - 3

housing - 3

residential - 3

home - 3

accounting - 3

businesses census - 3

classified - 3

incentive - 3

tenure - 3

linked census - 3

workplace - 3

employment dynamics - 3

owner - 3

ownership - 3

census business - 3

corp - 3

census 2020 - 3

labor statistics - 3

proprietorship - 3

wholesale - 3

census records - 3

race census - 3

healthcare - 3

health insurance - 3

gdp - 3

Viewing papers 51 through 60 of 79


  • Working Paper

    The Center for Economic Studies 1982-2007: A Brief History

    October 2009

    Authors: B.K. Atrostic

    Working Paper Number:

    CES-09-35

    More than half a century ago, visionaries representing both the Census Bureau and the external research community laid the foundation for the Center for Economic Studies (CES) and the Research Data Center (RDC) system. They saw a clear need for a system meeting the inextricably related requirements of providing more and better information from existing Census Bureau data collections while preserving respondent confidentiality and privacy. CES opened in 1982 to house new longitudinal business databases, develop them further, and make them available to qualified researchers. CES and the RDC system evolved to meet the designers' requirements. Research at CES and the RDCs meets the commitments of the Census Bureau (and, recently, of other agencies) to preserving confidentiality while contributing paradigm-shifting fundamental research in a range of disciplines and up-to-the-minute critical tools for decision-makers.
    View Full Paper PDF
  • Working Paper

    Resolving the Tension Between Access and Confidentiality: Past Experience and Future Plans at the U.S. Census Bureau

    September 2009

    Working Paper Number:

    CES-09-33

    This paper provides an historical context for access to U.S. Federal statistical data with a primary focus on the U.S. Census Bureau. We review the various modes used by the Census Bureau to make data available to users, and highlight the costs and benefits associated with each. We highlight some of the specific improvements underway or under consideration at the Census Bureau to better serve its data users, as well as discuss the broad strategies employed by statistical agencies to respond to the challenges of data access.
    View Full Paper PDF
  • Working Paper

    Discretionary Disclosure in Financial Reporting: An Examination Comparing Internal Firm Data to Externally Reported Segment Data

    September 2009

    Working Paper Number:

    CES-09-28

    We use confidential, U.S. Census Bureau, plant-level data to investigate aggregation in external reporting. We compare firms' plant-level data to their published segment reports, conducting our tests by grouping a firm's plants that share the same four-digit SIC code into a 'pseudo-segment.' We then determine whether that pseudo-segment is disclosed as an external segment, or whether it is subsumed into a different business unit for external reporting purposes. We find pseudo-segments are more likely to be aggregated within a line-of-business segment when the agency and proprietary costs of separately reporting the pseudo-segment are higher and when firm and pseudo-segment characteristics allow for more discretion in the application of segment reporting rules. For firms reporting multiple external segments, aggregation of pseudo-segments is driven by both agency and proprietary costs. However, for firms reporting a single external segment, we find no evidence of an agency cost motive for aggregation.
    View Full Paper PDF
  • Working Paper

    Economic Factors Underlying the Unbundling of Advertising Agency Services

    August 2009

    Working Paper Number:

    CES-09-15

    This paper addresses a longstanding puzzle involving the unbundling of services that has occurred over more than two decades in the U.S. advertising agency industry: How can the shift from the bundling to the unbundling of services be explained and what accounts for the slow pace of change? Using a cost-based theoretical framework of bundling due to Evans and Salinger (2005, 2008), we develop a simple model of an advertising agency's decision to unbundle its services as a tradeoff between the fixed cost to the advertiser of establishing and maintaining a relationship with an advertising agency and pecuniary economies of scale available in providing media services. The results from an econometric analysis of cross-sectional and pooled data collected by the U.S. Census Bureau for quinquenial censuses conducted between 1982 and 2002 support the key predictions of the model. We find that advertising agency establishments are more likely to unbundle if they are large and diversified in their service offerings and are less likely to do so with increasing age and greater geographical scope. We also find a strong trend toward unbundling over time, a result that is partially explained by increases in media prices over time.
    View Full Paper PDF
  • Working Paper

    An Analysis of Key Differences in Micro Data: Results from the Business List Comparison Project

    September 2008

    Working Paper Number:

    CES-08-28

    The Bureau of Labor Statistics and the Bureau of the Census each maintain a business register, a universe of all U.S. business establishments and their characteristics, created from independent sources. Both registers serve critical functions such as supplying aggregate data inputs for certain national statistics generated by the Bureau of Economic Analysis. This paper examines key micro-level differences across these two business registers.
    View Full Paper PDF
  • Working Paper

    Health-Related Research Using Confidential U.S. Census Bureau Data

    August 2008

    Working Paper Number:

    CES-08-21

    Economic studies on health-related issues have the potential to benefit all Americans. The approaches for dealing with the growth of health care costs and health insurance coverage are ever changing and information is needed on their efficacy. Research on health-related topics has been conducted for about a decade at the Census Bureau\u2019s Center for Economic Studies and the Research Data Centers. This paper begins by describing the confidential business and demographic Census Bureau data products used in this research. The discussion continues with summaries of nearly 30 papers, including how this work has benefited the Census Bureau and its research findings. Some focus on data linkages and assessing data quality, while others address important questions in the employer, public, and individual insurance markets. This research could not have been accomplished with public-use data. The newly available data from the Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality and National Center for Health Statistics, as well as additional Census Bureau data now available in the Research Data Centers are also discussed.
    View Full Paper PDF
  • Working Paper

    Access Methods for United States Microdata

    August 2007

    Working Paper Number:

    CES-07-25

    Beyond the traditional methods of tabulations and public-use microdata samples, statistical agencies have developed four key alternatives for providing non-government researchers with access to confidential microdata to improve statistical modeling. The first, licensing, allows qualified researchers access to confidential microdata at their own facilities, provided certain security requirements are met. The second, statistical data enclaves, offer qualified researchers restricted access to confidential economic and demographic data at specific agency-controlled locations. Third, statistical agencies can offer remote access, through a computer interface, to the confidential data under automated or manual controls. Fourth, synthetic data developed from the original data but retaining the correlations in the original data have the potential for allowing a wide range of analyses.
    View Full Paper PDF
  • Working Paper

    Lessons for Targeted Program Evaluation: A Personal and Professional History of the Survey of Program Dynamics

    August 2007

    Authors: Daniel Weinberg

    Working Paper Number:

    CES-07-24

    The Survey of Program Dynamics (SPD) was created by the 1996 welfare reform legislation to facilitate its evaluation. This paper describes the evolution of that survey, discusses its implementation, and draws lessons for future evaluation. Large-scale surveys can be an important part of a portfolio of evaluation methods, but sufficient time must be given to data collection agencies if a high-quality longitudinal survey is expected. Such a survey must have both internal (agency) and external (policy analyst) buy-in. Investments in data analysis by agency staff, downplayed in favor of larger sample sizes given a fixed budget, could have contributed to more external acceptance. More attention up-front to reducing the potentially deleterious effects of attrition in longitudinal surveys, such as through the use of monetary incentives, might have been worthwhile. Given the problems encountered by the Census Bureau in producing the SPD, I argue that ongoing multi-purpose longitudinal surveys like the Survey of Income and Program Participation are potentially more valuable than episodic special-purpose surveys.
    View Full Paper PDF
  • Working Paper

    The Impact of Hurricanes Katrina, Rita and Wilma on Business Establishments: A GIS Approach

    August 2006

    Working Paper Number:

    CES-06-23

    We use Geographic Information System tools to develop estimates of the economic impact of disaster events such as Hurricane Katrina. Our methodology relies on mapping establishments from the Census Bureau's Business Register into damage zones defined by remote sensing information provided by FEMA. The identification of damaged establishments by precisely locating them on a map provides a far more accurate characterization of affected businesses than those typically reported from readily available county level data. The need for prompt estimates is critical since they are more valuable the sooner they are released after a catastrophic event. Our methodology is based on pre-storm data. Therefore, estimates can be made available very quickly to inform the public as well as policy makers. Robustness tests using data from after the storms indicate our GIS estimates, while much smaller than those based on publicly available county-level data, still overstate actual observed losses. We discuss ways to refine and augment the GIS approach to provide even more accurate estimates of the impact of disasters on businesses.
    View Full Paper PDF
  • Working Paper

    Residual Claims and Incentives in Restaurant Chains

    July 2006

    Authors: Clarissa Yeap

    Working Paper Number:

    CES-06-18

    I examine the relationship between ownership and production activities using a new dataset of restaurant chains. Production in restaurant chains provides an opportunity to examine the effects of residual claims on incentives because production is decentralized and fairly uniform across restaurants in the same chain. Yet the allocation of residual claims varies between company-owned and franchised units, affecting the strength of incentives for restaurantlevel activities. The decision to own or franchise each restaurant reflects the value of either withholding or allocating residual claims for performing these activities. I find that more complex production activities are systematically correlated with company ownership. Onsite food production raises the likelihood of company ownership by 28% relative to offsite food production. Table service raises the likelihood of company ownership by 26% relative to counter service. The results are not consistent with straightforward effort-promoting effects of residual claims in simple principal agent models. They are consistent with the view that residual claims can generate unbalanced incentives across diverse tasks.
    View Full Paper PDF