CREAT: Census Research Exploration and Analysis Tool

Papers Containing Keywords(s): 'neighborhood'

The following papers contain search terms that you selected. From the papers listed below, you can navigate to the PDF, the profile page for that working paper, or see all the working papers written by an author. You can also explore tags, keywords, and authors that occur frequently within these papers.
Click here to search again

Frequently Occurring Concepts within this Search

American Community Survey - 32

Decennial Census - 31

Metropolitan Statistical Area - 30

Ordinary Least Squares - 23

Census Bureau Disclosure Review Board - 21

Federal Statistical Research Data Center - 20

Housing and Urban Development - 17

Chicago Census Research Data Center - 16

2010 Census - 15

Center for Economic Studies - 15

Department of Housing and Urban Development - 15

National Science Foundation - 14

Internal Revenue Service - 13

Current Population Survey - 11

Longitudinal Employer Household Dynamics - 11

American Housing Survey - 11

Protected Identification Key - 10

MTO - 10

Bureau of Labor Statistics - 9

Federal Reserve Bank - 8

Disclosure Review Board - 8

Special Sworn Status - 8

National Bureau of Economic Research - 7

Department of Economics - 7

Longitudinal Business Database - 7

PSID - 6

Geographic Information Systems - 6

Department of Agriculture - 6

Social Security Number - 6

W-2 - 6

Employer Identification Numbers - 6

Indian Health Service - 6

Research Data Center - 6

Standard Statistical Establishment List - 6

Adjusted Gross Income - 5

Russell Sage Foundation - 5

Core Based Statistical Area - 5

Social Security Administration - 5

Alfred P Sloan Foundation - 5

Harvard University - 5

Supreme Court - 5

American Economic Association - 5

1940 Census - 5

North American Industry Classification System - 5

Consolidated Metropolitan Statistical Areas - 5

Census 2000 - 5

Center for Administrative Records Research - 5

Public Use Micro Sample - 5

Social Security - 4

UC Berkeley - 4

Opportunity Atlas - 4

Bureau of Economic Analysis - 4

Economic Census - 4

Standard Industrial Classification - 4

County Business Patterns - 4

Survey of Income and Program Participation - 3

National Institutes of Health - 3

Integrated Public Use Microdata Series - 3

University of Chicago - 3

Office of Management and Budget - 3

Earned Income Tax Credit - 3

Unemployment Insurance - 3

International Trade Research Report - 3

Master Address File - 3

Generalized Method of Moments - 3

Postal Service - 3

Linear Probability Models - 3

Federal Reserve System - 3

Characteristics of Business Owners - 3

Survey of Business Owners - 3

Department of Commerce - 3

National Longitudinal Survey of Youth - 3

Census Bureau Longitudinal Business Database - 3

Environmental Protection Agency - 3

Quarterly Census of Employment and Wages - 3

New York University - 3

housing - 49

resident - 44

residential - 39

metropolitan - 39

residence - 31

population - 30

segregation - 29

poverty - 26

ethnicity - 25

racial - 24

urban - 24

disadvantaged - 22

minority - 21

rent - 21

disparity - 20

suburb - 19

socioeconomic - 19

ethnic - 19

race - 18

neighbor - 18

renter - 17

city - 17

home - 16

hispanic - 16

black - 16

segregated - 15

white - 14

house - 13

homeowner - 13

rural - 12

immigrant - 12

reside - 12

migrant - 12

residential segregation - 11

discrimination - 11

census data - 11

income neighborhoods - 11

econometric - 11

community - 10

migration - 10

state - 9

district - 9

estimating - 9

family - 8

suburbanization - 8

suburban - 8

town - 8

employ - 8

recession - 8

relocate - 8

amenity - 8

intergenerational - 7

welfare - 7

poorer - 7

relocation - 7

apartment - 7

migrating - 7

immigration - 7

census research - 7

locality - 7

employed - 7

urbanization - 6

sociology - 6

geographic - 6

heterogeneity - 6

workforce - 6

geographically - 6

relocating - 6

economically - 6

migrate - 6

estimation - 6

moving - 6

establishment - 6

urbanized - 5

citizen - 5

labor - 5

area - 5

hiring - 5

entrepreneur - 5

census use - 5

data census - 5

respondent - 5

crime - 5

impact - 5

census bureau - 5

market - 5

survey - 4

affluent - 4

geography - 4

child - 4

unemployed - 4

2010 census - 4

economic census - 4

housing survey - 4

retail - 4

discriminatory - 4

job - 4

residing - 4

generation - 3

mortgage - 3

rurality - 3

country - 3

saving - 3

interracial - 3

mobility - 3

income children - 3

worker - 3

venture - 3

entrepreneurship - 3

proprietor - 3

microdata - 3

regression - 3

utility - 3

incorporated - 3

research census - 3

census survey - 3

social - 3

census responses - 3

financial - 3

school - 3

sale - 3

assimilation - 3

work census - 3

network - 3

native - 3

immigrant population - 3

pollution - 3

environmental - 3

economist - 3

Viewing papers 11 through 20 of 86


  • Working Paper

    Contrasting the Local and National Demographic Incidence of Local Labor Demand Shocks

    July 2024

    Working Paper Number:

    CES-24-36

    This paper examines how spatial frictions that differ among heterogeneous workers and establishments shape the geographic and demographic incidence of alternative local labor demand shocks, with implications for the appropriate level of government at which to fund local economic initiatives. LEHD data featuring millions of job transitions facilitate estimation of a rich two-sided labor market assignment model. The model generates simulated forecasts of many alternative local demand shocks featuring different establishment compositions and local areas. Workers within 10 miles receive only 11.2% (6.6%) of nationwide welfare (employment) short-run gains, with at least 35.9% (62.0%) accruing to out-of-state workers, despite much larger per-worker impacts for the closest workers. Local incidence by demographic category is very sensitive to shock composition, but different shocks produce similar demographic incidence farther from the shock. Furthermore, the remaining heterogeneity in incidence at the state or national level can reverse patterns of heterogeneous demographic impacts at the local level. Overall, the results suggest that reduced-form approaches using distant locations as controls can produce accurate estimates of local shock impacts on local workers, but that the distribution of local impacts badly approximates shocks' statewide or national incidence.
    View Full Paper PDF
  • Working Paper

    Who Marries Whom? The Role of Segregation by Race and Class

    June 2024

    Working Paper Number:

    CES-24-30

    Americans rarely marry outside of their race or class group. We distinguish between two possible explanations: a lack of exposure to other groups versus a preference to marry within group. We develop an instrument for neighborhood exposure to opposite-sex members of other race and class groups using variation in sex ratios among nearby birth cohorts in childhood neighborhoods. We then test whether increased exposure results in more interracial (white-Black) and interclass (top-to-bottom parent income quartile) marriages. Increased exposure to opposite-sex members of other class groups generates a substantial increase in interclass marriage, but increased exposure to other race groups has no detectable effect on interracial marriage. We use these results to estimate a spatial model of the marriage market and quantify the impact of reducing residential segregation in general equilibrium. For small changes in exposure, the model implies effects in line with recent estimates from policy experiments. We then use the model to assess the overall contribution of segregation and find that residential segregation has large effects on interclass, but not interracial, marriage.
    View Full Paper PDF
  • Working Paper

    Whose Neighborhood Now? Gentrification and Community Life in Low-Income Urban Neighborhoods

    June 2024

    Authors: AJ Golio

    Working Paper Number:

    CES-24-29

    Gentrification is a process of urban change that has wide-ranging social and political impacts, but previous studies provide divergent findings. Does gentrification leave residents feeling alienated, or does it bolster neighborhood social satisfaction? Politically, does urban change mobilize residents, or leave them disengaged? I assess a national, cross-sectional sample of about 17,500 respondents in lower-income urban neighborhoods, and use a structural equation modeling approach to model six latent variables pertaining to local social environment and political participation. Amongst the full sample, gentrification has a positive association with all six factors. However, this relationship depends upon respondents' level of income, length of residency, and racial identity. White residents and those with shorter length of residency report higher levels of social cohesion as gentrification increases, but there is no such association amongst racial minority groups and longer-term residents. This finding aligns with a perspective on gentrification as a racialized process, and demonstrates that gentrification-related amenities primarily serve the interests of white residents and newcomers. All groups, however, are more likely to participate in neighborhood politics as gentrification increases, drawing attention to the agency of local residents as they attempt to influence processes of urban change.
    View Full Paper PDF
  • Working Paper

    Neighborhood Revitalization and Residential Sorting

    March 2024

    Working Paper Number:

    CES-24-12

    The HOPE VI Revitalization program sought to transform high-poverty neighborhoods into mixed-income communities through the demolition of public housing projects and the construction of new housing. We use longitudinal administrative data to investigate how the program affected both neighborhoods and individual residential outcomes. In line with the stated objectives, we find that the program reduced poverty rates in targeted neighborhoods and enabled subsidized renters to live in lower-poverty neighborhoods, on average. The primary beneficiaries were not the original neighborhood residents, most of whom moved away. Instead, subsidized renters who moved into the neighborhoods after an award experienced the largest reductions in neighborhood poverty. The program reduced the stock of public housing in targeted neighborhoods but expanded access to housing vouchers in other, lower-poverty neighborhoods. Spillover effects on the poverty rates of other neighborhoods were small and dispersed throughout the city. Our estimates imply that cities that revitalized half of their public housing stock reduced the average neighborhood poverty rate among all subsidized renters by 4.1 percentage points.
    View Full Paper PDF
  • Working Paper

    Where to Build Affordable Housing? Evaluating the Tradeoffs of Location

    December 2023

    Working Paper Number:

    CES-23-62R

    How does the location of affordable housing affect tenant welfare, the distribution of assistance, and broader societal objectives such as racial integration? Using administrative data on tenants of units funded by the Low-Income Housing Tax Credit (LIHTC), we first show that characteristics such as race and proxies for need vary widely across neighborhoods. Despite fixed eligibility requirements, LIHTC developments in more opportunity-rich neighborhoods house tenants who are higher income, more educated, and far less likely to be Black. To quantify the welfare implications, we build a residential choice model in which households choose from both market-rate and affordable housing options, where the latter must be rationed. While building affordable housing in higher-opportunity neighborhoods costs more, it also increases household welfare and reduces city-wide segregation. The gains in household welfare, however, accrue to more moderate-need, non-Black/Hispanic households at the expense of other households. This change in the distribution of assistance is primarily due to a 'crowding out' effect: households that only apply for assistance in higher-opportunity neighborhoods crowd out those willing to apply regardless of location. Finally, other policy levers'such as lowering the income limits used for means-testing'have only limited effects relative to the choice of location.
    View Full Paper PDF
  • Working Paper

    The Local Origins of Business Formation

    July 2023

    Working Paper Number:

    CES-23-34

    What locations generate more business ideas, and where are ideas more likely to turn into businesses? Using comprehensive administrative data on business applications, we analyze the spatial disparity in the creation of business ideas and the formation of new employer startups from these ideas. Startups per capita exhibit enormous variation across granular units of geography. We decompose this variation into variation in ideas per capita and in their rate of transition to startups, and find that both components matter. Observable local demographic, economic, financial, and business conditions accounts for a significant fraction of the variation in startups per capita, and more so for the variation in ideas per capita than in transition rate. Income, education, age, and foreign-born share are generally strong positive correlates of both idea generation and transition. Overall, the relationship of local conditions with ideas differs from that with transition rate in magnitude, and sometimes, in sign: certain conditions (notably, the African-American share of the population) are positively associated with ideas, but negatively with transition rates. We also find a close correspondence between the actual rank of locations in terms of startups per capita and the predicted rank based only on observable local conditions ' a result useful for characterizing locations with high startup activity.
    View Full Paper PDF
  • Working Paper

    Using Restricted-Access ACS Data to Examine Economic and Noneconomic Factors of Interstate Migration By Race and Ethnicity

    March 2023

    Working Paper Number:

    CES-23-12

    We explore how determinants of internal migration differ between Black non-Hispanics, White non-Hispanics, and Hispanics using micro-level, restricted-use American Community Survey (ACS) data matched to data on attributes of sub-geographies down to the county level. This paper extends the discussion of internal migration in the U.S. by not only observing relationships between economic and noneconomic factors and household-level propensities to migrate, but also how these relationships differ across race and ethnicity within smaller geographies than have been explored in previous literature. We show that when controlling for household and location characteristics, minorities have a lower propensity to migrate than White households and document nuances in the responsiveness of internal migration to individual and locational attributes by racial and ethnic population subgroups.
    View Full Paper PDF
  • Working Paper

    The Long-run Effects of the 1930s Redlining Maps on Children

    December 2022

    Working Paper Number:

    CES-22-56

    We estimate the long-run effects of the 1930s Home Owners Loan Corporation (HOLC) redlining maps by linking children in the full count 1940 Census to 1) the universe of IRS tax data in 1974 and 1979 and 2) the long form 2000 Census. We use two identification strategies to estimate the potential long-run effects of differential access to credit along HOLC boundaries. The first strategy compares cross-boundary differences along HOLC boundaries to a comparison group of boundaries that had statistically similar pre-existing differences as the actual boundaries. A second approach only uses boundaries that were least likely to have been chosen by the HOLC based on our statistical model. We find that children living on the lower-graded side of HOLC boundaries had significantly lower levels of educational attainment, reduced income in adulthood, and lived in neighborhoods during adulthood characterized by lower educational attainment, higher poverty rates, and higher rates of single-headed households.
    View Full Paper PDF
  • Working Paper

    Improving Estimates of Neighborhood Change with Constant Tract Boundaries

    May 2022

    Working Paper Number:

    CES-22-16

    Social scientists routinely rely on methods of interpolation to adjust available data to their research needs. This study calls attention to the potential for substantial error in efforts to harmonize data to constant boundaries using standard approaches to areal and population interpolation. We compare estimates from a standard source (the Longitudinal Tract Data Base) to true values calculated by re-aggregating original 2000 census microdata to 2010 tract areas. We then demonstrate an alternative approach that allows the re-aggregated values to be publicly disclosed, using 'differential privacy' (DP) methods to inject random noise to protect confidentiality of the raw data. The DP estimates are considerably more accurate than the interpolated estimates. We also examine conditions under which interpolation is more susceptible to error. This study reveals cause for greater caution in the use of interpolated estimates from any source. Until and unless DP estimates can be publicly disclosed for a wide range of variables and years, research on neighborhood change should routinely examine data for signs of estimation error that may be substantial in a large share of tracts that experienced complex boundary changes.
    View Full Paper PDF
  • Working Paper

    Metropolitan Segregation: No Breakthrough in Sight

    May 2022

    Working Paper Number:

    CES-22-14

    The 2020 Census offers new information on changes in residential segregation in metropolitan regions across the country as they continue to become more diverse. We take a long view, assessing trends since 1980 and extrapolating to the future. These new data mostly reinforce patterns that were observed a decade ago: high but slowly declining black-white segregation, and less intense but hardly changing segregation of Hispanics and Asians from whites. Enough time has passed since the civil rights era of the 1960s and 1970s to draw this conclusion: segregation will continue to divide Americans well into the 21st Century.
    View Full Paper PDF