CREAT: Census Research Exploration and Analysis Tool

Papers Containing Keywords(s): 'investment'

The following papers contain search terms that you selected. From the papers listed below, you can navigate to the PDF, the profile page for that working paper, or see all the working papers written by an author. You can also explore tags, keywords, and authors that occur frequently within these papers.
Click here to search again

Frequently Occurring Concepts within this Search

Longitudinal Business Database - 65

Total Factor Productivity - 57

North American Industry Classification System - 54

Annual Survey of Manufactures - 54

Center for Economic Studies - 49

National Science Foundation - 47

Ordinary Least Squares - 45

Bureau of Economic Analysis - 40

Longitudinal Research Database - 35

Standard Industrial Classification - 34

National Bureau of Economic Research - 33

Census Bureau Disclosure Review Board - 32

Bureau of Labor Statistics - 31

Federal Reserve Bank - 27

Census of Manufactures - 26

Federal Statistical Research Data Center - 26

Cobb-Douglas - 25

Chicago Census Research Data Center - 18

Census of Manufacturing Firms - 17

Economic Census - 17

Internal Revenue Service - 16

Survey of Industrial Research and Development - 15

Business Dynamics Statistics - 14

Disclosure Review Board - 14

Census Bureau Longitudinal Business Database - 13

Longitudinal Employer Household Dynamics - 13

Census Bureau Business Register - 13

Federal Reserve System - 13

Business Research and Development and Innovation Survey - 13

Business Register - 12

Special Sworn Status - 12

Employer Identification Numbers - 11

Current Population Survey - 11

Initial Public Offering - 11

Metropolitan Statistical Area - 11

Business R&D and Innovation Survey - 11

Standard Statistical Establishment List - 10

Boston College - 9

Securities and Exchange Commission - 8

TFPQ - 8

National Income and Product Accounts - 8

Patent and Trademark Office - 8

National Center for Science and Engineering Statistics - 8

Herfindahl Hirschman Index - 8

Generalized Method of Moments - 8

Foreign Direct Investment - 8

Small Business Administration - 7

Department of Homeland Security - 7

TFPR - 7

University of Chicago - 7

Northwestern University - 7

Organization for Economic Cooperation and Development - 7

COMPUSTAT - 7

World Bank - 7

Federal Trade Commission - 6

Alfred P Sloan Foundation - 6

University of Maryland - 6

Net Present Value - 6

Research Data Center - 6

Center for Research in Security Prices - 6

American Community Survey - 6

Kauffman Foundation - 6

Michigan Institute for Teaching and Research in Economics - 6

Securities Data Company - 6

Technical Services - 5

Harvard Business School - 5

Information and Communication Technology Survey - 5

Annual Business Survey - 5

County Business Patterns - 5

Ohio State University - 5

Herfindahl-Hirschman - 5

Bureau of Labor - 5

Cornell Institute for Social and Economic Research - 5

Characteristics of Business Owners - 5

Hypothesis 2 - 5

Washington University - 5

Harmonized System - 5

New York University - 5

Wholesale Trade - 4

Survey of Manufacturing Technology - 4

Social Security - 4

Decennial Census - 4

Department of Justice - 4

Council of Economic Advisers - 4

Financial, Insurance and Real Estate Industries - 4

European Union - 4

Postal Service - 4

Longitudinal Firm Trade Transactions Database - 4

University of California Los Angeles - 4

E32 - 4

Department of Commerce - 4

Boston Research Data Center - 4

Auxiliary Establishment Survey - 4

Computer Network Use Supplement - 4

Permanent Plant Number - 4

New England County Metropolitan - 4

Fabricated Metal Products - 4

Standard Occupational Classification - 3

Federal Reserve Bank of Chicago - 3

NBER Summer Institute - 3

Indian Health Service - 3

p<005 - 3

Board of Governors - 3

UC Berkeley - 3

IBM - 3

Social Security Administration - 3

Integrated Public Use Microdata Series - 3

New York Times - 3

Duke University - 3

University of Michigan - 3

Quarterly Journal of Economics - 3

Journal of Economic Literature - 3

Employment History File - 3

Business Services - 3

Census Bureau Center for Economic Studies - 3

Annual Survey of Entrepreneurs - 3

Citizenship and Immigration Services - 3

Service Annual Survey - 3

Department of Economics - 3

National Research Council - 3

Guzman and Stern - 3

World Trade Organization - 3

Department of Energy - 3

VAR - 3

Harvard University - 3

Labor Productivity - 3

Electronic Data Interchange - 3

growth - 54

expenditure - 50

market - 49

production - 48

company - 40

innovation - 40

manufacturing - 36

financial - 33

finance - 31

industrial - 30

sector - 29

revenue - 29

econometric - 29

invest - 28

technological - 27

investing - 27

estimating - 26

entrepreneur - 26

economically - 25

macroeconomic - 24

acquisition - 24

investor - 23

stock - 23

profit - 23

efficiency - 22

sale - 22

earnings - 22

enterprise - 22

recession - 22

depreciation - 21

entrepreneurship - 21

patent - 20

entrepreneurial - 20

produce - 20

economist - 19

venture - 18

equity - 17

productive - 17

productivity growth - 17

leverage - 17

demand - 16

patenting - 15

technology - 15

financing - 14

gdp - 13

profitability - 13

innovate - 13

estimation - 12

funding - 12

incentive - 12

fund - 12

spillover - 12

corporation - 12

merger - 12

innovative - 12

investment productivity - 12

endogeneity - 12

spending - 11

productivity dispersion - 11

quarterly - 11

shareholder - 11

firms productivity - 11

organizational - 11

strategic - 11

labor - 11

capital - 11

research - 10

accounting - 10

invention - 10

inventory - 10

innovating - 10

growth productivity - 10

plant investment - 10

innovator - 10

multinational - 10

industry productivity - 10

competitor - 10

study - 9

asset - 9

bank - 9

debt - 9

employed - 9

factory - 9

export - 9

gain - 9

researcher - 8

monopolistic - 8

incorporated - 8

specialization - 8

factor productivity - 8

corporate - 8

productivity measures - 8

ownership - 8

consumption - 8

plant productivity - 8

productivity plants - 8

analysis productivity - 8

loan - 7

borrowing - 7

takeover - 7

employee - 7

employ - 7

prospect - 7

firm innovation - 7

security - 7

productivity estimates - 7

producing - 7

acquirer - 7

manufacturer - 7

productivity capital - 6

patented - 6

lender - 6

endogenous - 6

subsidy - 6

externality - 6

banking - 6

capital productivity - 6

conglomerate - 6

productivity size - 6

regression - 6

yield - 6

productivity dynamics - 6

measures productivity - 6

valuation - 6

survey - 5

workforce - 5

innovation patenting - 5

contract - 5

creditor - 5

founder - 5

tax - 5

share - 5

lending - 5

product - 5

economic growth - 5

plants firms - 5

startup - 5

subsidiary - 5

foreign - 5

wealth - 5

exporter - 5

diversification - 5

opportunity - 5

productivity increases - 5

aggregate - 5

equilibrium - 5

plants industry - 5

plant - 5

productivity differences - 5

industry growth - 5

analysis - 4

impact - 4

institutional - 4

endowment - 4

productivity variation - 4

technology adoption - 4

earner - 4

firm patenting - 4

manufacturing productivity - 4

liquidation - 4

development - 4

developed - 4

larger firms - 4

rent - 4

firms plants - 4

proprietor - 4

import - 4

tariff - 4

sourcing - 4

estimates productivity - 4

reallocation productivity - 4

productivity firms - 4

entry productivity - 4

dispersion productivity - 4

data - 4

expense - 4

saving - 4

trading - 4

competitiveness - 4

econometrician - 4

advantage - 4

efficient - 4

productivity analysis - 4

heterogeneity - 4

technical - 4

observed productivity - 4

average - 3

ai - 3

union - 3

quantity - 3

deviation - 3

productivity distribution - 3

borrow - 3

report - 3

risk - 3

firms patents - 3

patents firms - 3

minority - 3

innovation productivity - 3

sector productivity - 3

bankruptcy - 3

bankrupt - 3

partnership - 3

unobserved - 3

affiliate - 3

firms size - 3

earn - 3

relocation - 3

business startups - 3

corp - 3

multinational firms - 3

trend - 3

industry heterogeneity - 3

payroll - 3

wages productivity - 3

outsourced - 3

firms grow - 3

labor productivity - 3

estimator - 3

aggregate productivity - 3

budget - 3

regress - 3

fluctuation - 3

inflation - 3

economic census - 3

growth firms - 3

international trade - 3

plant employment - 3

owner - 3

manufacturing plants - 3

oligopolistic - 3

recessionary - 3

consolidated - 3

oligopoly - 3

estimates production - 3

exogenous - 3

profitable - 3

rates productivity - 3

econometrically - 3

Viewing papers 101 through 110 of 144


  • Working Paper

    Cementing Relationships: Vertical Integration, Foreclosure, Productivity, and Prices

    July 2006

    Working Paper Number:

    CES-06-21

    This paper looks at the reasons for and results of vertical integration, with specific regard to its possible effects on market power as proposed in the theoretical literature on foreclosure. It uses a rich data set on producers in the cement and ready-mixed concrete industries over a 34- year period to perform a detailed case study. There is little evidence that foreclosure effects are quantitatively important in these industries. Instead, prices fall, quantities rise, and entry rates remain unchanged when markets become more integrated. We suggest an alternative mechanism that is consistent with these patterns and provide additional evidence in support of it: namely, that higher productivity producers are more likely to vertically integrate, and as has been documented elsewhere, are also larger, more likely to grow and survive, and charge lower prices. We explore possible sources of vertically integrated producers' productivity advantage and find that the advantage is tied to firm size, possibly in part through improved logistics coordination, but not to several other possible explanations.
    View Full Paper PDF
  • Working Paper

    Plant Turnover and Demand Fluctuations in the Ready-Mix Concrete Industry

    March 2006

    Working Paper Number:

    CES-06-08

    Fluctuations in demand cause some plants to exit a market and other to enter. Would eliminating these 'uctuations reduce plant turnover? A structural model of entry and exit in concentrated markets is estimated for the ready-mix concrete industry, using plant level data from the U.S. Census. The Nested Pseudo-Likelihood algorithm is used to 'nd parameters which rationalize behavior of 'rms involved in repeated competition. Due to high sunk costs, turnover rates would only be reduced by 3% by eliminating demand 'uctuations at the county level, saving around 20 million dollars a year in scrapped capital. However, demand 'uctuations blunt 'rms'incentive to invest, reducing the number of large plants by more than 50%.
    View Full Paper PDF
  • Working Paper

    The Industry Life Cycle and Acquisitions and Investment: Does Firm Organization Matter?

    October 2005

    Working Paper Number:

    CES-05-29

    We examine the effect of financial dependence on the acquisition and investment of single segment and conglomerate firms for different long-run changes in industry conditions. Conglomerates and single-segment firms differ in the investments they make. The main differences are in the investment in acquisitions rather than in the level of capital expenditure. Financial dependence, a deficit in a segment's internal financing, decreases the likelihood of acquisitions and opening new plants, especially for single-segment firms. These effects are mitigated for conglomerates in growth industries and also for firms that are publicly traded. In declining industries, plants of segments that are financially dependent are less likely to be closed by conglomerate firms. These findings persist after controlling for firm size and segment productivity. We also find that plants acquired by conglomerate firms in growth industries increase in productivity post-acquisition. The results are consistent with the comparative advantages of different firm organizations differing across long-run industry conditions.
    View Full Paper PDF
  • Working Paper

    Product Choice and Product Switching

    October 2005

    Working Paper Number:

    CES-05-22

    This paper develops a model of endogenous product selection within industries by firms. The model is motivated by new evidence we present on the prevalence and importance of product changing activity by U.S. manufacturers. Three-fifths of continuing firms alter their product mix within an industry every five years, and added and dropped products account for a substantial portion of firm output. In the model, firms make decisions about both industry entry and product choice. Product choice is shaped by the interaction of heterogeneous firm characteristics and diverse product attributes. Changes in market conditions within an industry result in simultaneous adjustment along a number of margins, including both entry/exit and product choice.
    View Full Paper PDF
  • Working Paper

    Survival of the Best Fit: Exposure to Low-Wage Countries and the (Uneven) Growth of U.S. Manufacturing Plants

    October 2005

    Working Paper Number:

    CES-05-19

    This paper examines the role of international trade in the reallocation of U.S. manufacturing within and across industries from 1977 to 1997. Motivated by the factor proportions framework, we introduce a new measure of industry exposure to international trade that focuses on where imports originate rather than on their overall level. We find that plant survival and growth are negatively associated with industry exposure to low-wage country imports. Within industries, we show that manufacturing activity is disproportionately reallocated towards capital-intensive plants. Finally, we provide the first evidence that firms adjust their product mix in response to trade pressures. Plants are more likely to switch industries when exposure to low-wage countries is high.
    View Full Paper PDF
  • Working Paper

    How is Value Created in Spin-Offs? A Look Inside the Black Box

    July 2005

    Working Paper Number:

    CES-05-09

    Using a unique sample of plant level data from the Longitudinal Research Database (LRD), we identify (for the first time in the literature), how (the precise channel and mechanism), where (parent or subsidiary), and when (the dynamic pattern) performance improvements arise following corporate spinoffs. We identify the source of value improvements in spin-offs by comparing the magnitude of post-spinoff changes in the wages, employment, materials costs, rental and administrative expenses, sales, and capital expenditures in the plants belonging to firms undergoing spin-offs relative to the magnitude of such changes in a control group of plants belonging to firms not undergoing spin-offs. We show that the total factor productivity (TFP) of plants belonging to spin-off firms (parent or spun-off subsidiary) increase, on average, following the spin-off. This increase in overall productivity begins immediately, starting with the first year following the spin-off, and continuing in the years thereafter. This performance improvement can be attributed to a decrease in workers' wages, employment at the plant, decrease in the cost of materials purchased, as well as a decrease in rental and office expenditures, but not from improved product market performance by these plants. Further, such productivity improvements arise primarily in plants that remain with the parent; plants belonging to the spun-off subsidiary do not experience such productivity increases. However, contrary to speculation in the previous literature, plants that are spun-off do not underperform parent plants prior to the spin-off. Finally, in our split-sample study of plants that were acquired subsequent to the spin-off and those that were not, we find that productivity increases for both groups of plants: while such productivity increases start immediately after the spin-off for the nonacquired plants, for the acquired plants they occur only after being taken over by a better management team.
    View Full Paper PDF
  • Working Paper

    Micro and Macro Data Integration: The Case of Capital

    May 2005

    Working Paper Number:

    CES-05-02

    Micro and macro data integration should be an objective of economic measurement as it is clearly advantageous to have internally consistent measurement at all levels of aggregation ' firm, industry and aggregate. In spite of the apparently compelling arguments, there are few measures of business activity that achieve anything close to micro/macro data internal consistency. The measures of business activity that are arguably the worst on this dimension are capital stocks and flows. In this paper, we document, quantify and analyze the widely different approaches to the measurement of capital from the aggregate (top down) and micro (bottom up) perspectives. We find that recent developments in data collection permit improved integration of the top down and bottom up approaches. We develop a prototype hybrid method that exploits these data to improve micro/macro data internal consistency in a manner that could potentially lead to substantially improved measures of capital stocks and flows at the industry level. We also explore the properties of the micro distribution of investment. In spite of substantial data and associated measurement limitations, we show that the micro distributions of investment exhibit properties that are of interest to both micro and macro analysts of investment behavior. These findings help highlight some of the potential benefits of micro/macro data integration.
    View Full Paper PDF
  • Working Paper

    Computer Investment, Computer Networks and Productivity

    January 2005

    Working Paper Number:

    CES-05-01

    Researchers in a large empirical literature find significant relationships between computers and labor productivity, but the estimated size of that relationship varies considerably. In this paper, we estimate the relationships among computers, computer networks, and plant-level productivity in U.S. manufacturing. Using new data on computer investment, we develop a sample with the best proxies for computer and total capital that the data allow us to construct. We find that computer networks and computer inputs have separate, positive, and significant relationships with U.S. manufacturing plant-level productivity. Keywords: computer input; information technology; labor productivity
    View Full Paper PDF
  • Working Paper

    IT and Beyond: The Contribution of Heterogenous Capital to Productivity

    December 2004

    Authors: Daniel Wilson

    Working Paper Number:

    CES-04-20

    This paper explores the relationship between capital composition and productivity using a unique and remarkably detailed data set on firm-level, asset-specific investment in the U.S. Using cross-sectional and longitudinal regressions, I find that among all types of capital, only computers, communications equipment, software, and office building are associated (positively) with current and subsequent years' multifactor productivity. The link between offices and productivity, however, is shown to be due to the correlation between the use of offices and organizational capital. In contrast, the link between ICT equipment and productivity is robust to a number of controls and appears to be part causal effect and part reflection of the correlation between ICT and firm fixed (or slow-moving) effects. The implied marginal products by capital type are derived and compared to official data on rental prices; substantial differences exist for a number of key capital types. Lastly, I provide evidence of complementaries and substitutabilities among capital types ' a rejection of the common assumption of perfect substitutability ' and between particular capital types and labor.
    View Full Paper PDF
  • Working Paper

    Investment Behavior of U.S. Firms Over Heterogenous Capital Goods: A Snapshot

    December 2004

    Authors: Daniel Wilson

    Working Paper Number:

    CES-04-19

    Recent research has indicated that investment in certain capital types, such as computers, has fostered accelerated productivity growth and enabled a fundamental reorganization of the workplace. However, remarkably little is known about the composition of investment at the micro level. This paper takes an important first step in filling this knowledge gap by looking at the newly available micro data from the 1998 Annual Capital Expenditure Survey (ACES), a sample of roughly 30,000 firms drawn from the private, nonfarm economy. The paper establishes a number of stylized facts. Among other things, I find that in contrast to aggregate data the typical firm tends to concentrate its capital expenditures in a very limited number of capital types, though which types are chosen varies greatly from firm to firm. In addition, computers account for a significantly larger share of firms' incremental investment than they do of lumpy investment.
    View Full Paper PDF