CREAT: Census Research Exploration and Analysis Tool

Papers Containing Keywords(s): 'labor'

The following papers contain search terms that you selected. From the papers listed below, you can navigate to the PDF, the profile page for that working paper, or see all the working papers written by an author. You can also explore tags, keywords, and authors that occur frequently within these papers.
Click here to search again

Frequently Occurring Concepts within this Search

Longitudinal Employer Household Dynamics - 100

Bureau of Labor Statistics - 97

Current Population Survey - 97

Center for Economic Studies - 81

North American Industry Classification System - 77

Longitudinal Business Database - 73

Ordinary Least Squares - 72

Standard Industrial Classification - 59

Census Bureau Disclosure Review Board - 58

National Science Foundation - 58

Internal Revenue Service - 57

American Community Survey - 53

Annual Survey of Manufactures - 50

National Bureau of Economic Research - 48

Employer Identification Numbers - 41

Longitudinal Research Database - 40

Alfred P Sloan Foundation - 40

Social Security Administration - 38

Census of Manufactures - 36

Total Factor Productivity - 35

Decennial Census - 34

Metropolitan Statistical Area - 32

Quarterly Census of Employment and Wages - 31

Social Security - 30

Bureau of Economic Analysis - 30

Federal Statistical Research Data Center - 29

Survey of Income and Program Participation - 29

Federal Reserve Bank - 29

Unemployment Insurance - 28

Economic Census - 28

Cornell University - 26

Protected Identification Key - 26

Social Security Number - 25

Quarterly Workforce Indicators - 24

Department of Labor - 23

Disclosure Review Board - 23

Chicago Census Research Data Center - 21

Business Register - 20

Census of Manufacturing Firms - 19

Census Bureau Business Register - 18

W-2 - 18

PSID - 18

Standard Statistical Establishment List - 17

Census Bureau Longitudinal Business Database - 17

University of Maryland - 17

Cobb-Douglas - 17

LEHD Program - 17

Business Dynamics Statistics - 16

International Trade Research Report - 16

National Institute on Aging - 16

Organization for Economic Cooperation and Development - 15

AKM - 15

Federal Reserve System - 15

County Business Patterns - 14

Cornell Institute for Social and Economic Research - 14

Individual Characteristics File - 13

Labor Turnover Survey - 13

American Economic Review - 13

Special Sworn Status - 12

Local Employment Dynamics - 12

JOLTS - 11

Research Data Center - 11

Journal of Economic Literature - 11

Occupational Employment Statistics - 10

Department of Economics - 10

National Longitudinal Survey of Youth - 10

NBER Summer Institute - 10

Business Employment Dynamics - 10

Employment History File - 10

Employer Characteristics File - 10

2010 Census - 10

University of Chicago - 10

WECD - 10

Financial, Insurance and Real Estate Industries - 9

Person Validation System - 9

Labor Productivity - 9

Journal of Political Economy - 9

Generalized Method of Moments - 8

Retail Trade - 8

Harvard University - 8

New York Times - 8

Survey of Manufacturing Technology - 8

Journal of Human Resources - 8

Standard Occupational Classification - 7

Urban Institute - 7

Heckscher-Ohlin - 7

Herfindahl Hirschman Index - 7

Detailed Earnings Records - 7

Department of Homeland Security - 7

New York University - 7

North American Industry Classi - 7

Quarterly Journal of Economics - 7

IQR - 6

National Center for Health Statistics - 6

Office of Management and Budget - 6

Census Numident - 6

National Establishment Time Series - 6

Census Bureau Center for Economic Studies - 6

Supplemental Nutrition Assistance Program - 6

Board of Governors - 6

Columbia University - 6

Council of Economic Advisers - 6

Earned Income Tax Credit - 6

Kauffman Foundation - 6

1940 Census - 6

Journal of Labor Economics - 6

World Bank - 6

Service Annual Survey - 6

Permanent Plant Number - 6

BLS Handbook of Methods - 6

Department of Commerce - 6

Social and Economic Supplement - 5

COVID-19 - 5

United States Census Bureau - 5

Department of Health and Human Services - 5

Integrated Longitudinal Business Database - 5

Technical Services - 5

Successor Predecessor File - 5

VAR - 5

North American Free Trade Agreement - 5

World Trade Organization - 5

National Employer Survey - 5

Survey of Business Owners - 5

Society of Labor Economists - 5

ASEC - 5

Current Population Survey Annual Social and Economic Supplement - 5

National Income and Product Accounts - 5

Wholesale Trade - 5

Census Industry Code - 5

TFPQ - 5

CDF - 5

Cumulative Density Function - 5

American Economic Association - 5

Temporary Assistance for Needy Families - 5

Company Organization Survey - 5

Retirement History Survey - 5

Current Employment Statistics - 5

Center for Administrative Records Research - 5

Business Register Bridge - 5

Sample Edited Detail File - 5

MIT Press - 5

Review of Economics and Statistics - 5

Department of Education - 4

Integrated Public Use Microdata Series - 4

Accommodation and Food Services - 4

Stanford University - 4

Characteristics of Business Owners - 4

Postal Service - 4

Health and Retirement Study - 4

Brookings Institution - 4

Agriculture, Forestry - 4

Michigan Institute for Teaching and Research in Economics - 4

Russell Sage Foundation - 4

Harmonized System - 4

General Accounting Office - 4

Department of Agriculture - 4

Sloan Foundation - 4

Social Security Disability Insurance - 4

Employer-Household Dynamics - 4

Federal Trade Commission - 4

Supreme Court - 4

Personally Identifiable Information - 4

Master Address File - 4

Federal Reserve Board of Governors - 4

Value Added - 4

Person Identification Validation System - 4

Center for Administrative Records Research and Applications - 4

Regional Economic Information System - 4

Geographic Information Systems - 4

IZA - 4

Public Use Micro Sample - 4

Medical Expenditure Panel Survey - 4

Computer Network Use Supplement - 4

American Statistical Association - 4

Consolidated Metropolitan Statistical Areas - 4

Cambridge University Press - 4

Electronic Data Interchange - 4

Annual Business Survey - 3

Ohio State University - 3

Educational Services - 3

Health Care and Social Assistance - 3

University of Toronto - 3

E32 - 3

International Trade Commission - 3

Robert Wood Johnson Foundation - 3

Core Based Statistical Area - 3

Composite Person Record - 3

George Mason University - 3

Indian Health Service - 3

Department of Justice - 3

Boston College - 3

Duke University - 3

Individual Taxpayer Identification Numbers - 3

Data Management System - 3

Disability Insurance - 3

2SLS - 3

UC Berkeley - 3

Census Bureau Business Dynamics Statistics - 3

Pew Research Center - 3

Public Administration - 3

Stern School of Business - 3

Securities and Exchange Commission - 3

Medicaid Services - 3

Department of Defense - 3

Administrative Records - 3

Economic Research Service - 3

Small Business Administration - 3

University of Minnesota - 3

Housing and Urban Development - 3

Environmental Protection Agency - 3

Establishment Micro Properties - 3

Journal of Econometrics - 3

Business Master File - 3

Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality - 3

employ - 136

employed - 132

workforce - 124

recession - 83

employee - 80

worker - 76

earnings - 70

payroll - 64

job - 56

economist - 49

manufacturing - 49

industrial - 45

growth - 45

unemployed - 43

econometric - 43

production - 43

hiring - 42

salary - 41

macroeconomic - 40

employment dynamics - 37

earner - 34

occupation - 33

labor statistics - 31

demand - 31

employment growth - 31

endogeneity - 30

heterogeneity - 30

quarterly - 30

hire - 28

layoff - 28

workplace - 27

estimating - 26

earn - 25

sector - 24

labor markets - 24

market - 24

labor productivity - 24

expenditure - 23

unemployment rates - 23

establishment - 23

longitudinal - 22

survey - 21

trend - 21

shift - 20

employing - 20

tenure - 20

census bureau - 19

census employment - 19

turnover - 19

gdp - 19

welfare - 18

economically - 18

revenue - 17

longitudinal employer - 17

entrepreneurship - 17

productive - 17

estimation - 17

incentive - 16

discrimination - 16

productivity growth - 16

employer household - 16

estimates employment - 16

regress - 15

employment statistics - 15

recessionary - 15

endogenous - 15

union - 14

export - 14

factory - 14

efficiency - 13

enrollment - 13

employment unemployment - 13

disparity - 13

poverty - 13

employment wages - 13

segregation - 12

trends employment - 12

employment trends - 12

immigrant - 12

entrepreneur - 12

research census - 12

econometrician - 12

effect wages - 12

produce - 12

economic census - 12

employment flows - 12

employment estimates - 11

investment - 11

workers earnings - 11

retirement - 11

aggregate - 11

regressing - 11

wage growth - 11

wages productivity - 11

recession employment - 11

metropolitan - 11

employment changes - 11

technology - 11

technological - 11

aging - 11

statistical - 10

disadvantaged - 10

employment data - 10

state employment - 10

relocation - 10

migrant - 10

decline - 10

increase employment - 10

employment earnings - 10

decade - 10

sale - 10

insurance - 10

wage differences - 10

wage industries - 10

employment count - 10

trends labor - 10

agency - 9

effects employment - 9

benefit - 9

rates employment - 9

spillover - 9

report - 9

race - 9

employment production - 9

migration - 9

import - 9

enterprise - 9

tax - 9

state - 9

woman - 9

productivity measures - 9

profit - 9

manufacturer - 9

industry employment - 9

wage changes - 9

employee data - 9

organizational - 9

data census - 8

mother - 8

bias - 8

socioeconomic - 8

ethnicity - 8

wage effects - 8

wage gap - 8

unobserved - 8

worker demographics - 8

exogeneity - 8

declining - 8

worker wages - 8

earnings workers - 8

industry wages - 8

earnings inequality - 8

minority - 8

wages production - 8

employment recession - 8

wage variation - 8

finance - 8

respondent - 7

population - 7

family - 7

parental - 7

maternal - 7

wages employment - 7

unemployment insurance - 7

compensation - 7

racial - 7

innovation - 7

producing - 7

job growth - 7

entrepreneurial - 7

proprietorship - 7

aggregate productivity - 7

housing - 7

merger - 7

federal - 7

accounting - 7

growth productivity - 7

proprietor - 7

regional - 7

segregated - 7

measures productivity - 6

eligible - 6

preschool - 6

childcare - 6

work census - 6

specialization - 6

regressors - 6

hispanic - 6

immigration - 6

migrate - 6

exporter - 6

leverage - 6

factor productivity - 6

productivity estimates - 6

productivity size - 6

venture - 6

resident - 6

employment effects - 6

educated - 6

earnings gap - 6

wage data - 6

productivity wage - 6

industry productivity - 6

productivity dispersion - 6

ethnic - 6

clerical - 6

earnings growth - 6

regression - 6

wage regressions - 6

productivity increases - 6

measures employment - 6

employment measures - 6

company - 6

workforce indicators - 6

plant productivity - 6

parent - 5

filing - 5

subsidy - 5

black - 5

white - 5

urban - 5

city - 5

neighborhood - 5

productivity shocks - 5

migrating - 5

exporting - 5

multinational - 5

development - 5

gain - 5

disability - 5

irs - 5

impact employment - 5

women earnings - 5

career - 5

corporate - 5

productivity dynamics - 5

gender - 5

moving - 5

coverage - 5

wage earnings - 5

medicaid - 5

monopolistic - 5

firm dynamics - 5

tech - 5

earnings age - 5

productivity impacts - 5

plant employment - 5

transition - 5

share - 5

opportunity - 5

census data - 5

manufacturing industries - 5

capital - 5

census research - 5

productivity plants - 5

plant - 5

productivity analysis - 4

percentile - 4

enrolled - 4

household surveys - 4

2010 census - 4

relocate - 4

employment distribution - 4

autoregressive - 4

shock - 4

tariff - 4

relocating - 4

immigrant workers - 4

international trade - 4

sectoral - 4

outsourced - 4

exogenous - 4

eligibility - 4

researcher - 4

level productivity - 4

outsourcing - 4

rent - 4

regulation - 4

healthcare - 4

earnings employees - 4

wealth - 4

productivity differences - 4

manufacturing productivity - 4

firms employment - 4

rates productivity - 4

computer - 4

associate - 4

price - 4

startup - 4

bankruptcy - 4

technical - 4

estimates productivity - 4

mobility - 4

taxpayer - 4

supplier - 4

rural - 4

matching - 4

residential - 4

inference - 4

network - 4

data - 4

agriculture - 4

manufacturing plants - 4

department - 4

plants industry - 4

productivity variation - 3

country - 3

suburb - 3

industry heterogeneity - 3

growth employment - 3

foreign - 3

monopolistically - 3

practices productivity - 3

employment entrepreneurship - 3

nonemployer businesses - 3

startups employees - 3

exemption - 3

town - 3

intergenerational - 3

volatility - 3

graduate - 3

study - 3

expense - 3

education - 3

wholesale - 3

industry concentration - 3

residence - 3

medicare - 3

insurance employer - 3

insured - 3

health insurance - 3

insurance premiums - 3

insurer - 3

birth - 3

pregnancy - 3

equilibrium - 3

firms productivity - 3

econometrically - 3

saving - 3

model - 3

ssa - 3

coverage employer - 3

fertility - 3

cohort - 3

firms grow - 3

dispersion productivity - 3

founder - 3

employed census - 3

capital productivity - 3

fluctuation - 3

income year - 3

substitute - 3

financial - 3

acquisition - 3

bank - 3

schooling - 3

lender - 3

debt - 3

firms plants - 3

heterogeneous - 3

average - 3

reallocation productivity - 3

analysis - 3

empirical - 3

elasticity - 3

discriminatory - 3

plants firms - 3

Viewing papers 21 through 30 of 254


  • Working Paper

    Contrasting the Local and National Demographic Incidence of Local Labor Demand Shocks

    July 2024

    Working Paper Number:

    CES-24-36

    This paper examines how spatial frictions that differ among heterogeneous workers and establishments shape the geographic and demographic incidence of alternative local labor demand shocks, with implications for the appropriate level of government at which to fund local economic initiatives. LEHD data featuring millions of job transitions facilitate estimation of a rich two-sided labor market assignment model. The model generates simulated forecasts of many alternative local demand shocks featuring different establishment compositions and local areas. Workers within 10 miles receive only 11.2% (6.6%) of nationwide welfare (employment) short-run gains, with at least 35.9% (62.0%) accruing to out-of-state workers, despite much larger per-worker impacts for the closest workers. Local incidence by demographic category is very sensitive to shock composition, but different shocks produce similar demographic incidence farther from the shock. Furthermore, the remaining heterogeneity in incidence at the state or national level can reverse patterns of heterogeneous demographic impacts at the local level. Overall, the results suggest that reduced-form approaches using distant locations as controls can produce accurate estimates of local shock impacts on local workers, but that the distribution of local impacts badly approximates shocks' statewide or national incidence.
    View Full Paper PDF
  • Working Paper

    Payroll Tax Incidence: Evidence from Unemployment Insurance

    June 2024

    Authors: Audrey Guo

    Working Paper Number:

    CES-24-35

    Economic models assume that payroll tax burdens fall fully on workers, but where does tax incidence fall when taxes are firm-specific and time-varying? Unemployment insurance in the United States has the key feature of varying both across employers and over time, creating the potential for labor demand responses if tax costs cannot be fully passed through to worker wages. Using state policy changes and administrative data of matched employer-employee job spells, I study how employment and earnings respond to unexpected payroll tax increases for highly exposed employers. I find significant drops in employment growth driven by lower hiring, and minimal evidence of passthrough to earnings. The negative employment effects are strongest for young workers and single-establishment firms.
    View Full Paper PDF
  • Working Paper

    Interpreting Cohort Profiles of Lifecycle Earnings Volatility

    April 2024

    Working Paper Number:

    CES-24-21

    We present new estimates of earnings volatility over time and the lifecycle for men and women by race and human capital. Using a long panel of restricted-access administrative Social Security earnings linked to the Current Population Survey, we estimate volatility with both transparent summary measures, as well as decompositions into permanent and transitory components. From the late 1970s to the mid 1990s there is a strong negative trend in earnings volatility for both men and women. We show this is driven by a reduction in transitory variance. Starting in the mid 1990s there is relative stability in trends of male earnings volatility because of an increase in the variance of permanent shocks, especially among workers without a college education, and a more attenuated trend decline among women. Cohort analyses indicate a strong U-shape pattern of volatility over the working life, which comes from large permanent shocks early and later in the lifecycle. However, this U-shape shifted downward and leftward in more recent cohorts, the latter from the fanning out of lifecycle transitory volatility in younger cohorts. These patterns are more pronounced among White men and women compared to Black workers.
    View Full Paper PDF
  • Working Paper

    The Impact of Immigration on Firms and Workers: Insights from the H-1B Lottery

    April 2024

    Working Paper Number:

    CES-24-19

    We study how random variation in the availability of highly educated, foreign-born workers impacts firm performance and recruitment behavior. We combine two rich data sources: 1) administrative employer-employee matched data from the US Census Bureau; and 2) firm level information on the first large-scale H-1B visa lottery in 2007. Using an event-study approach, we find that lottery wins lead to increases in firm hiring of college-educated, immigrant labor along with increases in scale and survival. These effects are stronger for small, skill-intensive, and high-productivity firms that participate in the lottery. We do not find evidence for displacement of native-born, college-educated workers at the firm level, on net. However, this result masks dynamics among more specific subgroups of incumbents that we further elucidate.
    View Full Paper PDF
  • Working Paper

    Scientific Talent Leaks Out of Funding Gaps

    February 2024

    Working Paper Number:

    CES-24-08

    We study how delays in NIH grant funding affect the career outcomes of research personnel. Using comprehensive earnings and tax records linked to university transaction data along with a difference-in-differences design, we find that a funding interruption of more than 30 days has a substantial effect on job placements for personnel who work in labs with a single NIH R01 research grant, including a 3 percentage point (40%) increase in the probability of not working in the US. Incorporating information from the full 2020 Decennial Census and data on publications, we find that about half of those induced into nonemployment appear to permanently leave the US and are 90% less likely to publish in a given year, with even larger impacts for trainees (postdocs and graduate students). Among personnel who continue to work in the US, we find that interrupted personnel earn 20% less than their continuously-funded peers, with the largest declines concentrated among trainees and other non-faculty personnel (such as staff and undergraduates). Overall, funding delays account for about 5% of US nonemployment in our data, indicating that they have a meaningful effect on the scientific labor force at the national level.
    View Full Paper PDF
  • Working Paper

    Low-Wage Jobs, Foreign-Born Workers, and Firm Performance

    January 2024

    Working Paper Number:

    CES-24-05

    We examine how migrant workers impact firm performance using administrative data from the United States. Exploiting an unexpected change in firms' likelihood of securing low-wage workers through the H-2B visa program, we find limited crowd-out of other forms of employment and no impact on average pay at the firm. Yet, access to H-2B workers raises firms' annual revenues and survival likelihood. Our results are consistent with the notion that guest worker programs can help address labor shortages without inflicting large losses on incumbent workers.
    View Full Paper PDF
  • Working Paper

    Collaborative Micro-productivity Project: Establishment-Level Productivity Dataset, 1972-2020

    December 2023

    Working Paper Number:

    CES-23-65

    We describe the process for building the Collaborative Micro-productivity Project (CMP) microdata and calculating establishment-level productivity numbers. The documentation is for version 7 and the data cover the years 1972-2020. These data have been used in numerous research papers and are used to create the experimental public-use data product Dispersion Statistics on Productivity (DiSP).
    View Full Paper PDF
  • Working Paper

    Outsourcing Dynamism

    December 2023

    Working Paper Number:

    CES-23-64

    This paper investigates the increasing importance of domestic outsourcing in U.S. manufacturing. Under domestic outsourcing, the agency is the employer of record for temporary workers, though they perform their tasks at the client business' premises. On a yearly basis, one in two manufacturing plants hires at least some of its workers through a temporary help agency. Furthermore, domestic outsourcing is becoming increasingly more important: the average share of revenue spent on such arrangements has gone up by 85 percent since 2006. We develop a methodology to transform reported expenses on temporary and leased workers into plant-level outsourced employment counts, using administrative data on the U.S. manufacturing sector. We find that domestic outsourcing is an important margin of adjustment that plants use to modify their workforce in response to productivity shocks. Plant-level outsourced employment adjusts more quickly and is twice as responsive as payroll employment. These micro implications have significant aggregate consequences. Without taking reallocations in outsourced employment into account, the measured pace at which jobs reallocate across workplaces is underestimated. On average, we omit the equivalent of 15 percent of payroll employment reallocations in each year. However, outsourced employment churns at a much higher rate compared to its payroll counterpart. Therefore, the omission of outsourced reallocations can rationalize 37 percent of the secular decline in the aggregate job reallocation rate. Lastly, the extent of mismeasurement varies with the business cycle; falling in downturns and increasing in upturns implying that the speed of economic recovery is underestimated.
    View Full Paper PDF
  • Working Paper

    Is the Gender Pay Gap Largest at the Top?

    December 2023

    Working Paper Number:

    CES-23-61

    No: it is at least as large at bottom percentiles of the earnings distribution. Conditional quantile regressions reveal that while the gap at top percentiles is largest among the most-educated, the gap at bottom percentiles is largest among the least-educated. Gender differences in labor supply create more pay inequality among the least-educated than they do among the most-educated. The pay gap has declined throughout the distribution since 2006, but it declined more for the most-educated women. Current economics-of-gender research focuses heavily on the top end; equal emphasis should be placed on mechanisms driving gender inequality for noncollege-educated workers.
    View Full Paper PDF
  • Working Paper

    Local and National Concentration Trends in Jobs and Sales: The Role of Structural Transformation

    November 2023

    Working Paper Number:

    CES-23-59

    National U.S. industrial concentration rose between 1992-2017. Simultaneously, the Herfindhahl Index of local (six-digit-NAICS by county) employment concentration fell. This divergence between national and local employment concentration is due to structural transformation. Both sales and employment concentration rose within industry-by-county cells. But activity shifted from concentrated Manufacturing towards relatively un-concentrated Services. A stronger between-sector shift in employment relative to sales explains the fall in local employment concentration. Had sectoral employment shares remained at their 1992 levels, average local employment concentration would have risen by 9% by 2017 rather than falling by 7%.
    View Full Paper PDF