CREAT: Census Research Exploration and Analysis Tool

Papers Containing Keywords(s): 'expenditure'

The following papers contain search terms that you selected. From the papers listed below, you can navigate to the PDF, the profile page for that working paper, or see all the working papers written by an author. You can also explore tags, keywords, and authors that occur frequently within these papers.
Click here to search again

Frequently Occurring Concepts within this Search

Center for Economic Studies - 72

Annual Survey of Manufactures - 70

Census of Manufactures - 51

Bureau of Economic Analysis - 51

Total Factor Productivity - 48

North American Industry Classification System - 48

Ordinary Least Squares - 46

Bureau of Labor Statistics - 44

National Science Foundation - 44

Longitudinal Research Database - 41

Longitudinal Business Database - 40

Standard Industrial Classification - 38

National Bureau of Economic Research - 37

Cobb-Douglas - 31

Environmental Protection Agency - 29

Internal Revenue Service - 26

Current Population Survey - 25

Census Bureau Disclosure Review Board - 24

Economic Census - 24

Census of Manufacturing Firms - 22

Chicago Census Research Data Center - 20

Federal Statistical Research Data Center - 19

Pollution Abatement Costs and Expenditures - 19

Federal Reserve Bank - 18

American Community Survey - 18

Medical Expenditure Panel Survey - 18

Standard Statistical Establishment List - 17

Business Register - 15

Census Bureau Longitudinal Business Database - 15

Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality - 15

Disclosure Review Board - 14

Special Sworn Status - 14

Survey of Industrial Research and Development - 13

Manufacturing Energy Consumption Survey - 13

Research Data Center - 12

PAOC - 12

Census Bureau Business Register - 11

National Income and Product Accounts - 11

Federal Reserve System - 11

Metropolitan Statistical Area - 11

Decennial Census - 11

Energy Information Administration - 11

National Ambient Air Quality Standards - 11

National Center for Health Statistics - 10

Generalized Method of Moments - 10

Social Security - 10

Journal of Economic Literature - 10

Department of Labor - 9

Longitudinal Employer Household Dynamics - 9

University of Chicago - 9

General Accounting Office - 9

Service Annual Survey - 9

Employer Identification Numbers - 8

Business Research and Development and Innovation Survey - 8

County Business Patterns - 8

Bureau of Labor - 8

Michigan Institute for Teaching and Research in Economics - 8

Survey of Manufacturing Technology - 8

Alfred P Sloan Foundation - 7

Social Security Administration - 7

Protected Identification Key - 7

TFPQ - 7

New York University - 7

Department of Economics - 7

Council of Economic Advisers - 7

Census Bureau Center for Economic Studies - 7

National Academy of Sciences - 6

2010 Census - 6

Information and Communication Technology Survey - 6

Organization for Economic Cooperation and Development - 6

Office of Management and Budget - 6

Fabricated Metal Products - 6

American Economic Review - 6

Boston Research Data Center - 6

Auxiliary Establishment Survey - 6

Wholesale Trade - 5

Federal Government - 5

Consumer Expenditure Survey - 5

Department of Education - 5

New York Times - 5

Housing and Urban Development - 5

Social Security Number - 5

Earned Income Tax Credit - 5

W-2 - 5

UC Berkeley - 5

Duke University - 5

State Energy Data System - 5

Establishment Micro Properties - 5

University of Maryland - 5

COMPUSTAT - 5

TFPR - 5

Herfindahl Hirschman Index - 5

Urban Institute - 5

Review of Economics and Statistics - 5

Department of Agriculture - 5

Supreme Court - 5

American Economic Association - 5

Permanent Plant Number - 5

National Research Council - 5

Department of Commerce - 5

Financial, Insurance and Real Estate Industries - 5

Occupational Employment Statistics - 4

Quarterly Census of Employment and Wages - 4

Business R&D and Innovation Survey - 4

Securities and Exchange Commission - 4

Department of Housing and Urban Development - 4

Survey of Income and Program Participation - 4

Business Services - 4

Small Business Administration - 4

Department of Homeland Security - 4

European Commission - 4

Kauffman Foundation - 4

Characteristics of Business Owners - 4

Social and Economic Supplement - 4

Cornell University - 4

Administrative Records - 4

E32 - 4

Federal Trade Commission - 4

Cornell Institute for Social and Economic Research - 4

Toxics Release Inventory - 4

Labor Productivity - 4

Computer Network Use Supplement - 4

Electronic Data Interchange - 4

Department of Defense - 3

Retail Trade - 3

Technical Services - 3

University of Texas - 3

Board of Governors - 3

Longitudinal Firm Trade Transactions Database - 3

Net Present Value - 3

Temporary Assistance for Needy Families - 3

Washington University - 3

NBER Summer Institute - 3

Business Dynamics Statistics - 3

Person Validation System - 3

Social Science Research Institute - 3

CPS ASEC - 3

International Trade Commission - 3

2SLS - 3

Boston College - 3

Code of Federal Regulations - 3

National Institutes of Health - 3

Research and Development - 3

European Union - 3

Adjusted Gross Income - 3

Journal of Labor Economics - 3

University of Michigan - 3

Department of Justice - 3

Medicaid Services - 3

Ohio State University - 3

Center for Research in Security Prices - 3

Department of Energy - 3

Business Master File - 3

Journal of Political Economy - 3

Yale University - 3

Harvard University - 3

New England County Metropolitan - 3

Statistics Canada - 3

Schools Under Registration Review - 3

American Statistical Association - 3

Columbia University - 3

production - 64

econometric - 53

demand - 50

investment - 48

manufacturing - 47

estimating - 46

growth - 46

revenue - 40

efficiency - 39

market - 39

produce - 36

economist - 33

cost - 33

consumption - 31

industrial - 31

productivity growth - 27

depreciation - 26

estimation - 26

sector - 25

productive - 25

emission - 25

earnings - 24

sale - 23

spending - 23

gdp - 23

labor - 23

epa - 23

regulation - 23

macroeconomic - 22

pollution - 22

innovation - 21

economically - 21

environmental - 20

payroll - 19

technological - 19

expense - 19

survey - 18

enrollment - 18

company - 18

regulatory - 18

pollutant - 18

polluting - 18

recession - 18

workforce - 17

manufacturer - 17

technology - 16

endogeneity - 16

subsidy - 16

profit - 16

pollution abatement - 16

industry productivity - 16

healthcare - 16

productivity measures - 15

insurance - 15

productivity estimates - 14

spillover - 14

quarterly - 13

employ - 13

enterprise - 13

factory - 13

respondent - 12

population - 12

economic census - 12

tax - 12

efficient - 12

investing - 12

pricing - 12

plant productivity - 12

abatement expenditures - 12

aggregate - 11

price - 11

welfare - 11

factor productivity - 11

labor productivity - 11

incentive - 11

financial - 11

invest - 11

costs pollution - 11

coverage - 11

statistical - 10

measures productivity - 10

estimates productivity - 10

employed - 10

investment productivity - 10

medicaid - 10

policy - 10

rate - 10

analysis productivity - 10

health insurance - 10

accounting - 10

environmental regulation - 10

census bureau - 9

consumer - 9

socioeconomic - 9

budget - 9

poverty - 9

saving - 9

regulated - 9

energy - 9

medicare - 9

environmental expenditures - 9

productivity analysis - 8

profitability - 8

endogenous - 8

producing - 8

monopolistic - 8

agency - 8

electricity - 8

finance - 8

polluting industries - 8

irs - 8

insurance coverage - 8

productivity increases - 8

productivity plants - 8

plant investment - 8

econometrician - 8

regulation productivity - 8

capital - 8

inflation - 7

heterogeneity - 7

stock - 7

growth productivity - 7

productivity dynamics - 7

energy prices - 7

electricity prices - 7

regression - 7

premium - 7

insured - 7

insurance premiums - 7

federal - 7

retirement - 7

refinery - 7

organizational - 7

fiscal - 6

data census - 6

manufacturing productivity - 6

development - 6

housing - 6

multinational - 6

capital productivity - 6

economic growth - 6

salary - 6

renewable - 6

fuel - 6

productivity dispersion - 6

econometrically - 6

data - 6

impact - 6

insurance plans - 6

report - 6

acquisition - 6

estimates production - 6

firms productivity - 6

census data - 6

rates productivity - 6

imputation - 5

inventory - 5

aggregate productivity - 5

productivity variation - 5

gain - 5

patent - 5

rent - 5

employment growth - 5

schooling - 5

corporate - 5

employee - 5

energy efficiency - 5

utility - 5

study - 5

research - 5

pollution regulation - 5

commodity - 5

wages productivity - 5

taxation - 5

state - 5

regional - 5

enrollee - 5

uninsured - 5

quantity - 5

dispersion productivity - 5

analysis - 5

product - 5

estimator - 5

tariff - 5

plants industry - 5

productivity impacts - 5

plant - 5

average - 4

occupation - 4

labor statistics - 4

regress - 4

export - 4

productivity shocks - 4

sector productivity - 4

family - 4

corporation - 4

leverage - 4

disadvantaged - 4

productivity size - 4

practices productivity - 4

metropolitan - 4

city - 4

funding - 4

education - 4

microdata - 4

research census - 4

researcher - 4

financing - 4

patenting - 4

exogeneity - 4

valuation - 4

trend - 4

taxable - 4

taxpayer - 4

regional economic - 4

utilization - 4

health - 4

economic statistics - 4

dependent - 4

pension - 4

benefit - 4

insurer - 4

regressing - 4

coverage employer - 4

use census - 4

resident - 4

merger - 4

wholesale - 4

equilibrium - 4

management - 4

retiree - 4

manufacturing plants - 4

compliance - 4

productivity differences - 4

industry concentration - 4

specialization - 4

census years - 4

computer - 4

observed productivity - 4

imputation model - 3

information census - 3

commerce - 3

percentile - 3

good - 3

purchase - 3

prospect - 3

disparity - 3

maternal - 3

sectoral - 3

residential - 3

exogenous - 3

entry productivity - 3

larger firms - 3

firms size - 3

school - 3

level productivity - 3

outsourcing - 3

innovative - 3

earns - 3

externality - 3

industry heterogeneity - 3

region - 3

technical - 3

statistician - 3

imputed - 3

surveys censuses - 3

subsidized - 3

incorporated - 3

fund - 3

investor - 3

firm innovation - 3

census business - 3

geographically - 3

policymakers - 3

estimates employment - 3

insurance employer - 3

manager - 3

estimates pollution - 3

recessionary - 3

concentration - 3

industry output - 3

competitor - 3

aging - 3

substitute - 3

endowment - 3

performance - 3

strategic - 3

Viewing papers 141 through 150 of 174


  • Working Paper

    Why Some Firms Export

    June 2001

    Working Paper Number:

    CES-01-05

    This paper presents a dynamic model of the export decision by a profit-maximizing firm. Using a panelofU.S.manufacturing plants, we test for the role of plant characteristics, spillovers from neighboring exporters, entry costs and government export promotion expenditures. Entry and exit in the export market by U.S. plants is substantial, past exporters are apt to reenter, and plants are likely to export in consecutive years. However, we find that entry costs are significant and spillovers from the export activity of other plants negligible. State export promotion expenditures have no significant effect on the probability of exporting. Plant characteristics, especially those indicative of past success, strongly increase the probability of exporting as do favorable exchange rate shocks.
    View Full Paper PDF
  • Working Paper

    Measuring the Electronic Economy: Current Status and Next Steps

    June 2000

    Working Paper Number:

    CES-00-10

    The recent growth of consumer retailing over the Internet draws attention to the electronic economy. However, businesses also conduct other business processes over computer networks, and many have been doing so for some time. Uses of computer networks attract attention because of assertions that they lead to new products and services, new delivery methods, streamlined or re-engineered business processes, new business structures, and enhanced business performance. These changes, in turn, potentially affect the performance of the entire economy, including economic growth, productivity, prices, employment, trade, and the structures of businesses, regions, and markets. Evaluating these assertions, and their effects on economic performance, requires solid statistical information about the electronic economy. This paper develops principles for identifying information critical to measuring the size and evaluating the potential effects of the electronic economy, relates that information to current data collection programs, and notes relevant measurement issues. Some of the required information about the electronic economy can be collected by adding questions to existing surveys, making the scope of existing surveys consistent, or developing new surveys. However, many key pieces of information pose significant challenges to economic measurement. While some of those challenges are specific to the electronic economy, others are long-standing ones. Interest in the electronic economy highlights the importance of continuing attempts to address these challenges. Improving and enhancing the statistical system to provide information about the electronic economy, therefore, would also substantially improve the baseline information available for evaluating the performance of the entire economy.
    View Full Paper PDF
  • Working Paper

    Scale Economies and Consolidation in Hog Slaughter

    March 2000

    Working Paper Number:

    CES-00-03

    We use establishment based panel data to estimate a cost function which identifies the role of scale economies in hog slaughter consolidation. We find modest by extensive technological scale economies in the 1990s, and they became more important over time. But wages rose sharply with plant size through the 1970s and those wage premiums generated a pecuniary scale diseconomy that largely offset the effects of technological scale economies. The size-wage relation disappeared in the 1980; with growing technological scale economies and disappearing pecuniary diseconomies, large plants realized growing cost advantages over smaller plants, and production shifted to larger plants.
    View Full Paper PDF
  • Working Paper

    Are Some Firms Better at IT? Differing Relationships between Productivity and IT Spending

    October 1999

    Working Paper Number:

    CES-99-13

    Although recent studies have found a positive relationship between spending on information technology and firm productivity, the magnitude of this relationship has not been as dramatic as one would expect given the anecdotal evidence. Data collected by the Bureau of the Census is analyzed to investigate the relationship between plant-level productivity and spending on IT. This relationship is investigated by separating the manufacturing plants in the sample along two dimensions, total factor productivity and IT spending. Analysis along these dimensions reveals that there are significant differences between the highest and lowest productivity plants. The highest productivity plants tend to spend less on IT while the lowest productivity plants tend to spend more on IT. Although there is support for the idea that lower productivity plants are spending more on IT to compensate for their productivity shortcomings, the results indicate that this is not the only difference. The robustness of this finding is strengthened by investigating changes in productivity and IT spending over time. High productivity plants with the lowest amounts of IT spending tend to remain high productivity plants with low IT spending while low productivity plants with high IT spending tend to remain low productivity plants with high IT spending. The results show that management skill, as measured by the overall productivity level of a firm, is an additional factor that must be taken into consideration when investigating the IT "productivity paradox."
    View Full Paper PDF
  • Working Paper

    IT Spending and Firm Productivity: Additional Evidence from the Manufacturing Sector

    October 1999

    Working Paper Number:

    CES-99-10

    The information systems (IS) "productivity paradox" is based on those studies that found little or no positive relationship between firm productivity and spending on IS. However, some earlier studies and one more recent study have found a positive relationship. Given the large amounts spent by organizations on information systems, it is important to understand the relationship between spending on IS and productivity. Beyond replicating positive results, an explanation is needed for the conflicting conclusions reached by these earlier studies. Data collected by the Bureau of the Census is analyzed to investigate the relationship between plant-level productivity and spending on IS. The relationship between productivity and spending on IS is investigated using assumptions and models similar to both studies with positive findings and studies with negative findings. First, the overall relationship is investigated across all manufacturing industries. Next, the relationship is investigated industry by industry. The analysis finds a positive relationship between plant-level productivity and spending on IS. The relationship is also shown to vary across industries. The conflicting results from earlier studies are explained by understanding the characteristics of the data analyzed in each study. A large enough sample size is needed to find the relatively smaller effect from IS spending as compared to other input spending included in the models. Because the relationship between productivity and IS spending varies across industries, industry mix is shown to be an important data characteristic that may have influenced prior results.
    View Full Paper PDF
  • Working Paper

    Costs of Air Quality Regulation

    July 1999

    Working Paper Number:

    CES-99-09

    This paper explores some costs associated with environmental regulation. We focus on regulation pertaining to ground-level- ozone (O) and its effects on two manufacturing industries - industrial organic chemicals (SIC 2865-9) and miscellaneous plastic products (SIC 308). Both are major emitters of volatile organic compounds (VOC) and nitrogen oxides (NO), the chemical precursors to ozone. Using plant-level data from the Census Bureau's Longitudinal Research Database (LRD), we examine the effects of regulation on the timing and magnitudes of investments by firms and on the impact it has had on their operating costs. As an alternative way to assess costs, we also employ plant-level data from the Pollution Abatement Costs and Expenditures (PACE) survey. Analyses employing average total costs functions reveal that plants' production costs are indeed higher in (heavily-regulated) non-attainment areas relative to (less-regulated) attainment areas. This is particularly true for younger plants, consistent with the notion that regulation is most burdensome for new (rather existing) plants. Cost estimates using PACE data generally reveal lower costs. We also find that new heavily-regulated plants start out much larger than less-regulated plants, but then do not invest as much. Among other things, this highlights the substantial fixed costs involved in obtaining expansion permits. We also discuss reasons why plants may restrict their size.
    View Full Paper PDF
  • Working Paper

    Large Plant Data in the LRD: Selection of a Sample for Estimation

    March 1999

    Working Paper Number:

    CES-99-06

    This paper describes preliminary work with the LRD during our tenure at the Census Bureau as participants in the ASA/NSF/Census Research Program. The objective of the work described here were two-fold. First, we wanted to examine the suitableness of these data for the calculation of plant-level productivity indexes, following procedures typically implemented with time series data. Second, we wanted to select a small number of 2-digit industry groups that would be well suited to the estimation of production functions and systems of factor share equations and factor demand forecasting equations with system-wide techniques. This description of our initial work may be useful to other researchers who are interested in the LRD for the analysis of productivity growth and/or the estimation of systems of factor equations, because the specific results reported in this memo suggest that the data are of good quality, or because the nature of the tasks undertaken provides insight into issues that arise in the analysis of longitudinal establishment data.
    View Full Paper PDF
  • Working Paper

    Job Reallocation And The Business Cycle: New Facts An Old Debate

    September 1998

    Working Paper Number:

    CES-98-11

    This paper provides new facts on the nature of job reallocation over the business cycle, and addresses the question of whether reallocation causes recessions or recessions cause reallocation. Although we do not resolve the question of causality, two general findings emerge that advance our understanding of job reallocation and business cycles. First, much of the cyclical fluctuation in gross job flows occurs in larger plants with relatively moderate employment growth that tends to be transitory, especially at medium-term horizons (up to five years). Unusually large employment growth rates, especially plant startups and shutdowns, are primarily small-plant phenomena and tend to be permanent, less cyclical, and occur later in recessions. Further, high job flow rates occur primarily in plants previously experiencing sharp employment contractions or expansions. Second, key variables that should determine the allocation factors of production across plants and sectors do in fact appear to be related to gross job flows, particularly job destruction. Relative prices, productivity, and investment exhibit time series correlations with job reallocation that suggest that allocative driving forces may contribute significantly to business cycle fluctuations.
    View Full Paper PDF
  • Working Paper

    Manufacturing Extension And Productivity Dynamics

    June 1998

    Authors: Ron Jarmin

    Working Paper Number:

    CES-98-08

    This paper presents results from an investigation of the effects of manufacturing extension on the productivity dynamics of client plants. Previous econometric studies of manufacturing extension had very little time series information. This limited what researchers could say about the relative timing of extension services and performance improvements. In turn, this makes it difficult to attribute performance improvements to the receipt of extension services. In this paper, I use a panel of client and nonclient plants to more carefully analyze the dynamics of extension and productivity. The results suggest that the timing of observed productivity improvements at client plants is consistent with a positive impact of manufacturing extension. Estimated program impacts are within the range of those found in previous studies.
    View Full Paper PDF
  • Working Paper

    Factor Substitution In U.S. Manufacturing: Does Plant Size Matter

    April 1998

    Working Paper Number:

    CES-98-06

    We use micro data for 10,412 U.S. manufacturing plants to estimate the degrees of factor substitution by industry and by plant size. We find that (1) capital, labor, energy and materials are substitutes in production, and (2) the degrees of substitution among inputs are quite similar across plant sizes in a majority of industries. Two important implications of these findings are that (1) small plants are typically as flexible as large plants in factor substitution; consequently, economic policies such energy conservation policies that result in rising energy prices would not cause negative effects on either large or small U.S. manufacturing plants; and (2) since energy and capital are found to be substitutes; the 1973 energy crisis is unlikely to be a significant factor contributing to the post 1973 productivity slowdown. of Substitution
    View Full Paper PDF