CREAT: Census Research Exploration and Analysis Tool

Papers Containing Keywords(s): 'report'

The following papers contain search terms that you selected. From the papers listed below, you can navigate to the PDF, the profile page for that working paper, or see all the working papers written by an author. You can also explore tags, keywords, and authors that occur frequently within these papers.
Click here to search again

Frequently Occurring Concepts within this Search

Center for Economic Studies - 32

Bureau of Labor Statistics - 32

North American Industry Classification System - 30

National Science Foundation - 26

Internal Revenue Service - 24

Longitudinal Employer Household Dynamics - 18

Longitudinal Business Database - 18

Employer Identification Numbers - 18

Census Bureau Disclosure Review Board - 16

Economic Census - 16

Annual Survey of Manufactures - 16

Standard Industrial Classification - 16

American Community Survey - 15

Business Register - 15

Current Population Survey - 15

Social Security Administration - 15

Cornell University - 14

Federal Statistical Research Data Center - 14

Quarterly Workforce Indicators - 13

Bureau of Economic Analysis - 13

Service Annual Survey - 13

County Business Patterns - 12

Quarterly Census of Employment and Wages - 12

Disclosure Review Board - 12

Research Data Center - 12

Census of Manufactures - 11

Longitudinal Research Database - 11

Federal Reserve Bank - 9

Census Bureau Business Register - 9

Social Security Number - 8

Decennial Census - 8

Local Employment Dynamics - 8

Standard Statistical Establishment List - 8

LEHD Program - 7

Metropolitan Statistical Area - 7

Business Dynamics Statistics - 7

Social Security - 7

Census Bureau Longitudinal Business Database - 7

Small Business Administration - 7

Alfred P Sloan Foundation - 7

Survey of Income and Program Participation - 7

Company Organization Survey - 6

Master Address File - 6

Postal Service - 6

Management and Organizational Practices Survey - 6

Protected Identification Key - 6

Special Sworn Status - 6

Department of Labor - 6

American Statistical Association - 6

2010 Census - 5

Financial, Insurance and Real Estate Industries - 5

National Bureau of Economic Research - 5

Unemployment Insurance - 5

University of Chicago - 5

Ordinary Least Squares - 5

Securities and Exchange Commission - 5

Cornell Institute for Social and Economic Research - 5

Individual Characteristics File - 4

Census of Manufacturing Firms - 4

Characteristics of Business Owners - 4

Accommodation and Food Services - 4

COVID-19 - 4

Department of Health and Human Services - 4

Board of Governors - 4

Sloan Foundation - 4

Department of Commerce - 4

Total Factor Productivity - 4

Medical Expenditure Panel Survey - 4

Permanent Plant Number - 4

Chicago Census Research Data Center - 4

Journal of Economic Literature - 4

Organization for Economic Cooperation and Development - 4

Employer Characteristics File - 3

Composite Person Record - 3

Office of Management and Budget - 3

Arts, Entertainment - 3

Annual Business Survey - 3

National Center for Health Statistics - 3

Centers for Disease Control and Prevention - 3

Federal Reserve System - 3

National Institute on Aging - 3

International Trade Research Report - 3

University of Maryland - 3

Census Bureau Center for Economic Studies - 3

Michigan Institute for Teaching and Research in Economics - 3

Kauffman Foundation - 3

Review of Economics and Statistics - 3

American Economic Review - 3

Information and Communication Technology Survey - 3

Establishment Micro Properties - 3

Business Master File - 3

Bureau of Labor - 3

American Economic Association - 3

Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality - 3

Statistics Canada - 3

Auxiliary Establishment Survey - 3

survey - 29

statistical - 25

respondent - 24

data - 22

census bureau - 21

agency - 19

payroll - 18

data census - 18

microdata - 18

census data - 14

employed - 14

quarterly - 14

population - 13

workforce - 13

record - 13

disclosure - 12

analysis - 12

employ - 11

use census - 10

research census - 10

estimating - 10

aggregate - 10

employee - 10

reporting - 10

enterprise - 10

economic census - 9

labor - 9

sector - 9

research - 9

earnings - 9

researcher - 9

census employment - 8

census survey - 8

datasets - 8

study - 8

econometric - 8

employment statistics - 7

federal - 7

census research - 7

confidentiality - 7

information - 7

manufacturing - 7

longitudinal - 7

business data - 7

imputation - 7

sale - 7

statistician - 7

privacy - 7

employment data - 6

2010 census - 6

prevalence - 6

coverage - 6

recession - 6

database - 6

organizational - 6

aggregation - 6

expenditure - 6

statistical agencies - 6

labor statistics - 6

work census - 5

information census - 5

irs - 5

company - 5

estimation - 5

economist - 5

market - 5

department - 5

discrepancy - 5

export - 5

macroeconomic - 5

revenue - 5

yearly - 5

incorporated - 5

trend - 5

employment count - 5

average - 5

percentile - 4

assessed - 4

census disclosure - 4

censuses surveys - 4

employee data - 4

census years - 4

employment estimates - 4

assessing - 4

medicaid - 4

production - 4

accounting - 4

census use - 4

workplace - 4

employment measures - 4

manager - 4

tenure - 4

firms census - 4

management - 4

insurance - 4

statistical disclosure - 4

industrial - 4

aging - 4

worker - 4

decade - 3

investment - 3

impact - 3

residential - 3

resident - 3

state - 3

estimates employment - 3

policymakers - 3

medicare - 3

publicly - 3

salary - 3

employment earnings - 3

productivity growth - 3

manufacturer - 3

acquisition - 3

businesses census - 3

workforce indicators - 3

import - 3

exporting - 3

exporter - 3

surveys censuses - 3

filing - 3

uninsured - 3

enrollee - 3

establishment - 3

performance - 3

analyst - 3

firms export - 3

firms exporting - 3

measure - 3

census business - 3

empirical - 3

Viewing papers 11 through 20 of 63


  • Working Paper

    Decomposing Aggregate Productivity

    July 2022

    Working Paper Number:

    CES-22-25

    In this note, we evaluate the sensitivity of commonly-used decompositions for aggregate productivity. Our analysis spans the universe of U.S. manufacturers from 1977 to 2012 and we find that, even holding the data and form of the production function fixed, results on aggregate productivity are extremely sensitive to how productivity at the firm level is measured. Even qualitative statements about the levels of aggregate productivity and the sign of the covariance between productivity and size are highly dependent on how production function parameters are estimated. Despite these difficulties, we uncover some consistent facts about productivity growth: (1) labor productivity is consistently higher and less error-prone than measures of multi-factor productivity; (2) most productivity growth comes from growth within firms, rather than from reallocation across firms; (3) what growth does come from reallocation appears to be driven by net entry, primarily from the exit of relatively less-productive firms.
    View Full Paper PDF
  • Working Paper

    Redesigning the Longitudinal Business Database

    May 2021

    Working Paper Number:

    CES-21-08

    In this paper we describe the U.S. Census Bureau's redesign and production implementation of the Longitudinal Business Database (LBD) first introduced by Jarmin and Miranda (2002). The LBD is used to create the Business Dynamics Statistics (BDS), tabulations describing the entry, exit, expansion, and contraction of businesses. The new LBD and BDS also incorporate information formerly provided by the Statistics of U.S. Businesses program, which produced similar year-to-year measures of employment and establishment flows. We describe in detail how the LBD is created from curation of the input administrative data, longitudinal matching, retiming of economic census-year births and deaths, creation of vintage consistent industry codes and noise factors, and the creation and cleaning of each year of LBD data. This documentation is intended to facilitate the proper use and understanding of the data by both researchers with approved projects accessing the LBD microdata and those using the BDS tabulations.
    View Full Paper PDF
  • Working Paper

    Business Formation: A Tale of Two Recessions

    January 2021

    Working Paper Number:

    CES-21-01

    The trajectory of new business applications and transitions to employer businesses differ markedly during the Great Recession and COVID-19 Recession. Both applications and transitions to employer startups decreased slowly but persistently in the post-Lehman crisis period of the Great Recession. In contrast, during the COVID-19 Recession new applications initially declined but have since sharply rebounded, resulting in a surge in applications during 2020. Projected transitions to employer businesses also rise but this is dampened by a change in the composition of applications in 2020 towards applications that are more likely to be nonemployers.
    View Full Paper PDF
  • Working Paper

    Total Error and Variability Measures for the Quarterly Workforce Indicators and LEHD Origin Destination Employment Statistics in OnTheMap

    September 2020

    Working Paper Number:

    CES-20-30

    We report results from the first comprehensive total quality evaluation of five major indicators in the U.S. Census Bureau's Longitudinal Employer-Household Dynamics (LEHD) Program Quarterly Workforce Indicators (QWI): total flow-employment, beginning-of-quarter employment, full quarter employment, average monthly earnings of full-quarter employees, and total quarterly payroll. Beginning-of-quarter employment is also the main tabulation variable in the LEHD Origin-Destination Employment Statistics (LODES) workplace reports as displayed in On-TheMap (OTM), including OnTheMap for Emergency Management. We account for errors due to coverage; record-level non response; edit and imputation of item missing data; and statistical disclosure limitation. The analysis reveals that the five publication variables under study are estimated very accurately for tabulations involving at least 10 jobs. Tabulations involving three to nine jobs are a transition zone, where cells may be fit for use with caution. Tabulations involving one or two jobs, which are generally suppressed on fitness-for-use criteria in the QWI and synthesized in LODES, have substantial total variability but can still be used to estimate statistics for untabulated aggregates as long as the job count in the aggregate is more than 10.
    View Full Paper PDF
  • Working Paper

    Measuring the Effect of COVID-19 on U.S. Small Businesses: The Small Business Pulse Survey

    May 2020

    Working Paper Number:

    CES-20-16

    In response to the novel coronavirus (COVID-19) pandemic, the Census Bureau developed and fielded an entirely new survey intended to measure the effect on small businesses. The Small Business Pulse Survey (SBPS) will run weekly from April 26 to June 27, 2020. Results from the SBPS will be published weekly through a visualization tool with downloadable data. We describe the motivation for SBPS, summarize how the content for the survey was developed, and discuss some of the initial results from the survey. We also describe future plans for the SBPS collections and for our research using the SBPS data. Estimates from the first week of the SBPS indicate large to moderate negative effects of COVID-19 on small businesses, and yet the majority expect to return to usual level of operations within the next six months. Reflecting the Census Bureau's commitment to scientific inquiry and transparency, the micro data from the SBPS will be available to qualified researchers on approved projects in the Federal Statistical Research Data Center network.
    View Full Paper PDF
  • Working Paper

    Are Customs Records Consistent Across Countries? Evidence from the U.S. and Colombia

    March 2020

    Working Paper Number:

    CES-20-11

    In many countries, official customs records include identifying information on the exporting and importing firms involved in each shipment. This information allows researchers to study international business networks, offshoring patterns, and the micro-foundations of aggregate trade flows. It also provides the government with a basis for tariff assessments at the border. However, there are no mechanisms in place to ensure that the shipment-level information recorded by the exporting country is consistent with the shipment-level information recorded by the importing country. And to the extent that there are discrepancies, it is not clear how prevalent they are or what form they take. In this paper we explore these issues, both to enhance our understanding of the limitations of customs records, and to inform future discussions of possible revisions in the way they are collected. Specifically, we match U.S.-bound export shipments that appear in Colombian Customs records (DIAN) with their counterparts in the US Customs records (LFTTD): U.S. import shipments from Colombia. Several patterns emerge. First, differences in the coverage of the two countries customs records lead to significant discrepancies in the official bilateral trade flow statistics of these two countries: the DIAN database records 8 percent fewer transactions than the LFTTD database over the sample period, and the average export shipment size in the DIAN is roughly 4 percent smaller than the corresponding import shipment size in the LFTTD. These discrepancies are not due to difference in minimum shipment sizes and they are not particular to a few sectors, though they are more common among small shipments and they evolve over time. Second, if we rely exclusively on firms' names and addresses, ignoring other shipment characteristics (value, product code, etc.), we are able to match 85 percent of the value of U.S. imports from Colombia in our LFTTD sample with particular Colombian suppliers in the DIAN. Further, fully 97 percent of the value of Colombian exports to the U.S. can be mapped onto particular importers in the U.S. LFTTD. Third, however, match rates at the shipment level within buyer-seller pairs are low. That is, while buyers and sellers can be paired up fairly accurately, only 25-30 percent of the individual transactions in the customs records of the two countries can be matched using fuzzy algorithms at reasonable tolerance levels. Fourth, the manufacturer ID (MANUF_ID) that appears in the LFTTD implies there are roughly twice as many Colombian exporters as actually appear in the DIAN. And similar comments apply to an analogous MANUF_ID variable constructed from importer name and address information in the DIAN. Hence studies that treat each MANUF_ID value as a distinct firm are almost surely overstating the number of foreign firms that engage in trade with the U.S. by a substantial amount. Finally, we conclude that if countries were to require that exporters report standardized shipment identifiers'either invoice numbers or bill of lading/air waybill numbers'it would be far easier to track individual transactions and to identify international discrepancies in reporting.
    View Full Paper PDF
  • Working Paper

    Predictive Analytics and Organizational Architecture: Plant-Level Evidence from Census Data

    January 2019

    Working Paper Number:

    CES-19-02

    We examine trends in the use of predictive analytics for a sample of more than 25,000 manufacturing plants using proprietary data from the US Census Bureau. Comparing 2010 and 2015, we find that use of predictive analytics has increased markedly, with the greatest use in younger plants, professionally-managed firms, more educated workforces, and stable industries. Decisions on data to be gathered originate from headquarters and are associated with less delegation of decision-making and more widespread awareness of quantitative targets among plant employees. Performance targets become more accurate, long-term oriented, and linked to company-wide performance, and management incentives strengthen, both in terms of monetary bonuses and career outcomes. Plants increasing predictive analytics become more efficient, with lower inventory, increased volume of shipments, narrower product mix, reduced management payroll and increased use of flexible and temporary employees. Results are robust to a specification based on increased government demand for data.
    View Full Paper PDF
  • Working Paper

    The Management and Organizational Practices Survey (MOPS): Collection and Processing

    December 2018

    Working Paper Number:

    CES-18-51

    The U.S. Census Bureau partnered with a team of external researchers to conduct the first-ever large-scale survey of management practices in the United States, the Management and Organizational Practices Survey (MOPS), for reference year 2010. With the help of the research team, the Census Bureau expanded and improved the survey for a second wave for reference year 2015. The MOPS is a supplement to the Annual Survey of Manufacturing (ASM), and so the collection and processing strategy for the MOPS built on the methodology for the ASM, while differing on key dimensions to address the unique nature of management relative to other business data. This paper provides detail on the mail strategy pursued for the MOPS, the collection methods for paper and electronic responses, the processing and estimation procedures, and the official Census Bureau data releases. This detail is useful for all those who have interest in using the MOPS for research purposes, those wishing to understand the MOPS data more deeply, and those with an interest in survey methodology.
    View Full Paper PDF
  • Working Paper

    Disclosure Avoidance Techniques Used for the 1970 through 2010 Decennial Censuses of Population and Housing

    November 2018

    Authors: Laura McKenna

    Working Paper Number:

    CES-18-47

    The U.S. Census Bureau conducts the decennial censuses under Title 13 of the U. S. Code with the Section 9 mandate to not 'use the information furnished under the provisions of this title for any purpose other than the statistical purposes for which it is supplied; or make any publication whereby the data furnished by any particular establishment or individual under this title can be identified; or permit anyone other than the sworn officers and employees of the Department or bureau or agency thereof to examine the individual reports (13 U.S.C. ' 9 (2007)).' The Census Bureau applies disclosure avoidance techniques to its publicly released statistical products in order to protect the confidentiality of its respondents and their data.
    View Full Paper PDF
  • Working Paper

    Total Error and Variability Measures with Integrated Disclosure Limitation for Quarterly Workforce Indicators and LEHD Origin Destination Employment Statistics in On The Map

    January 2017

    Working Paper Number:

    CES-17-71

    We report results from the rst comprehensive total quality evaluation of five major indicators in the U.S. Census Bureau's Longitudinal Employer-Household Dynamics (LEHD) Program Quarterly Workforce Indicators (QWI): total employment, beginning-of-quarter employment, full-quarter employment, total payroll, and average monthly earnings of full-quarter employees. Beginning-of-quarter employment is also the main tabulation variable in the LEHD Origin-Destination Employment Statistics (LODES) workplace reports as displayed in OnTheMap (OTM). The evaluation is conducted by generating multiple threads of the edit and imputation models used in the LEHD Infrastructure File System. These threads conform to the Rubin (1987) multiple imputation model, with each thread or implicate being the output of formal probability models that address coverage, edit, and imputation errors. Design-based sampling variability and nite population corrections are also included in the evaluation. We derive special formulas for the Rubin total variability and its components that are consistent with the disclosure avoidance system used for QWI and LODES/OTM workplace reports. These formulas allow us to publish the complete set of detailed total quality measures for QWI and LODES. The analysis reveals that the five publication variables under study are estimated very accurately for tabulations involving at least 10 jobs. Tabulations involving three to nine jobs have quality in the range generally deemed acceptable. Tabulations involving zero, one or two jobs, which are generally suppressed in the QWI and synthesized in LODES, have substantial total variability but their publication in LODES allows the formation of larger custom aggregations, which will in general have the accuracy estimated for tabulations in the QWI based on a similar number of workers.
    View Full Paper PDF