CREAT: Census Research Exploration and Analysis Tool

Papers Containing Keywords(s): 'revenue'

The following papers contain search terms that you selected. From the papers listed below, you can navigate to the PDF, the profile page for that working paper, or see all the working papers written by an author. You can also explore tags, keywords, and authors that occur frequently within these papers.
Click here to search again

Frequently Occurring Concepts within this Search

Longitudinal Business Database - 63

North American Industry Classification System - 59

Total Factor Productivity - 51

Annual Survey of Manufactures - 48

Center for Economic Studies - 43

Bureau of Labor Statistics - 41

National Bureau of Economic Research - 37

Internal Revenue Service - 37

Census of Manufactures - 37

Bureau of Economic Analysis - 36

Ordinary Least Squares - 36

Economic Census - 35

Standard Industrial Classification - 33

Census Bureau Disclosure Review Board - 32

National Science Foundation - 30

Cobb-Douglas - 24

Longitudinal Research Database - 22

Federal Statistical Research Data Center - 21

Employer Identification Numbers - 21

Chicago Census Research Data Center - 21

Metropolitan Statistical Area - 20

Current Population Survey - 19

Federal Reserve Bank - 18

Census Bureau Longitudinal Business Database - 18

Census of Manufacturing Firms - 17

Census Bureau Business Register - 17

Longitudinal Employer Household Dynamics - 17

Disclosure Review Board - 16

University of Chicago - 15

Business Register - 15

Business Dynamics Statistics - 13

Social Security - 13

TFPQ - 13

Federal Reserve System - 12

Social Security Administration - 12

County Business Patterns - 11

Standard Statistical Establishment List - 11

American Community Survey - 10

University of Maryland - 10

Kauffman Foundation - 10

Decennial Census - 9

Social Security Number - 9

Herfindahl Hirschman Index - 9

Special Sworn Status - 9

Board of Governors - 8

Alfred P Sloan Foundation - 8

NBER Summer Institute - 8

Generalized Method of Moments - 8

TFPR - 8

Department of Commerce - 8

Longitudinal Firm Trade Transactions Database - 7

Securities and Exchange Commission - 7

Michigan Institute for Teaching and Research in Economics - 7

University of California Los Angeles - 7

Retail Trade - 7

Protected Identification Key - 7

Journal of Economic Literature - 7

Service Annual Survey - 7

Research Data Center - 7

UC Berkeley - 6

Census of Retail Trade - 6

Census of Services - 6

Department of Labor - 6

2SLS - 6

Council of Economic Advisers - 6

Labor Productivity - 6

Federal Trade Commission - 6

Characteristics of Business Owners - 6

American Economic Review - 6

Department of Agriculture - 5

Initial Public Offering - 5

Wholesale Trade - 5

Survey of Business Owners - 5

Small Business Administration - 5

Office of Management and Budget - 5

Earned Income Tax Credit - 5

International Trade Commission - 5

Individual Characteristics File - 5

Department of Homeland Security - 5

Department of Economics - 5

COMPUSTAT - 5

International Trade Research Report - 5

New York University - 5

Quarterly Journal of Economics - 5

Chicago RDC - 5

Securities Data Company - 5

Center for Research in Security Prices - 5

Permanent Plant Number - 5

World Trade Organization - 4

Management and Organizational Practices Survey - 4

National Income and Product Accounts - 4

Technical Services - 4

Arts, Entertainment - 4

Accommodation and Food Services - 4

IQR - 4

Occupational Employment Statistics - 4

University of Texas - 4

Survey of Industrial Research and Development - 4

New York Times - 4

Herfindahl-Hirschman - 4

Patent and Trademark Office - 4

Retirement History Survey - 4

Harmonized System - 4

Integrated Longitudinal Business Database - 4

Commodity Flow Survey - 4

Financial, Insurance and Real Estate Industries - 4

Net Present Value - 4

American Economic Association - 4

Administrative Records - 4

Journal of Economic Perspectives - 4

Journal of International Economics - 4

Environmental Protection Agency - 4

MIT Press - 4

Medical Expenditure Panel Survey - 4

Boston Research Data Center - 4

Public Administration - 3

Federal Government - 3

Annual Business Survey - 3

IBM - 3

Census Bureau Business Dynamics Statistics - 3

National Center for Science and Engineering Statistics - 3

Business R&D and Innovation Survey - 3

Business Research and Development and Innovation Survey - 3

COVID-19 - 3

Economic Research Service - 3

Disability Insurance - 3

Federal Insurance Contribution Act - 3

W-2 - 3

Washington University - 3

Adjusted Gross Income - 3

Boston College - 3

Carnegie Mellon University - 3

Department of Housing and Urban Development - 3

Census Numident - 3

Organization for Economic Cooperation and Development - 3

Data Management System - 3

Department of Justice - 3

University of Minnesota - 3

Information and Communication Technology Survey - 3

Quarterly Workforce Indicators - 3

AKM - 3

Ewing Marion Kauffman Foundation - 3

National Center for Health Statistics - 3

Value Added - 3

2010 Census - 3

Federal Tax Information - 3

Journal of Political Economy - 3

World Bank - 3

Journal of Labor Economics - 3

Review of Economic Studies - 3

Manufacturing Energy Consumption Survey - 3

Bureau of Labor - 3

Harvard Business School - 3

Review of Economics and Statistics - 3

Harvard University - 3

E32 - 3

production - 50

sale - 46

market - 44

expenditure - 40

manufacturing - 37

growth - 34

earnings - 33

demand - 31

profit - 31

produce - 28

investment - 27

sector - 26

efficiency - 24

gdp - 24

econometric - 24

macroeconomic - 21

estimating - 21

payroll - 19

economist - 19

enterprise - 19

economically - 19

tax - 18

profitability - 18

productivity growth - 17

labor - 17

industrial - 17

productive - 16

incentive - 16

company - 15

proprietorship - 15

endogeneity - 15

export - 14

irs - 14

salary - 14

recession - 14

competitor - 14

cost - 14

pricing - 14

quarterly - 13

financial - 13

accounting - 13

acquisition - 13

monopolistic - 13

estimation - 13

industry productivity - 13

firms productivity - 13

price - 13

employed - 12

depreciation - 12

corporation - 12

organizational - 12

exporter - 11

workforce - 11

entrepreneurship - 11

innovation - 11

aggregate - 10

productivity measures - 10

aggregate productivity - 10

survey - 10

entrepreneur - 10

employee - 10

manufacturer - 10

growth productivity - 10

agency - 10

proprietor - 10

product - 9

employ - 9

productivity dispersion - 9

consumer - 9

competitiveness - 9

exporting - 8

respondent - 8

measures productivity - 8

factor productivity - 8

stock - 8

employment growth - 8

multinational - 8

productivity dynamics - 8

heterogeneity - 8

trend - 8

regression - 8

producing - 8

merger - 8

statistical - 7

population - 7

productivity estimates - 7

finance - 7

establishment - 7

incorporated - 7

gain - 7

earner - 7

corporate - 7

subsidy - 7

consumption - 7

profitable - 7

quantity - 7

wholesale - 7

report - 6

taxable - 6

inventory - 6

technological - 6

entrepreneurial - 6

labor productivity - 6

spillover - 6

practices productivity - 6

conglomerate - 6

level productivity - 6

productivity wage - 6

wages productivity - 6

oligopolistic - 6

tariff - 6

plant productivity - 6

productivity plants - 6

inflation - 6

specialization - 6

import - 5

impact - 5

contract - 5

economic census - 5

fiscal - 5

customer - 5

productivity analysis - 5

regress - 5

manufacturing productivity - 5

monopolistically - 5

endogenous - 5

filing - 5

leverage - 5

earn - 5

investing - 5

equilibrium - 5

industry concentration - 5

retailer - 5

taxation - 5

decline - 5

declining - 5

dispersion productivity - 5

commodity - 5

aggregation - 5

acquirer - 5

diversification - 5

efficient - 5

shipment - 4

regulatory - 4

exported - 4

trading - 4

custom - 4

equity - 4

fund - 4

asset - 4

disclosure - 4

reporting - 4

imputation - 4

estimates productivity - 4

commerce - 4

spending - 4

percentile - 4

labor statistics - 4

productivity variation - 4

venture - 4

patent - 4

sector productivity - 4

funding - 4

taxpayer - 4

productivity size - 4

welfare - 4

foreign - 4

firms size - 4

larger firms - 4

invest - 4

marketing - 4

wage growth - 4

productivity firms - 4

compensation - 4

turnover - 4

estimator - 4

supplier - 4

census data - 4

economic growth - 4

good - 4

firms grow - 4

growth employment - 4

ownership - 4

buyer - 4

rate - 4

firms export - 4

security - 4

advantage - 4

loan - 3

bank - 3

debt - 3

record - 3

average - 3

data census - 3

occupation - 3

census bureau - 3

investor - 3

productivity shocks - 3

prospect - 3

share - 3

lender - 3

restaurant - 3

poverty - 3

exogenous - 3

insurance - 3

bias - 3

coverage - 3

1040 - 3

earnings age - 3

plant investment - 3

plants firms - 3

externality - 3

federal - 3

employment earnings - 3

patenting - 3

industry variation - 3

effect wages - 3

importer - 3

export market - 3

retail - 3

business survival - 3

opportunity - 3

younger firms - 3

firms young - 3

healthcare - 3

state - 3

regional - 3

emission - 3

regional economic - 3

earnings inequality - 3

yield - 3

productivity distribution - 3

productivity increases - 3

oligopoly - 3

analysis productivity - 3

use census - 3

longitudinal - 3

productivity differences - 3

startup - 3

firms employment - 3

census business - 3

factory - 3

franchise - 3

regulation - 3

rates productivity - 3

sourcing - 3

liquidation - 3

exporting firms - 3

partnership - 3

trade costs - 3

prices products - 3

utilization - 3

downstream - 3

strategic - 3

diversify - 3

expense - 3

lawyer - 3

plants industry - 3

textile - 3

econometrically - 3

observed productivity - 3

Viewing papers 131 through 136 of 136


  • Working Paper

    Whittling Away At Productivity Dispersion Futher Notes: Persistent Dispersion or Measurement Error?

    November 1996

    Authors: Douglas W Dwyer

    Working Paper Number:

    CES-96-11

    This note considers several hypotheses regarding measurement error as a source of observed cross-sectional dispersion in plant-level productivity in the US textile industry. The hypotheses that reporting error and/or price rigidity in either materials and/or output account for a substantial portion of the observed dispersion in productivity are consistent with the data. Similarly, the hypothesis that transitory product niches or fashion effects lead to differential markups and consequently dispersion in observed productivity is consistent with the data. The hypothesis that transfer pricing problems lead to persistent differences in plant-level productivity, in contrast, does not appear to be consistent with the data. Finally, the hypothesis that some plants have permanent product niches that lead to dispersion in observed productivity does not appear to be consistent with data. In order to avoid imposing a strong functional form on the data, this note follows a non-parametric methodology developed in the early paper.
    View Full Paper PDF
  • Working Paper

    Capital Structure And Product Market Rivalry: How Do We Reconcile Theory And Evidence?

    February 1995

    Working Paper Number:

    CES-95-03

    This paper presents empirical evidence on the interaction of capital structure decisions and product market behavior. We examine when firms recapitalize and increase the proportion of debt in their capital structure. The evidence in this paper shows that firms with low productivity plants in highly concentrated industries are more likely to recapitalize and increase debt financing. This finding suggests that debt plays a role in highly concentrated industries where agency costs are not significantly reduced by product market competition. Following the empirical evidence we introduce the "strategic investment" effects of debt and argue that this effect, in conjunction with agency costs, appears to fit the data.
    View Full Paper PDF
  • Working Paper

    Preferential Procurement Programs Do Not Necessarily Help Minority-Owned Business

    January 1995

    Working Paper Number:

    CES-95-01

    Some minority business enterprises (MBEs) benefit from their participation in government preferential procurement programs and some do not. A subset of minority vendors identified in this study behaves in ways suggesting sensitivity to penalties for violating minority business certification and procurement program regulations. These firms flourish in the absence of fraud penalties. A different group of minority vendors selling to government benefits from an environment in which MBE certification is comprehensive, bonding and working capital assistance are available, and assistance is delivered by a staff dedicated to aiding potential and actual MBE vendors. The preferential procurement program can serve as either a valuable economic development tool for fostering minority business development, or it can promote MBE front companies that pass on their procurement contracts to nonminority firms. Some governments choose to operate the former type of program; others opt for the latter.
    View Full Paper PDF
  • Working Paper

    The Structure Of Technology, Substitution, And Productivity In The Interstate Natural Gas Transmission Industry Under The NGPA Of 1978

    August 1992

    Working Paper Number:

    CES-92-09

    The structure of production in the natural gas transmission industry is estimated using the dual restricted cost function based on panel data for twenty four firms. A standard translog variable cost function with firm fixed effects is augmented with controls for capacity utilization, technical change, and shifting regulatory regimes. During the implementation of the Natural Gas Policy Act (NGPA), 1978-1985, the industry exhibited no significant increase in productivity, largely attributable to the decline in output for the industry. Regulatory efforts to promote voluntary non-contract transmission appear to have enabled some firms to mitigate the overall industry productivity stagnation. The NGPA instituted a complex schedule of partial and gradual decontrol of natural gas prices at the well head. This form of deregulation costs natural gas producers over $100 billion in lost revenues, relative to immediate and full price deregulation. However, the transmission firms benefited by paying $1.5 billion less for natural gas than they would have under total deregulation. The benefits to consumers, totaling $98.7 billion, were unevenly distributed. On average, for the 1978-1985 period, utilities, commercial, and industrial users paid less for their gas than they would have under total decontrol and residential users paid $8.6 billion more. The NGPA and Federal Regulatory Commission oversight practices allow the transmission industry to price discriminate among customers.
    View Full Paper PDF
  • Working Paper

    Costs, Demand, and Imperfect Competition as Determinants of Plant_level Output Prices

    June 1992

    Working Paper Number:

    CES-92-05

    The empirical modeling of imperfectly competitive markets has been constrained by the difficulty of obtaining micro data on individual producer prices, outputs, and costs. In this paper we utilize micro data collected from the 1977 Census of Manufactures to study the determinants of plant-level output prices among U.S. bread producers. A theoretical model of short-run price competition among plants producing differentiated products is used to specify reduced-form equations for each plant's price and output. Estimates of the reduced-form equations indicate that the main determinants of both the plant's output level and output price are the plant's own cost variables, particularly its capital stock and the prices of material inputs. The number of rival producers faced by the plant, the production costs of these rivals, and the demand conditions faced by the plant play no role in price or output determination. The results are not consistent with either oligopolistic competition or monopoly behavior, but rather are consistent with price-taking behavior by individual producers combined with output quality differentials across producers.
    View Full Paper PDF
  • Working Paper

    Price Dispersion In U.S. Manufacturing: Implications For The Aggregation Of Products And Firms

    March 1992

    Working Paper Number:

    CES-92-03

    This paper addresses the question of whether products in the U.S. Manufacturing sector sell at a single (common) price, or whether prices vary across producers. Price dispersion is interesting for at least two reasons. First, if output prices vary across producers, standard methods of using industry price deflators lead to errors in measuring real output at the industry, firm, and establishment level which may bias estimates of the production function and productivity growth. Second, price dispersion suggests product heterogeneity which, if consumers do not have identical preferences, could lead to market segmentation and price in excess of marginal cost, thus making the current (competitive) characterization of the Manufacturing sector inappropriate and invalidating many empirical studies. In the course of examining these issues, the paper develops a robust measure of price dispersion as well as new quantitative methods for testing whether observed price differences are the result of differences in product quality. Our results indicate that price dispersion is widespread throughout manufacturing and that for at least one industry, Hydraulic Cement, it is not the result of differences in product quality.
    View Full Paper PDF