CREAT: Census Research Exploration and Analysis Tool

Papers Containing Keywords(s): 'labor'

The following papers contain search terms that you selected. From the papers listed below, you can navigate to the PDF, the profile page for that working paper, or see all the working papers written by an author. You can also explore tags, keywords, and authors that occur frequently within these papers.
Click here to search again

Frequently Occurring Concepts within this Search

Longitudinal Employer Household Dynamics - 100

Bureau of Labor Statistics - 97

Current Population Survey - 97

Center for Economic Studies - 82

North American Industry Classification System - 77

Longitudinal Business Database - 74

Ordinary Least Squares - 72

Standard Industrial Classification - 59

Census Bureau Disclosure Review Board - 58

National Science Foundation - 58

Internal Revenue Service - 57

American Community Survey - 53

Annual Survey of Manufactures - 50

National Bureau of Economic Research - 48

Employer Identification Numbers - 41

Longitudinal Research Database - 40

Alfred P Sloan Foundation - 40

Social Security Administration - 38

Census of Manufactures - 36

Total Factor Productivity - 35

Decennial Census - 34

Metropolitan Statistical Area - 32

Quarterly Census of Employment and Wages - 31

Social Security - 30

Bureau of Economic Analysis - 30

Federal Statistical Research Data Center - 29

Survey of Income and Program Participation - 29

Federal Reserve Bank - 29

Unemployment Insurance - 28

Economic Census - 28

Cornell University - 26

Protected Identification Key - 26

Social Security Number - 25

Quarterly Workforce Indicators - 24

Department of Labor - 23

Disclosure Review Board - 23

Chicago Census Research Data Center - 21

Business Register - 20

Census of Manufacturing Firms - 19

Census Bureau Business Register - 18

W-2 - 18

PSID - 18

Standard Statistical Establishment List - 17

Census Bureau Longitudinal Business Database - 17

University of Maryland - 17

Cobb-Douglas - 17

LEHD Program - 17

Organization for Economic Cooperation and Development - 16

Business Dynamics Statistics - 16

International Trade Research Report - 16

National Institute on Aging - 16

AKM - 15

Federal Reserve System - 15

County Business Patterns - 14

Cornell Institute for Social and Economic Research - 14

Individual Characteristics File - 13

Labor Turnover Survey - 13

American Economic Review - 13

Special Sworn Status - 12

Local Employment Dynamics - 12

JOLTS - 11

Research Data Center - 11

Journal of Economic Literature - 11

Occupational Employment Statistics - 10

Department of Economics - 10

National Longitudinal Survey of Youth - 10

NBER Summer Institute - 10

Business Employment Dynamics - 10

Employment History File - 10

Employer Characteristics File - 10

2010 Census - 10

University of Chicago - 10

WECD - 10

Financial, Insurance and Real Estate Industries - 9

Person Validation System - 9

Labor Productivity - 9

Journal of Political Economy - 9

Generalized Method of Moments - 8

Retail Trade - 8

Harvard University - 8

New York Times - 8

Survey of Manufacturing Technology - 8

Journal of Human Resources - 8

Standard Occupational Classification - 7

Urban Institute - 7

Heckscher-Ohlin - 7

Herfindahl Hirschman Index - 7

Detailed Earnings Records - 7

Department of Homeland Security - 7

New York University - 7

North American Industry Classi - 7

Quarterly Journal of Economics - 7

IQR - 6

National Center for Health Statistics - 6

Office of Management and Budget - 6

Census Numident - 6

National Establishment Time Series - 6

Census Bureau Center for Economic Studies - 6

Supplemental Nutrition Assistance Program - 6

Board of Governors - 6

Columbia University - 6

Council of Economic Advisers - 6

Earned Income Tax Credit - 6

Kauffman Foundation - 6

1940 Census - 6

Journal of Labor Economics - 6

World Bank - 6

Service Annual Survey - 6

Permanent Plant Number - 6

BLS Handbook of Methods - 6

Department of Commerce - 6

Social and Economic Supplement - 5

COVID-19 - 5

United States Census Bureau - 5

Department of Health and Human Services - 5

Integrated Longitudinal Business Database - 5

Technical Services - 5

Successor Predecessor File - 5

Michigan Institute for Teaching and Research in Economics - 5

VAR - 5

North American Free Trade Agreement - 5

World Trade Organization - 5

National Employer Survey - 5

Survey of Business Owners - 5

Society of Labor Economists - 5

ASEC - 5

Current Population Survey Annual Social and Economic Supplement - 5

National Income and Product Accounts - 5

Wholesale Trade - 5

Census Industry Code - 5

TFPQ - 5

CDF - 5

Cumulative Density Function - 5

American Economic Association - 5

Temporary Assistance for Needy Families - 5

Company Organization Survey - 5

Retirement History Survey - 5

Current Employment Statistics - 5

Center for Administrative Records Research - 5

Business Register Bridge - 5

Sample Edited Detail File - 5

MIT Press - 5

Review of Economics and Statistics - 5

University of Texas - 4

Department of Education - 4

Integrated Public Use Microdata Series - 4

Accommodation and Food Services - 4

Stanford University - 4

Characteristics of Business Owners - 4

Postal Service - 4

Health and Retirement Study - 4

Brookings Institution - 4

Agriculture, Forestry - 4

Russell Sage Foundation - 4

Harmonized System - 4

General Accounting Office - 4

Department of Agriculture - 4

Sloan Foundation - 4

Social Security Disability Insurance - 4

Employer-Household Dynamics - 4

Federal Trade Commission - 4

Supreme Court - 4

Personally Identifiable Information - 4

Master Address File - 4

Federal Reserve Board of Governors - 4

Value Added - 4

Person Identification Validation System - 4

Center for Administrative Records Research and Applications - 4

Regional Economic Information System - 4

Geographic Information Systems - 4

IZA - 4

Public Use Micro Sample - 4

Medical Expenditure Panel Survey - 4

Computer Network Use Supplement - 4

American Statistical Association - 4

Consolidated Metropolitan Statistical Areas - 4

Cambridge University Press - 4

Electronic Data Interchange - 4

Annual Business Survey - 3

Ohio State University - 3

Educational Services - 3

Health Care and Social Assistance - 3

University of Toronto - 3

E32 - 3

International Trade Commission - 3

Robert Wood Johnson Foundation - 3

Core Based Statistical Area - 3

Composite Person Record - 3

George Mason University - 3

Indian Health Service - 3

Department of Justice - 3

Boston College - 3

Duke University - 3

Individual Taxpayer Identification Numbers - 3

Data Management System - 3

Disability Insurance - 3

2SLS - 3

UC Berkeley - 3

Census Bureau Business Dynamics Statistics - 3

Pew Research Center - 3

Information and Communication Technology Survey - 3

Public Administration - 3

Stern School of Business - 3

Securities and Exchange Commission - 3

Medicaid Services - 3

Department of Defense - 3

Administrative Records - 3

Economic Research Service - 3

Small Business Administration - 3

University of Minnesota - 3

Housing and Urban Development - 3

Environmental Protection Agency - 3

Establishment Micro Properties - 3

Computer Aided Design - 3

Journal of Econometrics - 3

Business Master File - 3

Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality - 3

employ - 136

employed - 132

workforce - 125

recession - 83

employee - 80

worker - 77

earnings - 70

payroll - 64

job - 56

economist - 49

manufacturing - 49

industrial - 46

growth - 45

unemployed - 43

econometric - 43

production - 43

hiring - 42

salary - 41

macroeconomic - 40

employment dynamics - 37

earner - 34

occupation - 33

labor statistics - 31

demand - 31

employment growth - 31

endogeneity - 30

heterogeneity - 30

quarterly - 30

hire - 28

layoff - 28

workplace - 27

estimating - 26

earn - 25

sector - 24

labor markets - 24

market - 24

labor productivity - 24

expenditure - 23

unemployment rates - 23

establishment - 23

longitudinal - 22

survey - 21

trend - 21

shift - 20

gdp - 20

employing - 20

tenure - 20

census bureau - 19

census employment - 19

turnover - 19

welfare - 18

economically - 18

revenue - 17

longitudinal employer - 17

entrepreneurship - 17

productive - 17

estimation - 17

incentive - 16

discrimination - 16

productivity growth - 16

employer household - 16

estimates employment - 16

regress - 15

employment statistics - 15

union - 15

recessionary - 15

endogenous - 15

export - 14

factory - 14

efficiency - 13

enrollment - 13

employment unemployment - 13

disparity - 13

poverty - 13

employment wages - 13

segregation - 12

trends employment - 12

employment trends - 12

immigrant - 12

entrepreneur - 12

research census - 12

econometrician - 12

effect wages - 12

produce - 12

economic census - 12

employment flows - 12

employment estimates - 11

investment - 11

workers earnings - 11

retirement - 11

aggregate - 11

regressing - 11

wage growth - 11

wages productivity - 11

recession employment - 11

metropolitan - 11

employment changes - 11

technology - 11

technological - 11

aging - 11

statistical - 10

disadvantaged - 10

employment data - 10

state employment - 10

relocation - 10

migrant - 10

decline - 10

increase employment - 10

employment earnings - 10

decade - 10

sale - 10

insurance - 10

wage differences - 10

wage industries - 10

employment count - 10

trends labor - 10

agency - 9

effects employment - 9

benefit - 9

rates employment - 9

spillover - 9

report - 9

race - 9

employment production - 9

migration - 9

import - 9

enterprise - 9

tax - 9

state - 9

woman - 9

productivity measures - 9

profit - 9

manufacturer - 9

industry employment - 9

wage changes - 9

employee data - 9

organizational - 9

data census - 8

paper census - 8

mother - 8

bias - 8

socioeconomic - 8

ethnicity - 8

wage effects - 8

wage gap - 8

unobserved - 8

worker demographics - 8

exogeneity - 8

declining - 8

worker wages - 8

earnings workers - 8

industry wages - 8

earnings inequality - 8

minority - 8

wages production - 8

employment recession - 8

wage variation - 8

finance - 8

respondent - 7

population - 7

family - 7

parental - 7

maternal - 7

wages employment - 7

unemployment insurance - 7

compensation - 7

racial - 7

innovation - 7

producing - 7

job growth - 7

entrepreneurial - 7

proprietorship - 7

aggregate productivity - 7

housing - 7

merger - 7

federal - 7

accounting - 7

growth productivity - 7

proprietor - 7

regional - 7

segregated - 7

measures productivity - 6

eligible - 6

preschool - 6

childcare - 6

work census - 6

specialization - 6

regressors - 6

hispanic - 6

immigration - 6

migrate - 6

exporter - 6

leverage - 6

factor productivity - 6

productivity estimates - 6

productivity size - 6

venture - 6

resident - 6

employment effects - 6

educated - 6

earnings gap - 6

wage data - 6

productivity wage - 6

industry productivity - 6

productivity dispersion - 6

ethnic - 6

clerical - 6

earnings growth - 6

regression - 6

wage regressions - 6

productivity increases - 6

measures employment - 6

employment measures - 6

company - 6

workforce indicators - 6

plant productivity - 6

parent - 5

filing - 5

subsidy - 5

black - 5

white - 5

urban - 5

city - 5

neighborhood - 5

productivity shocks - 5

migrating - 5

exporting - 5

multinational - 5

development - 5

gain - 5

disability - 5

irs - 5

impact employment - 5

women earnings - 5

career - 5

corporate - 5

productivity dynamics - 5

gender - 5

moving - 5

coverage - 5

wage earnings - 5

medicaid - 5

monopolistic - 5

firm dynamics - 5

tech - 5

earnings age - 5

productivity impacts - 5

plant employment - 5

transition - 5

share - 5

opportunity - 5

census data - 5

manufacturing industries - 5

capital - 5

census research - 5

productivity plants - 5

plant - 5

productivity analysis - 4

percentile - 4

enrolled - 4

household surveys - 4

2010 census - 4

relocate - 4

employment distribution - 4

autoregressive - 4

shock - 4

tariff - 4

relocating - 4

immigrant workers - 4

international trade - 4

sectoral - 4

outsourced - 4

exogenous - 4

eligibility - 4

researcher - 4

level productivity - 4

outsourcing - 4

rent - 4

regulation - 4

healthcare - 4

earnings employees - 4

wealth - 4

productivity differences - 4

manufacturing productivity - 4

firms employment - 4

rates productivity - 4

computer - 4

associate - 4

price - 4

startup - 4

bankruptcy - 4

technical - 4

estimates productivity - 4

mobility - 4

taxpayer - 4

supplier - 4

rural - 4

matching - 4

residential - 4

inference - 4

network - 4

data - 4

agriculture - 4

manufacturing plants - 4

department - 4

plants industry - 4

productivity variation - 3

country - 3

suburb - 3

industry heterogeneity - 3

growth employment - 3

foreign - 3

monopolistically - 3

practices productivity - 3

employment entrepreneurship - 3

nonemployer businesses - 3

startups employees - 3

exemption - 3

town - 3

intergenerational - 3

volatility - 3

graduate - 3

study - 3

advancement - 3

expense - 3

education - 3

wholesale - 3

industry concentration - 3

residence - 3

medicare - 3

insurance employer - 3

insured - 3

health insurance - 3

insurance premiums - 3

insurer - 3

birth - 3

pregnancy - 3

equilibrium - 3

firms productivity - 3

econometrically - 3

saving - 3

model - 3

ssa - 3

coverage employer - 3

fertility - 3

cohort - 3

firms grow - 3

dispersion productivity - 3

founder - 3

employed census - 3

capital productivity - 3

fluctuation - 3

income year - 3

substitute - 3

financial - 3

acquisition - 3

bank - 3

schooling - 3

lender - 3

debt - 3

firms plants - 3

heterogeneous - 3

average - 3

reallocation productivity - 3

analysis - 3

empirical - 3

elasticity - 3

discriminatory - 3

plants firms - 3

Viewing papers 141 through 150 of 255


  • Working Paper

    The Recent Decline in Employment Dynamics

    March 2013

    Working Paper Number:

    CES-13-03

    In recent years, the rate at which workers and businesses exchange jobs has declined in the United States. Between 1998 and 2010, rates of job creation, job destruction, hiring, and separation declined dramatically, and the rate of job-to-job flows fell by about half. Little is known about the nature and extent of these changes, and even less about their causes and implications. In this paper, we document and attempt to explain the recent decline in employment dynamics. Our empirical work relies on the four leading datasets of quarterly employment dynamics in the United States ' the Longitudinal Employer-Household Dynamics (LEHD), the Business Employment Dynamics (BED), the Job Openings and Labor Turnover Survey (JOLTS), and the Current Population Survey (CPS). We find that changes in the composition of the labor force and of employers explain relatively little of the decline. Exploiting some identities that relate the different measures to each other, we find that job creation and destruction could explain as much of a third of the decline in hires and separations, while job-to-job flows may explain more of the decline. We end our paper with a discussion of different possible explanations and their relative merits.
    View Full Paper PDF
  • Working Paper

    Testing for Factor Price Equality with Unobserved Differences in Factor Quality or Productivity

    September 2012

    Working Paper Number:

    CES-12-32

    We develop a method for identifying departures from relative factor price equality that is robust to unobserved variation in factor productivity. We implement this method using data on the relative wage bills of non-production and production workers across 170 local labor markets comprising the continental United States for 1972, 1992 and 2007. We find evidence of statistically significant differences in relative wages in all three years. These differences increase in magnitude over time and are related to industry structure in a manner that is consistent with neoclassical models of production.
    View Full Paper PDF
  • Working Paper

    Do Labor Market Networks Have An Important Spatial Dimension?

    September 2012

    Working Paper Number:

    CES-12-30

    We test for evidence of spatial, residence-based labor market networks. Turnover is lower for workers more connected to their neighbors generally and more connected to neighbors of the same race or ethnic group. Both results are consistent with networks producing better job matches, while the latter could also reflect preferences for working with neighbors of the same race or ethnicity. For earnings, we find a robust positive effect of the overall residence-based network measure, whereas we usually find a negative effect of the same-group measure, suggesting that the overall network measure reflects productivity enhancing positive network effects, while the same-group measure captures a non-wage amenity.
    View Full Paper PDF
  • Working Paper

    Estimation of Job-to-Job Flow Rates under Partially Missing Geography

    September 2012

    Working Paper Number:

    CES-12-29

    Integration of data from different regions presents challenges for the calculation of entitylevel longitudinal statistics with a strong geographic component: for example, movements between employers, migration, business dynamics, and health statistics. In this paper, we consider the estimation of worker-level employment statistics when the geographies (in our application, US states) over which such measures are defined are partially missing. We focus on the recent pilot set of job-to-job flow statistics produced by the US Census Bureau's Longitudinal Employer- Household Dynamics (LEHD) program, which measure the frequency of worker movements between jobs and into and out of nonemployment. LEHD's coverage of the labor force gradually increases during the 1990s and 2000s because some states have a longer time series than others, so employment transitions involving missing states are only partially or not at all observed. We propose and implement a method for estimating national-level job-to-job flow statistics that involves dropping observed states to recover the relationship between missing states and directly tabulated job-to-job flow rates. Using the estimated relationship between the observable characteristics of the missing states and changes in the employment measures, we provide estimates of the rates of job-to-job, and job-to-nonemployment, job-to-nonemploymentto- job flows were all states uniformly available.
    View Full Paper PDF
  • Working Paper

    The United States Labor Market: Status Quo or A New Normal?

    September 2012

    Working Paper Number:

    CES-12-28

    The recession of 2007-09 witnessed high rates of unemployment that have been slow to recede. This has led many to conclude that structural changes have occurred in the labor market and that the economy will not return to the low rates of unemployment that prevailed in the recent past. Is this true? The question is important because central banks may be able to reduce unemployment that is cyclic in nature, but not that which is structural. An analysis of labor market data suggests that there are no structural changes that can explain movements in unemployment rates over recent years. Neither industrial nor demographic shifts nor a mismatch of skills with job vacancies is behind the increased rates of unemployment. Although mismatch increased during the recession, it retreated at the same rate. The patterns observed are consistent with unemployment being caused by cyclic phenomena that are more pronounced during the current recession than in prior recessions.
    View Full Paper PDF
  • Working Paper

    Testing for Wage Discrimination in U.S. Manufacturing

    September 2012

    Authors: Joyce Burnette

    Working Paper Number:

    CES-12-23

    In spite of the large literature on labor market discrimination, the quantity of solid evidence on discrimination is relatively limited. This is because evidence of discrimination is difficult to obtain. Two individuals may be treated equally, but this does not prove discrimination unless we can show that the differences in treatment were not justified by differences in productivity. The method most commonly used to identify wage discrimination, the Oaxaca decomposition, is flawed because any omitted variables that are correlated with gender will contribute to the unexplained portion of the wage gap, leading to an over- or under-estimation of wage discrimination. Audit studies provide more direct evidence of differential treatment, but are costly to carry out. Only a small number of studies attempt to measure worker productivity to see if wage differences are justified. This may be because the data needed to measure productivity are difficult to obtain. This paper tests for wage discrimination by gender and race by estimating relative productivity from 2002 Census of Manufacturing data linked to demographic information on workers from Longitudinal Employer-Household Dynamics (LEHD) files. Comparing the estimated productivity ratios to the observed wage ratios, I conclude that females and blacks face wage discrimination in US manufacturing.
    View Full Paper PDF
  • Working Paper

    The Life Cycle of Plants in India and Mexico

    September 2012

    Working Paper Number:

    CES-12-20

    In the U.S., the average 40 year old plant employs almost eight times as many workers as the typical plant five years or younger. In contrast, surviving Indian plants exhibit little growth in terms of either employment or output. Mexico is intermediate to India and the U.S. in these respects: the average 40 year old Mexican plant employs twice as many workers as an average new plant. This pattern holds across many industries and for formal and informal establishments alike. The divergence in plant dynamics suggests lower investments by Indian and Mexican plants in process efficiency, quality, and in accessing markets at home and abroad. In simple GE models, we find that the difference in life cycle dynamics could lower aggregate manufacturing productivity on the order of 25% in India and Mexico relative to the U.S.
    View Full Paper PDF
  • Working Paper

    Evaluating the Impact of MEP Services on Establishment Performance: A Preliminary Empirical Investigation

    July 2012

    Working Paper Number:

    CES-12-15

    This work examines the impact of manufacturing extension services on establishment productivity. It builds on an earlier study conducted by Jarmin in the 1990s, by matching the Census of Manufacturers (CMF) with the Manufacturing Extension Partnership (MEP) customer and activity datasets to generate treatment and comparison groups for analysis. The scope of the study is the period 1997 to 2002, which was a period of economic downturn in the manufacturing sector and budgetary challenges for the MEP. The paper presents some preliminary findings from this analysis. Both lagged dependent variable (LDV) and difference in difference (DiD) models are employed to estimate the relationship between manufacturing extension and labor productivity. The results presented are inconclusive and paint a mixed picture as they demonstrate the benefits and limitations of using Census microdata in program evaluation. They also point to the need to conduct analyses that could help to better understand the dynamic impact of MEP services.
    View Full Paper PDF
  • Working Paper

    THE RISE AND FALL OF UNIONS IN THE U.S.

    June 2012

    Working Paper Number:

    CES-12-12R

    Union membership in U.S. displayed a n-shaped pattern over the 20th century, while in- come inequality sketched a ?. A model of unions is developed to analyze this phenomenon. There is a distribution of productivity across firms in the economy. Firms hire capital, plus skilled and unskilled labor. Unionization is a costly process. A union chooses how many firms to organize and the union wage. Simulation of the model establishes that skill-biased technological change, which a?ects the productivity of skilled labor relative to unskilled labor, can potentially explain the above facts. Statistical analysis suggests that skill-biased technological change is an important factor in deunionization.
    View Full Paper PDF
  • Working Paper

    Micro Data and the Macro Elasticity of Substitution

    March 2012

    Working Paper Number:

    CES-12-05

    We estimate the aggregate elasticity of substitution between capital and labor in the US manufacturing sector. We show that the aggregate elasticity of substitution can be expressed as a simple function of plant level structural parameters and sufficient statistics of the distribution of plant input cost shares. We then use plant level data from the Census of Manufactures to construct a local elasticity of substitution at various levels of aggregation. Our approach does not assume the existence of a stable aggregate production function, as we build up our estimate from the cross section of plants at a point in time. Accounting for substitution within and across plants, we find that the aggregate elasticity is substantially below unity at approximately 0.7. Lastly we assess the sources of the bias of aggregate technical change from 1987 to 1997. We find that the labor augmenting character of aggregate technical change is due almost exclusively to labor augmenting productivity growth at the plant level rather than relative growth in capital intensive plants.
    View Full Paper PDF