CREAT: Census Research Exploration and Analysis Tool

Papers Containing Keywords(s): 'respondent'

The following papers contain search terms that you selected. From the papers listed below, you can navigate to the PDF, the profile page for that working paper, or see all the working papers written by an author. You can also explore tags, keywords, and authors that occur frequently within these papers.
Click here to search again

Frequently Occurring Concepts within this Search

Current Population Survey - 61

American Community Survey - 60

Internal Revenue Service - 58

Social Security Administration - 52

Protected Identification Key - 45

Census Bureau Disclosure Review Board - 45

Survey of Income and Program Participation - 40

Center for Economic Studies - 37

Social Security Number - 37

Social Security - 37

2010 Census - 31

Bureau of Labor Statistics - 30

Person Validation System - 29

Decennial Census - 27

Master Address File - 26

National Science Foundation - 25

Longitudinal Employer Household Dynamics - 23

Cornell University - 22

Employer Identification Numbers - 21

Disclosure Review Board - 21

Personally Identifiable Information - 21

Business Register - 20

Service Annual Survey - 20

Person Identification Validation System - 19

North American Industry Classification System - 19

Research Data Center - 19

Department of Housing and Urban Development - 18

Federal Statistical Research Data Center - 18

Office of Management and Budget - 17

Computer Assisted Personal Interview - 16

Housing and Urban Development - 15

Census Bureau Business Register - 15

Administrative Records - 15

Longitudinal Business Database - 14

Some Other Race - 13

Supplemental Nutrition Assistance Program - 12

Quarterly Census of Employment and Wages - 12

Annual Survey of Manufactures - 12

Metropolitan Statistical Area - 12

Postal Service - 12

MAFID - 11

Health and Retirement Study - 11

Ordinary Least Squares - 11

Standard Industrial Classification - 11

Medicaid Services - 10

Temporary Assistance for Needy Families - 10

Individual Taxpayer Identification Numbers - 10

Economic Census - 10

Quarterly Workforce Indicators - 10

Detailed Earnings Records - 10

Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality - 10

Indian Health Service - 9

Census Numident - 9

Population Estimates Program - 9

W-2 - 9

Social and Economic Supplement - 9

Unemployment Insurance - 9

National Opinion Research Center - 9

1940 Census - 9

Census Edited File - 9

ASEC - 9

Census Bureau Master Address File - 9

Standard Statistical Establishment List - 9

Center for Administrative Records Research and Applications - 8

Census Household Composition Key - 8

SSA Numident - 8

CPS ASEC - 8

Computer Assisted Telephone Interviews and Computer Assisted Personal Interviews - 8

Census of Manufactures - 8

National Center for Health Statistics - 8

American Housing Survey - 8

Cornell Institute for Social and Economic Research - 8

Bureau of Economic Analysis - 8

Department of Health and Human Services - 8

Alfred P Sloan Foundation - 8

National Academy of Sciences - 7

PIKed - 7

National Longitudinal Survey of Youth - 7

LEHD Program - 7

Centers for Medicare - 7

Census Bureau Person Identification Validation System - 7

Master Beneficiary Record - 7

Public Use Micro Sample - 7

CATI - 7

Longitudinal Research Database - 7

Special Sworn Status - 7

Local Employment Dynamics - 6

MAF-ARF - 6

Citizenship and Immigration Services - 6

Department of Economics - 6

Disability Insurance - 6

Social Science Research Institute - 6

Indian Housing Information Center - 6

Statistics Canada - 6

Medical Expenditure Panel Survey - 6

National Health Interview Survey - 6

National Bureau of Economic Research - 6

Sloan Foundation - 6

Chicago Census Research Data Center - 6

Securities and Exchange Commission - 6

Federal Statistical System - 5

Total Factor Productivity - 5

Department of Labor - 5

Department of Education - 5

NUMIDENT - 5

General Accounting Office - 5

Financial, Insurance and Real Estate Industries - 5

Business Dynamics Statistics - 5

Workforce Information Council Administrative Wage Record Enhancement Study Group - 5

Adjusted Gross Income - 5

Selective Service System - 5

University of Chicago - 5

University of Michigan - 5

American Statistical Association - 5

Federal Reserve Bank - 5

Census 2000 - 5

Permanent Plant Number - 5

Annual Business Survey - 4

Individual Characteristics File - 4

United States Census Bureau - 4

County Business Patterns - 4

Office of Personnel Management - 4

Federal Insurance Contribution Act - 4

Characteristics of Business Owners - 4

Management and Organizational Practices Survey - 4

COVID - 4

Earned Income Tax Credit - 4

Data Management System - 4

Master Earnings File - 4

American Economic Association - 4

National Institute on Aging - 4

Survey of Business Owners - 4

Kauffman Foundation - 4

Federal Tax Information - 4

Journal of Economic Literature - 4

PSID - 4

COVID-19 - 3

Bureau of Labor - 3

Employment History File - 3

Occupational Employment Statistics - 3

Department of Homeland Security - 3

General Education Development - 3

Company Organization Survey - 3

Composite Person Record - 3

Multiple Worksite Report - 3

LODES - 3

Department of State - 3

Accommodation and Food Services - 3

Department of Agriculture - 3

Food and Nutrition Service - 3

Current Population Survey Annual Social and Economic Supplement - 3

Consumer Expenditure Survey - 3

Core Based Statistical Area - 3

Customs and Border Protection - 3

Department of Justice - 3

Michigan Institute for Teaching and Research in Economics - 3

University of Minnesota - 3

Center for Administrative Records Research - 3

Urban Institute - 3

Geographic Information Systems - 3

National Institutes of Health - 3

Small Business Administration - 3

Census Bureau Center for Economic Studies - 3

Probability Density Function - 3

Census Bureau Longitudinal Business Database - 3

Georgetown University - 3

Duke University - 3

Minnesota Population Center - 3

Census of Manufacturing Firms - 3

Organization for Economic Cooperation and Development - 3

Pollution Abatement Costs and Expenditures - 3

survey - 93

population - 57

census bureau - 47

data - 44

statistical - 41

data census - 33

census data - 33

agency - 28

estimating - 27

imputation - 24

use census - 24

report - 24

record - 22

microdata - 22

datasets - 21

census survey - 20

resident - 19

earnings - 19

coverage - 18

hispanic - 18

sampling - 17

census responses - 17

irs - 17

census research - 16

analysis - 16

statistician - 16

employed - 16

ethnicity - 16

assessed - 15

survey income - 15

citizen - 15

household surveys - 14

federal - 14

2010 census - 14

survey data - 14

enrollment - 13

sample - 13

research census - 13

medicaid - 13

study - 12

research - 12

expenditure - 12

percentile - 12

minority - 12

insurance - 12

1040 - 12

estimation - 11

census records - 11

poverty - 11

economist - 11

researcher - 11

census employment - 11

assessing - 11

payroll - 11

workforce - 11

ssa - 11

tax - 11

income data - 11

earner - 10

employ - 10

economic census - 10

population survey - 10

disclosure - 10

confidentiality - 10

socioeconomic - 9

race - 9

average - 9

aggregate - 9

censuses surveys - 9

prevalence - 9

survey households - 9

information - 9

filing - 9

income survey - 9

privacy - 9

census use - 8

sample census - 8

disadvantaged - 8

residential - 8

revenue - 8

ethnic - 8

salary - 8

taxpayer - 8

linked census - 8

immigrant - 8

surveys censuses - 8

race census - 8

firms census - 8

records census - 7

bias - 7

matching - 7

yearly - 7

individuals census - 7

trend - 7

quarterly - 7

labor - 7

disparity - 7

work census - 7

provided census - 7

estimator - 7

sector - 7

residence - 7

census linked - 7

immigration - 7

public - 7

longitudinal - 7

estimates census - 6

housing - 6

neighborhood - 6

department - 6

census disclosure - 6

employment data - 6

employee data - 6

census 2020 - 6

racial - 6

enrolled - 6

census estimates - 6

census household - 6

unemployed - 6

employee - 6

econometric - 6

recession - 6

reporting - 6

healthcare - 6

database - 6

welfare - 5

linkage - 5

available census - 5

manufacturing - 5

information census - 5

employment statistics - 5

latino - 5

eligibility - 5

disability - 5

eligible - 5

income individuals - 5

family - 5

income households - 5

census years - 5

citizenship - 5

state - 5

statistical disclosure - 5

discrepancy - 5

ancestry - 5

medicare - 5

enrollee - 5

statistical agencies - 5

earn - 5

paper census - 4

www census - 4

imputation model - 4

labor statistics - 4

employed census - 4

propensity - 4

household income - 4

environmental - 4

social - 4

migration - 4

publicly - 4

metropolitan - 4

worker - 4

establishment - 4

business data - 4

native - 4

insurance coverage - 4

white - 4

health insurance - 4

aging - 4

gdp - 4

occupation - 3

residing - 3

retirement - 3

agriculture - 3

dependent - 3

pandemic - 3

associate - 3

migrant - 3

unobserved - 3

filed - 3

empirical - 3

home - 3

housing survey - 3

census business - 3

policymakers - 3

estimates employment - 3

sale - 3

uninsured - 3

inference - 3

company - 3

analyst - 3

insured - 3

matched - 3

census file - 3

workplace - 3

income year - 3

manufacturer - 3

Viewing papers 41 through 50 of 123


  • Working Paper

    Improving Estimates of Neighborhood Change with Constant Tract Boundaries

    May 2022

    Working Paper Number:

    CES-22-16

    Social scientists routinely rely on methods of interpolation to adjust available data to their research needs. This study calls attention to the potential for substantial error in efforts to harmonize data to constant boundaries using standard approaches to areal and population interpolation. We compare estimates from a standard source (the Longitudinal Tract Data Base) to true values calculated by re-aggregating original 2000 census microdata to 2010 tract areas. We then demonstrate an alternative approach that allows the re-aggregated values to be publicly disclosed, using 'differential privacy' (DP) methods to inject random noise to protect confidentiality of the raw data. The DP estimates are considerably more accurate than the interpolated estimates. We also examine conditions under which interpolation is more susceptible to error. This study reveals cause for greater caution in the use of interpolated estimates from any source. Until and unless DP estimates can be publicly disclosed for a wide range of variables and years, research on neighborhood change should routinely examine data for signs of estimation error that may be substantial in a large share of tracts that experienced complex boundary changes.
    View Full Paper PDF
  • Working Paper

    Finding Needles in Haystacks: Multiple-Imputation Record Linkage Using Machine Learning

    November 2021

    Working Paper Number:

    CES-21-35

    This paper considers the problem of record linkage between a household-level survey and an establishment-level frame in the absence of unique identifiers. Linkage between frames in this setting is challenging because the distribution of employment across establishments is highly skewed. To address these difficulties, this paper develops a probabilistic record linkage methodology that combines machine learning (ML) with multiple imputation (MI). This ML-MI methodology is applied to link survey respondents in the Health and Retirement Study to their workplaces in the Census Business Register. The linked data reveal new evidence that non-sampling errors in household survey data are correlated with respondents' workplace characteristics.
    View Full Paper PDF
  • Working Paper

    Small Business Pulse Survey Estimates by Owner Characteristics and Rural/Urban Designation

    September 2021

    Working Paper Number:

    CES-21-24

    In response to requests from policymakers for additional context for Small Business Pulse Survey (SBPS) measures of the impact of COVID-19 on small businesses, we researched developing estimates by owner characteristics and rural/urban locations. Leveraging geographic coding on the Business Register, we create estimates of the effect of the pandemic on small businesses by urban and rural designations. A more challenging exercise entails linking micro-level data from the SBPS with ownership data from the Annual Business Survey (ABS) to create estimates of the effect of the pandemic on small businesses by owner race, sex, ethnicity, and veteran status. Given important differences in survey design and concerns about nonresponse bias, we face significant challenges in producing estimates for owner demographics. We discuss our attempts to meet these challenges and provide discussion about caution that must be used in interpreting the results. The estimates produced for this paper are available for download. Reflecting the Census Bureau's commitment to scientific inquiry and transparency, the micro data from the SBPS will be available to qualified researchers on approved projects in the Federal Statistical Research Data Center network.
    View Full Paper PDF
  • Working Paper

    Measuring the Impact of COVID-19 on Businesses and People: Lessons from the Census Bureau's Experience

    January 2021

    Working Paper Number:

    CES-21-02

    We provide an overview of Census Bureau activities to enhance the consistency, timeliness, and relevance of our data products in response to the COVID-19 pandemic. We highlight new data products designed to provide timely and granular information on the pandemic's impact: the Small Business Pulse Survey, weekly Business Formation Statistics, the Household Pulse Survey, and Community Resilience Estimates. We describe pandemic-related content introduced to existing surveys such as the Annual Business Survey and the Current Population Survey. We discuss adaptations to ensure the continuity and consistency of existing data products such as principal economic indicators and the American Community Survey.
    View Full Paper PDF
  • Working Paper

    Determination of the 2020 U.S. Citizen Voting Age Population (CVAP) Using Administrative Records and Statistical Methodology Technical Report

    October 2020

    Working Paper Number:

    CES-20-33

    This report documents the efforts of the Census Bureau's Citizen Voting-Age Population (CVAP) Internal Expert Panel (IEP) and Technical Working Group (TWG) toward the use of multiple data sources to produce block-level statistics on the citizen voting-age population for use in enforcing the Voting Rights Act. It describes the administrative, survey, and census data sources used, and the four approaches developed for combining these data to produce CVAP estimates. It also discusses other aspects of the estimation process, including how records were linked across the multiple data sources, and the measures taken to protect the confidentiality of the data.
    View Full Paper PDF
  • Working Paper

    The Impact of 2010 Decennial Census Hiring on the Unemployment Rate

    June 2020

    Working Paper Number:

    CES-20-19

    The decennial census is the largest peacetime operation of the U.S. federal government. The Census Bureau hires hundreds of thousands of temporary workers to conduct the decennial census. The magnitude of this temporary workforce influences the national employment situation when enumeration efforts ramp up and when they recede. The impact of decennial census hiring on the headline number of payroll jobs added each month is well established, but previous work has not established how decennial census hiring affects the headline unemployment rate. We link the 2010 Decennial Applicant Personnel and Payroll System data to the 2010 American Community Survey to answer this question. We find that the large hiring surge in May 2010 came mostly from people already employed (40 percent) or from people who were unemployed (33 percent). We estimate that the workers hired for Census 2010 lowered the May 2010 unemployment rate by one-tenth of a percentage point relative to the counterfactual. This one-tenth of a percentage point is within the standard error for the official unemployment rate, and BLS press releases would denote a change in the unemployment rate of 0.1% or less as 'unchanged.' We also estimate that relative to the counterfactual, the more gradual changes in decennial census employment influenced the unemployment rate by less than one-tenth of a percentage point in every other month during 2010.
    View Full Paper PDF
  • Working Paper

    Automating Response Evaluation For Franchising Questions On The 2017 Economic Census

    July 2019

    Working Paper Number:

    CES-19-20

    Between the 2007 and 2012 Economic Censuses (EC), the count of franchise-affiliated establishments declined by 9.8%. One reason for this decline was a reduction in resources that the Census Bureau was able to dedicate to the manual evaluation of survey responses in the franchise section of the EC. Extensive manual evaluation in 2007 resulted in many establishments, whose survey forms indicated they were not franchise-affiliated, being recoded as franchise-affiliated. No such evaluation could be undertaken in 2012. In this paper, we examine the potential of using external data harvested from the web in combination with machine learning methods to automate the process of evaluating responses to the franchise section of the 2017 EC. Our method allows us to quickly and accurately identify and recode establishments have been mistakenly classified as not being franchise-affiliated, increasing the unweighted number of franchise-affiliated establishments in the 2017 EC by 22%-42%.
    View Full Paper PDF
  • Working Paper

    Predicting the Effect of Adding a Citizenship Question to the 2020 Census

    June 2019

    Working Paper Number:

    CES-19-18

    The addition of a citizenship question to the 2020 census could affect the self-response rate, a key driver of the cost and quality of a census. We find that citizenship question response patterns in the American Community Survey (ACS) suggest that it is a sensitive question when asked about administrative record noncitizens but not when asked about administrative record citizens. ACS respondents who were administrative record noncitizens in 2017 frequently choose to skip the question or answer that the person is a citizen. We predict the effect on self-response to the entire survey by comparing mail response rates in the 2010 ACS, which included a citizenship question, with those of the 2010 census, which did not have a citizenship question, among households in both surveys. We compare the actual ACS-census difference in response rates for households that may contain noncitizens (more sensitive to the question) with the difference for households containing only U.S. citizens. We estimate that the addition of a citizenship question will have an 8.0 percentage point larger effect on self-response rates in households that may have noncitizens relative to those with only U.S. citizens. Assuming that the citizenship question does not affect unit self-response in all-citizen households and applying the 8.0 percentage point drop to the 28.1 % of housing units potentially having at least one noncitizen would predict an overall 2.2 percentage point drop in self-response in the 2020 census, increasing costs and reducing the quality of the population count.
    View Full Paper PDF
  • Working Paper

    Optimal Probabilistic Record Linkage: Best Practice for Linking Employers in Survey and Administrative Data

    March 2019

    Working Paper Number:

    CES-19-08

    This paper illustrates an application of record linkage between a household-level survey and an establishment-level frame in the absence of unique identifiers. Linkage between frames in this setting is challenging because the distribution of employment across firms is highly asymmetric. To address these difficulties, this paper uses a supervised machine learning model to probabilistically link survey respondents in the Health and Retirement Study (HRS) with employers and establishments in the Census Business Register (BR) to create a new data source which we call the CenHRS. Multiple imputation is used to propagate uncertainty from the linkage step into subsequent analyses of the linked data. The linked data reveal new evidence that survey respondents' misreporting and selective nonresponse about employer characteristics are systematically correlated with wages.
    View Full Paper PDF
  • Working Paper

    The Management and Organizational Practices Survey (MOPS): Collection and Processing

    December 2018

    Working Paper Number:

    CES-18-51

    The U.S. Census Bureau partnered with a team of external researchers to conduct the first-ever large-scale survey of management practices in the United States, the Management and Organizational Practices Survey (MOPS), for reference year 2010. With the help of the research team, the Census Bureau expanded and improved the survey for a second wave for reference year 2015. The MOPS is a supplement to the Annual Survey of Manufacturing (ASM), and so the collection and processing strategy for the MOPS built on the methodology for the ASM, while differing on key dimensions to address the unique nature of management relative to other business data. This paper provides detail on the mail strategy pursued for the MOPS, the collection methods for paper and electronic responses, the processing and estimation procedures, and the official Census Bureau data releases. This detail is useful for all those who have interest in using the MOPS for research purposes, those wishing to understand the MOPS data more deeply, and those with an interest in survey methodology.
    View Full Paper PDF