CREAT: Census Research Exploration and Analysis Tool

Papers Containing Keywords(s): 'estimation'

The following papers contain search terms that you selected. From the papers listed below, you can navigate to the PDF, the profile page for that working paper, or see all the working papers written by an author. You can also explore tags, keywords, and authors that occur frequently within these papers.
Click here to search again

Frequently Occurring Concepts within this Search

Center for Economic Studies - 33

Ordinary Least Squares - 32

Annual Survey of Manufactures - 31

Longitudinal Research Database - 30

Total Factor Productivity - 25

Bureau of Labor Statistics - 24

National Science Foundation - 22

Census of Manufactures - 22

North American Industry Classification System - 21

Bureau of Economic Analysis - 20

Current Population Survey - 19

Longitudinal Business Database - 16

Standard Industrial Classification - 16

Internal Revenue Service - 15

National Bureau of Economic Research - 15

Cobb-Douglas - 14

Longitudinal Employer Household Dynamics - 12

Census Bureau Disclosure Review Board - 11

Metropolitan Statistical Area - 11

American Community Survey - 11

Federal Reserve Bank - 11

Cornell University - 9

Chicago Census Research Data Center - 9

Social Security Administration - 8

Census of Manufacturing Firms - 8

Economic Census - 8

Business Register - 7

University of Chicago - 7

Standard Statistical Establishment List - 7

Generalized Method of Moments - 7

Census Bureau Longitudinal Business Database - 7

Federal Statistical Research Data Center - 6

Disclosure Review Board - 6

Decennial Census - 6

Quarterly Workforce Indicators - 6

Department of Economics - 6

Federal Reserve System - 6

Alfred P Sloan Foundation - 6

Social Security - 5

Social Security Number - 5

Environmental Protection Agency - 5

Employer Identification Numbers - 5

Special Sworn Status - 5

United States Census Bureau - 5

Department of Commerce - 5

Survey of Income and Program Participation - 4

Research Data Center - 4

AKM - 4

Journal of Labor Economics - 4

Department of Agriculture - 4

Service Annual Survey - 4

Journal of Economic Literature - 4

Department of Labor - 4

Medical Expenditure Panel Survey - 4

Boston Research Data Center - 4

Detailed Earnings Records - 3

Protected Identification Key - 3

Social and Economic Supplement - 3

Organization for Economic Cooperation and Development - 3

Annual Business Survey - 3

Quarterly Census of Employment and Wages - 3

Accommodation and Food Services - 3

MIT Press - 3

Columbia University - 3

Energy Information Administration - 3

Housing and Urban Development - 3

National Research Council - 3

LEHD Program - 3

University of Maryland - 3

Economic Research Service - 3

Census Bureau Business Register - 3

American Immigration Council - 3

Center for Administrative Records Research - 3

IQR - 3

Federal Government - 3

Manufacturing Energy Consumption Survey - 3

Quarterly Journal of Economics - 3

American Economic Review - 3

Michigan Institute for Teaching and Research in Economics - 3

PAOC - 3

Pollution Abatement Costs and Expenditures - 3

New York University - 3

Permanent Plant Number - 3

estimating - 72

econometric - 36

production - 29

economist - 27

expenditure - 26

growth - 24

regression - 23

manufacturing - 20

estimator - 19

earnings - 19

demand - 19

macroeconomic - 18

statistical - 17

labor - 17

aggregate - 15

produce - 14

survey - 13

endogeneity - 13

revenue - 13

recession - 12

investment - 11

employed - 11

employ - 11

market - 11

data - 10

respondent - 10

salary - 10

industrial - 10

quarterly - 10

gdp - 10

sale - 10

payroll - 9

estimates production - 9

workforce - 9

economically - 9

census bureau - 8

spillover - 8

unobserved - 8

econometrician - 8

productivity growth - 8

depreciation - 8

efficiency - 8

average - 7

manufacturer - 7

regressing - 7

industry productivity - 7

productivity measures - 7

trend - 7

productive - 7

agency - 7

population - 6

innovation - 6

productivity dynamics - 6

estimates employment - 6

employee - 6

statistician - 6

elasticity - 6

data census - 6

microdata - 6

neighborhood - 6

imputation - 6

empirical - 6

inference - 6

survey data - 5

subsidy - 5

regressors - 5

technological - 5

growth productivity - 5

rates productivity - 5

report - 5

state - 5

regress - 5

sector - 5

measures productivity - 5

accounting - 5

incorporated - 5

metropolitan - 5

utilization - 5

endogenous - 5

census research - 5

aggregation - 5

plant productivity - 5

autoregressive - 5

estimates productivity - 5

sampling - 4

earner - 4

monopolistic - 4

exporter - 4

company - 4

factory - 4

wages productivity - 4

housing - 4

analysis - 4

bias - 4

econometrically - 4

disclosure - 4

factor productivity - 4

productivity estimates - 4

resident - 4

exogeneity - 4

industries estimate - 4

impact - 4

worker - 4

wage changes - 4

imputed - 4

quantity - 4

cost - 4

profit - 4

earn - 4

assessed - 4

regulation - 4

model - 4

establishment - 4

employment growth - 4

employment wages - 4

ssa - 3

sample - 3

survey income - 3

population survey - 3

export - 3

exporting - 3

exported - 3

inventory - 3

patent - 3

patenting - 3

employment estimates - 3

policymakers - 3

residence - 3

forecast - 3

productivity dispersion - 3

indicator - 3

productivity size - 3

firms productivity - 3

aggregate productivity - 3

manufacturing productivity - 3

confidentiality - 3

privacy - 3

competitor - 3

economic census - 3

finance - 3

larger firms - 3

wage regressions - 3

public - 3

spending - 3

regional - 3

heterogeneity - 3

wage data - 3

enterprise - 3

financial - 3

investing - 3

consumption - 3

emission - 3

employment data - 3

insurance - 3

employment count - 3

disadvantaged - 3

fiscal - 3

enrollment - 3

household income - 3

imputation model - 3

tax - 3

compensation - 3

earns - 3

regulatory - 3

pollution - 3

environmental regulation - 3

epa - 3

environmental - 3

pollutant - 3

merger - 3

labor productivity - 3

productivity wage - 3

substitute - 3

productivity plants - 3

labor statistics - 3

capital - 3

employment dynamics - 3

layoff - 3

profitability - 3

employing - 3

regulation productivity - 3

longitudinal - 3

observed productivity - 3

analysis productivity - 3

Viewing papers 21 through 30 of 91


  • Working Paper

    Recalculating... : How Uncertainty in Local Labor Market Definitions Affects Empirical Findings

    January 2017

    Working Paper Number:

    CES-17-49R

    This paper evaluates the use of commuting zones as a local labor market definition. We revisit Tolbert and Sizer (1996) and demonstrate the sensitivity of definitions to two features of the methodology: a cluster dissimilarity cutoff, or the count of clusters, and uncertainty in the input data. We show how these features impact empirical estimates using a standard application of commuting zones and an example from related literature. We conclude with advice to researchers on how to demonstrate the robustness of empirical findings to uncertainty in the definition of commuting zones
    View Full Paper PDF
  • Working Paper

    Macro and Micro Dynamics of Productivity: From Devilish Details to Insights

    January 2017

    Working Paper Number:

    CES-17-41R

    Researchers use a variety of methods to estimate total factor productivity (TFP) at the firm level and, while these may seem broadly equivalent, how the resulting measures relate to the TFP concept in theoretical models depends on the assumptions about the environment in which firms operate. Interpreting these measures and drawing insights based upon their characteristics thus must take into account these conceptual differences. Absent data on prices and quantities, most methods yield 'revenue productivity' measures. We focus on two broad classes of revenue productivity measures in our examination of the relationship between measured and conceptual TFP (TFPQ). The first measure has been increasingly used as a measure of idiosyncratic distortions and to assess the degree of misallocation. The second measure is, under standard assumptions, a function of funda- mentals (e.g., TFPQ). Using plant-level U.S. manufacturing data, we find these alternative measures are (i) highly correlated; (ii) exhibit similar dispersion; and (iii) have similar relationships with growth and survival. These findings raise questions about interpreting the first measure as a measure of idiosyncratic distortions. We also explore the sensitivity of estimates of the contribution of reallocation to aggregate productivity growth to these alternative approaches. We use recently developed structural decompositions of aggregate productivity growth that depend critically on estimates of output versus revenue elasticities. We find alternative approaches all yield a significant contribution of reallocation to productivity growth (although the quantitative contribution varies across approaches).
    View Full Paper PDF
  • Working Paper

    An Empirical Analysis of Capacity Costs

    January 2017

    Working Paper Number:

    CES-17-26

    A central premise of management accounting is that including the cost of unused capacity in product costs can distort these costs and misguide users. Yet, there is little large-scale empirical evidence on the materiality of the cost of unused capacity. This study uses a confidential Census sample of 151,900 U.S. manufacturing plants from 1974-2011 to investigate the impact of separating the cost of unused capacity. We find that excluding the cost of unused capacity increases operating profit margins by approximately 26 percent. This order of magnitude is economically significant, and is pervasive across industries and over time. In additional analyses, we find that separating the cost of unused capacity largely smooths the time-series variation in unitized product costs and profit margins. Our finding of higher mean and lower variation of adjusted margins should be of considerable interest to both investors and managers.
    View Full Paper PDF
  • Working Paper

    Industrial Investments in Energy Efficiency: A Good Idea?

    January 2017

    Authors: Mary Jialin Li

    Working Paper Number:

    CES-17-05

    Yes, from an energy-saving perspective. No, once we factor in the negative output and productivity adoption effects. These are the main conclusions we reach by conducting the first large-scale study on cogeneration technology adoption ' a prominent form of energy-saving investments ' in the U.S. manufacturing sector, using a sample that runs from 1982 to 2010 and drawing on multiple data sources from the U.S. Census Bureau and the U.S. Energy Information Administration. We first show through a series of event studies that no differential trends exist in energy consumption nor production activities between adopters and never-adopters prior to the adoption event. We then compute a distribution of realized returns to energy savings, using accounting methods and regression methods, based on our difference-in-difference estimator. We find that (1) significant heterogeneity exists in returns; (2) unlike previous studies in the residential sector, the realized and projected returns to energy savings are roughly consistent in the industrial sector, for both private and social returns; (3) however, cogeneration adoption decreases manufacturing output and productivity persistently for at least the next 7-10 years, relative to the control group. Our IV strategies also show sizable decline in TFP post adoption.
    View Full Paper PDF
  • Working Paper

    Revisiting the Effects of Unemployment Insurance Extensions on Unemployment: A Measurement Error-Corrected Regression Discontinuity Approach

    March 2016

    Working Paper Number:

    carra-2016-01

    The extension of Unemployment Insurance (UI) benefits was a key policy response to the Great Recession. However, these benefit extensions may have had detrimental labor market effects. While evidence on the individual labor supply response indicates small effects on unemployment, recent work by Hagedorn et al. (2015) uses a county border pair identification strategy to find that the total effects inclusive of effects on labor demand are substantially larger. By focusing on variation within border county pairs, this identification strategy requires counties in the pairs to be similar in terms of unobservable factors. We explore this assumption using an alternative regression discontinuity approach that controls for changes in unobservables by distance to the border. To do so, we must account for measurement error induced by using county-level aggregates. These new results provide no evidence of a large change in unemployment induced by differences in UI generosity across state boundaries. Further analysis suggests that individuals respond to UI benefit differences across boundaries by targeting job search in high-benefit states, thereby raising concerns of treatment spillovers in this setting. Taken together, these two results suggest that the effect of UI benefit extensions on unemployment remains an open question.
    View Full Paper PDF
  • Working Paper

    Introduction of Head Start and Maternal Labor Supply: Evidence from a Regression Discontinuity Design

    January 2016

    Authors: Cuiping Long

    Working Paper Number:

    CES-16-35

    I use the non-public decennial censuses in 1970 to investigate the effect of the Head Start program on maternal labor supply and schooling in its early years. I exploit a discontinuity in county-level Head Start funding beginning in the late 1960s to explore differences in countylevel maternal employment and maternal schooling. The results provide suggestive evidence that the more availability of Head Start led to an increase the nursery school enrollment of children and a decrease in maternal labor supply. In addition, the ITT estimates imply a relatively large, negative effect of enrollment on maternal labor supply. However, the estimates are somewhat sensitive to addition of covariates and the standard errors are also large to draw firm inferences.
    View Full Paper PDF
  • Working Paper

    Data in Action: Data-Driven Decision Making in U.S. Manufacturing

    January 2016

    Working Paper Number:

    CES-16-06

    Manufacturing in America has become significantly more data-intensive. We investigate the adoption, performance effects and organizational complementarities of data-driven decision making (DDD) in the U.S. Using data collected by the Census Bureau for 2005 and 2010, we observe the extent to which manufacturing firms track and use data to guide decision making, as well as their investments in information technology (IT) and the use of other structured management practices. Examining a representative sample of over 18,000 plans, we find that adoption of DDD is earlier and more prevalent among larger, older plants belonging to multi-unit firms. Smaller single-establishment firms adopt later but have a higher correlation with performance than similar non-adopters. Using a fixed-effects estimator, we find the average value-added for later DDD adopters to be 3% greater than non-adopters, controlling for other inputs to production. This effect is distinct from that associated with IT and other structured management practices and is concentrated among single-unit firms. Performance improves after plants adopt DDD, but not before ' consistent with a causal relationship. However, DDD-related performance differentials decrease over time for early and late adopters, consistent with firm learning and development of organizational complementarities. Formal complementarity tests suggest that DDD and high levels of IT capital reinforce each other, as do DDD and skilled workers. For some industries, the benefits of DDD adoption appear to be greater for plants that delegate some decision making to frontline workers.
    View Full Paper PDF
  • Working Paper

    Estimation and Inference in Regression Discontinuity Designs with Clustered Sampling

    August 2015

    Working Paper Number:

    carra-2015-06

    Regression Discontinuity (RD) designs have become popular in empirical studies due to their attractive properties for estimating causal effects under transparent assumptions. Nonetheless, most popular procedures assume i.i.d. data, which is not reasonable in many common applications. To relax this assumption, we derive the properties of traditional non-parametric estimators in a setting that incorporates potential clustering at the level of the running variable, and propose an accompanying optimal-MSE bandwidth selection rule. Simulation results demonstrate that falsely assuming data are i.i.d. when selecting the bandwidth may lead to the choice of bandwidths that are too small relative to the optimal-MSE bandwidth. Last, we apply our procedure using person-level microdata that exhibits clustering at the census tract level to analyze the impact of the Low-Income Housing Tax Credit program on neighborhood characteristics and low-income housing supply.
    View Full Paper PDF
  • Working Paper

    Modeling Endogenous Mobility in Wage Determiniation

    June 2015

    Working Paper Number:

    CES-15-18

    We evaluate the bias from endogenous job mobility in fixed-effects estimates of worker- and firm-specific earnings heterogeneity using longitudinally linked employer-employee data from the LEHD infrastructure file system of the U.S. Census Bureau. First, we propose two new residual diagnostic tests of the assumption that mobility is exogenous to unmodeled determinants of earnings. Both tests reject exogenous mobility. We relax the exogenous mobility assumptions by modeling the evolution of the matched data as an evolving bipartite graph using a Bayesian latent class framework. Our results suggest that endogenous mobility biases estimated firm effects toward zero. To assess validity, we match our estimates of the wage components to out-of-sample estimates of revenue per worker. The corrected estimates attribute much more of the variation in revenue per worker to variation in match quality and worker quality than the uncorrected estimates.
    View Full Paper PDF
  • Working Paper

    USING IMPUTATION TECHNIQUES TO EVALUATE STOPPING RULES IN ADAPTIVE SURVEY DESIGN

    October 2014

    Working Paper Number:

    CES-14-40

    Adaptive Design methods for social surveys utilize the information from the data as it is collected to make decisions about the sampling design. In some cases, the decision is either to continue or stop the data collection. We evaluate this decision by proposing measures to compare the collected data with follow-up samples. The options are assessed by imputation of the nonrespondents under different missingness scenarios, including Missing Not at Random. The variation in the utility measures is compared to the cost induced by the follow-up sample sizes. We apply the proposed method to the 2007 U.S. Census of Manufacturers.
    View Full Paper PDF