CREAT: Census Research Exploration and Analysis Tool

Papers Containing Keywords(s): 'hiring'

The following papers contain search terms that you selected. From the papers listed below, you can navigate to the PDF, the profile page for that working paper, or see all the working papers written by an author. You can also explore tags, keywords, and authors that occur frequently within these papers.
Click here to search again

Frequently Occurring Concepts within this Search

Longitudinal Employer Household Dynamics - 49

Current Population Survey - 32

Bureau of Labor Statistics - 28

Longitudinal Business Database - 27

North American Industry Classification System - 26

Census Bureau Disclosure Review Board - 24

Ordinary Least Squares - 23

Employer Identification Numbers - 23

Center for Economic Studies - 21

Internal Revenue Service - 19

National Science Foundation - 19

Alfred P Sloan Foundation - 18

Decennial Census - 17

American Community Survey - 17

National Bureau of Economic Research - 17

Federal Statistical Research Data Center - 16

Quarterly Workforce Indicators - 16

Unemployment Insurance - 14

Quarterly Census of Employment and Wages - 13

Disclosure Review Board - 12

Federal Reserve Bank - 10

Department of Labor - 9

Protected Identification Key - 9

Metropolitan Statistical Area - 8

JOLTS - 8

International Trade Research Report - 8

Local Employment Dynamics - 8

AKM - 7

Special Sworn Status - 7

Cornell University - 7

Individual Characteristics File - 7

Business Dynamics Statistics - 7

Labor Turnover Survey - 7

American Economic Association - 7

Standard Statistical Establishment List - 7

American Economic Review - 7

University of Chicago - 7

Department of Homeland Security - 6

Integrated Longitudinal Business Database - 6

W-2 - 6

Business Register - 6

Social Security Administration - 6

NBER Summer Institute - 5

Educational Services - 5

Technical Services - 5

Core Based Statistical Area - 5

Census Bureau Business Register - 5

National Longitudinal Survey of Youth - 5

Social Security Number - 5

Standard Industrial Classification - 5

Employment History File - 5

Employer Characteristics File - 5

Research Data Center - 5

University of Maryland - 5

Bureau of Labor - 5

Bureau of Economic Analysis - 5

LEHD Program - 5

Annual Survey of Manufactures - 5

Survey of Income and Program Participation - 5

Chicago Census Research Data Center - 5

Standard Occupational Classification - 4

Agriculture, Forestry - 4

Professional Services - 4

New York University - 4

Department of Economics - 4

Successor Predecessor File - 4

Generalized Method of Moments - 4

Indian Health Service - 4

2010 Census - 4

Harvard University - 4

Journal of Political Economy - 4

Journal of Labor Economics - 4

Business Employment Dynamics - 4

Census of Manufactures - 4

Census of Manufacturing Firms - 4

Russell Sage Foundation - 4

National Institute on Aging - 4

Wholesale Trade - 3

Council of Economic Advisers - 3

Accommodation and Food Services - 3

COVID-19 - 3

Small Business Administration - 3

Organization for Economic Cooperation and Development - 3

Survey of Business Owners - 3

Health Care and Social Assistance - 3

Columbia University - 3

Social Security - 3

Cornell Institute for Social and Economic Research - 3

Employer-Household Dynamics - 3

Office of Management and Budget - 3

Harvard Business School - 3

Federal Reserve System - 3

Journal of Economic Literature - 3

Office of Personnel Management - 3

Person Validation System - 3

Quarterly Journal of Economics - 3

Service Annual Survey - 3

Business Register Bridge - 3

Total Factor Productivity - 3

Society of Labor Economists - 3

Journal of Econometrics - 3

Duke University - 3

Retail Trade - 3

Census Bureau Longitudinal Business Database - 3

Journal of Human Resources - 3

Sample Edited Detail File - 3

NICHD - 3

WECD - 3

employ - 53

employed - 51

workforce - 47

labor - 45

employee - 37

hire - 33

job - 29

worker - 29

earnings - 21

recession - 21

economist - 20

payroll - 19

employment growth - 18

unemployed - 15

econometric - 15

discrimination - 15

salary - 15

heterogeneity - 14

workplace - 14

occupation - 13

employment dynamics - 13

entrepreneurship - 12

minority - 12

bias - 11

employing - 11

tenure - 11

entrepreneur - 10

layoff - 10

earner - 9

trend - 9

unemployment rates - 9

endogeneity - 8

quarterly - 8

employment statistics - 8

turnover - 8

longitudinal employer - 8

segregation - 8

black - 7

hispanic - 7

estimating - 7

longitudinal - 7

immigrant - 7

survey - 7

disadvantaged - 7

establishment - 7

census employment - 7

entrepreneurial - 6

trends employment - 6

econometrician - 6

applicant - 6

immigration - 6

associate - 6

earn - 6

labor markets - 6

employment unemployment - 6

ethnic - 6

racial - 6

race - 6

shift - 6

labor statistics - 6

effects employment - 6

clerical - 6

census bureau - 6

employee data - 6

estimates employment - 5

career - 5

employment declines - 5

unobserved - 5

migrant - 5

organizational - 5

venture - 5

work census - 5

employment data - 5

worker demographics - 5

neighborhood - 5

transition - 5

ethnicity - 5

employment count - 5

recession employment - 5

wage data - 5

matching - 5

macroeconomic - 5

recessionary - 5

discriminatory - 5

proprietor - 4

employment trends - 4

agency - 4

opportunity - 4

growth - 4

startup - 4

employees startups - 4

startups employees - 4

employment estimates - 4

employment distribution - 4

wages employment - 4

segregated - 4

neighbor - 4

retirement - 4

woman - 4

decade - 4

employment recession - 4

employer household - 4

endogenous - 4

white - 4

measures employment - 3

regress - 3

state employment - 3

forecast - 3

specialization - 3

educated - 3

graduate - 3

business startups - 3

wage regressions - 3

residential - 3

employment effects - 3

worker wages - 3

employment wages - 3

workers earnings - 3

rent - 3

disparity - 3

gender - 3

employment changes - 3

department - 3

research census - 3

industrial - 3

heterogeneous - 3

wage variation - 3

wage effects - 3

effect wages - 3

network - 3

employment flows - 3

rates employment - 3

Viewing papers 21 through 30 of 80


  • Working Paper

    Eclipse of Rent-Sharing: The Effects of Managers' Business Education on Wages and the Labor Share in the US and Denmark

    December 2022

    Working Paper Number:

    CES-22-58

    This paper provides evidence from the US and Denmark that managers with a business degree ('business managers") reduce their employees' wages. Within five years of the appointment of a business manager, wages decline by 6% and the labor share by 5 percentage points in the US, and by 3% and 3 percentage points in Denmark. Firms appointing business managers are not on differential trends and do not enjoy higher output, investment, or employment growth thereafter. Using manager retirements and deaths and an IV strategy based on the diffusion of the practice of appointing business managers within industry, region and size quartile cells, we provide additional evidence that these are causal effects. We establish that the proximate cause of these (relative) wage effects are changes in rent-sharing practices following the appointment of business managers. Exploiting exogenous export demand shocks, we show that non-business managers share profits with their workers, whereas business managers do not. But consistent with our first set of results, these business managers show no greater ability to increase sales or profits in response to exporting opportunities. Finally, we use the influence of role models on college major choice to instrument for the decision to enroll in a business degree in Denmark and show that our estimates correspond to causal effects of practices and values acquired in business education--rather than the differential selection into business education of individuals unlikely to share rents with workers.
    View Full Paper PDF
  • Working Paper

    Is Affirmative Action in Employment Still Effective in the 21st Century?

    November 2022

    Working Paper Number:

    CES-22-54

    We study Executive Order 11246, an employment-based affirmative action policy tar geted at firms holding contracts with the federal government. We find this policy to be in effective in the 21st century, contrary to the positive effects found in the late 1900s (Miller, 2017). Our novel dataset combines data on federal contract acquisition and enforcement with US linked employer-employee Census data 2000'2014. We employ an event study around firms' acquiring a contract, based on Miller (2017), and find the policy had no ef fect on employment shares or on hiring, for any minority group. Next, we isolate the impact of the affirmative action plan, which is EO 11246's preeminent requirement that applies to firms with contracts over $50,000. Leveraging variation from this threshold in an event study and regression discontinuity design, we find similarly null effects. Last, we show that even randomized audits are not effective, suggesting weak enforcement. Our results highlight the importance of the recent budget increase for the enforcement agency, as well as recent policies enacted to improve compliance
    View Full Paper PDF
  • Working Paper

    Diversity and Labor Market Outcomes in the Economics Profession

    July 2022

    Working Paper Number:

    CES-22-26

    While the lack of gender and racial diversity in economics in academia (for students and professors) is well-established, less is known about the overall placement and earnings of economists by gender and race. Understanding demand-side factors is important, as improvements in the supply side by diversifying the pipeline alone may not be enough to improve equity in the profession. Using the Survey of Earned Doctorates (SED) linked to Longitudinal Employer-Household Dynamics (LEHD) jobs data, we examine placements and earnings for economists working in the U.S. after receiving a PhD by gender and race. We find enormous dispersion in pay for economists within and across sectors that grows over time. Female PhD economists earn about 12 percent less than their male colleagues on average; Black PhD economists earn about 15 percent less than their white counterparts on average; and overall underrepresented minority PhD economists earn about 8 percent less than their white counterparts. These pay disparities are attenuated in some sectors and when controlling for rank of PhD granting institution and employer.
    View Full Paper PDF
  • Working Paper

    Combining Rules and Discretion in Economic Development Policy: Evidence on the Impacts of the California Competes Tax Credit

    June 2021

    Working Paper Number:

    CES-21-13

    We evaluate the effects of one of a new generation of economic development programs, the California Competes Tax Credit (CCTC), on local job creation. Incorporating perceived best practices from previous initiatives, the CCTC combines explicit eligibility thresholds with some discretion on the part of program officials to select tax credit recipients. The structure and implementation of the program facilitates rigorous evaluation. We exploit detailed data on accepted and rejected applicants to the CCTC, including information on scoring of applicants with regard to program goals and funding decisions, together with restricted access American Community Survey (ACS) data on local economic conditions. Using a difference-in-differences approach, we find that each CCTC-incentivized job in a census tract increases the number of individuals working in that tract by over two ' a significant local multiplier. We also explore the program's distributional implications and impacts by industry. We find that CCTC awards increase employment among workers residing in both high income and low income communities, and that the local multipliers are larger for non-manufacturing awards than for manufacturing awards.
    View Full Paper PDF
  • Working Paper

    Whose Job Is It Anyway? Co-Ethnic Hiring in New U.S. Ventures

    March 2021

    Working Paper Number:

    CES-21-05

    We explore co-ethnic hiring among new ventures using U.S. administrative data. Co-ethnic hiring is ubiquitous among immigrant groups, averaging about 22.5% and ranging from 2% to 40%. Co-ethnic hiring grows with the size of the local ethnic workforce, greater linguistic distance to English, lower cultural/genetic similarity to U.S. natives, and in harsher policy environments for immigrants. Co ethnic hiring is remarkably persistent for ventures and for individuals. Co-ethnic hiring is associated with greater venture survival and growth when thick local ethnic employment surrounds the business. Our results are consistent with a blend of hiring due to information advantages within ethnic groups with some taste-based hiring.
    View Full Paper PDF
  • Working Paper

    Family-Leave Mandates and Female Labor at U.S. Firms: Evidence from a Trade Shock

    September 2020

    Working Paper Number:

    CES-20-25

    We study the role of family-leave mandates in shaping the gender composition at U.S. firms that experience a negative demand shock. In a regression discontinuity framework, we compare firms mandated to provide job-protected leave under the Family and Medical Leave Act (FMLA) and firms that are exempt from the law (non-FMLA) following the post-2001 surge in Chinese imports. Using confidential microdata on matched employers and employees in the U.S. non-farm private sector, we find that between 2000 and 2003, an increase in import competition decreases the share of female workers at FMLA compared to non-FMLA firms. The negative differential effect is driven by female workers in prime childbearing years, with less than college education, and is strongest at firms with all male managers. We find similar patterns in changes in the female share of earnings and promotions. These results suggest that, when traditional gender norms prevail, adverse shocks may exacerbate gender inequalities in the presence of job-protected leave mandates.
    View Full Paper PDF
  • Working Paper

    The Impact of 2010 Decennial Census Hiring on the Unemployment Rate

    June 2020

    Working Paper Number:

    CES-20-19

    The decennial census is the largest peacetime operation of the U.S. federal government. The Census Bureau hires hundreds of thousands of temporary workers to conduct the decennial census. The magnitude of this temporary workforce influences the national employment situation when enumeration efforts ramp up and when they recede. The impact of decennial census hiring on the headline number of payroll jobs added each month is well established, but previous work has not established how decennial census hiring affects the headline unemployment rate. We link the 2010 Decennial Applicant Personnel and Payroll System data to the 2010 American Community Survey to answer this question. We find that the large hiring surge in May 2010 came mostly from people already employed (40 percent) or from people who were unemployed (33 percent). We estimate that the workers hired for Census 2010 lowered the May 2010 unemployment rate by one-tenth of a percentage point relative to the counterfactual. This one-tenth of a percentage point is within the standard error for the official unemployment rate, and BLS press releases would denote a change in the unemployment rate of 0.1% or less as 'unchanged.' We also estimate that relative to the counterfactual, the more gradual changes in decennial census employment influenced the unemployment rate by less than one-tenth of a percentage point in every other month during 2010.
    View Full Paper PDF
  • Working Paper

    Earnings Growth, Job Flows and Churn

    April 2020

    Working Paper Number:

    CES-20-15

    How much do workers making job-to-job transitions benefit from moving away from a shrinking and towards a growing firm? We show that earnings growth in the transition increases with net employment growth at the destination firm and, to a lesser extent, decreases if the origin firm is shrinking. So, we sum the effect of leaving a shrinking and entering a growing firm and remove the excess turnover-related hires because gross hiring has a much smaller association with earnings growth than net employment growth. We find that job-to-job transitions with the cross-firm job flow have 23% more earnings growth than average.
    View Full Paper PDF
  • Working Paper

    Did Timing Matter? Life Cycle Differences in Effects of Exposure to the Great Recession

    September 2019

    Authors: Kevin Rinz

    Working Paper Number:

    CES-19-25

    Exposure to a recession can have persistent, negative consequences, but does the severity of those consequences depend on when in the life cycle a person is exposed? I estimate the effects of exposure to the Great Recession on employment and earnings outcomes for groups defined by year of birth over the ten years following the beginning of the recession. With the exception of the oldest workers, all groups experience reductions in earnings and employment due to local unemployment rate shocks during the recession. Younger workers experience the largest earnings losses in percent terms (up to 13 percent), in part because recession exposure makes them persistently less likely to work for high-paying employers even as their overall employment recovers more quickly than older workers'. Younger workers also experience reductions in earnings and employment due to changes in local labor market structure associated with the recession. These effects are substantially smaller in magnitude but more persistent than the effects of unemployment rate increases.
    View Full Paper PDF
  • Working Paper

    Hiring through Startup Acquisitions: Preference Mismatch and Employee Departures

    September 2018

    Authors: J. Daniel Kim

    Working Paper Number:

    CES-18-41

    This paper investigates the effectiveness of startup acquisitions as a hiring strategy. Unlike conventional hires who choose to join a new firm on their own volition, most acquired employees do not have a voice in the decision to be acquired, much less by whom to be acquired. The lack of worker agency may result in a preference mismatch between the acquired employees and the acquiring firm, leading to elevated rates of turnover. Using comprehensive employee-employer matched data from the US Census, I document that acquired workers are significantly more likely to leave compared to regular hires. By constructing a novel peer-based proxy for worker preferences, I show that acquired employees who prefer to work for startups ' rather than established firms ' are the most likely to leave after the acquisition, lending support to the preference mismatch theory. Moreover, these departures suggest a deeper strategic cost of competitive spawning: upon leaving, acquired workers are more likely to found their own companies, many of which appear to be competitive threats that impair the acquirer's long-run performance.
    View Full Paper PDF