CREAT: Census Research Exploration and Analysis Tool

Papers Containing Keywords(s): 'estimating'

The following papers contain search terms that you selected. From the papers listed below, you can navigate to the PDF, the profile page for that working paper, or see all the working papers written by an author. You can also explore tags, keywords, and authors that occur frequently within these papers.
Click here to search again

Frequently Occurring Concepts within this Search

Center for Economic Studies - 62

Ordinary Least Squares - 54

Annual Survey of Manufactures - 51

North American Industry Classification System - 50

National Science Foundation - 49

Longitudinal Research Database - 42

Bureau of Labor Statistics - 39

Total Factor Productivity - 39

Longitudinal Business Database - 38

Current Population Survey - 36

Bureau of Economic Analysis - 36

Standard Industrial Classification - 34

Census of Manufactures - 32

Internal Revenue Service - 32

Census Bureau Disclosure Review Board - 28

Longitudinal Employer Household Dynamics - 27

American Community Survey - 25

Federal Reserve Bank - 22

Economic Census - 22

National Bureau of Economic Research - 22

Disclosure Review Board - 21

Federal Statistical Research Data Center - 21

Cobb-Douglas - 21

Employer Identification Numbers - 20

Social Security Administration - 20

Protected Identification Key - 20

Chicago Census Research Data Center - 20

Metropolitan Statistical Area - 19

Alfred P Sloan Foundation - 17

Census Bureau Longitudinal Business Database - 17

Social Security Number - 16

Decennial Census - 16

Census of Manufacturing Firms - 15

Research Data Center - 15

Special Sworn Status - 15

Cornell University - 15

Social Security - 14

Census Bureau Business Register - 13

Business Register - 13

Quarterly Workforce Indicators - 12

Department of Economics - 12

Survey of Income and Program Participation - 11

Environmental Protection Agency - 11

Federal Reserve System - 11

Service Annual Survey - 11

Quarterly Census of Employment and Wages - 10

Department of Labor - 9

Energy Information Administration - 9

University of Chicago - 9

Standard Statistical Establishment List - 9

Generalized Method of Moments - 9

Manufacturing Energy Consumption Survey - 8

2010 Census - 8

Business Dynamics Statistics - 8

National Income and Product Accounts - 8

Organization for Economic Cooperation and Development - 8

Cornell Institute for Social and Economic Research - 8

Journal of Economic Literature - 8

Person Validation System - 7

Department of Housing and Urban Development - 7

Small Business Administration - 7

County Business Patterns - 7

Unemployment Insurance - 7

Establishment Micro Properties - 6

COVID-19 - 6

W-2 - 6

Social and Economic Supplement - 6

Detailed Earnings Records - 6

Indian Health Service - 6

Duke University - 6

Personally Identifiable Information - 6

Master Address File - 6

Housing and Urban Development - 6

LEHD Program - 6

United States Census Bureau - 6

European Union - 6

Department of Commerce - 6

PAOC - 6

Pollution Abatement Costs and Expenditures - 6

Permanent Plant Number - 6

Accommodation and Food Services - 5

ASEC - 5

Department of Homeland Security - 5

Person Identification Validation System - 5

IQR - 5

Office of Management and Budget - 5

AKM - 5

MIT Press - 5

Individual Characteristics File - 5

University of Maryland - 5

CDF - 5

Cumulative Density Function - 5

International Trade Research Report - 5

Local Employment Dynamics - 5

Census Bureau Center for Economic Studies - 5

New England County Metropolitan - 5

Wholesale Trade - 4

Educational Services - 4

Arts, Entertainment - 4

Agriculture, Forestry - 4

COVID - 4

Business Formation Statistics - 4

Maximum Likelihood Estimation - 4

Individual Taxpayer Identification Numbers - 4

SSA Numident - 4

CPS ASEC - 4

Annual Business Survey - 4

Supplemental Nutrition Assistance Program - 4

Statistics Canada - 4

1940 Census - 4

Columbia University - 4

American Housing Survey - 4

Centers for Disease Control and Prevention - 4

Michigan Institute for Teaching and Research in Economics - 4

Office of Personnel Management - 4

Business Employment Dynamics - 4

Geographic Information Systems - 4

Retirement History Survey - 4

TFPR - 4

Financial, Insurance and Real Estate Industries - 4

American Immigration Council - 4

Composite Person Record - 4

State Energy Data System - 4

TFPQ - 4

Retail Trade - 4

North American Industry Classi - 4

Employment History File - 4

Federal Government - 4

New York University - 4

Center for Administrative Records Research and Applications - 4

Employer Characteristics File - 4

Core Based Statistical Area - 4

Boston Research Data Center - 4

American Statistical Association - 4

VAR - 3

Council of Economic Advisers - 3

Technical Services - 3

Oil and Gas Extraction - 3

Federal Trade Commission - 3

Department of Justice - 3

Herfindahl Hirschman Index - 3

Limited Liability Company - 3

Linear Probability Models - 3

National Academy of Sciences - 3

University of Texas - 3

University of Michigan - 3

Social Science Research Institute - 3

Census Bureau Person Identification Validation System - 3

Disability Insurance - 3

Master Earnings File - 3

Journal of Labor Economics - 3

Census Numident - 3

NUMIDENT - 3

General Accounting Office - 3

Census Bureau Business Dynamics Statistics - 3

Federal Reserve Bank of Chicago - 3

Department of Energy - 3

National Center for Science and Engineering Statistics - 3

Postal Service - 3

Department of Health and Human Services - 3

National Ambient Air Quality Standards - 3

IZA - 3

Economic Research Service - 3

Business Research and Development and Innovation Survey - 3

Ohio State University - 3

Urban Institute - 3

Board of Governors - 3

National Institute on Aging - 3

Company Organization Survey - 3

MTO - 3

Bureau of Labor - 3

Harvard University - 3

Employer-Household Dynamics - 3

Department of Agriculture - 3

Center for Administrative Records Research - 3

Public Use Micro Sample - 3

Kauffman Foundation - 3

Chicago RDC - 3

Survey of Industrial Research and Development - 3

Labor Turnover Survey - 3

Review of Economics and Statistics - 3

Commodity Flow Survey - 3

PSID - 3

American Economic Review - 3

Survey of Manufacturing Technology - 3

National Longitudinal Survey of Youth - 3

estimation - 73

econometric - 65

expenditure - 46

production - 45

economist - 41

growth - 41

earnings - 34

survey - 34

statistical - 33

demand - 29

employ - 28

labor - 28

macroeconomic - 28

manufacturing - 27

regression - 26

respondent - 26

estimator - 25

investment - 25

employed - 24

recession - 24

market - 23

data - 23

efficiency - 22

census bureau - 21

revenue - 21

gdp - 21

aggregate - 20

industrial - 20

produce - 20

endogeneity - 19

sale - 18

workforce - 17

population - 17

payroll - 16

quarterly - 16

sector - 16

imputation - 15

productivity growth - 14

data census - 14

trend - 13

unobserved - 13

productivity measures - 13

consumption - 13

estimates production - 13

productive - 13

employment growth - 12

salary - 12

technological - 12

economically - 12

depreciation - 12

longitudinal - 11

econometrician - 11

measures productivity - 11

spillover - 11

datasets - 11

estimates employment - 10

bias - 10

regress - 10

average - 10

percentile - 10

innovation - 10

report - 10

state - 10

census data - 10

microdata - 10

analysis - 10

housing - 10

employee - 10

industry productivity - 10

plant productivity - 10

cost - 10

sampling - 9

estimates productivity - 9

census employment - 9

disclosure - 9

emission - 9

use census - 9

resident - 9

econometrically - 9

regulation - 9

metropolitan - 9

neighborhood - 9

productivity plants - 9

inference - 9

technology - 9

analyst - 8

job - 8

aggregation - 8

entrepreneur - 8

entrepreneurship - 8

socioeconomic - 8

factory - 8

rates productivity - 8

assessed - 8

regressing - 8

statistician - 8

autoregressive - 8

poverty - 8

efficient - 8

empirical - 8

impact - 8

hiring - 7

finance - 7

forecast - 7

inventory - 7

imputation model - 7

growth productivity - 7

productivity dynamics - 7

energy - 7

epa - 7

record - 7

incentive - 7

indicator - 7

employment dynamics - 7

census research - 7

residential - 7

worker - 7

establishment - 7

research census - 7

agency - 6

entrepreneurial - 6

household surveys - 6

earner - 6

survey data - 6

survey income - 6

company - 6

electricity - 6

country - 6

exogeneity - 6

economic census - 6

residence - 6

enterprise - 6

utilization - 6

elasticity - 6

productivity dispersion - 6

productivity estimates - 6

industries estimate - 6

endogenous - 6

aging - 6

spending - 6

merger - 6

regulatory - 6

pollution - 6

environmental - 6

profit - 6

analysis productivity - 6

workplace - 5

heterogeneity - 5

employment statistics - 5

unemployed - 5

profitability - 5

matching - 5

linkage - 5

labor statistics - 5

sample - 5

productivity impacts - 5

specialization - 5

subsidy - 5

fuel - 5

employment estimates - 5

assessing - 5

rural - 5

regional - 5

privacy - 5

earn - 5

yearly - 5

quantity - 5

imputed - 5

wage data - 5

factor productivity - 5

employer household - 5

census years - 5

model - 5

budget - 5

layoff - 5

regulated - 5

environmental regulation - 5

pollutant - 5

abatement expenditures - 5

pollution abatement - 5

capital - 5

technical - 5

regulation productivity - 5

employment increases - 4

irs - 4

aggregate productivity - 4

productivity analysis - 4

productivity variation - 4

paper census - 4

ssa - 4

population survey - 4

manufacturer - 4

patent - 4

federal - 4

policy - 4

income survey - 4

citizen - 4

city - 4

rent - 4

ethnicity - 4

research - 4

turnover - 4

refinery - 4

renewable - 4

researcher - 4

observed productivity - 4

geographically - 4

productivity shocks - 4

confidentiality - 4

monopolistic - 4

competitor - 4

startup - 4

employment data - 4

disadvantaged - 4

proprietorship - 4

wage changes - 4

economic statistics - 4

consumer - 4

firm dynamics - 4

inflation - 4

area - 4

geographic - 4

productivity size - 4

development - 4

employment changes - 4

employee data - 4

workforce indicators - 4

tax - 4

earns - 4

coverage - 4

costs pollution - 4

tenure - 4

longitudinal employer - 4

labor productivity - 4

investment productivity - 4

employment wages - 4

polluting - 4

industry employment - 3

hire - 3

occupation - 3

trends employment - 3

employment trends - 3

measures employment - 3

unemployment rates - 3

oligopolistic - 3

strategic - 3

2010 census - 3

innovate - 3

wages productivity - 3

innovating - 3

patenting - 3

externality - 3

census survey - 3

census records - 3

census responses - 3

urban - 3

locality - 3

relocation - 3

income data - 3

venture - 3

classified - 3

industrial classification - 3

classification - 3

rate - 3

utility - 3

incorporated - 3

regional economic - 3

larger firms - 3

tariff - 3

distribution - 3

energy efficiency - 3

gain - 3

yield - 3

wage regressions - 3

medicaid - 3

prevalence - 3

price - 3

department - 3

statistical disclosure - 3

public - 3

census use - 3

businesses grow - 3

declining - 3

mobility - 3

earnings mobility - 3

region - 3

dispersion productivity - 3

regressors - 3

product - 3

pricing - 3

investing - 3

insurance - 3

enrollment - 3

employment count - 3

acquisition - 3

financial - 3

household income - 3

employment flows - 3

compensation - 3

district - 3

substitute - 3

productivity differences - 3

plants industry - 3

plant investment - 3

employing - 3

industry growth - 3

performance - 3

plant - 3

textile - 3

Viewing papers 131 through 140 of 172


  • Working Paper

    The Survival of Industrial Plants

    October 2002

    Working Paper Number:

    CES-02-25

    The study seeks to explain the attrition rate of new manufacturing plants in the United States in terms of three vectors of variables. The first explains how survival of the fittest proceeds through learning by firms (plants) about their own relative efficiency. The second explains how efficiency systematically changes over time and what augments or diminishes it. The third captures the opportunity cost of resources employed in a plant. The model is tested using maximum-likelihood probit analysis with very large samples for successive census years in the 1967-97 period. One sample consists of an unbalanced panel of about three-fourths of a million plants of single and multi-unit firms, or alternatively of about 300,000 plants if only the most reliable data are considered. The second is restricted to the plants of multi-unit firms in the same time span and consists of an unbalanced panel of more than 100,000 plants. The empirical analysis strongly confirms the predictions of the model.
    View Full Paper PDF
  • Working Paper

    Agent Heterogeneity and Learning: An Application to Labor Markets

    October 2002

    Authors: Simon Woodcock

    Working Paper Number:

    tp-2002-20

    I develop a matching model with heterogeneous workers, rms, and worker-firm matches, and apply it to longitudinal linked data on employers and employees. Workers vary in their marginal product when employed and their value of leisure when unemployed. Firms vary in their marginal product and cost of maintaining a vacancy. The marginal product of a worker-firm match also depends on a match-specific interaction between worker and rm that I call match quality. Agents have complete information about worker and rm heterogeneity, and symmetric but incomplete information about match quality. They learn its value slowly by observing production outcomes. There are two key results. First, under a Nash bargain, the equilibrium wage is linear in a person-specific component, a firm-specific component, and the posterior mean of beliefs about match quality. Second, in each period the separation decision depends only on the posterior mean of beliefs and person and rm characteristics. These results have several implications for an empirical model of earnings with person and rm e ects. The rst implies that residuals within a worker-firm match are a martingale; the second implies the distribution of earnings is truncated. I test predictions from the matching model using data from the Longitudinal Employer-Household Dynamics (LEHD) Program at the US Census Bureau. I present both xed and mixed model specifications of the equilibrium wage function, taking account of structural aspects implied by the learning process. In the most general specification, earnings residuals have a completely unstructured covariance within a worker-firm match. I estimate and test a variety of more parsimonious error structures, including the martingale structure implied by the learning process. I nd considerable support for the matching model in these data.
    View Full Paper PDF
  • Working Paper

    Estimating Measurement Error in SIPP Annual Job Earnings: A Comparison of Census Survey and SSA Administrative Data

    September 2002

    Authors: Martha Stinson

    Working Paper Number:

    tp-2002-24

    The third chapter investigates measurement error in SIPP annual job earnings data linked to SSA administrative earnings data. The multiple earnings measures provided by the survey and administrative data enable the identification of components of true variation and variation due to measurement error. We find that 18% of the variation in SIPP annual job earnings can be attributed to measurement error. We also find that in both the SIPP and the DER, measurement error is persistent over time. A lower level of auto-correlation in the SIPP measurement error than in the economic error component leads to a lower reliability ratio of .62 for first-differenced earnings.
    View Full Paper PDF
  • Working Paper

    The Mis-Measurement of Permanent Earnings: New Evidence from Social Security Earnings Data

    May 2002

    Working Paper Number:

    CES-02-12

    This study investigates the reliability of using short-term averages of earnings as a proxy for permanent earnings in empirical research. An earnings dynamics model is estimated on a large sample of men covering the period from 1983 to 1997 following the cohort-based methodology of Baker and Solon (1999). The analysis uses a unique dataset that matches men in the 1984, 1990 and 1996 Surveys of Income and Program Participation (SIPP) to the Social Security Administration's Summary Earnings Records (SER). The results confirm that using a short-term average of earnings can lead to spurious estimates of the effect of lifetime earnings on a particular outcome. In addition, the transitory variance appears to vary considerably over the lifecycle. The share of earnings variance due to transitory factors is higher among blacks and the persistence of transitory shocks appears to be greater for this group as well. Finally, the transitory variance appears to be a more important factor in explaining the overall earnings variance of college educated men than those without college.
    View Full Paper PDF
  • Working Paper

    The Measurement of Human Capital in the U.S. Economy

    April 2002

    Working Paper Number:

    tp-2002-09

    We develop a new approach to measuring human capital that permits the distinction of both observable and unobservable dimensions of skill by associating human capital with the portable part of an individual's wage rate. Using new large-scale, integrated employer-employee data containing information on 68 million individuals and 3.6 million firms, we explain a very large proportion (84%) of the total variation in wages rates and attribute substantial variation to both individual and employer heterogeneity. While the wage distribution remained largely unchanged between 1992-1997, we document a pronounced right shift in the overall distribution of human capital. Most workers entering our sample, while less experienced, were otherwise more highly skilled, a difference which can be attributed almost exclusively to unobservables. Nevertheless, compared to exiters and continuers, entrants exhibited a greater tendency to match to firms paying below average internal wages. Firms reduced employment shares of low skilled workers and increased employment shares of high skilled workers in virtually every industry. Our results strongly suggest that the distribution of human capital will continue to shift to the right, implying a continuing up-skilling of the employed labor force.
    View Full Paper PDF
  • Working Paper

    Within and Between Firm Changes in Human Capital, Technology, and Productivity Preliminary and incomplete

    December 2001

    Working Paper Number:

    tp-2001-03

    View Full Paper PDF
  • Working Paper

    Plant Vintage, Technology, and Environmental Regulation

    September 2001

    Working Paper Number:

    CES-01-08

    Does the impact of environmental regulation differ by plant vintage and technology? We answer this question using annual Census Bureau information on 116 pulp and paper mills' vintage, technology, productivity, and pollution abatement operating costs for 1979-1990. We find a significant negative relationship between pollution abatement costs and productivity levels. This is due almost entirely to integrated mills (those incorporating a pulping process), where a one standard deviation increase in abatement costs is predicted to reduce productivity by 5.4 percent. Older plants appear to have lower productivity but are less sensitive to abatement costs, perhaps due to 'grandfathering' of regulations. Mills which undergo renovations are also less sensitive to abatement costs, although these vintage and renovation results are not generally significant. We find similar results using a log-linear version of a three input Cobb-Douglas production function in which we include our technology, vintage, and renovation variables. Sample calculations of the impact of pollution abatement on productivity show the importance of allowing for differences based on plant technology. In a model incorporating technology interactions we estimate that total pollution abatement costs reduce productivity levels by an average of 4.7 percent across all the plants. The comparable estimate without technology interactions is 3.3 percent, approximately 30% lower.
    View Full Paper PDF
  • Working Paper

    An Economist's Primer on Survey Samples

    September 2000

    Working Paper Number:

    CES-00-15

    Survey data underlie most empirical work in economics, yet economists typically have little familiarity with survey sample design and its effects on inference. This paper describes how sample designs depart from the simple random sampling model implicit in most econometrics textbooks, points out where the effects of this departure are likely to be greatest, and describes the relationship between design-based estimators developed by survey statisticians and related econometric methods for regression. Its intent is to provide empirical economists with enough background in survey methods to make informed use of design-based estimators. It emphasizes surveys of households (the source of most public-use files), but also considers how surveys of businesses differ. Examples from the National Longitudinal Survey of Youth of 1979 and the Current Population Survey illustrate practical aspects of design-based estimation.
    View Full Paper PDF
  • Working Paper

    Measuring the Electronic Economy: Current Status and Next Steps

    June 2000

    Working Paper Number:

    CES-00-10

    The recent growth of consumer retailing over the Internet draws attention to the electronic economy. However, businesses also conduct other business processes over computer networks, and many have been doing so for some time. Uses of computer networks attract attention because of assertions that they lead to new products and services, new delivery methods, streamlined or re-engineered business processes, new business structures, and enhanced business performance. These changes, in turn, potentially affect the performance of the entire economy, including economic growth, productivity, prices, employment, trade, and the structures of businesses, regions, and markets. Evaluating these assertions, and their effects on economic performance, requires solid statistical information about the electronic economy. This paper develops principles for identifying information critical to measuring the size and evaluating the potential effects of the electronic economy, relates that information to current data collection programs, and notes relevant measurement issues. Some of the required information about the electronic economy can be collected by adding questions to existing surveys, making the scope of existing surveys consistent, or developing new surveys. However, many key pieces of information pose significant challenges to economic measurement. While some of those challenges are specific to the electronic economy, others are long-standing ones. Interest in the electronic economy highlights the importance of continuing attempts to address these challenges. Improving and enhancing the statistical system to provide information about the electronic economy, therefore, would also substantially improve the baseline information available for evaluating the performance of the entire economy.
    View Full Paper PDF
  • Working Paper

    IT Spending and Firm Productivity: Additional Evidence from the Manufacturing Sector

    October 1999

    Working Paper Number:

    CES-99-10

    The information systems (IS) "productivity paradox" is based on those studies that found little or no positive relationship between firm productivity and spending on IS. However, some earlier studies and one more recent study have found a positive relationship. Given the large amounts spent by organizations on information systems, it is important to understand the relationship between spending on IS and productivity. Beyond replicating positive results, an explanation is needed for the conflicting conclusions reached by these earlier studies. Data collected by the Bureau of the Census is analyzed to investigate the relationship between plant-level productivity and spending on IS. The relationship between productivity and spending on IS is investigated using assumptions and models similar to both studies with positive findings and studies with negative findings. First, the overall relationship is investigated across all manufacturing industries. Next, the relationship is investigated industry by industry. The analysis finds a positive relationship between plant-level productivity and spending on IS. The relationship is also shown to vary across industries. The conflicting results from earlier studies are explained by understanding the characteristics of the data analyzed in each study. A large enough sample size is needed to find the relatively smaller effect from IS spending as compared to other input spending included in the models. Because the relationship between productivity and IS spending varies across industries, industry mix is shown to be an important data characteristic that may have influenced prior results.
    View Full Paper PDF