CREAT: Census Research Exploration and Analysis Tool

Papers Containing Keywords(s): 'sale'

The following papers contain search terms that you selected. From the papers listed below, you can navigate to the PDF, the profile page for that working paper, or see all the working papers written by an author. You can also explore tags, keywords, and authors that occur frequently within these papers.
Click here to search again

Frequently Occurring Concepts within this Search

Center for Economic Studies - 67

Longitudinal Business Database - 59

North American Industry Classification System - 54

Bureau of Labor Statistics - 49

Standard Industrial Classification - 46

Bureau of Economic Analysis - 45

Total Factor Productivity - 45

Annual Survey of Manufactures - 45

National Science Foundation - 39

National Bureau of Economic Research - 39

Ordinary Least Squares - 39

Economic Census - 36

Census of Manufactures - 35

Internal Revenue Service - 30

Longitudinal Research Database - 30

Census Bureau Disclosure Review Board - 22

Metropolitan Statistical Area - 22

Federal Statistical Research Data Center - 20

Census of Manufacturing Firms - 20

Federal Reserve Bank - 19

Cobb-Douglas - 18

Longitudinal Firm Trade Transactions Database - 17

Employer Identification Numbers - 17

Business Register - 17

Chicago Census Research Data Center - 17

County Business Patterns - 16

Census of Retail Trade - 15

Federal Reserve System - 14

Census Bureau Business Register - 14

Business Dynamics Statistics - 14

University of Chicago - 14

Department of Commerce - 13

Standard Statistical Establishment List - 13

Disclosure Review Board - 12

Retail Trade - 12

Board of Governors - 11

Securities and Exchange Commission - 11

Harmonized System - 11

Organization for Economic Cooperation and Development - 11

Service Annual Survey - 11

Characteristics of Business Owners - 11

Generalized Method of Moments - 10

Small Business Administration - 10

Census Bureau Longitudinal Business Database - 10

Research Data Center - 10

National Income and Product Accounts - 9

Herfindahl Hirschman Index - 9

Federal Trade Commission - 9

Current Population Survey - 9

Special Sworn Status - 9

World Trade Organization - 8

University of Maryland - 8

Kauffman Foundation - 8

Wholesale Trade - 7

Survey of Business Owners - 7

Michigan Institute for Teaching and Research in Economics - 7

Customs and Border Protection - 7

TFPQ - 7

Office of Management and Budget - 7

Permanent Plant Number - 7

Electronic Data Interchange - 7

Yale University - 7

Patent and Trademark Office - 6

Michigan Institute for Data Science - 6

Wal-Mart - 6

American Economic Review - 6

Journal of Economic Literature - 6

Securities Data Company - 6

Social Security Administration - 6

World Bank - 6

Harvard University - 6

Department of Agriculture - 5

Survey of Industrial Research and Development - 5

Technical Services - 5

Foreign Direct Investment - 5

New York Times - 5

IBM - 5

Department of Homeland Security - 5

UC Berkeley - 5

Information and Communication Technology Survey - 5

Department of Justice - 5

State Energy Data System - 5

Labor Productivity - 5

Quarterly Journal of Economics - 5

Postal Service - 5

Business R&D and Innovation Survey - 5

Management and Organizational Practices Survey - 5

University of California Los Angeles - 5

Company Organization Survey - 5

Business Research and Development and Innovation Survey - 5

International Trade Research Report - 5

Census of Services - 4

Public Administration - 4

Arts, Entertainment - 4

Accommodation and Food Services - 4

IQR - 4

University of Michigan - 4

Department of Economics - 4

Retirement History Survey - 4

Council of Economic Advisers - 4

Herfindahl-Hirschman - 4

American Economic Association - 4

Initial Public Offering - 4

Financial, Insurance and Real Estate Industries - 4

Value Added - 4

United States Census Bureau - 4

Census Bureau Center for Economic Studies - 4

2010 Census - 4

New York University - 4

Center for Research in Security Prices - 4

Center for Administrative Records Research - 4

Computer Network Use Supplement - 4

Review of Economics and Statistics - 4

MIT Press - 4

Medical Expenditure Panel Survey - 4

Administrative Records - 4

American Statistical Association - 4

Consumer Expenditure Survey - 3

Annual Business Survey - 3

Business Formation Statistics - 3

Sloan Foundation - 3

Limited Liability Company - 3

TFPR - 3

Research and Development - 3

Census Bureau Business Dynamics Statistics - 3

Longitudinal Employer Household Dynamics - 3

Paycheck Protection Program - 3

Review of Economic Studies - 3

Princeton University Press - 3

Cambridge University Press - 3

Department of Labor - 3

Bureau of Labor - 3

Commodity Flow Survey - 3

NBER Summer Institute - 3

Fabricated Metal Products - 3

Statistics Canada - 3

2SLS - 3

Net Present Value - 3

Boston Research Data Center - 3

New England County Metropolitan - 3

Social Security - 3

Russell Sage Foundation - 3

Survey of Manufacturing Technology - 3

market - 71

production - 66

manufacturing - 64

revenue - 46

growth - 41

demand - 36

enterprise - 36

industrial - 35

sector - 35

econometric - 35

company - 32

export - 28

macroeconomic - 27

recession - 27

gdp - 25

wholesale - 25

retail - 24

produce - 24

expenditure - 23

retailer - 23

manufacturer - 22

establishment - 22

investment - 21

exporter - 20

economist - 20

commerce - 20

profit - 19

product - 18

inventory - 18

merger - 17

acquisition - 17

price - 17

consumer - 17

estimating - 17

import - 16

shipment - 16

exporting - 16

innovation - 16

competitor - 16

economically - 16

monopolistic - 15

corporation - 15

cost - 15

organizational - 15

productivity growth - 14

industry productivity - 14

earnings - 13

pricing - 13

employed - 13

profitability - 13

trend - 12

entrepreneur - 12

aggregate - 12

efficiency - 12

trading - 11

competitiveness - 11

entrepreneurship - 11

proprietor - 11

retailing - 11

firms export - 11

financial - 11

exported - 10

good - 10

purchase - 10

productive - 10

employment growth - 10

labor - 10

estimation - 10

tariff - 10

buyer - 10

proprietorship - 10

customer - 9

subsidiary - 9

quarterly - 9

shareholder - 9

stock - 9

commodity - 9

quantity - 9

endogeneity - 9

importer - 9

supplier - 9

technological - 9

ownership - 9

merchandise - 8

oligopolistic - 8

multinational - 8

export market - 8

entrepreneurial - 8

firms productivity - 8

productivity measures - 8

labor productivity - 8

takeover - 8

agency - 8

accounting - 8

aggregation - 8

employee - 8

custom - 7

productivity dispersion - 7

store - 7

grocery - 7

oligopoly - 7

firms grow - 7

employ - 7

foreign - 7

statistical - 7

acquirer - 7

report - 7

survey - 7

payroll - 7

minority - 7

incorporated - 7

corporate - 7

owner - 7

economic census - 6

spending - 6

warehousing - 6

trade costs - 6

industry concentration - 6

marketing - 6

venture - 6

equity - 6

data - 6

spillover - 6

international trade - 6

finance - 6

financing - 6

owned businesses - 6

strategic - 6

producing - 6

leverage - 6

technology - 6

patent - 5

patenting - 5

dispersion productivity - 5

warehouse - 5

sector productivity - 5

consumption - 5

startup - 5

prices products - 5

growth productivity - 5

industry growth - 5

productivity dynamics - 5

sectoral - 5

industry variation - 5

rates productivity - 5

firms exporting - 5

small businesses - 5

investor - 5

decline - 5

economic statistics - 5

franchising - 5

outsourcing - 5

exporting firms - 5

rate - 5

larger firms - 5

hispanic - 5

regional - 5

business owners - 5

disparity - 5

trader - 4

gain - 4

share - 4

business startups - 4

prospect - 4

advantage - 4

productivity increases - 4

consolidated - 4

incentive - 4

industry heterogeneity - 4

globalization - 4

competitive - 4

monopolistically - 4

trade models - 4

factor productivity - 4

aggregate productivity - 4

agriculture - 4

agricultural - 4

restaurant - 4

managerial - 4

security - 4

productivity size - 4

classified - 4

franchise - 4

supermarket - 4

heterogeneity - 4

depreciation - 4

practices productivity - 4

regression - 4

export growth - 4

partnership - 4

analysis - 4

black - 4

industry output - 4

contract - 4

productivity impacts - 4

research - 4

productivity differences - 4

characteristics businesses - 4

plants industry - 4

invention - 3

specialization - 3

information census - 3

inflation - 3

substitute - 3

average - 3

regress - 3

productivity variation - 3

employment estimates - 3

industry employment - 3

outsourced - 3

exogeneity - 3

industries estimate - 3

metropolitan - 3

firm dynamics - 3

importing - 3

small firms - 3

management - 3

firms size - 3

turnover - 3

respondent - 3

classification - 3

franchisor - 3

franchise establishments - 3

factory - 3

exports firms - 3

recession exposure - 3

businesses grow - 3

declining - 3

imported - 3

utilization - 3

expense - 3

business survival - 3

neighborhood - 3

mergers acquisitions - 3

manager - 3

manufacturing industries - 3

microdata - 3

white - 3

equilibrium - 3

conglomerate - 3

productivity analysis - 3

restructuring - 3

midwest - 3

estimates productivity - 3

computer - 3

econometrically - 3

black business - 3

disadvantaged - 3

firms census - 3

plant productivity - 3

Viewing papers 131 through 140 of 154


  • Working Paper

    Firm Performance And Evolution Empirical Regularities In The U.S. Microdata

    October 1996

    Working Paper Number:

    CES-96-10

    This paper presents a view of firm performance, industry evolution, and economic growth that contrasts with the traditional representative firm model. The paper reviews recent empirical work, primarily studies using the Longitudinal Research Database (LRD), that explicitly focuses on individual business units. The major empirical regularity in the studies is that heterogeneity is pervasive -- it is found across and within all sectors and across all plant characteristics. Further, firms are not only different in the cross-section. They enter at different times, make different choices, and react differently to economic shocks. Thus, to understand economic performance and competition, one must move beyond representative firm models. Competition must be understood as a process in which some firms choose correctly and grow while other firms choose poorly and die; the growth of the successful firms at the expense of less successful rivals drives economic growth.
    View Full Paper PDF
  • Working Paper

    Measuring the Impact of the Manufacturing Extension Partnership

    September 1996

    Authors: Ron Jarmin

    Working Paper Number:

    CES-96-08

    In this paper, I measure the impact of the Manufacturing Extension Partnership (MEP) on productivity and sales growth at manufacturing plants. To do this, I match MEP client data to the Census Bureau's Longitudinal Research Database (LRD). The LRD contains data for all manufacturing establishments in the U.S. and provides a number of measures of plant performance and characteristics that are measured consistently across plants and time. This facilitates valid comparisons between both client and non-client plants and among clients served by different MEP centers. The National Institute of Standards and Technology (NIST) administers the MEP as part of their effort to improve the competitiveness of U.S. manufacturing. The program provides business and technical assistance to small and medium sized manufacturers much as agricultural extension does for farmers. The goal of the paper is to see if measures of plant performance (e.g., productivity and sales growth) are systematically related to participation in the MEP, while controlling for other factors that are known or thought to influence performance. Selection bias is often a problem in evaluation studies so I specify an econometric model that controls for selection. I estimate the model with data from 8 manufacturing extension centers in 2 states. The control group includes all plants from each state in the LRD. Preliminary results indicate that MEP participation is systematically related to productivity growth but not to sales growth.
    View Full Paper PDF
  • Working Paper

    Capital Structure And Product Market Rivalry: How Do We Reconcile Theory And Evidence?

    February 1995

    Working Paper Number:

    CES-95-03

    This paper presents empirical evidence on the interaction of capital structure decisions and product market behavior. We examine when firms recapitalize and increase the proportion of debt in their capital structure. The evidence in this paper shows that firms with low productivity plants in highly concentrated industries are more likely to recapitalize and increase debt financing. This finding suggests that debt plays a role in highly concentrated industries where agency costs are not significantly reduced by product market competition. Following the empirical evidence we introduce the "strategic investment" effects of debt and argue that this effect, in conjunction with agency costs, appears to fit the data.
    View Full Paper PDF
  • Working Paper

    Preferential Procurement Programs Do Not Necessarily Help Minority-Owned Business

    January 1995

    Working Paper Number:

    CES-95-01

    Some minority business enterprises (MBEs) benefit from their participation in government preferential procurement programs and some do not. A subset of minority vendors identified in this study behaves in ways suggesting sensitivity to penalties for violating minority business certification and procurement program regulations. These firms flourish in the absence of fraud penalties. A different group of minority vendors selling to government benefits from an environment in which MBE certification is comprehensive, bonding and working capital assistance are available, and assistance is delivered by a staff dedicated to aiding potential and actual MBE vendors. The preferential procurement program can serve as either a valuable economic development tool for fostering minority business development, or it can promote MBE front companies that pass on their procurement contracts to nonminority firms. Some governments choose to operate the former type of program; others opt for the latter.
    View Full Paper PDF
  • Working Paper

    A Guide To R&D Data At The Center For Economic Studies U.S. Bureau Of THe Census

    August 1994

    Working Paper Number:

    CES-94-09

    The National Science Foundation R&D Survey is an annual survey of firms' research and development expenditures. The survey covers 3000 firms reporting positive R&D. This paper provides a description of the R&D data available at the Center for Economic Studies (CES). The most basic data series available contains the original survey R&D data. It covers the years 1972-92. The remaining two series, although derived from the original files, specialize in particular items. The Mandatory Series contains required survey items for the years 1973-88. Items reported at firms' discretion are in the Voluntary Series, which covers the years 1974-89. Both of the derived series incorporate flags that track quality of the data. Both also include corrections to the data based on original hard copy survey evidence stored at CES. In addition to describing each dataset, we offer suggestions to researchers wishing to use the R&D data in exploring various economic issues. We report selected response rates, discuss the survey design, and provide hints on how to use the data.
    View Full Paper PDF
  • Working Paper

    The Span of the Effect of R&D in the Firm and Industry

    May 1994

    Working Paper Number:

    CES-94-07

    Previous studies have found that the firm's own research and spillovers of research by related firms increase firm productivity. In contrast, in this paper we explore the impact of firm R&D on the productivity of its individual plants. We carry out this investigation of within firm R&D effects using a unique set of Census data. The data, which are from the chemicals industry, are a match of plant level productivity and other characteristics with firm level data on R&D of the parent company, cross-classified by location and applied product field. We explore three aspects of the span of effect of the firm's R&D: (i), the degree to which its R&D is "public" across plants; (ii), the extent of its localization in geographic space, and (iii), the breadth of its relevance outside the applied product area in which it is classified. We find that (i), firm R&D acts more like a private input which is strongly amortized by the number of plants in the firm; (ii), firm R&D is geographically localized, and exerts greater influence on productivity when it is conducted nearer to the plant; and (iii), firm R&D in a given applied product area is of limited relevance to plants producing outside that product area. Moreover, we find that while geographic localization remains significant, it diminishes over time. This trend is consistent with the effect of improved telecommunications on increased information flows within organizations. Finally, we consider spillovers of R&D from the rest of industry, finding that the marginal product of industry R&D on plant productivity, though positive and significant, is far smaller than the marginal product of parent firm's R&D.
    View Full Paper PDF
  • Working Paper

    On The Turnover of Business Firms and Business Managers

    April 1994

    Working Paper Number:

    CES-92-06

    The success of a business depends in part on whether or not the manager and the business make a good "fit" or "match." Success also depends upon characteristics of the business that are distinct from the manager, for example, the convenience of the business location to customers. Variations across firms in "match quality" and in "business quality" account, in part, for why some businesses survive and others are discontinued. This paper is a first attempt at assessing the relative importance of variation in match quality and variation in business quality in accounting for the turnover dynamics of the U.S. small business sector. An evolutionary model is developed in which a selection process tends to eliminate both "unfit" business as well as "unfit" pairings between businesses and managers. We estimated this model with the Characteristics of Business Owners Survey. Our estimates suggest that variations in match quality play a more significant role than variations in business, or general, quality in accounting for turnover behavior of U.S. of small businesses. We discuss the implications of this finding and demonstrate its importance in the context of an experiment conducted in the estimated model economy.
    View Full Paper PDF
  • Working Paper

    CONSTRUCTION OF REGIONAL INPUT-OUTPUT TABLES FROM ESTABLISHMENT-LEVEL MICRODATA: ILLINOIS, 1982

    August 1993

    Authors: Eduardo Martins

    Working Paper Number:

    CES-93-12

    This paper presents a new method for use in the construction of hybrid regional input-output tables, based primarily on individual returns from the Census of Manufactures. Using this method, input- output tables can be completed at a fraction of the cost and time involved in the completion of a full survey table. Special attention is paid to secondary production, a problem often ignored by input-output analysts. A new method to handle secondary production is presented. The method reallocates the amount of secondary production and its associated inputs, on an establishment basis, based on the assumption that the input structure for any given commodity is determined not by the industry in which the commodity was produced, but by the commodity itself -- the commodity-based technology assumption. A biproportional adjustment technique is used to perform the reallocations.
    View Full Paper PDF
  • Working Paper

    The Importance of Establishment Data in Economic Research

    August 1993

    Working Paper Number:

    CES-93-10

    The importance and usefulness of establishment microdata for economic research and policy analysis is outlined and contrasted with traditional products of statistical agencies -- aggregate cross-section tabulations. It is argued that statistical agencies must begin to seriously rethink the way they view establishment data products.
    View Full Paper PDF
  • Working Paper

    LBOs, Debt And R&D Intensity

    February 1993

    Working Paper Number:

    CES-93-03

    This paper details the impact of debt on R&D intensity for firms undergoing a leveraged buyout (LBO). We develop seven hypotheses based on capital market imperfection theories and agency theory. To test these hypotheses, we compare 72 R&D performing LBOs with 3329 non-LBO control observations and 126 LBOs with little or no R&D expenditures. The regressions yield four statistically significant major findings. First, pre-LBO R&D intensity is roughly one-half of the overall manufacturing mean and two-thirds of the firm's industry mean. Second, LBOs cause R&D intensity to drop by 40 percent. Third, large firms tend to have smaller LBO- related declines in R&D intensity. Fourth, R&D intensive LBOs outperform both their non-LBO industry peers and other LBOs without R&D expenditures.
    View Full Paper PDF