CREAT: Census Research Exploration and Analysis Tool

Papers Containing Keywords(s): 'estimating'

The following papers contain search terms that you selected. From the papers listed below, you can navigate to the PDF, the profile page for that working paper, or see all the working papers written by an author. You can also explore tags, keywords, and authors that occur frequently within these papers.
Click here to search again

Frequently Occurring Concepts within this Search

Center for Economic Studies - 61

Ordinary Least Squares - 53

Annual Survey of Manufactures - 51

National Science Foundation - 49

North American Industry Classification System - 48

Longitudinal Research Database - 42

Total Factor Productivity - 39

Bureau of Labor Statistics - 38

Longitudinal Business Database - 37

Bureau of Economic Analysis - 36

Current Population Survey - 35

Standard Industrial Classification - 34

Census of Manufactures - 32

Internal Revenue Service - 32

Census Bureau Disclosure Review Board - 27

Longitudinal Employer Household Dynamics - 25

American Community Survey - 24

Economic Census - 22

National Bureau of Economic Research - 22

Federal Statistical Research Data Center - 21

Cobb-Douglas - 21

Federal Reserve Bank - 21

Employer Identification Numbers - 20

Social Security Administration - 20

Protected Identification Key - 20

Disclosure Review Board - 20

Chicago Census Research Data Center - 20

Metropolitan Statistical Area - 19

Census Bureau Longitudinal Business Database - 17

Social Security Number - 16

Decennial Census - 16

Alfred P Sloan Foundation - 16

Census of Manufacturing Firms - 15

Research Data Center - 15

Special Sworn Status - 15

Cornell University - 15

Social Security - 14

Census Bureau Business Register - 13

Business Register - 13

Department of Economics - 12

Survey of Income and Program Participation - 11

Quarterly Workforce Indicators - 11

Environmental Protection Agency - 11

Federal Reserve System - 11

Service Annual Survey - 11

Quarterly Census of Employment and Wages - 10

Energy Information Administration - 9

University of Chicago - 9

Standard Statistical Establishment List - 9

Generalized Method of Moments - 9

Manufacturing Energy Consumption Survey - 8

2010 Census - 8

Business Dynamics Statistics - 8

National Income and Product Accounts - 8

Organization for Economic Cooperation and Development - 8

Cornell Institute for Social and Economic Research - 8

Journal of Economic Literature - 8

Person Validation System - 7

Department of Labor - 7

Department of Housing and Urban Development - 7

Small Business Administration - 7

County Business Patterns - 7

Unemployment Insurance - 7

Establishment Micro Properties - 6

COVID-19 - 6

W-2 - 6

Social and Economic Supplement - 6

Detailed Earnings Records - 6

Indian Health Service - 6

Duke University - 6

Personally Identifiable Information - 6

Master Address File - 6

Housing and Urban Development - 6

LEHD Program - 6

United States Census Bureau - 6

European Union - 6

Department of Commerce - 6

PAOC - 6

Pollution Abatement Costs and Expenditures - 6

Permanent Plant Number - 6

ASEC - 5

Department of Homeland Security - 5

Person Identification Validation System - 5

IQR - 5

Office of Management and Budget - 5

AKM - 5

MIT Press - 5

Individual Characteristics File - 5

University of Maryland - 5

CDF - 5

Cumulative Density Function - 5

International Trade Research Report - 5

Local Employment Dynamics - 5

Census Bureau Center for Economic Studies - 5

New England County Metropolitan - 5

Business Formation Statistics - 4

Maximum Likelihood Estimation - 4

Individual Taxpayer Identification Numbers - 4

SSA Numident - 4

CPS ASEC - 4

Annual Business Survey - 4

Supplemental Nutrition Assistance Program - 4

Statistics Canada - 4

1940 Census - 4

Columbia University - 4

American Housing Survey - 4

Centers for Disease Control and Prevention - 4

Accommodation and Food Services - 4

Michigan Institute for Teaching and Research in Economics - 4

Office of Personnel Management - 4

Business Employment Dynamics - 4

Geographic Information Systems - 4

Retirement History Survey - 4

TFPR - 4

Financial, Insurance and Real Estate Industries - 4

American Immigration Council - 4

Composite Person Record - 4

State Energy Data System - 4

TFPQ - 4

Retail Trade - 4

North American Industry Classi - 4

Employment History File - 4

Federal Government - 4

New York University - 4

Center for Administrative Records Research and Applications - 4

Employer Characteristics File - 4

Core Based Statistical Area - 4

Boston Research Data Center - 4

American Statistical Association - 4

Limited Liability Company - 3

Linear Probability Models - 3

COVID - 3

National Academy of Sciences - 3

University of Texas - 3

University of Michigan - 3

Social Science Research Institute - 3

Census Bureau Person Identification Validation System - 3

Disability Insurance - 3

Master Earnings File - 3

Journal of Labor Economics - 3

Census Numident - 3

NUMIDENT - 3

General Accounting Office - 3

Census Bureau Business Dynamics Statistics - 3

Federal Reserve Bank of Chicago - 3

Department of Energy - 3

National Center for Science and Engineering Statistics - 3

Postal Service - 3

Department of Health and Human Services - 3

Wholesale Trade - 3

Arts, Entertainment - 3

National Ambient Air Quality Standards - 3

IZA - 3

Economic Research Service - 3

Business Research and Development and Innovation Survey - 3

Ohio State University - 3

Urban Institute - 3

Board of Governors - 3

National Institute on Aging - 3

Company Organization Survey - 3

MTO - 3

Educational Services - 3

Agriculture, Forestry - 3

Bureau of Labor - 3

Harvard University - 3

Employer-Household Dynamics - 3

Department of Agriculture - 3

Center for Administrative Records Research - 3

Public Use Micro Sample - 3

Kauffman Foundation - 3

Chicago RDC - 3

Survey of Industrial Research and Development - 3

Labor Turnover Survey - 3

Review of Economics and Statistics - 3

Commodity Flow Survey - 3

PSID - 3

American Economic Review - 3

Survey of Manufacturing Technology - 3

National Longitudinal Survey of Youth - 3

estimation - 73

econometric - 65

expenditure - 46

production - 45

economist - 41

growth - 41

survey - 34

earnings - 33

statistical - 33

demand - 29

macroeconomic - 28

employ - 27

manufacturing - 27

respondent - 26

labor - 26

estimator - 25

investment - 25

regression - 25

recession - 24

market - 23

data - 23

efficiency - 22

employed - 22

census bureau - 21

revenue - 21

gdp - 21

aggregate - 20

industrial - 20

produce - 20

sale - 18

endogeneity - 18

population - 17

sector - 16

workforce - 16

quarterly - 15

imputation - 15

payroll - 15

productivity growth - 14

data census - 14

productivity measures - 13

consumption - 13

estimates production - 13

productive - 13

unobserved - 12

salary - 12

technological - 12

economically - 12

trend - 12

depreciation - 12

econometrician - 11

measures productivity - 11

spillover - 11

datasets - 11

employment growth - 11

average - 10

percentile - 10

innovation - 10

report - 10

state - 10

census data - 10

microdata - 10

analysis - 10

housing - 10

employee - 10

industry productivity - 10

plant productivity - 10

cost - 10

longitudinal - 10

bias - 9

sampling - 9

estimates productivity - 9

regress - 9

census employment - 9

disclosure - 9

emission - 9

estimates employment - 9

use census - 9

resident - 9

econometrically - 9

regulation - 9

metropolitan - 9

neighborhood - 9

productivity plants - 9

inference - 9

technology - 9

aggregation - 8

entrepreneur - 8

entrepreneurship - 8

socioeconomic - 8

factory - 8

rates productivity - 8

assessed - 8

regressing - 8

statistician - 8

autoregressive - 8

poverty - 8

efficient - 8

empirical - 8

impact - 8

analyst - 7

finance - 7

forecast - 7

inventory - 7

imputation model - 7

growth productivity - 7

productivity dynamics - 7

energy - 7

epa - 7

record - 7

incentive - 7

indicator - 7

employment dynamics - 7

census research - 7

residential - 7

job - 7

worker - 7

establishment - 7

research census - 7

entrepreneurial - 6

household surveys - 6

earner - 6

survey data - 6

survey income - 6

company - 6

electricity - 6

country - 6

exogeneity - 6

economic census - 6

residence - 6

enterprise - 6

utilization - 6

elasticity - 6

productivity dispersion - 6

productivity estimates - 6

industries estimate - 6

endogenous - 6

aging - 6

spending - 6

merger - 6

regulatory - 6

pollution - 6

environmental - 6

profit - 6

analysis productivity - 6

profitability - 5

hiring - 5

matching - 5

linkage - 5

labor statistics - 5

sample - 5

productivity impacts - 5

specialization - 5

subsidy - 5

fuel - 5

employment estimates - 5

assessing - 5

rural - 5

regional - 5

privacy - 5

earn - 5

yearly - 5

quantity - 5

agency - 5

imputed - 5

wage data - 5

factor productivity - 5

employer household - 5

census years - 5

model - 5

budget - 5

layoff - 5

regulated - 5

environmental regulation - 5

pollutant - 5

abatement expenditures - 5

pollution abatement - 5

capital - 5

technical - 5

regulation productivity - 5

irs - 4

aggregate productivity - 4

productivity analysis - 4

productivity variation - 4

paper census - 4

ssa - 4

population survey - 4

manufacturer - 4

patent - 4

federal - 4

policy - 4

income survey - 4

citizen - 4

city - 4

rent - 4

employment statistics - 4

ethnicity - 4

research - 4

turnover - 4

refinery - 4

renewable - 4

researcher - 4

observed productivity - 4

geographically - 4

productivity shocks - 4

confidentiality - 4

monopolistic - 4

competitor - 4

startup - 4

employment data - 4

disadvantaged - 4

unemployed - 4

proprietorship - 4

wage changes - 4

economic statistics - 4

consumer - 4

firm dynamics - 4

inflation - 4

heterogeneity - 4

area - 4

geographic - 4

productivity size - 4

development - 4

employment changes - 4

employee data - 4

workforce indicators - 4

tax - 4

earns - 4

coverage - 4

costs pollution - 4

tenure - 4

longitudinal employer - 4

labor productivity - 4

investment productivity - 4

employment wages - 4

polluting - 4

workplace - 4

oligopolistic - 3

strategic - 3

2010 census - 3

innovate - 3

wages productivity - 3

innovating - 3

patenting - 3

externality - 3

census survey - 3

census records - 3

census responses - 3

urban - 3

locality - 3

relocation - 3

income data - 3

venture - 3

classified - 3

industrial classification - 3

classification - 3

rate - 3

utility - 3

incorporated - 3

regional economic - 3

larger firms - 3

tariff - 3

distribution - 3

energy efficiency - 3

gain - 3

yield - 3

wage regressions - 3

medicaid - 3

prevalence - 3

price - 3

department - 3

statistical disclosure - 3

public - 3

census use - 3

businesses grow - 3

declining - 3

mobility - 3

earnings mobility - 3

region - 3

dispersion productivity - 3

regressors - 3

product - 3

pricing - 3

investing - 3

insurance - 3

enrollment - 3

employment count - 3

acquisition - 3

financial - 3

household income - 3

employment flows - 3

compensation - 3

district - 3

substitute - 3

productivity differences - 3

plants industry - 3

plant investment - 3

employing - 3

industry growth - 3

performance - 3

plant - 3

textile - 3

Viewing papers 111 through 120 of 170


  • Working Paper

    Estimating the Distribution of Plant-Level Manufacturing Energy Efficiency with Stochastic Frontier Regression

    March 2007

    Authors: Gale Boyd

    Working Paper Number:

    CES-07-07

    A feature commonly used to distinguish between parametric/statistical models and engineering models is that engineering models explicitly represent best practice technologies while the parametric/statistical models are typically based on average practice. Measures of energy intensity based on average practice are less useful in the corporate management of energy or for public policy goal setting. In the context of company or plant level energy management, it is more useful to have a measure of energy intensity capable of representing where a company or plant lies within a distribution of performance. In other words, is the performance close (or far) from the industry best practice? This paper presents a parametric/statistical approach that can be used to measure best practice, thereby providing a measure of the difference, or 'efficiency gap' at a plant, company or overall industry level. The approach requires plant level data and applies a stochastic frontier regression analysis to energy use. Stochastic frontier regression analysis separates the energy intensity into three components, systematic effects, inefficiency, and statistical (random) error. The stochastic frontier can be viewed as a sub-vector input distance function. One advantage of this approach is that physical product mix can be included in the distance function, avoiding the problem of aggregating output to define a single energy/output ratio to measure energy intensity. The paper outlines the methods and gives an example of the analysis conducted for a non-public micro-dataset of wet corn refining plants.
    View Full Paper PDF
  • Working Paper

    Identifying Individual and Group Effects in the Presence of Sorting: A Neighborhood Effects Application

    January 2007

    Working Paper Number:

    CES-07-03

    Researchers have long recognized that the non-random sorting of individuals into groups generates correlation between individual and group attributes that is likely to bias naive estimates of both individual and group effects. This paper proposes a non-parametric strategy for identifying these effects in a model that allows for both individual and group unobservables, applying this strategy to the estimation of neighborhood effects on labor market outcomes. The first part of this strategy is guided by a robust feature of the equilibrium in the canonical vertical sorting model of Epple and Platt (1998), that there is a monotonic relationship between neighborhood housing prices and neighborhood quality. This implies that under certain conditions a non-parametric function of neighborhood housing prices serves as a suitable control function for the neighborhood unobservable in the labor market outcome regression. This control function converts the problem to a model with one unobservable so that traditional instrumental variables solutions may be applied. In our application, we instrument for each individual.s observed neighborhood attributes with the average neighborhood attributes of a set of observationally identical individuals. The neighborhood effects model is estimated using confidential microdata from the 1990 Decennial Census for the Boston MSA. The results imply that the direct effects of geographic proximity to jobs, neighborhood poverty rates, and average neighborhood education are substantially larger than the conditional correlations identified using OLS, although the net effect of neighborhood quality on labor market outcomes remains small. These findings are robust across a wide variety of specifications and robustness checks.
    View Full Paper PDF
  • Working Paper

    Distribution Preserving Statistical Disclosure Limitation

    September 2006

    Working Paper Number:

    tp-2006-04

    One approach to limiting disclosure risk in public-use microdata is to release multiply-imputed, partially synthetic data sets. These are data on actual respondents, but with confidential data replaced by multiply-imputed synthetic values. A mis-specified imputation model can invalidate inferences because the distribution of synthetic data is completely determined by the model used to generate them. We present two practical methods of generating synthetic values when the imputer has only limited information about the true data generating process. One is applicable when the true likelihood is known up to a monotone transformation. The second requires only limited knowledge of the true likelihood, but nevertheless preserves the conditional distribution of the confidential data, up to sampling error, on arbitrary subdomains. Our method maximizes data utility and minimizes incremental disclosure risk up to posterior uncertainty in the imputation model and sampling error in the estimated transformation. We validate the approach with a simulation and application to a large linked employer-employee database.
    View Full Paper PDF
  • Working Paper

    The Impact of Hurricanes Katrina, Rita and Wilma on Business Establishments: A GIS Approach

    August 2006

    Working Paper Number:

    CES-06-23

    We use Geographic Information System tools to develop estimates of the economic impact of disaster events such as Hurricane Katrina. Our methodology relies on mapping establishments from the Census Bureau's Business Register into damage zones defined by remote sensing information provided by FEMA. The identification of damaged establishments by precisely locating them on a map provides a far more accurate characterization of affected businesses than those typically reported from readily available county level data. The need for prompt estimates is critical since they are more valuable the sooner they are released after a catastrophic event. Our methodology is based on pre-storm data. Therefore, estimates can be made available very quickly to inform the public as well as policy makers. Robustness tests using data from after the storms indicate our GIS estimates, while much smaller than those based on publicly available county-level data, still overstate actual observed losses. We discuss ways to refine and augment the GIS approach to provide even more accurate estimates of the impact of disasters on businesses.
    View Full Paper PDF
  • Working Paper

    The Dynamics of Plant-Level Productivity in U.S. Manufacturing

    July 2006

    Working Paper Number:

    CES-06-20

    Using a unique database that covers the entire U.S. manufacturing sector from 1976 until 1999, we estimate plant-level total factor productivity for a large number of plants. We characterize time series properties of plant-level idiosyncratic shocks to productivity, taking into account aggregate manufacturing-sector shocks and industry-level shocks. Plant-level heterogeneity and shocks are a key determinant of the cross-sectional variations in output. We compare the persistence and volatility of the idiosyncratic plant-level shocks to those of aggregate productivity shocks estimated from aggregate data. We find that the persistence of plant level shocks is surprisingly low-we estimate an average autocorrelation of the plantspecific productivity shock of only 0.37 to 0.41 on an annual basis. Finally, we find that estimates of the persistence of productivity shocks from aggregate data have a large upward bias. Estimates of the persistence of productivity shocks in the same data aggregated to the industry level produce autocorrelation estimates ranging from 0.80 to 0.91 on an annual basis. The results are robust to the inclusion of various measures of lumpiness in investment and job flows, different weighting methods, and different measures of the plants' capital stocks.
    View Full Paper PDF
  • Working Paper

    Plant Turnover and Demand Fluctuations in the Ready-Mix Concrete Industry

    March 2006

    Working Paper Number:

    CES-06-08

    Fluctuations in demand cause some plants to exit a market and other to enter. Would eliminating these 'uctuations reduce plant turnover? A structural model of entry and exit in concentrated markets is estimated for the ready-mix concrete industry, using plant level data from the U.S. Census. The Nested Pseudo-Likelihood algorithm is used to 'nd parameters which rationalize behavior of 'rms involved in repeated competition. Due to high sunk costs, turnover rates would only be reduced by 3% by eliminating demand 'uctuations at the county level, saving around 20 million dollars a year in scrapped capital. However, demand 'uctuations blunt 'rms'incentive to invest, reducing the number of large plants by more than 50%.
    View Full Paper PDF
  • Working Paper

    Soft and Hard Within- and Between-Industry Changes of U.S. Skill Intensity: Shedding Light on Worker's Inequality

    January 2006

    Working Paper Number:

    CES-06-01

    In order to examine the worsening of inequality between workers of different skill levels over the past three decades and to further motivate the theoretical discussion on this issue, we use the decomposition methodology to focus on the interaction of within- and between-industry changes of the relative skill intensity in U.S. manufacturing. Unlike previous work, we use more detailed levels of industry classification (5-digit SIC product codes), and we analyze the impact of plants switching industries as well as of plant births and deaths on these changes. Internal, plant-level data from the U.S. Census Bureau's Longitudinal Research Database and the new Longitudinal Business Database provide us with the requisite information to conduct these studies. Finally, our empirical conclusions are discussed in relation to the inspired theoretical inference, as they enrich the debate concerning the sources of the inequality by justifying the skill-biased character of technical change.
    View Full Paper PDF
  • Working Paper

    The LEHD Infrastructure Files and the Creation of the Quarterly Workforce Indicators

    January 2006

    Working Paper Number:

    tp-2006-01

    The Longitudinal Employer-Household Dynamics (LEHD) Program at the U.S. Census Bureau, with the support of several national research agencies, has built a set of infrastructure files using administrative data provided by state agencies, enhanced with information from other administrative data sources, demographic and economic (business) surveys and censuses. The LEHD Infrastructure Files provide a detailed and comprehensive picture of workers, employers, and their interaction in the U.S. economy. Beginning in 2003 and building on this infrastructure, the Census Bureau has published the Quarterly Workforce Indicators (QWI), a new collection of data series that offers unprecedented detail on the local dynamics of labor markets. Despite the fine detail, confidentiality is maintained due to the application of state-of-the-art confidentiality protection methods. This article describes how the input files are compiled and combined to create the infrastructure files. We describe the multiple imputation methods used to impute in missing data and the statistical matching techniques used to combine and edit data when a direct identifier match requires improvement. Both of these innovations are crucial to the success of the final product. Finally, we pay special attention to the details of the confidentiality protection system used to protect the identity and micro data values of the underlying entities used to form the published estimates. We provide a brief description of public-use and restricted-access data files with pointers to further documentation for researchers interested in using these data.
    View Full Paper PDF
  • Working Paper

    Wage Dispersion, Compensation Policy and the Role of Firms

    November 2005

    Authors: Bryce Stephens

    Working Paper Number:

    tp-2005-04

    Empirical work in economics stresses the importance of unobserved firm- and person-level characteristics in the determination of wages, finding that these unobserved components account for the overwhelming majority of variation in wages. However, little is known about the mechanisms sustaining these wage di'er- entials. This paper attempts to demystify the firm-side of the puzzle by developing a statistical model that enriches the role that firms play in wage determination, allowing firms to influence both average wages as well as the returns to observable worker characteristics. I exploit the hierarchical nature of a unique employer-employee linked dataset for the United States, estimating a multilevel statistical model of earnings that accounts for firm-specific deviations in average wages as well as the returns to components of human capital - race, gender, education, and experience - while also controlling for person-level heterogeneity in earnings. These idiosyncratic prices reflect one aspect of firm compensation policy; another, and more novel aspect, is the unstructured characterization of the covariance of these prices across firms. I estimate the model's variance parameters using Restricted (or Residual) Maximum Likelihood tech- niques. Results suggest that there is significant variation in the returns to worker characteristics across firms. First, estimates of the parameters of the covariance matrix of firm-specific returns are statistically significant. Firms that tend to pay higher average wages also tend to pay higher than average returns to worker characteristics; firms that tend to reward highly the human capital of men also highly reward the human capital of women. For instance, the correlation between the firm-specific returns to education for men and women is 0.57. Second, the firm-specific returns account for roughly 9% of the variation in wages - approximately 50% of the variation in wages explained by firm-specific intercepts alone. The inclusion of firm-specific returns ties variation in wages, otherwise attributable to firm-specific intercepts, to observable components of human capital.
    View Full Paper PDF
  • Working Paper

    Networking Off Madison Avenue

    October 2005

    Working Paper Number:

    CES-05-15

    This paper examines the effect on productivity of having more near advertising agency neighbors and hence better opportunities for meetings and exchange within Manhattan. We will show that there is extremely rapid spatial decay in the benefits of having more near neighbors even in the close quarters of southern Manhattan, a finding that is new to the empirical literature and indicates our understanding of scale externalities is still very limited. The finding indicates that having a high density of commercial establishments is important in enhancing local productivity, an issue in Lucas and Rossi-Hansberg (2002), where within business district spatial decay of spillovers plays a key role. We will argue also that in Manhattan advertising agencies trade-off the higher rent costs of being in bigger clusters nearer 'centers of action', against the lower rent costs of operating on the 'fringes' away from high concentrations of other agencies. Introducing the idea of trade-offs immediately suggests heterogeneity is involved. We will show that higher quality agencies are the ones willing to pay more rent to locate in greater size clusters, specifically because they benefit more from networking. While all this is an exploration of neighborhood and networking externalities, the findings relate to the economic anatomy of large metro areas like New Yorkthe nature of their buzz.
    View Full Paper PDF