CREAT: Census Research Exploration and Analysis Tool

Papers Containing Keywords(s): 'employee'

The following papers contain search terms that you selected. From the papers listed below, you can navigate to the PDF, the profile page for that working paper, or see all the working papers written by an author. You can also explore tags, keywords, and authors that occur frequently within these papers.
Click here to search again

Frequently Occurring Concepts within this Search

Longitudinal Employer Household Dynamics - 102

Bureau of Labor Statistics - 67

Longitudinal Business Database - 65

Current Population Survey - 60

North American Industry Classification System - 59

Employer Identification Numbers - 49

National Science Foundation - 49

Internal Revenue Service - 47

Center for Economic Studies - 47

Alfred P Sloan Foundation - 44

Ordinary Least Squares - 39

Standard Industrial Classification - 36

Quarterly Workforce Indicators - 35

Quarterly Census of Employment and Wages - 35

Census Bureau Disclosure Review Board - 33

Social Security Administration - 32

American Community Survey - 30

Business Register - 27

Unemployment Insurance - 27

Decennial Census - 26

Metropolitan Statistical Area - 26

National Bureau of Economic Research - 25

Protected Identification Key - 23

Cornell University - 23

Federal Statistical Research Data Center - 21

Social Security - 21

Chicago Census Research Data Center - 21

Annual Survey of Manufactures - 20

Economic Census - 20

LEHD Program - 20

Federal Reserve Bank - 19

Social Security Number - 19

International Trade Research Report - 19

Standard Statistical Establishment List - 19

Census of Manufactures - 18

Disclosure Review Board - 18

Department of Labor - 18

Research Data Center - 18

Survey of Income and Program Participation - 18

AKM - 17

Local Employment Dynamics - 17

Bureau of Economic Analysis - 16

Service Annual Survey - 15

Individual Characteristics File - 15

Business Dynamics Statistics - 15

Employment History File - 15

Federal Reserve System - 14

County Business Patterns - 14

National Institute on Aging - 14

Longitudinal Research Database - 14

Total Factor Productivity - 13

University of Chicago - 13

Census Bureau Business Register - 12

Employer Characteristics File - 11

Cornell Institute for Social and Economic Research - 11

Special Sworn Status - 11

American Economic Review - 11

Financial, Insurance and Real Estate Industries - 11

Census Bureau Longitudinal Business Database - 10

Department of Homeland Security - 10

Retail Trade - 10

National Longitudinal Survey of Youth - 9

Census of Manufacturing Firms - 9

Business Employment Dynamics - 9

University of Michigan - 8

Successor Predecessor File - 8

Characteristics of Business Owners - 8

Business Register Bridge - 8

Labor Turnover Survey - 8

Occupational Employment Statistics - 8

Employer-Household Dynamics - 8

Office of Personnel Management - 8

University of Maryland - 8

PSID - 8

Technical Services - 7

W-2 - 7

Census Numident - 7

JOLTS - 7

Journal of Labor Economics - 7

Core Based Statistical Area - 7

Kauffman Foundation - 7

Herfindahl Hirschman Index - 6

Educational Services - 6

American Economic Association - 6

Survey of Business Owners - 6

Department of Economics - 6

Census Industry Code - 6

Columbia University - 6

Master Address File - 6

Board of Governors - 6

2010 Census - 6

Quarterly Journal of Economics - 6

Journal of Political Economy - 6

Small Business Administration - 6

Securities and Exchange Commission - 5

Office of Management and Budget - 5

Michigan Institute for Teaching and Research in Economics - 5

Boston College - 5

Standard Occupational Classification - 5

Review of Economics and Statistics - 5

Composite Person Record - 5

Federal Tax Information - 5

Department of Health and Human Services - 5

Urban Institute - 5

North American Industry Classi - 5

Hypothesis 2 - 5

Harvard University - 5

Business Master File - 5

Probability Density Function - 5

New York Times - 5

Postal Service - 5

Journal of Economic Literature - 5

Department of Commerce - 5

Russell Sage Foundation - 5

Permanent Plant Number - 5

Company Organization Survey - 4

Center for Research in Security Prices - 4

Person Validation System - 4

Agriculture, Forestry - 4

Health Care and Social Assistance - 4

Ewing Marion Kauffman Foundation - 4

CDF - 4

Cumulative Density Function - 4

Census Bureau Business Dynamics Statistics - 4

Accommodation and Food Services - 4

MIT Press - 4

Cobb-Douglas - 4

Business Services - 4

Professional Services - 4

Medical Expenditure Panel Survey - 4

University of Minnesota - 4

Journal of Economic Perspectives - 4

BLS Handbook of Methods - 4

University of Toronto - 4

Organization for Economic Cooperation and Development - 4

Wholesale Trade - 4

Public Administration - 4

Integrated Longitudinal Business Database - 4

Department of Defense - 4

Bureau of Labor - 4

Sloan Foundation - 4

American Housing Survey - 4

Census 2000 - 4

Federal Reserve Bank of Chicago - 4

American Statistical Association - 4

Census of Retail Trade - 4

1940 Census - 4

Sample Edited Detail File - 4

Computer Assisted Telephone Interviews and Computer Assisted Personal Interviews - 4

CATI - 4

WECD - 4

National Employer Survey - 4

Federal Trade Commission - 3

NBER Summer Institute - 3

National Center for Science and Engineering Statistics - 3

Annual Business Survey - 3

Data Management System - 3

Council of Economic Advisers - 3

Management and Organizational Practices Survey - 3

DOB - 3

Arts, Entertainment - 3

Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality - 3

United States Census Bureau - 3

Federal Insurance Contribution Act - 3

Disability Insurance - 3

Health and Retirement Study - 3

UC Berkeley - 3

Federal Reserve Board of Governors - 3

National Income and Product Accounts - 3

Information and Communication Technology Survey - 3

Initial Public Offering - 3

Indian Health Service - 3

HHS - 3

Ohio State University - 3

Current Employment Statistics - 3

Society of Labor Economists - 3

Housing and Urban Development - 3

Journal of Econometrics - 3

Kauffman Firm Survey - 3

Generalized Method of Moments - 3

National Research Council - 3

Computer Assisted Personal Interview - 3

Consolidated Metropolitan Statistical Areas - 3

Survey of Manufacturing Technology - 3

employed - 119

employ - 106

workforce - 101

labor - 80

worker - 69

payroll - 59

earnings - 58

job - 38

hiring - 37

workplace - 33

hire - 30

salary - 30

economist - 29

recession - 28

establishment - 28

tenure - 28

employing - 27

survey - 26

earner - 25

econometric - 25

employment dynamics - 25

occupation - 24

organizational - 23

entrepreneurship - 22

census employment - 22

entrepreneur - 21

longitudinal employer - 20

company - 19

agency - 19

industrial - 19

employment statistics - 18

enterprise - 17

earn - 17

longitudinal - 17

employment growth - 17

quarterly - 17

employee data - 17

venture - 17

layoff - 16

turnover - 16

employment data - 16

census bureau - 15

incentive - 15

manufacturing - 15

employer household - 15

labor statistics - 14

entrepreneurial - 14

heterogeneity - 13

production - 13

corporation - 12

corporate - 12

unemployed - 12

employment estimates - 12

growth - 12

bias - 12

proprietorship - 12

employment earnings - 11

shift - 11

employment wages - 11

compensation - 11

ownership - 11

disclosure - 10

acquisition - 10

revenue - 10

endogeneity - 10

workers earnings - 10

estimating - 10

discrimination - 10

manager - 10

employment count - 10

report - 10

data - 10

effect wages - 9

earnings employees - 9

profit - 9

work census - 9

immigrant - 9

earnings workers - 9

wage industries - 9

wage data - 9

workforce indicators - 9

estimates employment - 9

data census - 9

founder - 9

wages employment - 9

clerical - 9

economic census - 9

employment flows - 9

statistical - 9

census data - 8

executive - 8

proprietor - 8

department - 8

labor markets - 8

finance - 8

unemployment rates - 8

opportunity - 8

matching - 8

associate - 8

wage variation - 8

sale - 8

aging - 8

merger - 7

incorporated - 7

investment - 7

employment effects - 7

worker demographics - 7

worker wages - 7

gdp - 7

woman - 7

microdata - 7

productive - 7

owner - 7

macroeconomic - 7

research census - 7

segregation - 7

record - 6

shareholder - 6

trend - 6

irs - 6

rent - 6

earnings growth - 6

estimation - 6

wage effects - 6

respondent - 6

employment measures - 6

union - 6

labor productivity - 6

startup - 6

prospect - 6

startups employees - 6

ethnicity - 6

measures employment - 6

sector - 6

recessionary - 6

minority - 6

effects employment - 5

wage earnings - 5

takeover - 5

investor - 5

employment trends - 5

imputation - 5

leverage - 5

earnings age - 5

expenditure - 5

statistician - 5

industry wages - 5

wage differences - 5

earnings inequality - 5

wage changes - 5

insurance - 5

retirement - 5

metropolitan - 5

accounting - 5

startup firms - 5

employment changes - 5

industry employment - 5

regression - 5

wage regressions - 5

rates employment - 5

residential - 5

hispanic - 5

specialization - 5

managerial - 5

employment production - 5

technological - 5

unobserved - 4

relocation - 4

trends employment - 4

export - 4

financial - 4

exogeneity - 4

tax - 4

impact employment - 4

transition - 4

immigration - 4

outsourcing - 4

analysis - 4

aggregate - 4

productivity differences - 4

efficiency - 4

federal - 4

medicaid - 4

ssa - 4

census research - 4

decline - 4

state employment - 4

gender - 4

job growth - 4

rural - 4

population - 4

censuses surveys - 4

researcher - 4

unemployment insurance - 4

owned businesses - 4

business data - 4

endogenous - 4

employees startups - 4

employment entrepreneurship - 4

socioeconomic - 4

wages productivity - 4

segregated - 4

technology - 4

information census - 3

database - 3

subsidiary - 3

firm data - 3

wage gap - 3

earnings gap - 3

market - 3

spillover - 3

employment distribution - 3

younger firms - 3

firms employment - 3

firms age - 3

firms size - 3

migrant - 3

immigrant workers - 3

expense - 3

outsourced - 3

econometrician - 3

women earnings - 3

wage growth - 3

reporting - 3

stock - 3

coverage employer - 3

linked census - 3

household surveys - 3

datasets - 3

housing - 3

regress - 3

recession employment - 3

innovation - 3

competitor - 3

funding - 3

firms young - 3

demand - 3

growth employment - 3

profitability - 3

use census - 3

nonemployer businesses - 3

career - 3

contract - 3

business owners - 3

heterogeneous - 3

residence - 3

business startups - 3

ethnic - 3

partnership - 3

customer - 3

establishments data - 3

management - 3

performance - 3

pension - 3

network - 3

insured - 3

insurance employer - 3

white - 3

racial - 3

surveys censuses - 3

citizen - 3

educated - 3

franchising - 3

econometrically - 3

model - 3

poverty - 3

paper census - 3

firm growth - 3

firms plants - 3

Viewing papers 101 through 110 of 170


  • Working Paper

    Job Referral Networks and the Determination of Earnings in Local Labor Markets

    December 2010

    Authors: Ian M. Schmutte

    Working Paper Number:

    CES-10-40

    Referral networks may affect the efficiency and equity of labor market outcomes, but few studies have been able to identify earnings effects empirically. To make progress, I set up a model of on-the-job search in which referral networks channel information about high-paying jobs. I evaluate the model using employer-employee matched data for the U.S. linked to the Census block of residence for each worker. The referral effect is identified by variations in the quality of local referral networks within narrowly defined neighborhoods. I find, consistent with the model, a positive and significant role for local referral networks on the full distribution of earnings outcomes from job search.
    View Full Paper PDF
  • Working Paper

    Workplace Concentration of Immigrants

    November 2010

    Working Paper Number:

    CES-10-39R

    To what extent do immigrants and the native-born work in separate workplaces? Do worker and employer characteristics explain the degree of workplace concentration? We explore these questions using a matched employer-employee database that extensively covers employers in selected MSAs. We find that immigrants are much more likely to have immigrant coworkers than are natives, and are particularly likely to work with their compatriots. We find much higher levels of concentration for small businesses than for large ones, that concentration varies substantially across industries, and that concentration is particularly high among immigrants with limited English skills. We also find evidence that neighborhood job networks are strongly positively associated with concentration. The effects of networks and language remain strong when type is defined by country of origin rather than simply immigrant status. The importance of these factors varies by immigrant country of origin'for example, not speaking English well has a particularly strong association with concentration for immigrants from Asian countries. Controlling for differences across MSAs, we find that observable employer and employee characteristics account for about half of the difference between immigrants and natives in the likelihood of having immigrant coworkers, with differences in industry, residential segregation and English speaking skills being the most important factors.
    View Full Paper PDF
  • Working Paper

    Decomposing the Sources of Earnings Inequality: Assessing the Role of Reallocation

    September 2010

    Working Paper Number:

    CES-10-32

    This paper uses matched employer-employee data from the U.S. Census Bureau to investigate the contribution of worker and firm reallocation to changes in wage inequality within and across industries between 1992 and 2003. We find that the entry and exit of firms and the sorting of workers and firms based on underlying worker skills are important sources of changes in earnings distributions over time. Our results suggest that the underlying dynamics driving changes in earnings inequality are complex and are due to factors that cannot be measured in standard cross-sectional data.
    View Full Paper PDF
  • Working Paper

    Employer-to-Employer Flows in the United States: Estimates Using Linked Employer-Employee Data

    September 2010

    Working Paper Number:

    CES-10-26

    We use administrative data linking workers and firms to study employer-to-employer flows. After discussing how to identify such flows in quarterly data, we investigate their basic empirical patterns. We find that the pace of employer-to-employer flows is high, representing about 4 percent of employment and 30 percent of separations each quarter. The pace of employer-to-employer flows is highly procyclical, and varies systematically across worker, job and employer characteristics. Our findings regarding job tenure and earnings dynamics suggest that for those workers moving directly to new jobs, the new jobs are generally better jobs; however, this pattern is highly procyclical. There are rich patterns in terms of origin and destination of industries. We find somewhat surprisingly that more than half of the workers making employer-to-employer transitions switch even broadly-defined industries (NAICS supersectors).
    View Full Paper PDF
  • Working Paper

    Computer Networks and Productivity Revisited: Does Plant Size Matter? Evidence and Implications

    September 2010

    Working Paper Number:

    CES-10-25

    Numerous studies have documented a positive association between information technology (IT) investments and business- and establishment-level productivity, but these studies usually pay sole or disporportionate attention to small- or medium-sized entities. In this paper, we revisit the evidence for manufacturing plants presented in Atrostic and Nguyen (2005) and show that the positive relationship between computer networks and labor productivity is only found among small- and medium-sized plants. Indeed, for larger plants the relationship is negative, and employment-weighted estimates indicate computer networks have a negative relationship with the productivity of employees, on average. These findings indicate that computer network investments may have an ambiguous relationship with aggregate labor productivity growth.
    View Full Paper PDF
  • Working Paper

    Professional Employer Organizations: What Are They, Who Uses Them and Why Should We Care?

    September 2010

    Working Paper Number:

    CES-10-22

    More and more U.S. workers are counted as employees of firms that they do not actually work for. Among such workers are those who staffed by temporary help service (THS) agencies and leased employees who are on the payroll of professional employment organizations (PEOs) but work for PEOs' client firms. While several papers study firms' use of THS services, few examine firms' use of PEO services. In this article, we summarize PEOs' business practices and examine how the intensity of their use varies across industries, geographic areas, and establishment characteristics using both public and confidential data.
    View Full Paper PDF
  • Working Paper

    The Effect of Firm Compensation Structures on Employee Mobility and Employee Entrepreneurship of Extreme Performers

    March 2010

    Working Paper Number:

    CES-10-06

    Previous studies of employee entrepreneurship have not considered the rewards available to potential entrepreneurs inside of their current organizations. This study hopes to fill this gap by investigating how the firm's compensation structure, an important strategic decision closely scrutinized by human resource management, affects the mobility and entrepreneurship decisions of its employees, particularly those employees at the extreme ends of the performance distribution. Using a comprehensive U.S. Census data set covering all employees in the legal services industry across ten states for fifteen years, we find that high performing employees are less likely to leave firms with highly dispersed compensation structures. However, if high performers do leave employers that offer highly disperse compensation structures, they are more likely to join new firms. Less talented employees, on the other hand, are more likely to leave firms with greater pay dispersion. Unlike high performers, we find that low performers are less likely to move to new ventures when departing firms with highly disperse compensation structures.
    View Full Paper PDF
  • Working Paper

    Employee Capitalism or Corporate Socialism? Broad-Based Employee Stock Ownership

    December 2009

    Working Paper Number:

    CES-09-44

    How employee share ownership plans (ESOPs) affect employee compensation and shareholder value depends on the size. Small ESOPs, defined as those controlling less than 5% of outstanding shares, benefit both workers and shareholders, implying positive productivity gains. However, the effects of large ESOPs on worker compensation and shareholder value are more or less neutral, suggesting little productivity gains. These differential effects appear to be due to two non-value-creating motives specific to large ESOPS: (1) To form management-worker alliances ala Pagano and Volpin (2005), wherein management bribes workers to garner worker support in thwarting hostile takeover threats and (2) To substitute wages with ESOP shares by cash constrained firms. Worker compensation increases when firms under takeover threats adopt large ESOPs, but only if the firm operates in a non-competitive industry. The effects on firm valuation also depend on the strength of product market competition: When the competition is strong (weak), most of the productivity gains accrue to employees (shareholders). Competitive industry also implies greater job mobility within the industry, enabling workers to take a greater portion of productivity gains.
    View Full Paper PDF
  • Working Paper

    A Formal Test of Assortative Matching in the Labor Market

    November 2009

    Working Paper Number:

    CES-09-40

    We estimate a structural model of job assignment in the presence of coordination frictions due to Shimer (2005). The coordination friction model places restrictions on the joint distribution of worker and firm effects from a linear decomposition of log labor earnings. These restrictions permit estimation of the unobservable ability and productivity differences between workers and their employers as well as the way workers sort into jobs on the basis of these unobservable factors. The estimation is performed on matched employer-employee data from the LEHD program of the U.S. Census Bureau. The estimated correlation between worker and firm effects from the earnings decomposition is close to zero, a finding that is often interpreted as evidence that there is no sorting by comparative advantage in the labor market. Our estimates suggest that his finding actually results from a lack of sufficient heterogeneity in the workforce and available jobs. Workers do sort into jobs on the basis of productive differences, but the effects of sorting are not visible because of the composition of workers and employers.
    View Full Paper PDF
  • Working Paper

    The Effect of Wage Insurance on Labor Supply: A Test for Income Effects

    October 2009

    Authors: Henry Hyatt

    Working Paper Number:

    CES-09-37

    Studies of moral hazard in wage insurance programs such as Unemployment Insurance (UI) or Workers Compensation (WC) have demonstrated that higher benefits discourage work, emphasizing the price distortion inherent in benefit provision. Utilizing administrative data linking WC claim records to wage records from a UI payroll tax database, I find that the effect of WC benefits on the duration of benefit receipt cannot fully account for the effect of these benefits on post-injury unemployment. This indicates that a significant fraction of the effect of WC benefits on employment is due to an income effect rather than a price distortion.
    View Full Paper PDF