CREAT: Census Research Exploration and Analysis Tool

Papers Containing Keywords(s): 'neighborhood'

The following papers contain search terms that you selected. From the papers listed below, you can navigate to the PDF, the profile page for that working paper, or see all the working papers written by an author. You can also explore tags, keywords, and authors that occur frequently within these papers.
Click here to search again

Frequently Occurring Concepts within this Search

American Community Survey - 41

Decennial Census - 34

Metropolitan Statistical Area - 30

Census Bureau Disclosure Review Board - 28

Ordinary Least Squares - 25

Federal Statistical Research Data Center - 21

2010 Census - 20

Housing and Urban Development - 19

Longitudinal Employer Household Dynamics - 16

Center for Economic Studies - 16

Department of Housing and Urban Development - 16

National Science Foundation - 16

Chicago Census Research Data Center - 16

Internal Revenue Service - 15

Protected Identification Key - 14

MTO - 12

Current Population Survey - 11

American Housing Survey - 11

Bureau of Labor Statistics - 10

Special Sworn Status - 10

Disclosure Review Board - 10

Social Security Number - 8

W-2 - 8

Research Data Center - 8

National Bureau of Economic Research - 8

Federal Reserve Bank - 8

Adjusted Gross Income - 7

Alfred P Sloan Foundation - 7

Employer Identification Numbers - 7

PSID - 7

Department of Economics - 7

Longitudinal Business Database - 7

Social Security Administration - 6

North American Industry Classification System - 6

Russell Sage Foundation - 6

Harvard University - 6

Geographic Information Systems - 6

Department of Agriculture - 6

Indian Health Service - 6

MWTP - 6

Standard Statistical Establishment List - 6

Master Address File - 5

Social Security - 5

Opportunity Atlas - 5

Core Based Statistical Area - 5

Supreme Court - 5

American Economic Association - 5

1940 Census - 5

Consolidated Metropolitan Statistical Areas - 5

Census 2000 - 5

Center for Administrative Records Research - 5

Public Use Micro Sample - 5

Earned Income Tax Credit - 4

Robert Wood Johnson Foundation - 4

UC Berkeley - 4

Bureau of Economic Analysis - 4

Economic Census - 4

Standard Industrial Classification - 4

County Business Patterns - 4

Department of Energy - 3

Princeton University - 3

Census Numident - 3

AKM - 3

Individual Characteristics File - 3

General Accounting Office - 3

Survey of Income and Program Participation - 3

National Institutes of Health - 3

Integrated Public Use Microdata Series - 3

University of Chicago - 3

Office of Management and Budget - 3

Unemployment Insurance - 3

International Trade Research Report - 3

Generalized Method of Moments - 3

Postal Service - 3

Linear Probability Models - 3

Federal Reserve System - 3

Characteristics of Business Owners - 3

Survey of Business Owners - 3

Department of Commerce - 3

National Longitudinal Survey of Youth - 3

Census Bureau Longitudinal Business Database - 3

Environmental Protection Agency - 3

Quarterly Census of Employment and Wages - 3

New York University - 3

housing - 56

resident - 49

residential - 46

metropolitan - 41

residence - 36

segregation - 33

population - 32

poverty - 29

disadvantaged - 28

ethnicity - 27

rent - 25

racial - 25

urban - 24

neighbor - 23

socioeconomic - 22

disparity - 22

minority - 22

renter - 21

suburb - 21

ethnic - 21

home - 19

race - 19

black - 17

hispanic - 17

city - 17

segregated - 16

income neighborhoods - 15

white - 15

homeowner - 14

rural - 13

reside - 13

immigrant - 13

house - 13

residential segregation - 12

discrimination - 12

migrant - 12

income housing - 11

migration - 11

community - 11

census data - 11

econometric - 11

relocation - 10

relocate - 10

family - 10

neighborhood income - 9

welfare - 9

amenity - 9

intergenerational - 9

poorer - 9

state - 9

district - 9

estimating - 9

apartment - 8

suburbanization - 8

suburban - 8

town - 8

employ - 8

recession - 8

relocating - 7

census bureau - 7

economically - 7

mobility - 7

geographic - 7

moving - 7

sociology - 7

migrating - 7

immigration - 7

census research - 7

locality - 7

employed - 7

respondent - 6

impact - 6

urbanization - 6

heterogeneity - 6

workforce - 6

geographically - 6

migrate - 6

estimation - 6

establishment - 6

geography - 5

generation - 5

residing - 5

grandparent - 5

urbanized - 5

citizen - 5

labor - 5

area - 5

hiring - 5

entrepreneur - 5

census use - 5

data census - 5

crime - 5

market - 5

mortgage - 4

assimilation - 4

interracial - 4

survey - 4

affluent - 4

child - 4

unemployed - 4

2010 census - 4

economic census - 4

housing survey - 4

retail - 4

discriminatory - 4

job - 4

wealth - 3

tax - 3

statistical - 3

use census - 3

estimates intergenerational - 3

midwest - 3

earnings - 3

adopt - 3

rurality - 3

country - 3

saving - 3

income children - 3

worker - 3

venture - 3

entrepreneurship - 3

proprietor - 3

microdata - 3

regression - 3

utility - 3

incorporated - 3

research census - 3

census survey - 3

social - 3

census responses - 3

financial - 3

school - 3

sale - 3

work census - 3

network - 3

native - 3

immigrant population - 3

pollution - 3

environmental - 3

economist - 3

Viewing papers 41 through 50 of 94


  • Working Paper

    Who are the people in my neighborhood? The 'contextual fallacy' of measuring individual context with census geographies

    February 2018

    Working Paper Number:

    CES-18-11

    Scholars deploy census-based measures of neighborhood context throughout the social sciences and epidemiology. Decades of research confirm that variation in how individuals are aggregated into geographic units to create variables that control for social, economic or political contexts can dramatically alter analyses. While most researchers are aware of the problem, they have lacked the tools to determine its magnitude in the literature and in their own projects. By using confidential access to the complete 2010 U.S. Decennial Census, we are able to construct'for all persons in the US'individual-specific contexts, which we group according to the Census-assigned block, block group, and tract. We compare these individual-specific measures to the published statistics at each scale, and we then determine the magnitude of variation in context for an individual with respect to the published measures using a simple statistic, the standard deviation of individual context (SDIC). For three key measures (percent Black, percent Hispanic, and Entropy'a measure of ethno-racial diversity), we find that block-level Census statistics frequently do not capture the actual context of individuals within them. More problematic, we uncover systematic spatial patterns in the contextual variables at all three scales. Finally, we show that within-unit variation is greater in some parts of the country than in others. We publish county-level estimates of the SDIC statistics that enable scholars to assess whether mis-specification in context variables is likely to alter analytic findings when measured at any of the three common Census units.
    View Full Paper PDF
  • Working Paper

    Social Influence and the Consumer Bankruptcy Decision

    January 2017

    Authors: Jonathan Fisher

    Working Paper Number:

    CES-17-60

    I examine the influence of neighbors on the consumer bankruptcy decision using administrative bankruptcy records linked the 2000 Decennial Census. Two empirical strategies remove unobserved common factors that affect identification. The first strategy uses small geographical areas to isolate neighborhood effects, and the second strategy identifies the effect using past bankruptcy filers who moved states. The findings from both strategies reinforce each other and confirm the role of social influence on the bankruptcy decision. Having a past bankruptcy filer move into the block from a different state increases the likelihood of filing by 10 percent.
    View Full Paper PDF
  • Working Paper

    School Accountability and Residential Location Patterns: Evaluating the Unintended Consequences of No Child Left Behind

    January 2017

    Working Paper Number:

    CES-17-28

    The 2002 to 2015 No Child Left Behind (NCLB) Act is often considered the most significant federal intervention into education in the United States since 1965 with the passage of the Elementary and Secondary Education Act. There is growing evidence that holding schools accountable is leading to some improved educational outcomes for students. There is in contrast very little work examining whether these sweeping reforms have unintended consequences for the communities which these schools are serving. As school attendance, particularly at the elementary school level, is closely tied to one's residence, placing sanctions on a school could have negative repercussions for neighborhoods if it provides new information on school failure. In contrast, if these sanctions also bring new resources, including financial resources or school choice, they could spark additional demand within a neighborhood. Through the use of restricted access census data, which includes local housing values, rents and individual residential choices in combination with the use of a boundary discontinuity identification strategy, this paper seeks to examine how failure to meet Adequate Yearly Progress (AYP), the key enforcement mechanism of NCLB, is shaping local housing markets and residential choices in five diverse urban school districts: New York, Los Angeles, Philadelphia, Detroit and Tucson.
    View Full Paper PDF
  • Working Paper

    Has Falling Crime Invited Gentrification?

    January 2017

    Working Paper Number:

    CES-17-27

    Over the past two decades, crime has fallen dramatically in cities in the United States. We explore whether, in the face of falling central city crime rates, households with more resources and options were more likely to move into central cities overall and more particularly into low income and/or majority minority central city neighborhoods. We use confidential, geocoded versions of the 1990 and 2000 Decennial Census and the 2010, 2011, and 2012 American Community Survey to track moves to different neighborhoods in 244 Core Based Statistical Areas (CBSAs) and their largest central cities. Our dataset includes over four million household moves across the three time periods. We focus on three household types typically considered gentrifiers: high-income, college-educated, and white households. We find that declines in city crime are associated with increases in the probability that highincome and college-educated households choose to move into central city neighborhoods, including low-income and majority minority central city neighborhoods. Moreover, we find little evidence that households with lower incomes and without college degrees are more likely to move to cities when violent crime falls. These results hold during the 1990s as well as the 2000s and for the 100 largest metropolitan areas, where crime declines were greatest. There is weaker evidence that white households are disproportionately drawn to cities as crime falls in the 100 largest metropolitan areas from 2000 to 2010.
    View Full Paper PDF
  • Working Paper

    Small Business Growth and Failure during the Great Recession: The Role of House Prices, Race & Gender

    November 2016

    Working Paper Number:

    carra-2016-08

    Using 2002-2011 data from the Longitudinal Business Database linked to the 2002 and 2007 Survey of Business Owners, this paper explores whether (through a collateral channel) the rise in home prices over the early 2000's and their subsequent fall associated with the Great Recession had differential impacts on business performance across owner race, ethnicity and gender. We find that the employment growth rate of minority-owned firms, particularly black and Hispanic-owned firms, is more sensitive to changes in house prices than is that of their nonminority-owned counterparts.
    View Full Paper PDF
  • Working Paper

    The Effect of Low-Income Housing on Neighborhood Mobility: Evidence from Linked Micro-Data

    May 2016

    Working Paper Number:

    carra-2016-02

    While subsidized low-income housing construction provides affordable living conditions for poor households, many observers worry that building low-income housing in poor communities induces individuals to move to poor neighborhoods. We examine this issue using detailed, nationally representative microdata constructed from linked decennial censuses. Our analysis exploits exogenous variation in low-income housing supply induced by program eligibility rules for Low-Income Housing Tax Credits to estimate the effect of subsidized housing on neighborhood mobility patterns. The results indicate little evidence to suggest a causal effect of additional low-income housing construction on the characteristics of neighborhoods to which households move. This result is true for households across the income distribution, and supports the hypothesis that subsidized housing provides affordable living conditions without encouraging households to move to less-affluent neighborhoods than they would have otherwise.
    View Full Paper PDF
  • Working Paper

    Black Pioneers, Intermetropolitan Movers, and Housing Desegregation

    March 2016

    Working Paper Number:

    CES-16-23

    In this project, we examine the mobility choices of black households between 1960 and 2000. We use household-level Decennial Census data geocoded down to the census tract level. Our results indicate that, for black households, one's status as an intermetropolitan migrant ' especially from an urban area outside the South ' is a powerful predictor of pioneering into a white neighborhood. Moreover, and perhaps even more importantly, the ratio of these intermetropolitan black arrivals to the incumbent metropolitan black population is a powerful predictor of whether a metropolitan area experiences substantial declines in housing segregation.
    View Full Paper PDF
  • Working Paper

    Structural versus Ethnic Dimensions of Housing Segregation

    March 2016

    Working Paper Number:

    CES-16-22

    Racial residential segregation is still very high in many American cities. Some portion of segregation is attributable to socioeconomic differences across racial lines; some portion is caused by purely racial factors, such as preferences about the racial composition of one's neighborhood or discrimination in the housing market. Social scientists have had great difficulty disaggregating segregation into a portion that can be explained by interracial differences in socioeconomic characteristics (what we call structural factors) versus a portion attributable to racial and ethnic factors. What would such a measure look like? In this paper, we draw on a new source of data to develop an innovative structural segregation measure that shows the amount of segregation that would remain if we could assign households to housing units based only on non-racial socioeconomic characteristics. This inquiry provides vital building blocks for the broader enterprise of understanding and remedying housing segregation.
    View Full Paper PDF
  • Working Paper

    Changes in Neighborhood Inequality, 2000-2010

    March 2016

    Authors: Daniel Weinberg

    Working Paper Number:

    CES-16-18

    Recent work has suggested that higher income inequality may be a desirable attribute of a neighborhood in that it represents diversity, even though high (and rising) inequality appears to be detrimental to the nation as a whole. The research reported here has determined the key characteristics of a census tract that are associated with the level of inequality in 2000 or 2010, and those associated with changes in income inequality between 2000 and 2010. For the change, the strongest influence is a negative effect for the level of income inequality in 2000; that is, higher income inequality in 2000 leads to a decline over the decade, ceteris paribus. Neighborhoods with higher proportions or levels of the following population and housing characteristics tend to have both higher income inequality and a larger increase in income inequality between 2000 and 2010: individuals in poverty, those with a bachelor's degree, older individuals, householders living alone, and median rent, and lower median housing value and household income. Among these, perhaps the most important determinant is the percent in poverty in 2000. Furthermore, as the baseline level of demographic and economic diversity increases, the better the baseline and change characteristics explain the change in the Gini index from 2000 to 2010.
    View Full Paper PDF
  • Working Paper

    Externalities of Public Housing: The Effect of Public Housing Demolitions on Local Crime

    March 2016

    Working Paper Number:

    CES-16-16

    This paper evaluates the potential for negative externalities from public housing by examining crime rates before and after demolition of public housing projects in Chicago between 1995 and 2010. Using data on block-level crimes by type of crime merged to detailed geographic data on individual public housing demolitions, I find evidence that Chicago's public housing imposed significant externalities on the surrounding neighborhood. Using a difference in difference approach comparing neighborhoods around public housing projects to nearby neighborhoods I find that crime decreases by 8.8% after a demolition. This decrease is concentrated in violent crime. I use an event study to show that the decrease occurs at the approximate date of the eviction of the residents and persists for at least 5 years after the demolition. Neighborhoods with large demolitions and demolitions of public housing that had been poorly maintained display the largest crime decreases.
    View Full Paper PDF