CREAT: Census Research Exploration and Analysis Tool

Papers Containing Keywords(s): 'trend'

The following papers contain search terms that you selected. From the papers listed below, you can navigate to the PDF, the profile page for that working paper, or see all the working papers written by an author. You can also explore tags, keywords, and authors that occur frequently within these papers.
Click here to search again

Frequently Occurring Concepts within this Search

Longitudinal Business Database - 29

Bureau of Labor Statistics - 25

North American Industry Classification System - 24

Current Population Survey - 22

Census Bureau Disclosure Review Board - 18

National Bureau of Economic Research - 16

Business Dynamics Statistics - 15

Center for Economic Studies - 15

Bureau of Economic Analysis - 15

National Science Foundation - 15

Internal Revenue Service - 13

Federal Reserve Bank - 12

Longitudinal Employer Household Dynamics - 10

Annual Survey of Manufactures - 10

Total Factor Productivity - 9

Economic Census - 9

Employer Identification Numbers - 9

Social Security Administration - 9

PSID - 9

Standard Industrial Classification - 9

Survey of Income and Program Participation - 9

American Community Survey - 8

Chicago Census Research Data Center - 8

Social Security - 8

Disclosure Review Board - 8

Metropolitan Statistical Area - 8

County Business Patterns - 8

Census Bureau Business Register - 7

Business Register - 7

Quarterly Workforce Indicators - 7

Federal Statistical Research Data Center - 7

Organization for Economic Cooperation and Development - 7

Federal Reserve System - 7

Census Bureau Longitudinal Business Database - 7

Cornell University - 7

Ordinary Least Squares - 6

Local Employment Dynamics - 6

Decennial Census - 5

Social Security Number - 5

Cobb-Douglas - 5

University of Maryland - 5

University of Chicago - 5

Unemployment Insurance - 5

Research Data Center - 5

Special Sworn Status - 5

Longitudinal Research Database - 5

Protected Identification Key - 4

W-2 - 4

Generalized Method of Moments - 4

ASEC - 4

COVID-19 - 4

Office of Management and Budget - 4

Department of Homeland Security - 4

Business Employment Dynamics - 4

Business Formation Statistics - 4

Census Bureau Business Dynamics Statistics - 4

Board of Governors - 4

Financial, Insurance and Real Estate Industries - 4

National Center for Health Statistics - 4

Census of Manufacturing Firms - 4

Kauffman Foundation - 4

Harmonized System - 4

JOLTS - 4

IQR - 3

Census of Retail Trade - 3

Federal Insurance Contribution Act - 3

Current Population Survey Annual Social and Economic Supplement - 3

Small Business Administration - 3

COMPUSTAT - 3

Retirement History Survey - 3

Standard Statistical Establishment List - 3

Energy Information Administration - 3

International Trade Research Report - 3

Retail Trade - 3

Census of Manufactures - 3

International Standard Industrial Classification - 3

Quarterly Census of Employment and Wages - 3

National Longitudinal Survey of Youth - 3

Labor Turnover Survey - 3

recession - 32

labor - 21

earnings - 17

growth - 16

market - 15

macroeconomic - 15

economist - 15

employed - 14

sector - 13

employment growth - 13

sale - 12

employ - 12

workforce - 12

employment dynamics - 12

estimating - 12

demand - 11

econometric - 11

quarterly - 11

trends employment - 10

percentile - 10

manufacturing - 10

decade - 9

declining - 9

population - 9

census bureau - 9

job - 9

decline - 9

hiring - 8

production - 8

industrial - 8

earner - 8

gdp - 8

revenue - 8

survey - 8

salary - 7

recessionary - 7

estimation - 7

employee - 6

employment statistics - 6

retirement - 6

volatility - 6

entrepreneurship - 6

statistical - 6

respondent - 6

longitudinal - 5

turnover - 5

worker - 5

enterprise - 5

company - 5

autoregressive - 5

firm dynamics - 5

downturn - 5

startup - 5

entrepreneur - 5

report - 5

poverty - 5

agency - 5

prevalence - 5

economically - 5

shift - 5

hire - 5

unemployment rates - 5

retail - 4

employment trends - 4

sectoral - 4

heterogeneity - 4

firms grow - 4

product - 4

expenditure - 4

average - 4

entrepreneurial - 4

forecast - 4

transition - 4

labor statistics - 4

yearly - 4

economic census - 4

consumption - 4

tenure - 4

census research - 4

study - 4

data - 4

data census - 4

retailer - 3

wholesale - 3

productivity dispersion - 3

distribution - 3

merchandise - 3

work census - 3

establishment - 3

employment data - 3

workplace - 3

worker demographics - 3

employment distribution - 3

innovation - 3

impact - 3

firm growth - 3

regressing - 3

tax - 3

disparity - 3

price - 3

econometrician - 3

consumer - 3

state - 3

federal - 3

investment - 3

business data - 3

census employment - 3

trends labor - 3

medicaid - 3

estimator - 3

regression - 3

aggregate - 3

manufacturer - 3

migration - 3

regress - 3

census survey - 3

income year - 3

layoff - 3

income individuals - 3

income data - 3

Viewing papers 11 through 20 of 63


  • Working Paper

    Has toughness of local competition declined?

    May 2022

    Authors: Lan Dinh

    Working Paper Number:

    CES-22-13

    Recent evidence on rm-level markups and concentration raises a concern that market competition has declined in the U.S. over the last few decades. Since measuring competition is difficult, methodologies used to arrive at these findings have merits but also raise technical concerns which question the validity of these results. Given the significance of documenting how competition has changed, I contribute to this literature by studying a different measure of competition. Specifically, I estimate the toughness of local competition over time. To derive this estimate, I use a generalized monopolistic competition model with variable markups. This model generates insights that allows me to measure competition as the sensitivity of weighted-average markup to changes in the number of competitors using directly observable variables. Compared to firm-level markups estimation, this method relaxes the need to estimate production functions. I then use confidential Census data to estimate toughness of local competition from 1997 to 2016, which shows that local competition has decreased in non-tradable industries on average in the U.S. during this time period.
    View Full Paper PDF
  • Working Paper

    The Evolution of U.S. Retail Concentration

    March 2022

    Working Paper Number:

    CES-22-07

    Increases in national concentration have been a salient feature of industry dynamics in the U.S. and have contributed to concerns about increasing market power. Yet, local trends may be more informative about market power, particularly in the retail sector where consumers have traditionally shopped at nearby stores. We find that local concentration has increased almost in parallel with national concentration using novel Census data on product-level revenue for all U.S. retail stores. The increases in concentration are broad based, affecting most markets, products, and retail industries. We implement a new decomposition of the national Herfindahl Hirschman Index and show that despite similar trends, national and local concentration reflect different changes in the retail sector. The increase in national concentration comes from consumers in different markets increasingly buying from the same firms and does not reflect changes in local market power. We estimate a model of retail competition which links local concentration to markups. The model implies that the increase in local concentration explains one-third of the observed increase in markups.
    View Full Paper PDF
  • Working Paper

    The Business Dynamics Statistics: Describing the Evolution of the U.S. Economy from 1978-2019

    October 2021

    Working Paper Number:

    CES-21-33

    The U.S. Census Bureau's Business Dynamics Statistics (BDS) provide annual measures of how many businesses begin, end, or continue their operations and the associated job creation and destruction. The BDS is a valuable resource for information on the U.S. economy because of its long time series (1978-2019), its complete coverage (all private sector, non-farm U.S. businesses), and its tabulations for both individual establishments and the firms that own and control them. In this paper, we use the publicly available BDS data to describe the dynamics of the economy over the past 40 years. We highlight the increasing concentration of employment at old and large firms and describe net job creation trends in the manufacturing, retail, information, food/accommodations, and healthcare industry sectors. We show how the spatial distribution of employment has changed, first moving away from the largest cities and then back again. Finally, we show long-run trends for a group of industries we classify as high-tech and explore how the share of employment at small and young firms has changed for this part of the economy.
    View Full Paper PDF
  • Working Paper

    Business Applications as a Leading Economic Indicator?

    May 2021

    Working Paper Number:

    CES-21-09R

    How are applications to start new businesses related to aggregate economic activity? This paper explores the properties of three monthly business application series from the U.S. Census Bureau's Business Formation Statistics as economic indicators: all business applications, business applications that are relatively likely to turn into new employer businesses ('likely employers'), and the residual series -- business applications that have a relatively low rate of becoming employers ('likely non-employers'). Growth in applications for likely employers significantly leads total nonfarm employment growth and has a strong positive correlation with it. Furthermore, growth in applications for likely employers leads growth in most of the monthly Principal Federal Economic Indicators (PFEIs). Motivated by our findings, we estimate a dynamic factor model (DFM) to forecast nonfarm employment growth over a 12-month period using the PFEIs and the likely employers series. The latter improves the model's forecast, especially in the years following the turning points of the Great Recession and the COVID-19 pandemic. Overall, applications for likely employers are a strong leading indicator of monthly PFEIs and aggregate economic activity, whereas applications for likely non-employers provide early information about changes in increasingly prevalent self-employment activity in the U.S. economy.
    View Full Paper PDF
  • Working Paper

    Business Formation: A Tale of Two Recessions

    January 2021

    Working Paper Number:

    CES-21-01

    The trajectory of new business applications and transitions to employer businesses differ markedly during the Great Recession and COVID-19 Recession. Both applications and transitions to employer startups decreased slowly but persistently in the post-Lehman crisis period of the Great Recession. In contrast, during the COVID-19 Recession new applications initially declined but have since sharply rebounded, resulting in a surge in applications during 2020. Projected transitions to employer businesses also rise but this is dampened by a change in the composition of applications in 2020 towards applications that are more likely to be nonemployers.
    View Full Paper PDF
  • Working Paper

    Male Earnings Volatility in LEHD before, during, and after the Great Recession

    September 2020

    Working Paper Number:

    CES-20-31

    This paper is part of a coordinated collection of papers on prime-age male earnings volatility. Each paper produces a similar set of statistics for the same reference population using a different primary data source. Our primary data source is the Census Bureau's Longitudinal Employer-Household Dynamics (LEHD) infrastructure files. Using LEHD data from 1998 to 2016, we create a well-defined population frame to facilitate accurate estimation of temporal changes comparable to designed longitudinal samples of people. We show that earnings volatility, excluding increases during recessions, has declined over the analysis period, a finding robust to various sensitivity analyses. Although we find volatility is declining, the effect is not homogeneous, particularly for workers with tenuous labor force attachment for whom volatility is increasing. These 'not stable' workers have earnings volatility approximately 30 times larger than stable workers, but more important for earnings volatility trends we observe a large increase in the share of stable employment from 60% in 1998 to 67% in 2016, which we show to largely be responsible for the decline in overall earnings volatility. To further emphasize the importance of not stable and/or low earning workers we also conduct comparisons with the PSID and show how changes over time in the share of workers at the bottom tail of the cross-sectional earnings distributions can produce either declining or increasing earnings volatility trends.
    View Full Paper PDF
  • Working Paper

    Trends in Earnings Volatility using Linked Administrative and Survey Data

    August 2020

    Working Paper Number:

    CES-20-24

    We document trends in earnings volatility separately by gender in combination with other characteristics such as race, educational attainment, and employment status using unique linked survey and administrative data for the tax years spanning 1995-2015. We also decompose the variance of trend volatility into within- and between-group contributions, as well as transitory and permanent shocks. Our results for continuously working men suggest that trend earnings volatility was stable over our period in both survey and tax data, though with a substantial countercyclical business-cycle component. Trend earnings volatility among women declined over the period in both survey and administrative data, but unlike for men, there was no change over the Great Recession. The variance decompositions indicate that nonresponders, low-educated, racial minorities, and part-year workers have the greatest group specific earnings volatility, but with the exception of part-year workers, they contribute least to the level and trend of volatility owing to their small share of the population. There is evidence of stable transitory volatility, but rising permanent volatility over the past two decades in male and female earnings.
    View Full Paper PDF
  • Working Paper

    Measuring the Effect of COVID-19 on U.S. Small Businesses: The Small Business Pulse Survey

    May 2020

    Working Paper Number:

    CES-20-16

    In response to the novel coronavirus (COVID-19) pandemic, the Census Bureau developed and fielded an entirely new survey intended to measure the effect on small businesses. The Small Business Pulse Survey (SBPS) will run weekly from April 26 to June 27, 2020. Results from the SBPS will be published weekly through a visualization tool with downloadable data. We describe the motivation for SBPS, summarize how the content for the survey was developed, and discuss some of the initial results from the survey. We also describe future plans for the SBPS collections and for our research using the SBPS data. Estimates from the first week of the SBPS indicate large to moderate negative effects of COVID-19 on small businesses, and yet the majority expect to return to usual level of operations within the next six months. Reflecting the Census Bureau's commitment to scientific inquiry and transparency, the micro data from the SBPS will be available to qualified researchers on approved projects in the Federal Statistical Research Data Center network.
    View Full Paper PDF
  • Working Paper

    The Micro-Level Anatomy of the Labor Share Decline

    March 2020

    Working Paper Number:

    CES-20-12

    The labor share in U.S. manufacturing declined from 62 percentage points (ppts) in 1967 to 41 ppts in 2012. The labor share of the typical U.S. manufacturing establishment, in contrast, rose by over 3 ppts during the same period. Using micro-level data, we document five salient facts: (1) since the 1980s, there has been a dramatic reallocation of value added toward the lower end of the labor share distribution; (2) this aggregate reallocation is not due to entry/exit, to 'superstars" growing faster or to large establishments lowering their labor shares, but is instead due to units whose labor share fell as they grew in size; (3) low labor share (LL) establishments benefit from high revenue labor productivity, not low wages; (4) they also enjoy a product price premium relative to their peers, pointing to a significant role for demand-side forces; and (5) they have only temporarily lower labor shares that rebound after five to eight years. This transient pattern has become more pronounced over time, and the dynamics of value added and employment are increasingly disconnected.
    View Full Paper PDF
  • Working Paper

    Addressing Data Gaps: Four New Lines of Inquiry in the 2017 Economic Census

    September 2019

    Working Paper Number:

    CES-19-28

    We describe four new lines of inquiry added to the 2017 Economic Census regarding (i) retail health clinics, (ii) management practices in health care services, (iii) self-service in retail and service industries, and (iv) water use in manufacturing and mining industries. These were proposed by economists from the U.S. Census Bureau's Center for Economic Studies in order to fill data gaps in current Census Bureau products concerning the U.S. economy. The new content addresses such issues as the rise in importance of health care and its complexity, the adoption of automation technologies, and the importance of measuring water, a critical input to many manufacturing and mining industries.
    View Full Paper PDF