CREAT: Census Research Exploration and Analysis Tool

Papers Containing Keywords(s): 'organizational'

The following papers contain search terms that you selected. From the papers listed below, you can navigate to the PDF, the profile page for that working paper, or see all the working papers written by an author. You can also explore tags, keywords, and authors that occur frequently within these papers.
Click here to search again

Frequently Occurring Concepts within this Search

Longitudinal Business Database - 30

North American Industry Classification System - 30

Center for Economic Studies - 25

Annual Survey of Manufactures - 24

National Science Foundation - 22

Bureau of Labor Statistics - 19

Economic Census - 19

Ordinary Least Squares - 19

National Bureau of Economic Research - 17

Census of Manufactures - 16

Bureau of Economic Analysis - 16

Business Register - 15

Total Factor Productivity - 15

Standard Industrial Classification - 13

Chicago Census Research Data Center - 13

Employer Identification Numbers - 12

Longitudinal Employer Household Dynamics - 11

Longitudinal Research Database - 11

Standard Statistical Establishment List - 11

Internal Revenue Service - 10

Metropolitan Statistical Area - 10

Federal Statistical Research Data Center - 9

County Business Patterns - 9

Michigan Institute for Teaching and Research in Economics - 9

Computer Network Use Supplement - 9

Census Bureau Disclosure Review Board - 8

Census Bureau Longitudinal Business Database - 8

Management and Organizational Practices Survey - 8

Special Sworn Status - 8

University of Chicago - 8

Decennial Census - 7

Disclosure Review Board - 7

Research Data Center - 7

Census of Manufacturing Firms - 7

University of Toronto - 7

Electronic Data Interchange - 7

Small Business Administration - 6

Organization for Economic Cooperation and Development - 6

Service Annual Survey - 6

Federal Reserve Bank - 6

Current Population Survey - 6

Social Security Administration - 6

Kauffman Foundation - 6

National Employer Survey - 5

Census Bureau Business Register - 5

Business Dynamics Statistics - 5

Quarterly Journal of Economics - 5

American Economic Review - 5

Information and Communication Technology Survey - 5

Alfred P Sloan Foundation - 5

Sloan Foundation - 5

Census of Services - 5

Accommodation and Food Services - 4

Technical Services - 4

Business Research and Development and Innovation Survey - 4

Journal of Economic Literature - 4

Company Organization Survey - 4

University of Maryland - 4

IBM - 4

University of California Los Angeles - 4

Department of Labor - 4

Review of Economics and Statistics - 4

International Trade Research Report - 4

Occupational Employment Statistics - 4

Medical Expenditure Panel Survey - 4

American Community Survey - 4

Stanford University - 4

Cornell Institute for Social and Economic Research - 4

Survey of Manufacturing Technology - 4

Retail Trade - 3

Wholesale Trade - 3

Journal of Political Economy - 3

Review of Economic Studies - 3

North American Industry Classi - 3

Securities and Exchange Commission - 3

Department of Economics - 3

Boston College - 3

Herfindahl Hirschman Index - 3

University of Michigan - 3

Postal Service - 3

Social Security - 3

American Economic Association - 3

Princeton University Press - 3

World Bank - 3

New York University - 3

Department of Commerce - 3

Cobb-Douglas - 3

Auxiliary Establishment Survey - 3

Federal Reserve System - 3

Federal Reserve Bank of Chicago - 3

Labor Productivity - 3

Financial, Insurance and Real Estate Industries - 3

New England County Metropolitan - 3

Characteristics of Business Owners - 3

American Statistical Association - 3

enterprise - 28

manufacturing - 27

production - 25

employee - 23

company - 22

growth - 17

corporate - 16

establishment - 15

sale - 15

employ - 13

sector - 13

technological - 13

innovation - 13

econometric - 13

entrepreneur - 12

revenue - 12

industrial - 12

manufacturer - 12

corporation - 11

employed - 11

venture - 11

investment - 11

earnings - 11

manager - 11

entrepreneurial - 10

entrepreneurship - 10

incorporated - 10

acquisition - 10

payroll - 10

management - 10

workforce - 10

agency - 10

specialization - 10

proprietorship - 9

ownership - 9

technology - 9

labor - 9

strategic - 8

productivity growth - 8

managerial - 8

productive - 8

efficiency - 8

labor productivity - 8

proprietor - 7

merger - 7

productivity measures - 7

expenditure - 7

finance - 6

funding - 6

innovate - 6

partnership - 6

competitor - 6

founder - 6

survey - 6

tenure - 6

report - 6

economist - 6

productivity differences - 6

market - 6

competitiveness - 6

quarterly - 5

development - 5

macroeconomic - 5

recession - 5

executive - 5

accounting - 5

profit - 5

department - 5

gdp - 5

workplace - 5

worker - 5

factory - 5

industry productivity - 5

productivity impacts - 5

produce - 5

computer - 5

startup - 4

hiring - 4

wholesale - 4

research - 4

patent - 4

patenting - 4

innovating - 4

investor - 4

shareholder - 4

inventory - 4

outsourced - 4

takeover - 4

owner - 4

incentive - 4

diversification - 4

occupation - 4

microdata - 4

demand - 4

outsourcing - 4

profitability - 4

productivity analysis - 4

spillover - 4

practices productivity - 4

restructuring - 4

subsidiary - 4

bankruptcy - 4

economically - 4

asset - 4

performance - 4

technology adoption - 4

endowment - 4

lawyer - 4

productivity estimates - 4

productivity increases - 4

loan - 3

researcher - 3

product - 3

innovative - 3

institutional - 3

associate - 3

salary - 3

leverage - 3

data - 3

reporting - 3

econometrician - 3

surveys censuses - 3

firms census - 3

business data - 3

state - 3

sourcing - 3

economic census - 3

consolidated - 3

liquidation - 3

bankrupt - 3

larger firms - 3

innovator - 3

multinational - 3

technical - 3

tech - 3

commerce - 3

advantage - 3

endogeneity - 3

conglomerate - 3

equilibrium - 3

productivity size - 3

measures productivity - 3

Viewing papers 21 through 30 of 76


  • Working Paper

    Asset Allocation in Bankruptcy

    February 2016

    Working Paper Number:

    CES-16-13

    This paper investigates the consequences of liquidation and reorganization on the allocation and subsequent utilization of assets in bankruptcy. We identify 129,000 bankrupt establishments and construct a novel dataset that tracks the occupancy, employment and wages paid at real estate assets over time. Using the random assignment of judges to bankruptcy cases as a natural experiment that forces some firms into liquidation, we find that even after accounting for reallocation, the long-run utilization of assets of liquidated firms is lower relative to assets of reorganized firms. These effects are concentrated in thin markets with few potential users, in areas with low access to finance, and in areas with low economic growth. The results highlight that different bankruptcy approaches affect asset allocation and utilization particularly when search frictions and financial frictions are present.
    View Full Paper PDF
  • Working Paper

    Making a Motivated Manager: A Census Data Investigation into Efficiency Differences Between Franchisee and Franchisor-Owned Restaurants

    January 2016

    Working Paper Number:

    CES-16-54

    While there has been significant research on the reasons for franchising, little work has examined the effects of franchising on establishment performance. This paper attempts to fill that gap. We use restricted-access US Census Bureau microdata from the 2007 Census of Retail Trade to examine establishment-level productivity of franchisee- and franchisor-owned restaurants. We do this by employing a two-stage data envelopment analysis model where the first stage uses DEA to measure each establishment's efficiency. The DEA efficiency score is then used as the second-stage dependent variable. The results show a strong and robust effect attributed to franchisee ownership for full service restaurants, but a smaller and insignificant difference for limited service restaurants. We believe the differences in task programability between limited and full service restaurants results in a very different role for managers/franchisees and is the driving factor behind the different results.
    View Full Paper PDF
  • Working Paper

    The Management and Organizational Practices Survey (MOPS): Cognitive Testing*

    January 2016

    Working Paper Number:

    CES-16-53

    All Census Bureau surveys must meet quality standards before they can be sent to the public for data collection. This paper outlines the pretesting process that was used to ensure that the Management and Organizational Practices Survey (MOPS) met those standards. The MOPS is the first large survey of management practices at U.S. manufacturing establishments. The first wave of the MOPS, issued for reference year 2010, was subject to internal expert review and two rounds of cognitive interviews. The results of this pretesting were used to make significant changes to the MOPS instrument and ensure that quality data was collected. The second wave of the MOPS, featuring new questions on data in decision making (DDD) and uncertainty and issued for reference year 2015, was subject to two rounds of cognitive interviews and a round of usability testing. This paper illustrates the effort undertaken by the Census Bureau to ensure that all surveys released into the field are of high quality and provides insight into how respondents interpret the MOPS questionnaire for those looking to utilize the MOPS data.
    View Full Paper PDF
  • Working Paper

    The Management and Organizational Practices Survey (MOPS): An Overview*

    January 2016

    Working Paper Number:

    CES-16-28

    Understanding productivity and business dynamics requires measuring production outputs and inputs. Through its surveys and use of administrative data, the Census Bureau collects information on production outputs and inputs including labor, capital, energy, and materials. With the introduction of the Management and Organizational Practices Survey (MOPS), the Census Bureau added information on another component of production: management. It has long been hypothesized that management is an important component of firm success, but until recently the study of management was confined to hypotheses, anecdotes, and case studies. Building upon the work of Bloom and Van Reenen (2007), the first-ever large scale survey of management practices in the United States, the MOPS, was conducted by the Census Bureau for 2010. A second, enhanced version of the MOPS is being conducted for 2015. The enhancement includes two new topics related to management: data and decision making (DDD) and uncertainty. As information technology has expanded plants are increasingly able to utilize data in their decision making. Structured management practices have been found to be complementary to DDD in earlier studies. Uncertainty has policy implications because uncertainty is found to be associated with reduced investment and employment. Uncertainty also plays a role in the targeting component of management.
    View Full Paper PDF
  • Working Paper

    Data in Action: Data-Driven Decision Making in U.S. Manufacturing

    January 2016

    Working Paper Number:

    CES-16-06

    Manufacturing in America has become significantly more data-intensive. We investigate the adoption, performance effects and organizational complementarities of data-driven decision making (DDD) in the U.S. Using data collected by the Census Bureau for 2005 and 2010, we observe the extent to which manufacturing firms track and use data to guide decision making, as well as their investments in information technology (IT) and the use of other structured management practices. Examining a representative sample of over 18,000 plans, we find that adoption of DDD is earlier and more prevalent among larger, older plants belonging to multi-unit firms. Smaller single-establishment firms adopt later but have a higher correlation with performance than similar non-adopters. Using a fixed-effects estimator, we find the average value-added for later DDD adopters to be 3% greater than non-adopters, controlling for other inputs to production. This effect is distinct from that associated with IT and other structured management practices and is concentrated among single-unit firms. Performance improves after plants adopt DDD, but not before ' consistent with a causal relationship. However, DDD-related performance differentials decrease over time for early and late adopters, consistent with firm learning and development of organizational complementarities. Formal complementarity tests suggest that DDD and high levels of IT capital reinforce each other, as do DDD and skilled workers. For some industries, the benefits of DDD adoption appear to be greater for plants that delegate some decision making to frontline workers.
    View Full Paper PDF
  • Working Paper

    Immigrant Diversity and Complex Problem Solving

    January 2016

    Working Paper Number:

    CES-16-04

    In the growing literature exploring the links between immigrant diversity and worker productivity, recent evidence strongly suggests that diversity generates productivity improvements. However, even the most careful extant empirical work remains at some remove from the mechanisms that theory says underlie this relationship: interpersonal interaction in the service of complex problem solving. This paper aims to `stress-test' these theoretical foundations, by observing how the relationship between diversity and productivity varies across workers differently engaged in complex problem solving and interaction. Using a uniquely comprehensive matched employer-employee dataset for the United States between 1991 and 2008, this paper shows that growing immigrant diversity inside cities and workplaces offers much stronger benefits for workers intensively engaged in various forms of complex problem solving, including tasks involving high levels of innovation, creativity, and STEM. Moreover, such effects are considerably stronger for those whose work requires high levels of both problem solving and interaction.
    View Full Paper PDF
  • Working Paper

    Evaluating the Long-Term Effect of NIST MEP Services on Establishment Performance

    March 2015

    Working Paper Number:

    CES-15-09

    This work examines the effects of receipt of business assistance services from the Manufacturing Extension Partnership (MEP) on manufacturing establishment performance. Several measures of performance are considered: (1) change in value-added per employee (a measure of productivity); (2) change in sales per worker; (3) change in employment; and (4) establishment survival. To analyze these relationships, we merged program records from the MEP's client and project information files with administrative records from the Census of Manufacturers and other Census databases over the periods 1997'2002 and 2002'2007 to compare the outcomes and performance of 'served' and 'unserved' manufacturing establishments. The approach builds on, updates, and expands upon earlier studies comparing matched MEP client and non-client performance over time periods ending in 1992 and 2002. Our results generally indicate that MEP services had positive and significant impacts on establishment productivity and sales per worker for the 2002'2007 period with some exceptions based on employment size, industry, and type of service provided. MEP services also increased the probability of establishment survival for the 1997'2007 period. Regardless of econometric model specification, MEP clients with 1'19 employees have statistically significant and higher levels of labor productivity growth. We also observed significant productivity differences associated with MEP services by broad sector, with higher impacts over the 2002'2007 time period in the durable goods manufacturing sector. The study further finds that establishments receiving MEP assistance are more likely to survive than those that do not receive MEP assistance. Detailed findings of the study, as well as caveats and limitations, are discussed in the paper.
    View Full Paper PDF
  • Working Paper

    Human Capital of Spinouts

    January 2015

    Working Paper Number:

    CES-15-06

    This study examines how the human capital of spinout founders and the performance of parent firms affect the success of spinouts by using a matched employer-employee dataset of new ventures covering 7 SIC 1-digit sectors in the United States. Our data cover 29,100 spinouts and 379,800 new ventures formed by lone entrepreneurs in 23 states between 1992 and 2005. We evaluate several components of human capital: outcomes of human capital investments vs. human capital investments, task-related human capital vs. non-task-related human capital, and individual human capital vs. group capital, and examine whether these types of human capital affect spinout performance differently. We find that spinout founder's earnings (an outcome of human capital investment) and industry experience (task-related human capital) prior to spinout formation have strong positive correlations with spinout performance, as measured by size, wage and growth rate. We also find that group experience of spinout founders prior to spinout formation has a positive correlation with spinout performance, though this effect is slightly weaker and smaller than those of spinout founder's earnings and industry experience. The effects of these three measures of human capital are mostly present after controlling for parent firm establishment fixed effects. We find some evidence that the size of parent firm establishments has a positive correlation with spinout performance, but this effect does not hold after controlling for parent firm fixed effects. Finally, we find that founder's earnings, industry experience, group experience and parent firm size are more important during the early stage of spinout formation.
    View Full Paper PDF
  • Working Paper

    None

    September 2014

    Working Paper Number:

    CES-14-35

    This paper presents a novel empirical study of innovation practices of U.S. companies and their relation to productivity levels using new business micro data from the Business Research and Development and Innovation Survey (BRDIS) for the years 2008-2011. We use factor analysis to reduce a set of inputs and outputs of innovation activities into four latent unobserved innovation modes or practices. Companies are grouped according to their scores across the four factors to see that in large, small and medium companies more than one mode of innovation practices prevails. The next step in the analysis links different types of innovation practices to levels of productivity using regression analysis. The innovation modes have a statistically significant positive relation with the level of productivity. The paper demonstrates the possibility of taking into account the multidimensionality of innovation without the use of composite indicators.
    View Full Paper PDF
  • Working Paper

    WHO DO UNIONS TARGET? UNIONIZATION OVER THE LIFE-CYCLE OF U.S. BUSINESSES

    February 2014

    Working Paper Number:

    CES-14-09R

    What type of businesses do unions target for organizing and when? A dynamic model of the union organizing process is constructed to answer this question. A union monitors establishments in an industry to learn about their productivity, and decides which ones to organize and when. An establishment becomes unionized if the union targets it for organizing and wins the union certification election. The model predicts two main selection effects: unions target larger and more productive establishments early in their life-cycles, and among the establishments targeted, unions are more likely to win elections in smaller and less productive ones. These predictions find support in union certification elections data for 1977-2007 matched with data on establishment characteristics.
    View Full Paper PDF