CREAT: Census Research Exploration and Analysis Tool

Papers Containing Keywords(s): 'census bureau'

The following papers contain search terms that you selected. From the papers listed below, you can navigate to the PDF, the profile page for that working paper, or see all the working papers written by an author. You can also explore tags, keywords, and authors that occur frequently within these papers.
Click here to search again

Frequently Occurring Concepts within this Search

American Community Survey - 42

Current Population Survey - 40

Internal Revenue Service - 35

Protected Identification Key - 31

Longitudinal Employer Household Dynamics - 29

Census Bureau Disclosure Review Board - 28

Social Security Administration - 27

National Science Foundation - 26

Bureau of Labor Statistics - 25

Cornell University - 24

Center for Economic Studies - 23

Social Security Number - 23

Employer Identification Numbers - 21

Person Validation System - 21

North American Industry Classification System - 19

Decennial Census - 19

Business Register - 18

2010 Census - 18

Service Annual Survey - 16

Economic Census - 16

Social Security - 15

Research Data Center - 15

Quarterly Census of Employment and Wages - 14

Master Address File - 14

Disclosure Review Board - 14

Survey of Income and Program Participation - 14

Alfred P Sloan Foundation - 14

Standard Industrial Classification - 14

Longitudinal Business Database - 13

Federal Statistical Research Data Center - 13

Census Bureau Business Register - 13

Personally Identifiable Information - 13

Quarterly Workforce Indicators - 12

Office of Management and Budget - 11

Person Identification Validation System - 11

Annual Survey of Manufactures - 10

Standard Statistical Establishment List - 10

Unemployment Insurance - 10

1940 Census - 9

Local Employment Dynamics - 9

Center for Administrative Records Research and Applications - 9

Administrative Records - 9

Department of Housing and Urban Development - 9

Computer Assisted Personal Interview - 9

MAFID - 8

LEHD Program - 8

Ordinary Least Squares - 8

National Institute on Aging - 8

Cornell Institute for Social and Economic Research - 8

National Opinion Research Center - 7

Department of Labor - 7

National Center for Health Statistics - 7

Business Dynamics Statistics - 7

Individual Taxpayer Identification Numbers - 7

SSA Numident - 7

Metropolitan Statistical Area - 7

Bureau of Economic Analysis - 7

Computer Assisted Telephone Interviews and Computer Assisted Personal Interviews - 6

Social and Economic Supplement - 6

Some Other Race - 6

National Longitudinal Survey of Youth - 6

Postal Service - 6

Supplemental Nutrition Assistance Program - 6

Housing and Urban Development - 6

Indian Health Service - 6

Company Organization Survey - 5

Individual Characteristics File - 5

Census Edited File - 5

County Business Patterns - 5

Composite Person Record - 5

Financial, Insurance and Real Estate Industries - 5

Federal Tax Information - 5

National Bureau of Economic Research - 5

W-2 - 5

Center for Administrative Records Research - 5

Census Numident - 5

Census Bureau Person Identification Validation System - 5

CATI - 5

Public Use Micro Sample - 5

Department of Health and Human Services - 5

Special Sworn Status - 5

Business Master File - 5

Census 2000 - 5

Medicaid Services - 5

Health and Retirement Study - 4

Census of Manufactures - 4

Annual Business Survey - 4

Department of Homeland Security - 4

United States Census Bureau - 4

Employment History File - 4

Employer Characteristics File - 4

CDF - 4

Office of Personnel Management - 4

Cumulative Density Function - 4

Earned Income Tax Credit - 4

Adjusted Gross Income - 4

Data Management System - 4

Census Bureau Master Address File - 4

Temporary Assistance for Needy Families - 4

Census Household Composition Key - 4

Statistics Canada - 4

Bureau of Labor - 4

American Housing Survey - 4

Core Based Statistical Area - 4

Business Register Bridge - 4

North American Industry Classi - 4

Chicago Census Research Data Center - 4

PIKed - 4

Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality - 4

Securities and Exchange Commission - 3

Occupational Employment Statistics - 3

MAF-ARF - 3

Accommodation and Food Services - 3

Sloan Foundation - 3

Social Science Research Institute - 3

Indian Housing Information Center - 3

American Economic Association - 3

National Academy of Sciences - 3

Federal Reserve System - 3

Retail Trade - 3

Survey of Business Owners - 3

University of Maryland - 3

American Economic Review - 3

Journal of Labor Economics - 3

Business Employment Dynamics - 3

Probability Density Function - 3

Successor Predecessor File - 3

Centers for Medicare - 3

Federal Reserve Bank - 3

General Accounting Office - 3

PSID - 3

Establishment Micro Properties - 3

Urban Institute - 3

Permanent Plant Number - 3

Wholesale Trade - 3

AKM - 3

survey - 59

population - 48

respondent - 44

census data - 38

data census - 36

data - 36

statistical - 26

agency - 24

workforce - 22

record - 21

employed - 21

report - 21

research census - 21

estimating - 20

labor - 19

economic census - 19

use census - 18

2010 census - 18

census research - 18

census survey - 17

employ - 16

microdata - 16

hispanic - 15

employee - 15

census employment - 14

resident - 14

datasets - 14

minority - 13

ethnicity - 13

longitudinal - 13

payroll - 12

coverage - 12

household surveys - 11

employer household - 11

aging - 11

trend - 10

disclosure - 10

earnings - 10

census use - 10

information census - 9

department - 9

expenditure - 9

work census - 9

censuses surveys - 9

provided census - 9

population survey - 9

prevalence - 9

enrollment - 9

records census - 9

recession - 9

worker - 9

percentile - 8

assessed - 8

estimation - 8

immigrant - 8

residential - 8

census records - 8

family - 8

federal - 8

census years - 8

citizen - 8

ethnic - 8

surveys censuses - 8

matching - 8

race - 8

race census - 8

longitudinal employer - 8

average - 7

sampling - 7

identifier - 7

census responses - 7

employment statistics - 7

employee data - 7

census 2020 - 7

salary - 7

sector - 7

residence - 7

poverty - 7

linked census - 7

linkage - 7

analysis - 7

imputation - 7

metropolitan - 7

employment dynamics - 7

database - 6

occupation - 6

labor statistics - 6

census disclosure - 6

employment data - 6

irs - 6

disparity - 6

aggregate - 6

information - 6

disadvantaged - 6

1040 - 6

privacy - 6

public - 6

census linked - 6

medicaid - 6

racial - 6

census business - 6

econometric - 6

research - 6

hiring - 6

workplace - 6

census file - 6

worker demographics - 6

job - 6

assessing - 5

survey data - 5

earner - 5

survey income - 5

state - 5

taxpayer - 5

child - 5

unemployed - 5

confidentiality - 5

publicly - 5

neighborhood - 5

quarterly - 5

economist - 5

yearly - 5

researcher - 5

clerical - 5

ancestry - 5

statistician - 5

study - 5

incorporated - 4

ssa - 4

migration - 4

tax - 4

census household - 4

health - 4

policymakers - 4

insurance - 4

gdp - 4

healthcare - 4

immigration - 4

market - 4

establishment - 4

associate - 4

tenure - 4

matched - 4

sample - 3

company - 3

revenue - 3

residing - 3

decade - 3

estimator - 3

migrant - 3

income individuals - 3

parent - 3

dependent - 3

household income - 3

income data - 3

income households - 3

environmental - 3

geographic - 3

impact - 3

survey households - 3

pandemic - 3

parental - 3

adoption - 3

bias - 3

black - 3

socioeconomic - 3

econometrician - 3

finance - 3

firms census - 3

statistical disclosure - 3

enrollee - 3

layoff - 3

welfare - 3

discrimination - 3

businesses census - 3

empirical - 3

Viewing papers 11 through 20 of 91


  • Working Paper

    CTC and ACTC Participation Results and IRS-Census Match Methodology, Tax Year 2020

    December 2024

    Working Paper Number:

    CES-24-76

    The Child Tax Credit (CTC) and Additional Child Tax Credit (ACTC) offer assistance to help ease the financial burden of families with children. This paper provides taxpayer and dollar participation estimates for the CTC and ACTC covering tax year 2020. The estimates derive from an approach that relies on linking the 2021 Current Population Survey Annual Social and Economic Supplement (CPS ASEC) to IRS administrative data. This approach, called the Exact Match, uses survey data to identify CTC/ACTC eligible taxpayers and IRS administrative data to indicate which eligible taxpayers claimed and received the credit. Overall in tax year 2020, eligible taxpayers participated in the CTC and ACTC program at a rate of 93 percent while dollar participation was 91 percent.
    View Full Paper PDF
  • Working Paper

    EITC Participation Results and IRS-Census Match Methodology, Tax Year 2021

    December 2024

    Working Paper Number:

    CES-24-75

    The Earned Income Tax Credit (EITC), enacted in 1975, offers a refundable tax credit to low income working families. This paper provides taxpayer and dollar participation estimates for the EITC covering tax year 2021. The estimates derive from an approach that relies on linking the 2022 Current Population Survey Annual Social and Economic Supplement (CPS ASEC) to IRS administrative data. This approach, called the Exact Match, uses survey data to identify EITC eligible taxpayers and IRS administrative data to indicate which eligible taxpayers claimed and received the credit. Overall in tax year 2021 eligible taxpayers participated in the EITC program at a rate of 78 percent while dollar participation was 81 percent.
    View Full Paper PDF
  • Working Paper

    The Privacy-Protected Gridded Environmental Impacts Frame

    December 2024

    Working Paper Number:

    CES-24-74

    This paper introduces the Gridded Environmental Impacts Frame (Gridded EIF), a novel privacy-protected dataset derived from the U.S. Census Bureau's confidential Environmental Impacts Frame (EIF) microdata infrastructure. The EIF combines comprehensive administrative records and survey data on the U.S. population with high-resolution geospatial information on environmental hazards. While access to the EIF is restricted due to the confidential nature of the underlying data, the Gridded EIF offers a broader research community the opportunity to glean insights from the data while preserving confidentiality. We describe the data and privacy protection process, and offer guidance on appropriate usage, presenting practical applications.
    View Full Paper PDF
  • Working Paper

    The Census Historical Environmental Impacts Frame

    October 2024

    Working Paper Number:

    CES-24-66

    The Census Bureau's Environmental Impacts Frame (EIF) is a microdata infrastructure that combines individual-level information on residence, demographics, and economic characteristics with environmental amenities and hazards from 1999 through the present day. To better understand the long-run consequences and intergenerational effects of exposure to a changing environment, we expand the EIF by extending it backward to 1940. The Historical Environmental Impacts Frame (HEIF) combines the Census Bureau's historical administrative data, publicly available 1940 address information from the 1940 Decennial Census, and historical environmental data. This paper discusses the creation of the HEIF as well as the unique challenges that arise with using the Census Bureau's historical administrative data.
    View Full Paper PDF
  • Working Paper

    Nonresponse and Coverage Bias in the Household Pulse Survey: Evidence from Administrative Data

    October 2024

    Working Paper Number:

    CES-24-60

    The Household Pulse Survey (HPS) conducted by the U.S. Census Bureau is a unique survey that provided timely data on the effects of the COVID-19 Pandemic on American households and continues to provide data on other emergent social and economic issues. Because the survey has a response rate in the single digits and only has an online response mode, there are concerns about nonresponse and coverage bias. In this paper, we match administrative data from government agencies and third-party data to HPS respondents to examine how representative they are of the U.S. population. For comparison, we create a benchmark of American Community Survey (ACS) respondents and nonrespondents and include the ACS respondents as another point of reference. Overall, we find that the HPS is less representative of the U.S. population than the ACS. However, performance varies across administrative variables, and the existing weighting adjustments appear to greatly improve the representativeness of the HPS. Additionally, we look at household characteristics by their email domain to examine the effects on coverage from limiting email messages in 2023 to addresses from the contact frame with at least 90% deliverability rates, finding no clear change in the representativeness of the HPS afterwards.
    View Full Paper PDF
  • Working Paper

    Comparison of Child Reporting in the American Community Survey and Federal Income Tax Returns Based on California Birth Records

    September 2024

    Authors: Gloria G. Aldana

    Working Paper Number:

    CES-24-55

    This paper takes advantage of administrative records from California, a state with a large child population and a significant historical undercount of children in Census Bureau data, dependent information in the Internal Revenue Service (IRS) Form 1040 records, and the American Community Survey to characterize undercounted children and compare child reporting. While IRS Form 1040 records offer potential utility for adjusting child undercounting in Census Bureau surveys, this analysis finds overlapping reporting issues among various demographic and economic groups. Specifically, older children, those of Non-Hispanic Black mothers and Hispanic mothers, children or parents with lower English proficiency, children whose mothers did not complete high school, and families with lower income-to-poverty ratio were less frequently reported in IRS 1040 records than other groups. Therefore, using IRS 1040 dependent records may have limitations for accurately representing populations with characteristics associated with the undercount of children in surveys.
    View Full Paper PDF
  • Working Paper

    Gradient Boosting to Address Statistical Problems Arising from Non-Linkage of Census Bureau Datasets

    June 2024

    Working Paper Number:

    CES-24-27

    This article introduces the twangRDC package, which contains functions to address non-linkage in US Census Bureau datasets. The Census Bureau's Person Identification Validation System facilitates data linkage by assigning unique person identifiers to federal, third party, decennial census, and survey data. Not all records in these datasets can be linked to the reference file and as such not all records will be assigned an identifier. This article is a tutorial for using the twangRDC to generate nonresponse weights to account for non-linkage of person records across US Census Bureau datasets.
    View Full Paper PDF
  • Working Paper

    Where Are Your Parents? Exploring Potential Bias in Administrative Records on Children

    March 2024

    Working Paper Number:

    CES-24-18

    This paper examines potential bias in the Census Household Composition Key's (CHCK) probabilistic parent-child linkages. By linking CHCK data to the American Community Survey (ACS), we reveal disparities in parent-child linkages among specific demographic groups and find that characteristics of children that can and cannot be linked to the CHCK vary considerably from the larger population. In particular, we find that children from low-income, less educated households and of Hispanic origin are less likely to be linked to a mother or a father in the CHCK. We also highlight some data considerations when using the CHCK.
    View Full Paper PDF
  • Working Paper

    The Changing Nature of Pollution, Income, and Environmental Inequality in the United States

    January 2024

    Working Paper Number:

    CES-24-04

    This paper uses administrative tax records linked to Census demographic data and high-resolution measures of fine small particulate (PM2.5) exposure to study the evolution of the Black-White pollution exposure gap over the past 40 years. In doing so, we focus on the various ways in which income may have contributed to these changes using a statistical decomposition. We decompose the overall change in the Black-White PM2.5 exposure gap into (1) components that stem from rank-preserving compression in the overall pollution distribution and (2) changes that stem from a reordering of Black and White households within the pollution distribution. We find a significant narrowing of the Black-White PM2.5 exposure gap over this time period that is overwhelmingly driven by rank-preserving changes rather than positional changes. However, the relative positions of Black and White households at the upper end of the pollution distribution have meaningfully shifted in the most recent years.
    View Full Paper PDF
  • Working Paper

    Incorporating Administrative Data in Survey Weights for the Basic Monthly Current Population Survey

    January 2024

    Working Paper Number:

    CES-24-02

    Response rates to the Current Population Survey (CPS) have declined over time, raising the potential for nonresponse bias in key population statistics. A potential solution is to leverage administrative data from government agencies and third-party data providers when constructing survey weights. In this paper, we take two approaches. First, we use administrative data to build a non-parametric nonresponse adjustment step while leaving the calibration to population estimates unchanged. Second, we use administratively linked data in the calibration process, matching income data from the Internal Return Service and state agencies, demographic data from the Social Security Administration and the decennial census, and industry data from the Census Bureau's Business Register to both responding and nonresponding households. We use the matched data in the household nonresponse adjustment of the CPS weighting algorithm, which changes the weights of respondents to account for differential nonresponse rates among subpopulations. After running the experimental weighting algorithm, we compare estimates of the unemployment rate and labor force participation rate between the experimental weights and the production weights. Before March 2020, estimates of the labor force participation rates using the experimental weights are 0.2 percentage points higher than the original estimates, with minimal effect on unemployment rate. After March 2020, the new labor force participation rates are similar, but the unemployment rate is about 0.2 percentage points higher in some months during the height of COVID-related interviewing restrictions. These results are suggestive that if there is any nonresponse bias present in the CPS, the magnitude is comparable to the typical margin of error of the unemployment rate estimate. Additionally, the results are overall similar across demographic groups and states, as well as using alternative weighting methodology. Finally, we discuss how our estimates compare to those from earlier papers that calculate estimates of bias in key CPS labor force statistics. This paper is for research purposes only. No changes to production are being implemented at this time.
    View Full Paper PDF