CREAT: Census Research Exploration and Analysis Tool

Papers Containing Keywords(s): 'metropolitan'

The following papers contain search terms that you selected. From the papers listed below, you can navigate to the PDF, the profile page for that working paper, or see all the working papers written by an author. You can also explore tags, keywords, and authors that occur frequently within these papers.
Click here to search again

Frequently Occurring Concepts within this Search

Metropolitan Statistical Area - 38

American Community Survey - 29

Center for Economic Studies - 28

Decennial Census - 25

National Science Foundation - 23

Chicago Census Research Data Center - 21

Longitudinal Business Database - 17

Ordinary Least Squares - 16

North American Industry Classification System - 16

Bureau of Labor Statistics - 16

Standard Industrial Classification - 15

Bureau of Economic Analysis - 15

2010 Census - 14

Federal Statistical Research Data Center - 13

Longitudinal Employer Household Dynamics - 13

Consolidated Metropolitan Statistical Areas - 13

Current Population Survey - 12

Census of Manufactures - 12

Internal Revenue Service - 11

Special Sworn Status - 11

Core Based Statistical Area - 10

Quarterly Census of Employment and Wages - 10

Annual Survey of Manufactures - 10

Research Data Center - 10

Census Bureau Disclosure Review Board - 9

Standard Statistical Establishment List - 9

County Business Patterns - 9

Department of Economics - 8

Economic Census - 8

Longitudinal Research Database - 8

Office of Management and Budget - 7

Census Bureau Longitudinal Business Database - 7

Disclosure Review Board - 7

American Housing Survey - 7

Unemployment Insurance - 7

Public Use Micro Sample - 7

Total Factor Productivity - 6

National Bureau of Economic Research - 6

Protected Identification Key - 6

PSID - 6

Geographic Information Systems - 5

Service Annual Survey - 5

Employer Identification Numbers - 5

National Longitudinal Survey of Youth - 5

Housing and Urban Development - 5

Survey of Income and Program Participation - 5

Census Bureau Center for Economic Studies - 5

Generalized Method of Moments - 5

Integrated Public Use Microdata Series - 4

Federal Reserve Bank - 4

Financial, Insurance and Real Estate Industries - 4

National Establishment Time Series - 4

Herfindahl Hirschman Index - 4

Herfindahl-Hirschman - 4

Department of Agriculture - 4

Economic Research Service - 4

Business Register - 4

Social Security Administration - 4

Council of Economic Advisers - 4

Social and Economic Supplement - 4

1940 Census - 4

Quarterly Workforce Indicators - 4

University of Chicago - 4

United States Census Bureau - 4

Census 2000 - 4

Russell Sage Foundation - 3

Cobb-Douglas - 3

Wholesale Trade - 3

Characteristics of Business Owners - 3

Federal Reserve System - 3

Retail Trade - 3

Social Security - 3

Master Address File - 3

Social Security Number - 3

Department of Housing and Urban Development - 3

Journal of Economic Literature - 3

Employer Characteristics File - 3

Ewing Marion Kauffman Foundation - 3

Permanent Plant Number - 3

Environmental Protection Agency - 3

Wal-Mart - 3

neighborhood - 39

resident - 34

housing - 30

city - 28

residential - 25

population - 24

residence - 23

urban - 22

employ - 20

area - 19

workforce - 19

segregation - 16

suburb - 16

rural - 16

rent - 16

econometric - 16

employed - 16

geographically - 15

racial - 15

geographic - 14

regional - 14

recession - 14

establishment - 14

minority - 13

ethnic - 13

ethnicity - 13

disparity - 12

geography - 12

race - 12

poverty - 12

market - 11

sector - 11

black - 11

labor - 11

segregated - 10

urbanization - 10

growth - 10

immigrant - 10

socioeconomic - 10

white - 10

migrant - 10

disadvantaged - 10

relocating - 10

region - 9

estimating - 9

state - 9

relocate - 9

hispanic - 8

midwest - 8

suburbanization - 8

census data - 8

relocation - 8

income neighborhoods - 8

entrepreneurship - 8

economically - 8

endogeneity - 8

spillover - 8

industrial - 8

home - 8

reside - 8

migration - 8

locality - 8

residential segregation - 7

urbanized - 7

suburban - 7

town - 7

commute - 7

production - 7

heterogeneity - 7

impact - 7

census bureau - 7

immigration - 7

neighbor - 7

renter - 7

manufacturing - 7

district - 6

economist - 6

entrepreneur - 6

earnings - 6

externality - 6

amenity - 6

enterprise - 6

job - 6

homeowner - 6

census research - 6

mobility - 6

moving - 6

venture - 5

industry concentration - 5

employee - 5

occupation - 5

estimation - 5

data census - 5

survey - 5

incorporated - 5

house - 5

census employment - 5

migrating - 5

discrimination - 5

country - 4

employment growth - 4

expenditure - 4

profit - 4

shift - 4

entrepreneurial - 4

agriculture - 4

regional economic - 4

gdp - 4

company - 4

workplace - 4

microdata - 4

respondent - 4

economic census - 4

payroll - 4

statistical - 4

migrate - 4

demand - 4

agglomeration - 4

macroeconomic - 4

location - 4

citizen - 4

econometrically - 3

local economic - 3

specialization - 3

sale - 3

proprietorship - 3

research census - 3

rurality - 3

housing survey - 3

community - 3

capital - 3

2010 census - 3

work census - 3

unemployed - 3

cluster - 3

prevalence - 3

crime - 3

discriminatory - 3

unemployment rates - 3

agglomeration economies - 3

worker - 3

regional industry - 3

regional industries - 3

efficiency - 3

profitability - 3

Viewing papers 11 through 20 of 87


  • Working Paper

    Location, Location, Location

    October 2021

    Working Paper Number:

    CES-21-32R

    We use data from the Longitudinal Employer-Household Dynamics program to study the causal effects of location on earnings. Starting from a model with employer and employee fixed effects, we estimate the average earnings premiums associated with jobs in different commuting zones (CZs) and different CZ-industry pairs. About half of the variation in mean wages across CZs is attributable to differences in worker ability (as measured by their fixed effects); the other half is attributable to place effects. We show that the place effects from a richly specified cross sectional wage model overstate the causal effects of place (due to unobserved worker ability), while those from a model that simply adds person fixed effects understate the causal effects (due to unobserved heterogeneity in the premiums paid by different firms in the same CZ). Local industry agglomerations are associated with higher wages, but overall differences in industry composition and in CZ-specific returns to industries explain only a small fraction of average place effects. Estimating separate place effects for college and non-college workers, we find that the college wage gap is bigger in larger and higher-wage places, but that two-thirds of this variation is attributable to differences in the relative skills of the two groups in different places. Most of the remaining variation reflects the enhanced sorting of more educated workers to higher-paying industries in larger and higher-wage CZs. Finally, we find that local housing costs at least fully offset local pay premiums, implying that workers who move to larger CZs have no higher net-of-housing consumption.
    View Full Paper PDF
  • Working Paper

    Small Business Pulse Survey Estimates by Owner Characteristics and Rural/Urban Designation

    September 2021

    Working Paper Number:

    CES-21-24

    In response to requests from policymakers for additional context for Small Business Pulse Survey (SBPS) measures of the impact of COVID-19 on small businesses, we researched developing estimates by owner characteristics and rural/urban locations. Leveraging geographic coding on the Business Register, we create estimates of the effect of the pandemic on small businesses by urban and rural designations. A more challenging exercise entails linking micro-level data from the SBPS with ownership data from the Annual Business Survey (ABS) to create estimates of the effect of the pandemic on small businesses by owner race, sex, ethnicity, and veteran status. Given important differences in survey design and concerns about nonresponse bias, we face significant challenges in producing estimates for owner demographics. We discuss our attempts to meet these challenges and provide discussion about caution that must be used in interpreting the results. The estimates produced for this paper are available for download. Reflecting the Census Bureau's commitment to scientific inquiry and transparency, the micro data from the SBPS will be available to qualified researchers on approved projects in the Federal Statistical Research Data Center network.
    View Full Paper PDF
  • Working Paper

    Immigration and the Demand for Urban Housing

    August 2021

    Authors: Miles M. Finney

    Working Paper Number:

    CES-21-23

    The immigrant population has grown dramatically in the US in the last fifty years. This study estimates housing demand among immigrants and discusses how immigration may be altering the structure of US urban areas. Immigrants are found to consume less housing per capita than native born US residents.
    View Full Paper PDF
  • Working Paper

    The Impacts of Opportunity Zones on Zone Residents

    June 2021

    Working Paper Number:

    CES-21-12

    Created by the Tax Cuts and Jobs Act in 2017, the Opportunity Zone program was designed to encourage investment in distressed communities across the U.S. We examine the early impacts of the Opportunity Zone program on residents of targeted areas. We leverage restricted-access microdata from the American Community Survey and employ difference-in-differences and matching approaches to estimate causal reduced-form effects of the program. Our results point to modest, if any, positive effects of the Opportunity Zone program on the employment, earnings, or poverty of zone residents.
    View Full Paper PDF
  • Working Paper

    Changes in Metropolitan Area Definition, 1910-2010

    February 2021

    Authors: Todd Gardner

    Working Paper Number:

    CES-21-04

    The Census Bureau was established as a permanent agency in 1902, as industrialization and urbanization were bringing about rapid changes in American society. The years following the establishment of a permanent Census Bureau saw the first attempts at devising statistical geography for tabulating statistics for large cities and their environs. These efforts faced several challenges owing to the variation in settlement patterns, political organization, and rates of growth across the United States. The 1910 census proved to be a watershed, as the Census Bureau offered a definition of urban places, established the first census tract boundaries for tabulating data within cities, and introduced the first standardized metropolitan area definition. It was not until the middle of the twentieth century, however, the Census Bureau in association with other statistical agencies had established a flexible standard metropolitan definition and a more consistent means of tabulating urban data. Since 1950, the rules for determining the cores and extent of metropolitan areas have been largely regarded as comparable. In the decades that followed, however, a number of rule changes were put into place that accounted for metropolitan complexity in differing ways, and these have been the cause of some confusion. Changes put into effect with the 2000 census represent a consensus of sorts for how to handle these issues.
    View Full Paper PDF
  • Working Paper

    Labor Market Concentration, Earnings Inequality, and Earnings Mobility

    September 2018

    Authors: Kevin Rinz

    Working Paper Number:

    carra-2018-10

    Using data from the Longitudinal Business Database and Form W-2, I document trends in local industrial concentration from 1976 through 2015 and estimate the effects of that concentration on earnings outcomes within and across demographic groups. Local industrial concentration has generally been declining throughout its distribution over that period, unlike national industrial concentration, which declined sharply in the early 1980s before increasing steadily to nearly its original level beginning around 1990. Estimates indicate that increased local concentration reduces earnings and increases inequality, but observed changes in concentration have been in the opposite direction, and the magnitude of these effects has been modest relative to broader trends; back-of-the-envelope calculations suggest that the 90/10 earnings ratio was about six percent lower and earnings were about one percent higher in 2015 than they would have been if local concentration were at its 1976 level. Within demographic subgroups, most experience mean earnings reductions and all experience increases in inequality. Estimates of the effects of concentration on earnings mobility are sensitive to specification.
    View Full Paper PDF
  • Working Paper

    Locally Owned Bank Commuting Zone Concentration and Employer Start-Ups in Metropolitan, Micropolitan and Non-Core Rural Commuting Zones from 1970-2010

    August 2018

    Working Paper Number:

    CES-18-34

    Access to financial capital is vital for the sustainability of the local business sector in metropolitan and nonmetropolitan communities. Recent research on the restructuring of the financial industry from local owned banks to interstate conglomerates has raised questions about the impact on rural economies. In this paper, we begin our exploration of the Market Concentration Hypothesis and the Local Bank Hypothesis. The former proposes that there is a negative relationship between the percent of banks that are locally owned in the local economy and the rate of business births and continuations, and a positive effect on business deaths, while that latter proposes that there is a positive relationship between the percent of banks that are locally owned in the local economy and the rate of business births and continuations, and a negative effect on business deaths. To examine these hypotheses, we examine the impact of bank ownership concentration (percent of banks that are locally owned in a commuting zone) on business establishment births and deaths in metropolitan, micropolitan and non-core rural commuting zones. We employ panel regression models for the 1980-2010 time frame, demonstrating robustness to several specifications and spatial spillover effects. We find that local bank concentration is positively related to business dynamism in rural commuting zones, providing support to the importance of relational lending in rural areas, while finding support for the importance of market concentration in urban areas. The implications of this research are important for rural sociology, regional economics, and finance.
    View Full Paper PDF
  • Working Paper

    Who are the people in my neighborhood? The 'contextual fallacy' of measuring individual context with census geographies

    February 2018

    Working Paper Number:

    CES-18-11

    Scholars deploy census-based measures of neighborhood context throughout the social sciences and epidemiology. Decades of research confirm that variation in how individuals are aggregated into geographic units to create variables that control for social, economic or political contexts can dramatically alter analyses. While most researchers are aware of the problem, they have lacked the tools to determine its magnitude in the literature and in their own projects. By using confidential access to the complete 2010 U.S. Decennial Census, we are able to construct'for all persons in the US'individual-specific contexts, which we group according to the Census-assigned block, block group, and tract. We compare these individual-specific measures to the published statistics at each scale, and we then determine the magnitude of variation in context for an individual with respect to the published measures using a simple statistic, the standard deviation of individual context (SDIC). For three key measures (percent Black, percent Hispanic, and Entropy'a measure of ethno-racial diversity), we find that block-level Census statistics frequently do not capture the actual context of individuals within them. More problematic, we uncover systematic spatial patterns in the contextual variables at all three scales. Finally, we show that within-unit variation is greater in some parts of the country than in others. We publish county-level estimates of the SDIC statistics that enable scholars to assess whether mis-specification in context variables is likely to alter analytic findings when measured at any of the three common Census units.
    View Full Paper PDF
  • Working Paper

    Estimating the Local Productivity Spillovers from Science

    January 2017

    Working Paper Number:

    CES-17-56

    We estimate the local productivity spillovers from science by relating wages and real estate prices across metros to measures of scienti c activity in those metros. We address three fundamental challenges: (1) factor input adjustments using wages and real estate prices, along with Shepards Lemma, to estimate changes metros' productivity, which must equal changes in unit production cost; (2) unobserved differences in metros/causality using a share shift index that exploits historic variation in the mix of research in metros interacted with trends in federal funding for specific fields as an instrument; (3) unobserved differences in workers using data on the states in which people are born. Our estimates show a strong positive relationship between wages and scientifc research and a weak positive relationship for real estate prices. Overall, we estimate high rate of return to research.
    View Full Paper PDF
  • Working Paper

    The Potential for Using Combined Survey and Administrative Data Sources to Study Internal Labor Migration

    January 2017

    Working Paper Number:

    CES-17-55

    This paper introduces a novel data set combining survey data from the American Community Survey (ACS) with administrative data on employment from the Longitudinal Employer-Household Dynamics program, in order to study geographic labor mobility. With its rich set of information about individuals at the time of the migration decision, large sample size, and near-comprehensive ability to detect labor mobility, the new combined ACS-LEHD data offers several advantages over the existing data sets that are typically used in the study of migration, such as the Decennial Census, Current Population Survey, and Internal Revenue Service data. An overview of how these different data sets can be employed, and examples demonstrating the usefulness of the newly proposed data set, are provided. Aggregate statistics and stylized facts are generated from the ACS-LEHD data which reveal many of the same features as the existing data sets, including the decline of aggregate mobility throughout the past decade, as well as many of the known demographic differences in migration propensity.
    View Full Paper PDF