CREAT: Census Research Exploration and Analysis Tool

Papers Containing Keywords(s): 'ethnicity'

The following papers contain search terms that you selected. From the papers listed below, you can navigate to the PDF, the profile page for that working paper, or see all the working papers written by an author. You can also explore tags, keywords, and authors that occur frequently within these papers.
Click here to search again

Frequently Occurring Concepts within this Search

American Community Survey - 64

Census Bureau Disclosure Review Board - 46

Protected Identification Key - 42

Internal Revenue Service - 36

2010 Census - 33

Social Security Number - 31

Social Security Administration - 29

Decennial Census - 27

National Science Foundation - 24

Disclosure Review Board - 22

Current Population Survey - 22

Social Security - 20

Center for Economic Studies - 20

Office of Management and Budget - 19

Person Validation System - 18

Ordinary Least Squares - 18

Department of Housing and Urban Development - 18

Metropolitan Statistical Area - 17

Census 2000 - 17

Longitudinal Employer Household Dynamics - 16

Person Identification Validation System - 16

Some Other Race - 16

W-2 - 16

Housing and Urban Development - 14

North American Industry Classification System - 14

1940 Census - 13

Federal Statistical Research Data Center - 12

Census Numident - 12

Survey of Business Owners - 12

Individual Taxpayer Identification Numbers - 11

Special Sworn Status - 10

Personally Identifiable Information - 10

Indian Health Service - 10

Longitudinal Business Database - 10

Research Data Center - 9

Adjusted Gross Income - 9

Indian Housing Information Center - 9

Harvard University - 9

Bureau of Labor Statistics - 8

Medicaid Services - 8

Centers for Medicare - 8

Integrated Public Use Microdata Series - 8

Survey of Income and Program Participation - 8

National Institutes of Health - 8

Master Address File - 8

Postal Service - 8

Business Register - 8

Administrative Records - 8

Public Use Micro Sample - 8

Chicago Census Research Data Center - 8

Census Household Composition Key - 7

Bureau of Economic Analysis - 7

International Trade Research Report - 7

Federal Reserve Bank - 6

Alfred P Sloan Foundation - 6

Earned Income Tax Credit - 6

University of Chicago - 6

Core Based Statistical Area - 6

Computer Assisted Personal Interview - 6

Supreme Court - 6

Employer Identification Numbers - 6

Cornell Institute for Social and Economic Research - 6

Citizenship and Immigration Services - 6

Characteristics of Business Owners - 6

Consolidated Metropolitan Statistical Areas - 6

Cornell University - 5

Census Edited File - 5

General Accounting Office - 5

MTO - 5

Opportunity Atlas - 5

Center for Administrative Records Research and Applications - 5

General Education Development - 5

Department of Commerce - 5

National Bureau of Economic Research - 5

Generalized Method of Moments - 5

American Housing Survey - 5

Annual Survey of Entrepreneurs - 5

Temporary Assistance for Needy Families - 5

Department of Homeland Security - 5

Sample Edited Detail File - 5

Hypothesis 2 - 4

Department of Education - 4

Stanford University - 4

NUMIDENT - 4

Department of Labor - 4

Center for Administrative Records Research - 4

National Center for Health Statistics - 4

Computer Assisted Telephone Interviews and Computer Assisted Personal Interviews - 4

Supplemental Nutrition Assistance Program - 4

Census Bureau Master Address File - 4

SSA Numident - 4

Pew Research Center - 4

Department of Justice - 4

PIKed - 4

Russell Sage Foundation - 4

Organization for Economic Cooperation and Development - 4

Integrated Longitudinal Business Database - 4

University of Minnesota - 4

Federal Reserve System - 3

Health and Retirement Study - 3

Disability Insurance - 3

United States Census Bureau - 3

MAFID - 3

Service Annual Survey - 3

PSID - 3

Survey of Consumer Finances - 3

Data Management System - 3

CATI - 3

Unemployment Insurance - 3

National Opinion Research Center - 3

American Economic Association - 3

Oil and Gas Extraction - 3

Employment History File - 3

Individual Characteristics File - 3

Accommodation and Food Services - 3

Robert Wood Johnson Foundation - 3

UC Berkeley - 3

Small Business Administration - 3

Technical Services - 3

Arts, Entertainment - 3

Agriculture, Forestry - 3

Legal Form of Organization - 3

Census Bureau Business Register - 3

County Business Patterns - 3

Kauffman Firm Survey - 3

Kauffman Foundation - 3

Minnesota Population Center - 3

ethnic - 77

hispanic - 77

immigrant - 56

minority - 55

racial - 55

population - 51

race - 48

immigration - 34

white - 33

segregation - 33

resident - 27

migrant - 27

neighborhood - 27

black - 26

disparity - 26

mexican - 23

disadvantaged - 22

latino - 22

native - 22

discrimination - 20

segregated - 19

poverty - 19

survey - 19

housing - 16

census bureau - 16

residence - 16

respondent - 16

socioeconomic - 15

census data - 15

workforce - 15

migration - 14

metropolitan - 14

census responses - 14

asian - 14

employed - 14

citizen - 13

ancestry - 13

entrepreneur - 13

entrepreneurship - 13

employ - 13

family - 12

heterogeneity - 11

residential - 11

ethnically - 11

assimilation - 10

interracial - 10

intergenerational - 10

immigrated - 9

race census - 9

immigrant population - 8

neighbor - 8

residential segregation - 8

use census - 8

1040 - 8

indian - 8

labor - 8

census household - 8

immigrant entrepreneurs - 8

workplace - 8

migrate - 7

generation - 7

percentile - 7

suburb - 7

record - 7

entrepreneurial - 7

venture - 7

recession - 7

residing - 6

reside - 6

grandparent - 6

statistical - 6

eligibility - 6

enrollment - 6

irs - 6

income white - 6

sociology - 6

citizenship - 6

data - 6

2010 census - 6

migrating - 6

employee - 6

data census - 6

census survey - 6

proprietorship - 6

proprietor - 6

establishment - 6

rural - 5

mobility - 5

earnings - 5

surveys censuses - 5

federal - 5

records census - 5

discriminatory - 5

imputation - 5

census records - 5

asian immigrants - 5

hiring - 5

immigrant workers - 5

census use - 5

census research - 5

refugee - 5

relocation - 4

midwest - 4

income neighborhoods - 4

medicaid - 4

mortality - 4

eligible - 4

ssa - 4

urban - 4

earner - 4

tax - 4

wealth - 4

adoption - 4

child - 4

datasets - 4

bias - 4

renter - 4

innovation - 4

estimating - 4

census 2020 - 4

enterprise - 4

worker - 4

occupation - 4

relocate - 3

neighborhood income - 3

prevalence - 3

enrolled - 3

census disclosure - 3

report - 3

state - 3

enrollee - 3

economic census - 3

assessed - 3

educated - 3

finance - 3

city - 3

suburbanization - 3

taxpayer - 3

parental - 3

welfare - 3

poorer - 3

matching - 3

disclosure - 3

parent - 3

associate - 3

network - 3

affluent - 3

innovate - 3

linked census - 3

specialization - 3

hire - 3

corporation - 3

founder - 3

individuals census - 3

financial - 3

tribe - 3

Viewing papers 21 through 30 of 109


  • Working Paper

    Where Are Your Parents? Exploring Potential Bias in Administrative Records on Children

    March 2024

    Working Paper Number:

    CES-24-18

    This paper examines potential bias in the Census Household Composition Key's (CHCK) probabilistic parent-child linkages. By linking CHCK data to the American Community Survey (ACS), we reveal disparities in parent-child linkages among specific demographic groups and find that characteristics of children that can and cannot be linked to the CHCK vary considerably from the larger population. In particular, we find that children from low-income, less educated households and of Hispanic origin are less likely to be linked to a mother or a father in the CHCK. We also highlight some data considerations when using the CHCK.
    View Full Paper PDF
  • Working Paper

    Examining Racial Identity Responses Among People with Middle Eastern and North African Ancestry in the American Community Survey

    March 2024

    Working Paper Number:

    CES-24-14

    People with Middle Eastern and North African (MENA) backgrounds living in the United States are defined and classified as White by current Federal standards for race and ethnicity, yet many MENA people do not identify as White in surveys, such as those conducted by the U.S. Census Bureau. Instead, they often select 'Some Other Race', if it is provided, and write in MENA responses such as Arab, Iranian, or Middle Eastern. In processing survey data for public release, the Census Bureau classifies these responses as White in accordance with Federal guidance set by the U.S. Office of Management and Budget. Research that uses these edited public data relies on limited information on MENA people's racial identification. To address this limitation, we obtained unedited race responses in the nationally representative American Community Survey from 2005-2019 to better understand how people of MENA ancestry report their race. We also use these data to compare the demographic, cultural, socioeconomic, and contextual characteristics of MENA individuals who identify as White versus those who do not identify as White. We find that one in four MENA people do not select White alone as their racial identity, despite official guidance that defines 'White' as people having origins in any of the original peoples of Europe, the Middle East, or North Africa. A variety of individual and contextual factors are associated with this choice, and some of these factors operate differently for U.S.-born and foreign-born MENA people living in the United States.
    View Full Paper PDF
  • Working Paper

    Connected and Uncooperative: The Effects of Homogenous and Exclusive Social Networks on Survey Response Rates and Nonresponse Bias

    January 2024

    Working Paper Number:

    CES-24-01

    Social capital, the strength of people's friendship networks and community ties, has been hypothesized as an important determinant of survey participation. Investigating this hypothesis has been difficult given data constraints. In this paper, we provide insights by investigating how response rates and nonresponse bias in the American Community Survey are correlated with county-level social network data from Facebook. We find that areas of the United States where people have more exclusive and homogenous social networks have higher nonresponse bias and lower response rates. These results provide further evidence that the effects of social capital may not be simply a matter of whether people are socially isolated or not, but also what types of social connections people have and the sociodemographic heterogeneity of their social networks.
    View Full Paper PDF
  • Working Paper

    Where to Build Affordable Housing? Evaluating the Tradeoffs of Location

    December 2023

    Working Paper Number:

    CES-23-62R

    How does the location of affordable housing affect tenant welfare, the distribution of assistance, and broader societal objectives such as racial integration? Using administrative data on tenants of units funded by the Low-Income Housing Tax Credit (LIHTC), we first show that characteristics such as race and proxies for need vary widely across neighborhoods. Despite fixed eligibility requirements, LIHTC developments in more opportunity-rich neighborhoods house tenants who are higher income, more educated, and far less likely to be Black. To quantify the welfare implications, we build a residential choice model in which households choose from both market-rate and affordable housing options, where the latter must be rationed. While building affordable housing in higher-opportunity neighborhoods costs more, it also increases household welfare and reduces city-wide segregation. The gains in household welfare, however, accrue to more moderate-need, non-Black/Hispanic households at the expense of other households. This change in the distribution of assistance is primarily due to a 'crowding out' effect: households that only apply for assistance in higher-opportunity neighborhoods crowd out those willing to apply regardless of location. Finally, other policy levers'such as lowering the income limits used for means-testing'have only limited effects relative to the choice of location.
    View Full Paper PDF
  • Working Paper

    Are Immigrants More Innovative? Evidence from Entrepreneurs

    November 2023

    Working Paper Number:

    CES-23-56

    We evaluate the contributions of immigrant entrepreneurs to innovation in the U.S. using linked survey-administrative data on 199,000 firms with a rich set of innovation measures and other firm and owner characteristics. We find that not only are immigrants more likely than natives to own businesses, but on average their firms display more innovation activities and outcomes. Immigrant owned firms are particularly more likely to create completely new products, improve previous products, use new processes, and engage in both basic and applied R&D, and their efforts are reflected in substantially higher levels of patents and productivity. Immigrant owners are slightly less likely than natives to imitate products of others and to hire more employees. Delving into potential explanations of the immigrant-native differences, we study other characteristics of entrepreneurs, access to finance, choice of industry, immigrant self-selection, and effects of diversity. We find that the immigrant innovation advantage is robust to controlling for detailed characteristics of firms and owners, it holds in both high-tech and non-high-tech industries and, with the exception of productivity, it tends to be even stronger in firms owned by diverse immigrant-native teams and by diverse immigrants from different countries. The evidence from nearly all measures that immigrants tend to operate more innovative and productive firms, together with the higher share of business ownership by immigrants, implies large contributions to U.S. innovation and growth.
    View Full Paper PDF
  • Working Paper

    Granular Income Inequality and Mobility using IDDA: Exploring Patterns across Race and Ethnicity

    November 2023

    Working Paper Number:

    CES-23-55

    Shifting earnings inequality among U.S. workers over the last five decades has been widely stud ied, but understanding how these shifts evolve across smaller groups has been difficult. Publicly available data sources typically only ensure representative data at high levels of aggregation, so they obscure many details of earnings distributions for smaller populations. We define and construct a set of granular statistics describing income distributions, income mobility and con ditional income growth for a large number of subnational groups in the U.S. for a two-decade period (1998-2019). In this paper, we use the resulting data to explore the evolution of income inequality and mobility for detailed groups defined by race and ethnicity. We find that patterns identified from the universe of tax filers and W-2 recipients that we observe differ in important ways from those that one might identify in public sources. The full set of statistics that we construct is available publicly as the Income Distributions and Dynamics in America, or IDDA, data set.
    View Full Paper PDF
  • Working Paper

    Coverage of Children in the American Community Survey Based on California Birth Records

    September 2023

    Authors: Gloria G. Aldana

    Working Paper Number:

    CES-23-46

    The U.S. Census Bureau's American Community Survey (ACS) collects information on individuals and households. The ACS provides survey-based estimates of children drawn from a sample of the U.S. population. However, survey responses may not match administrative records, such as birth records. Birth records should provide a complete account of all births, along with child-parent relationships and demographic characteristics. California is a state that has both a large population of children and a high undercount for young children. This paper uses California as a case study to examine differences between reported versus unreported children in the ACS based on state birth records. Child reporting rates were lower for more recent data years, younger children, for Black and Hispanic mothers, and for more complex households. Child reporting rates were higher for more educated mothers and for households above the poverty line. Using mother's race and Hispanic ethnicity from the birth records combined with poverty indices from the ACS, this analysis also finds that child reporting does not uniformly vary with poverty status across all race and ethnicity groups. This research builds support for the utility of state birth records in analyzing the undercount of children.
    View Full Paper PDF
  • Working Paper

    Noncitizen Coverage and Its Effects on U.S. Population Statistics

    August 2023

    Working Paper Number:

    CES-23-42

    We produce population estimates with the same reference date, April 1, 2020, as the 2020 Census of Population and Housing by combining 31 types of administrative record (AR) and third-party sources, including several new to the Census Bureau with a focus on noncitizens. Our AR census national population estimate is higher than other Census Bureau official estimates: 1.8% greater than the 2020 Demographic Analysis high estimate, 3.0% more than the 2020 Census count, and 3.6% higher than the vintage-2020 Population Estimates Program estimate. Our analysis suggests that inclusion of more noncitizens, especially those with unknown legal status, explains the higher AR census estimate. About 19.8% of AR census noncitizens have addresses that cannot be linked to an address in the 2020 Census collection universe, compared to 5.7% of citizens, raising the possibility that the 2020 Census did not collect data for a significant fraction of noncitizens residing in the United States under the residency criteria used for the census. We show differences in estimates by age, sex, Hispanic origin, geography, and socioeconomic characteristics symptomatic of the differences in noncitizen coverage.
    View Full Paper PDF
  • Working Paper

    Access to Financing and Racial Pay Gap Inside Firms

    July 2023

    Working Paper Number:

    CES-23-36

    How does access to financing influence racial pay inequality inside firms? We answer this question using the employer-employee matched data administered by the U.S. Census Bureau and detailed resume data recording workers' career trajectories. Exploiting exogenous shocks to firms' debt capacity, we find that better access to debt financing significantly narrows the earnings gap between minority and white workers. Minority workers experience a persistent increase in earnings and also a rise in the pay rank relative to white workers in the same firm. The effect is more pronounced among mid- and high-skill minority workers, in areas where white workers are in shorter supply, and for firms with ex-ante less diverse boards and greater pre-existing racial inequality. With better access to financing, minority workers are also more likely to be promoted or be reassigned to technology-oriented occupations compared to white workers. Our evidence is consistent with access to financing making firms better utilize minority workers' human capital.
    View Full Paper PDF
  • Working Paper

    Shift or replenishment? Reassessing the prospect of stable Spanish bilingualism across contexts of ethnic change

    June 2023

    Working Paper Number:

    CES-23-28

    Much of the existing literature on Latinos' use of Spanish claims that a general pattern of intergenerational decline in the use of Spanish will produce an overall shift away from Spanish use in the U.S. (Rumbaut, Massey, and Bean 2006; Veltman 1983b, 1990). In contrast, recent works emphasize the importance of the social and linguistic context in reinforcing the use of Spanish as well as (pan)ethnic identities among U.S.-born Latinos (Linton 2004; Linton and Jim'nez 2009; Stevens 1992). This literature suggests conditions under which Spanish-English bilingualism might become stable at the level of metropolitan areas; however, such conditions depend on how immigration shapes the context of language use for native-born Latinos. Given the declining levels of immigration from Latin America, will bilingualism subside in the U.S., or have certain communities created conditions in which bilingualism can be stable? Using geocoded data from restricted access versions of the Survey of Income and Program Participation (SIPP) and the American Community Survey (ACS), we model the probability of Spanish-English bilingualism among second- and third-generation Latinos using multilevel models with contextual measures of immigration and language use at both the neighborhood and metropolitan levels. We find evidence that U.S.-born Latinos are heavily influenced by the prevalence of Spanish use among U.S. born Latinos at both the metropolitan and neighborhood levels. Further, the proportion of foreign-born Latinos has little effect on the native born, after controlling for Spanish use among U.S,-born Latinos. These results are a first step in understanding the link between ethnic or panethnic contexts and language practices, and also in producing a better characterization of stable bilingualism that can be tested quantitatively.
    View Full Paper PDF