CREAT: Census Research Exploration and Analysis Tool

Papers Containing Keywords(s): 'layoff'

The following papers contain search terms that you selected. From the papers listed below, you can navigate to the PDF, the profile page for that working paper, or see all the working papers written by an author. You can also explore tags, keywords, and authors that occur frequently within these papers.
Click here to search again

Frequently Occurring Concepts within this Search

Bureau of Labor Statistics - 24

Longitudinal Employer Household Dynamics - 23

Current Population Survey - 19

Employer Identification Numbers - 13

Alfred P Sloan Foundation - 12

Standard Industrial Classification - 12

Longitudinal Business Database - 11

North American Industry Classification System - 11

Ordinary Least Squares - 11

Center for Economic Studies - 10

Internal Revenue Service - 10

Federal Reserve Bank - 9

Annual Survey of Manufactures - 9

National Science Foundation - 8

Quarterly Census of Employment and Wages - 7

Census of Manufactures - 7

National Bureau of Economic Research - 7

Longitudinal Research Database - 7

Unemployment Insurance - 6

Social Security Administration - 6

Quarterly Workforce Indicators - 6

Survey of Income and Program Participation - 6

Chicago Census Research Data Center - 6

Census Bureau Disclosure Review Board - 5

Federal Reserve System - 5

Standard Statistical Establishment List - 5

Labor Turnover Survey - 5

JOLTS - 5

Cornell University - 5

Herfindahl Hirschman Index - 4

Federal Statistical Research Data Center - 4

Total Factor Productivity - 4

Social Security - 4

Retail Trade - 4

Local Employment Dynamics - 4

Metropolitan Statistical Area - 4

University of Maryland - 4

Special Sworn Status - 4

County Business Patterns - 3

Employer Characteristics File - 3

Oil and Gas Extraction - 3

Decennial Census - 3

Technical Services - 3

Successor Predecessor File - 3

American Community Survey - 3

AKM - 3

Agriculture, Forestry - 3

Census Bureau Business Register - 3

Social Security Disability Insurance - 3

National Longitudinal Survey of Youth - 3

Federal Reserve Bank of Chicago - 3

Disability Insurance - 3

Bureau of Economic Analysis - 3

National Institute on Aging - 3

American Economic Association - 3

2010 Census - 3

New York Times - 3

Center for Research in Security Prices - 3

Permanent Plant Number - 3

Business Employment Dynamics - 3

Economic Census - 3

Journal of Economic Literature - 3

LEHD Program - 3

Viewing papers 21 through 30 of 43


  • Working Paper

    The United States Labor Market: Status Quo or A New Normal?

    September 2012

    Working Paper Number:

    CES-12-28

    The recession of 2007-09 witnessed high rates of unemployment that have been slow to recede. This has led many to conclude that structural changes have occurred in the labor market and that the economy will not return to the low rates of unemployment that prevailed in the recent past. Is this true? The question is important because central banks may be able to reduce unemployment that is cyclic in nature, but not that which is structural. An analysis of labor market data suggests that there are no structural changes that can explain movements in unemployment rates over recent years. Neither industrial nor demographic shifts nor a mismatch of skills with job vacancies is behind the increased rates of unemployment. Although mismatch increased during the recession, it retreated at the same rate. The patterns observed are consistent with unemployment being caused by cyclic phenomena that are more pronounced during the current recession than in prior recessions.
    View Full Paper PDF
  • Working Paper

    Job-to-Job Flows and the Business Cycle

    March 2012

    Working Paper Number:

    CES-12-04

    Job-to-job flows represent one of the most significant opportunities for the development of new economic statistics, having been made possible by the increased availability of matched employer-employee datasets for statistical tabulation. In this paper, we analyze a new database of job-to-job flows from 1999 to 2010 in the United States. This analysis provides definitive benchmarks on gross employment flows, origin and destination industries, nonemployment, and associated earnings. To demonstrate the usefulness of these statistics, we evaluate them in the context of the recessions of 2001 and 2007, as well as the economic expansion between the two. We find a sharp drop in job mobility in the Great Recession, much sharper than the previous recession, and higher earnings penalties for job transitions with an intervening nonemployment spell. This fall in job mobility is found within all age groups but is largest among younger workers. We also examine outcomes for displaced workers and examine labor market adjustment in several specific industries. Generally, we find higher rates of nonemployment upon job separation, increasing rates of industry change and higher earnings penalties from job change in the Great Recession.
    View Full Paper PDF
  • Working Paper

    Acquiring Labor

    October 2011

    Working Paper Number:

    CES-11-32

    We present evidence that some firms pursue M&A activity with the objective of obtaining a larger workforce. Firms most likely to be acquired for their large labor force, firms with the largest ex ante employment, are associated with more positive post-merger employment outcomes. Moreover, we find this relation is strongest when acquiring labor outside of an M&A is likely to be most difficult, due to tight labor conditions, or most valuable, in high human capital industries. We further find that high employment target firms are associated with relatively greater post-merger wage increases and lower post-merger employee turnover. We find no evidence that the positive relation between target ex ante employment and ex post employment change is driven by target asset size, market capitalization, industry, profitability or acquirer characteristics. Our findings do not exclude the possibility that a different subset of M&A activity may be motivated to penalize managers who have tolerated over-employment. Indeed, we find evidence consistent with this disciplinary motivation when considering acquisitions of targets in declining industries.
    View Full Paper PDF
  • Working Paper

    Professional Employer Organizations: What Are They, Who Uses Them and Why Should We Care?

    September 2010

    Working Paper Number:

    CES-10-22

    More and more U.S. workers are counted as employees of firms that they do not actually work for. Among such workers are those who staffed by temporary help service (THS) agencies and leased employees who are on the payroll of professional employment organizations (PEOs) but work for PEOs' client firms. While several papers study firms' use of THS services, few examine firms' use of PEO services. In this article, we summarize PEOs' business practices and examine how the intensity of their use varies across industries, geographic areas, and establishment characteristics using both public and confidential data.
    View Full Paper PDF
  • Working Paper

    National Estimates of Gross Employment and Job Flows from the Quarterly Workforce Indicators with Demographic and Industry Detail

    June 2010

    Working Paper Number:

    CES-10-11

    The Quarterly Workforce Indicators (QWI) are local labor market data produced and released every quarter by the United States Census Bureau. Unlike any other local labor market series produced in the U.S. or the rest of the world, the QWI measure employment flows for workers (accession and separations), jobs (creations and destructions) and earnings for demographic subgroups (age and gender), economic industry (NAICS industry groups), detailed geography (block (experimental), county, Core- Based Statistical Area, and Workforce Investment Area), and ownership (private, all) with fully interacted publication tables. The current QWI data cover 47 states, about 98% of the private workforce in those states, and about 92% of all private employment in the entire economy. State participation is sufficiently extensive to permit us to present the first national estimates constructed from these data. We focus on worker, job, and excess (churning) reallocation rates, rather than on levels of the basic variables. This permits comparison to existing series from the Job Openings and Labor Turnover Survey and the Business Employment Dynamics Series from the Bureau of Labor Statistics. The national estimates from the QWI are an important enhancement to existing series because they include demographic and industry detail for both worker and job flow data compiled from underlying micro-data that have been integrated at the job and establishment levels by the Longitudinal Employer-Household Dynamics Program at the Census Bureau. The estimates presented herein were compiled exclusively from public-use data series and are available for download.
    View Full Paper PDF
  • Working Paper

    Understanding Earnings Instability: How Important are Employment Fluctuations and Job Changes?

    August 2009

    Working Paper Number:

    CES-09-20

    Using three panel datasets (the matched CPS, the SIPP, and the newly available Longitudinal Employment and Household Dynamics (LEHD) data), we examine trends in male earnings instability in recent decades. In contrast to several papers that find a recent upward trend in earnings instability using the PSID data, we find that earnings instability has been remarkably stable in the 1990s and the 2000s. We find that job changing rates remained relatively constant casting doubt on the importance of labor market 'churning.' We find some evidence that earnings instability increased among job stayers which lends credence to the view that greater reliance on incentive pay increased instability of worker pay. We also find an offsetting decrease in earnings instability among job changers due largely to declining unemployment associated with job changes. One caveat to our findings is that we focus on men who have positive earnings in two adjacent years and thus ignore men who exit the labor force or re-enter after an extended period. Preliminary investigation suggests that ignoring these transitions understates the rise in earnings instability over the past two decades.
    View Full Paper PDF
  • Working Paper

    Estimating the "True" Cost of Job Loss: Evidence Using Matched Data from Califormia 1991-2000

    June 2009

    Working Paper Number:

    CES-09-14

    Estimates of the cost of job displacement from survey and administrative data differ markedly. This paper uses a unique match of data between the Displaced Worker Survey (DWS) and administrative wage records from California to examine the sources of this discrepancy. When we use similar estimation methods and account for measurement error in survey wages correlated with worker demographics, estimates of earnings losses at displacement are similar from both datasets and significantly larger than those based on the DWS alone. Also correcting for measurement errors in reported displacements suggests both sources of such estimates may yield lower bounds for the true cost of displacement.
    View Full Paper PDF
  • Working Paper

    Manufacturing Plants' Use of Temporary Workers: An Analysis Using Census Micro Data

    December 2008

    Working Paper Number:

    CES-08-40

    Using plant-level data from the Plant Capacity Utilization (PCU) Survey, we examine how manufacturing plants' use of temporary workers is associated with the nature of their output fluctuations and other plant characteristics. We find that plants tend to hire temporary workers when their output can be expected to fall, a result consistent with the notion that firms use temporary workers to reduce costs associated with dismissing permanent employees. In addition, we find that plants whose future output levels are subject to greater uncertainty tend to use more temporary workers. We also examine the effects of wage and benefit levels for permanent workers, unionization rates, turnover rates, seasonal factors, and plant size and age on the use of temporary workers; based on our results, we discuss various views of why firms use temporary workers.
    View Full Paper PDF
  • Working Paper

    Business Volatility, Job Destruction, and Unemployment

    August 2008

    Working Paper Number:

    CES-08-26

    Unemployment inflows fell from 4 percent of employment per month in the early 1980s to 2 percent or less by the mid 1990s and thereafter. U.S. data also show a secular decline in the job destruction rate and the volatility of firm-level employment growth rates. We interpret this decline as a decrease in the intensity of idiosyncratic labor demand shocks, a key parameter in search and matching models of unemployment. According to these models, a lower intensity of idiosyncratic shocks produces less job destruction, fewer workers flowing through the unemployment pool and less frictional unemployment. To evaluate the importance of this theoretical mechanism, we relate industry-level unemployment flows from 1977 to 2005 to industry-level indicators for the intensity of idiosyncratic shocks. Unlike previous research, we focus on the lower frequency relationship of job destruction and business volatility to unemployment flows. We find strong evidence that declines in the intensity of idiosyncratic labor demand shocks drove big declines in the incidence and rate of unemployment. This evidence implies that the unemployment rate has become much less sensitive to cyclical movements in the job-finding rate.
    View Full Paper PDF
  • Working Paper

    Private Equity and Employment

    March 2008

    Working Paper Number:

    CES-08-07R

    Private equity critics claim that leveraged buyouts bring huge job losses. To investigate this claim, we construct and analyze a new dataset that covers U.S. private equity transactions from 1980 to 2005. We track 3,200 target firms and their 150,000 establishments before and after acquisition, comparing outcomes to controls similar in terms of industry, size, age, and prior growth. Relative to controls, employment at target establishments declines 3 percent over two years post buyout and 6 percent over five years. The job losses are concentrated among public-to-private buyouts, and transactions involving firms in the service and retail sectors. But target firms also create more new jobs at new establishments, and they acquire and divest establishments more rapidly. When we consider these additional adjustment margins, net relative job losses at target firms are less than 1 percent of initial employment. In contrast, the sum of gross job creation and destruction at target firms exceeds that of controls by 13 percent of employment over two years. In short, private equity buyouts catalyze the creative destruction process in the labor market, with only a modest net impact on employment. The creative destruction response mainly involves a more rapid reallocation of jobs across establishments within target firms.
    View Full Paper PDF