CREAT: Census Research Exploration and Analysis Tool

Papers Containing Keywords(s): 'report'

The following papers contain search terms that you selected. From the papers listed below, you can navigate to the PDF, the profile page for that working paper, or see all the working papers written by an author. You can also explore tags, keywords, and authors that occur frequently within these papers.
Click here to search again

Frequently Occurring Concepts within this Search

Center for Economic Studies - 33

Bureau of Labor Statistics - 32

North American Industry Classification System - 31

Internal Revenue Service - 26

National Science Foundation - 26

Longitudinal Employer Household Dynamics - 18

Longitudinal Business Database - 18

Employer Identification Numbers - 18

Census Bureau Disclosure Review Board - 17

Annual Survey of Manufactures - 17

Economic Census - 17

Standard Industrial Classification - 16

American Community Survey - 15

Business Register - 15

Current Population Survey - 15

Social Security Administration - 15

Cornell University - 14

Federal Statistical Research Data Center - 14

Disclosure Review Board - 13

Quarterly Workforce Indicators - 13

Bureau of Economic Analysis - 13

Service Annual Survey - 13

County Business Patterns - 12

Quarterly Census of Employment and Wages - 12

Research Data Center - 12

Census of Manufactures - 11

Longitudinal Research Database - 11

Federal Reserve Bank - 9

Census Bureau Business Register - 9

Social Security Number - 8

Decennial Census - 8

Local Employment Dynamics - 8

Standard Statistical Establishment List - 8

Management and Organizational Practices Survey - 7

LEHD Program - 7

Metropolitan Statistical Area - 7

Business Dynamics Statistics - 7

Social Security - 7

Census Bureau Longitudinal Business Database - 7

Small Business Administration - 7

Alfred P Sloan Foundation - 7

Survey of Income and Program Participation - 7

National Bureau of Economic Research - 6

Securities and Exchange Commission - 6

Company Organization Survey - 6

Master Address File - 6

Postal Service - 6

Protected Identification Key - 6

Special Sworn Status - 6

Department of Labor - 6

American Statistical Association - 6

Total Factor Productivity - 5

2010 Census - 5

Multiple Worksite Report - 5

LODES - 5

Financial, Insurance and Real Estate Industries - 5

Unemployment Insurance - 5

University of Chicago - 5

Ordinary Least Squares - 5

Cornell Institute for Social and Economic Research - 5

Michigan Institute for Teaching and Research in Economics - 4

Individual Characteristics File - 4

Census of Manufacturing Firms - 4

Characteristics of Business Owners - 4

Accommodation and Food Services - 4

COVID-19 - 4

Department of Health and Human Services - 4

Board of Governors - 4

LEHD Origin-Destination Employment Statistics - 4

Sloan Foundation - 4

Department of Commerce - 4

Medical Expenditure Panel Survey - 4

Permanent Plant Number - 4

Chicago Census Research Data Center - 4

Journal of Economic Literature - 4

Organization for Economic Cooperation and Development - 4

Department of Education - 3

Stanford University - 3

Cobb-Douglas - 3

Wholesale Trade - 3

Employer Characteristics File - 3

Composite Person Record - 3

Office of Management and Budget - 3

Arts, Entertainment - 3

Annual Business Survey - 3

Federal Statistical System - 3

National Center for Health Statistics - 3

Centers for Disease Control and Prevention - 3

Federal Reserve System - 3

National Institute on Aging - 3

International Trade Research Report - 3

University of Maryland - 3

Census Bureau Center for Economic Studies - 3

Kauffman Foundation - 3

Review of Economics and Statistics - 3

American Economic Review - 3

Information and Communication Technology Survey - 3

Establishment Micro Properties - 3

Business Master File - 3

Bureau of Labor - 3

American Economic Association - 3

Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality - 3

Statistics Canada - 3

Auxiliary Establishment Survey - 3

survey - 30

statistical - 26

respondent - 24

census bureau - 22

data - 22

payroll - 19

agency - 19

data census - 18

microdata - 18

population - 14

record - 14

census data - 14

employed - 14

quarterly - 14

disclosure - 13

workforce - 13

analysis - 12

use census - 11

reporting - 11

employ - 11

research census - 10

estimating - 10

aggregate - 10

employee - 10

enterprise - 10

study - 9

economic census - 9

labor - 9

sector - 9

research - 9

earnings - 9

researcher - 9

census employment - 8

census survey - 8

datasets - 8

econometric - 8

irs - 7

prevalence - 7

employment statistics - 7

federal - 7

census research - 7

confidentiality - 7

information - 7

manufacturing - 7

longitudinal - 7

business data - 7

imputation - 7

sale - 7

statistician - 7

privacy - 7

revenue - 6

employment data - 6

2010 census - 6

coverage - 6

recession - 6

database - 6

organizational - 6

aggregation - 6

expenditure - 6

statistical agencies - 6

labor statistics - 6

percentile - 5

accounting - 5

work census - 5

information census - 5

company - 5

estimation - 5

economist - 5

market - 5

department - 5

discrepancy - 5

export - 5

macroeconomic - 5

yearly - 5

incorporated - 5

trend - 5

employment count - 5

average - 5

state - 4

enrollee - 4

www census - 4

assessed - 4

census disclosure - 4

censuses surveys - 4

employee data - 4

census years - 4

employment estimates - 4

assessing - 4

medicaid - 4

production - 4

census use - 4

workplace - 4

employment measures - 4

manager - 4

tenure - 4

firms census - 4

management - 4

sample census - 4

insurance - 4

statistical disclosure - 4

industrial - 4

aging - 4

worker - 4

ethnicity - 3

hispanic - 3

enrollment - 3

enrolled - 3

productive - 3

financial - 3

efficiency - 3

gdp - 3

decade - 3

investment - 3

impact - 3

residential - 3

resident - 3

estimates employment - 3

policymakers - 3

medicare - 3

publicly - 3

available census - 3

salary - 3

employment earnings - 3

productivity growth - 3

manufacturer - 3

acquisition - 3

businesses census - 3

workforce indicators - 3

import - 3

exporting - 3

exporter - 3

surveys censuses - 3

filing - 3

individuals census - 3

uninsured - 3

establishment - 3

performance - 3

analyst - 3

firms export - 3

firms exporting - 3

measure - 3

census business - 3

empirical - 3

Viewing papers 21 through 30 of 65


  • Working Paper

    Disclosure Avoidance Techniques Used for the 1970 through 2010 Decennial Censuses of Population and Housing

    November 2018

    Authors: Laura McKenna

    Working Paper Number:

    CES-18-47

    The U.S. Census Bureau conducts the decennial censuses under Title 13 of the U. S. Code with the Section 9 mandate to not 'use the information furnished under the provisions of this title for any purpose other than the statistical purposes for which it is supplied; or make any publication whereby the data furnished by any particular establishment or individual under this title can be identified; or permit anyone other than the sworn officers and employees of the Department or bureau or agency thereof to examine the individual reports (13 U.S.C. ' 9 (2007)).' The Census Bureau applies disclosure avoidance techniques to its publicly released statistical products in order to protect the confidentiality of its respondents and their data.
    View Full Paper PDF
  • Working Paper

    Total Error and Variability Measures with Integrated Disclosure Limitation for Quarterly Workforce Indicators and LEHD Origin Destination Employment Statistics in On The Map

    January 2017

    Working Paper Number:

    CES-17-71

    We report results from the rst comprehensive total quality evaluation of five major indicators in the U.S. Census Bureau's Longitudinal Employer-Household Dynamics (LEHD) Program Quarterly Workforce Indicators (QWI): total employment, beginning-of-quarter employment, full-quarter employment, total payroll, and average monthly earnings of full-quarter employees. Beginning-of-quarter employment is also the main tabulation variable in the LEHD Origin-Destination Employment Statistics (LODES) workplace reports as displayed in OnTheMap (OTM). The evaluation is conducted by generating multiple threads of the edit and imputation models used in the LEHD Infrastructure File System. These threads conform to the Rubin (1987) multiple imputation model, with each thread or implicate being the output of formal probability models that address coverage, edit, and imputation errors. Design-based sampling variability and nite population corrections are also included in the evaluation. We derive special formulas for the Rubin total variability and its components that are consistent with the disclosure avoidance system used for QWI and LODES/OTM workplace reports. These formulas allow us to publish the complete set of detailed total quality measures for QWI and LODES. The analysis reveals that the five publication variables under study are estimated very accurately for tabulations involving at least 10 jobs. Tabulations involving three to nine jobs have quality in the range generally deemed acceptable. Tabulations involving zero, one or two jobs, which are generally suppressed in the QWI and synthesized in LODES, have substantial total variability but their publication in LODES allows the formation of larger custom aggregations, which will in general have the accuracy estimated for tabulations in the QWI based on a similar number of workers.
    View Full Paper PDF
  • Working Paper

    Effects of a Government-Academic Partnership: Has the NSF-Census Bureau Research Network Helped Improve the U.S. Statistical System?

    January 2017

    Working Paper Number:

    CES-17-59R

    The National Science Foundation-Census Bureau Research Network (NCRN) was established in 2011 to create interdisciplinary research nodes on methodological questions of interest and significance to the broader research community and to the Federal Statistical System (FSS), particularly the Census Bureau. The activities to date have covered both fundamental and applied statistical research and have focused at least in part on the training of current and future generations of researchers in skills of relevance to surveys and alternative measurement of economic units, households, and persons. This paper discusses some of the key research findings of the eight nodes, organized into six topics: (1) Improving census and survey data collection methods; (2) Using alternative sources of data; (3) Protecting privacy and confidentiality by improving disclosure avoidance; (4) Using spatial and spatio-temporal statistical modeling to improve estimates; (5) Assessing data cost and quality tradeoffs; and (6) Combining information from multiple sources. It also reports on collaborations across nodes and with federal agencies, new software developed, and educational activities and outcomes. The paper concludes with an evaluation of the ability of the FSS to apply the NCRN's research outcomes and suggests some next steps, as well as the implications of this research-network model for future federal government renewal initiatives.
    View Full Paper PDF
  • Working Paper

    Who Files for Personal Bankruptcy in the United States?

    January 2017

    Authors: Jonathan Fisher

    Working Paper Number:

    CES-17-54

    Who files for bankruptcy in the United States is not well understood. Previous research relied on small samples from national surveys or a small number of states from administrative records. I use over 10 million administrative bankruptcy records linked to the 2000 Decennial Census and the 2001-2009 American Community Surveys to understand who files for personal bankruptcy. Bankruptcy filers are middle income, more likely to be divorced, more likely to be black, more likely to have terminal high school degree or some college, and more likely to be middle-aged. Bankruptcy filers are more likely to be employed than the U.S. as a whole, and they are more likely to be employed 50-52 weeks. The bankruptcy population is aging faster than the U.S. population as a whole. Lastly, using the pseudo-panels I study what happens in the years around bankruptcy. Individuals are likely to get divorced in the years before bankruptcy and then remarry. Income falls before bankruptcy and then rises after bankruptcy.
    View Full Paper PDF
  • Working Paper

    Decennial Census Return Rates: The Role of Social Capital

    January 2017

    Working Paper Number:

    CES-17-39

    This paper explores how useful information about social and civic engagement (social capital) might be to the U.S. Census Bureau in their efforts to improve predictions of mail return rates for the Decennial Census (DC) at the census tract level. Through construction of Hard-to-count (HRC) scores and multivariate analysis, we find that if information about social capital were available, predictions of response rates would be marginally improved.
    View Full Paper PDF
  • Working Paper

    Medicare Coverage and Reporting

    December 2016

    Working Paper Number:

    carra-2016-12

    Medicare coverage of the older population in the United States is widely recognized as being nearly universal. Recent statistics from the Current Population Survey Annual Social and Economic Supplement (CPS ASEC) indicate that 93 percent of individuals aged 65 and older were covered by Medicare in 2013. Those without Medicare include those who are not eligible for the public health program, though the CPS ASEC estimate may also be impacted by misreporting. Using linked data from the CPS ASEC and Medicare Enrollment Database (i.e., the Medicare administrative data), we estimate the extent to which individuals misreport their Medicare coverage. We focus on those who report having Medicare but are not enrolled (false positives) and those who do not report having Medicare but are enrolled (false negatives). We use regression analyses to evaluate factors associated with both types of misreporting including socioeconomic, demographic, and household characteristics. We then provide estimates of the implied Medicare-covered, insured, and uninsured older population, taking into account misreporting in the CPS ASEC. We find an undercount in the CPS ASEC estimates of the Medicare covered population of 4.5 percent. This misreporting is not random - characteristics associated with misreporting include citizenship status, year of entry, labor force participation, Medicare coverage of others in the household, disability status, and imputation of Medicare responses. When we adjust the CPS ASEC estimates to account for misreporting, Medicare coverage of the population aged 65 and older increases from 93.4 percent to 95.6 percent while the uninsured rate decreases from 1.4 percent to 1.3 percent.
    View Full Paper PDF
  • Working Paper

    Response Error & the Medicaid undercount in the CPS

    December 2016

    Working Paper Number:

    carra-2016-11

    The Current Population Survey Annual Social and Economic Supplement (CPS ASEC) is an important source for estimates of the uninsured population. Previous research has shown that survey estimates produce an undercount of beneficiaries compared to Medicaid enrollment records. We extend past work by examining the Medicaid undercount in the 2007-2011 CPS ASEC compared to enrollment data from the Medicaid Statistical Information System for calendar years 2006-2010. By linking individuals across datasets, we analyze two types of response error regarding Medicaid enrollment - false negative error and false positive error. We use regression analysis to identify factors associated with these two types of response error in the 2011 CPS ASEC. We find that the Medicaid undercount was between 22 and 31 percent from 2007 to 2011. In 2011, the false negative rate was 40 percent, and 27 percent of Medicaid reports in CPS ASEC were false positives. False negative error is associated with the duration of enrollment in Medicaid, enrollment in Medicare and private insurance, and Medicaid enrollment in the survey year. False positive error is associated with enrollment in Medicare and shared Medicaid coverage in the household. We discuss implications for survey reports of health insurance coverage and for estimating the uninsured population.
    View Full Paper PDF
  • Working Paper

    Using Partially Synthetic Microdata to Protect Sensitive Cells in Business Statistics

    February 2016

    Working Paper Number:

    CES-16-10

    We describe and analyze a method that blends records from both observed and synthetic microdata into public-use tabulations on establishment statistics. The resulting tables use synthetic data only in potentially sensitive cells. We describe different algorithms, and present preliminary results when applied to the Census Bureau's Business Dynamics Statistics and Synthetic Longitudinal Business Database, highlighting accuracy and protection afforded by the method when compared to existing public-use tabulations (with suppressions).
    View Full Paper PDF
  • Working Paper

    Food and Agricultural Industries: Opportunities for Improving Measurement and Reporting

    January 2016

    Working Paper Number:

    CES-16-58

    We measure one component of off-farm food and agricultural industries using establishment level microdata in the federal statistical system. We focus on services for crop production, and compare measures of firm and employment dynamics in this sector during the period 1992-2012 with county-level publicly available data for the same measures. Based on differences across data sources, we establish new facts regarding the evolution of food and agricultural industries, and demonstrate the value of working with confidential microdata. In addition to the data and results we present, we highlight possibilities for collaboration across universities and federal agencies to improve reporting in other segments of food and agricultural industries.
    View Full Paper PDF
  • Working Paper

    The Management and Organizational Practices Survey (MOPS): Cognitive Testing*

    January 2016

    Working Paper Number:

    CES-16-53

    All Census Bureau surveys must meet quality standards before they can be sent to the public for data collection. This paper outlines the pretesting process that was used to ensure that the Management and Organizational Practices Survey (MOPS) met those standards. The MOPS is the first large survey of management practices at U.S. manufacturing establishments. The first wave of the MOPS, issued for reference year 2010, was subject to internal expert review and two rounds of cognitive interviews. The results of this pretesting were used to make significant changes to the MOPS instrument and ensure that quality data was collected. The second wave of the MOPS, featuring new questions on data in decision making (DDD) and uncertainty and issued for reference year 2015, was subject to two rounds of cognitive interviews and a round of usability testing. This paper illustrates the effort undertaken by the Census Bureau to ensure that all surveys released into the field are of high quality and provides insight into how respondents interpret the MOPS questionnaire for those looking to utilize the MOPS data.
    View Full Paper PDF