CREAT: Census Research Exploration and Analysis Tool

Papers Containing Keywords(s): 'expenditure'

The following papers contain search terms that you selected. From the papers listed below, you can navigate to the PDF, the profile page for that working paper, or see all the working papers written by an author. You can also explore tags, keywords, and authors that occur frequently within these papers.
Click here to search again

Frequently Occurring Concepts within this Search

Center for Economic Studies - 72

Annual Survey of Manufactures - 70

Census of Manufactures - 51

Bureau of Economic Analysis - 51

Total Factor Productivity - 48

North American Industry Classification System - 48

Ordinary Least Squares - 46

Bureau of Labor Statistics - 44

National Science Foundation - 44

Longitudinal Research Database - 41

Longitudinal Business Database - 40

Standard Industrial Classification - 38

National Bureau of Economic Research - 37

Cobb-Douglas - 31

Environmental Protection Agency - 29

Internal Revenue Service - 26

Current Population Survey - 25

Census Bureau Disclosure Review Board - 24

Economic Census - 24

Census of Manufacturing Firms - 22

Chicago Census Research Data Center - 20

Federal Statistical Research Data Center - 19

Pollution Abatement Costs and Expenditures - 19

Federal Reserve Bank - 18

American Community Survey - 18

Medical Expenditure Panel Survey - 18

Standard Statistical Establishment List - 17

Business Register - 15

Census Bureau Longitudinal Business Database - 15

Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality - 15

Disclosure Review Board - 14

Special Sworn Status - 14

Survey of Industrial Research and Development - 13

Manufacturing Energy Consumption Survey - 13

Research Data Center - 12

PAOC - 12

Census Bureau Business Register - 11

National Income and Product Accounts - 11

Federal Reserve System - 11

Metropolitan Statistical Area - 11

Decennial Census - 11

Energy Information Administration - 11

National Ambient Air Quality Standards - 11

National Center for Health Statistics - 10

Generalized Method of Moments - 10

Social Security - 10

Journal of Economic Literature - 10

Department of Labor - 9

Longitudinal Employer Household Dynamics - 9

University of Chicago - 9

General Accounting Office - 9

Service Annual Survey - 9

Employer Identification Numbers - 8

Business Research and Development and Innovation Survey - 8

County Business Patterns - 8

Bureau of Labor - 8

Michigan Institute for Teaching and Research in Economics - 8

Survey of Manufacturing Technology - 8

Alfred P Sloan Foundation - 7

Social Security Administration - 7

Protected Identification Key - 7

TFPQ - 7

New York University - 7

Department of Economics - 7

Council of Economic Advisers - 7

Census Bureau Center for Economic Studies - 7

National Academy of Sciences - 6

2010 Census - 6

Information and Communication Technology Survey - 6

Organization for Economic Cooperation and Development - 6

Office of Management and Budget - 6

Fabricated Metal Products - 6

American Economic Review - 6

Boston Research Data Center - 6

Auxiliary Establishment Survey - 6

Wholesale Trade - 5

Federal Government - 5

Consumer Expenditure Survey - 5

Department of Education - 5

New York Times - 5

Housing and Urban Development - 5

Social Security Number - 5

Earned Income Tax Credit - 5

W-2 - 5

UC Berkeley - 5

Duke University - 5

State Energy Data System - 5

Establishment Micro Properties - 5

University of Maryland - 5

COMPUSTAT - 5

TFPR - 5

Herfindahl Hirschman Index - 5

Urban Institute - 5

Review of Economics and Statistics - 5

Department of Agriculture - 5

Supreme Court - 5

American Economic Association - 5

Permanent Plant Number - 5

National Research Council - 5

Department of Commerce - 5

Financial, Insurance and Real Estate Industries - 5

Occupational Employment Statistics - 4

Quarterly Census of Employment and Wages - 4

Business R&D and Innovation Survey - 4

Securities and Exchange Commission - 4

Department of Housing and Urban Development - 4

Survey of Income and Program Participation - 4

Business Services - 4

Small Business Administration - 4

Department of Homeland Security - 4

European Commission - 4

Kauffman Foundation - 4

Characteristics of Business Owners - 4

Social and Economic Supplement - 4

Cornell University - 4

Administrative Records - 4

E32 - 4

Federal Trade Commission - 4

Cornell Institute for Social and Economic Research - 4

Toxics Release Inventory - 4

Labor Productivity - 4

Computer Network Use Supplement - 4

Electronic Data Interchange - 4

Department of Defense - 3

Retail Trade - 3

Technical Services - 3

University of Texas - 3

Board of Governors - 3

Longitudinal Firm Trade Transactions Database - 3

Net Present Value - 3

Temporary Assistance for Needy Families - 3

Washington University - 3

NBER Summer Institute - 3

Business Dynamics Statistics - 3

Person Validation System - 3

Social Science Research Institute - 3

CPS ASEC - 3

International Trade Commission - 3

2SLS - 3

Boston College - 3

Code of Federal Regulations - 3

National Institutes of Health - 3

Research and Development - 3

European Union - 3

Adjusted Gross Income - 3

Journal of Labor Economics - 3

University of Michigan - 3

Department of Justice - 3

Medicaid Services - 3

Ohio State University - 3

Center for Research in Security Prices - 3

Department of Energy - 3

Business Master File - 3

Journal of Political Economy - 3

Yale University - 3

Harvard University - 3

New England County Metropolitan - 3

Statistics Canada - 3

Schools Under Registration Review - 3

American Statistical Association - 3

Columbia University - 3

production - 64

econometric - 53

demand - 50

investment - 48

manufacturing - 47

estimating - 46

growth - 46

revenue - 40

efficiency - 39

market - 39

produce - 36

economist - 33

cost - 33

consumption - 31

industrial - 31

productivity growth - 27

depreciation - 26

estimation - 26

sector - 25

productive - 25

emission - 25

earnings - 24

sale - 23

spending - 23

gdp - 23

labor - 23

epa - 23

regulation - 23

macroeconomic - 22

pollution - 22

innovation - 21

economically - 21

environmental - 20

payroll - 19

technological - 19

expense - 19

survey - 18

enrollment - 18

company - 18

regulatory - 18

pollutant - 18

polluting - 18

recession - 18

workforce - 17

manufacturer - 17

technology - 16

endogeneity - 16

subsidy - 16

profit - 16

pollution abatement - 16

industry productivity - 16

healthcare - 16

productivity measures - 15

insurance - 15

productivity estimates - 14

spillover - 14

quarterly - 13

employ - 13

enterprise - 13

factory - 13

respondent - 12

population - 12

economic census - 12

tax - 12

efficient - 12

investing - 12

pricing - 12

plant productivity - 12

abatement expenditures - 12

aggregate - 11

price - 11

welfare - 11

factor productivity - 11

labor productivity - 11

incentive - 11

financial - 11

invest - 11

costs pollution - 11

coverage - 11

statistical - 10

measures productivity - 10

estimates productivity - 10

employed - 10

investment productivity - 10

medicaid - 10

policy - 10

rate - 10

analysis productivity - 10

health insurance - 10

accounting - 10

environmental regulation - 10

census bureau - 9

consumer - 9

socioeconomic - 9

budget - 9

poverty - 9

saving - 9

regulated - 9

energy - 9

medicare - 9

environmental expenditures - 9

productivity analysis - 8

profitability - 8

endogenous - 8

producing - 8

monopolistic - 8

agency - 8

electricity - 8

finance - 8

polluting industries - 8

irs - 8

insurance coverage - 8

productivity increases - 8

productivity plants - 8

plant investment - 8

econometrician - 8

regulation productivity - 8

capital - 8

inflation - 7

heterogeneity - 7

stock - 7

growth productivity - 7

productivity dynamics - 7

energy prices - 7

electricity prices - 7

regression - 7

premium - 7

insured - 7

insurance premiums - 7

federal - 7

retirement - 7

refinery - 7

organizational - 7

fiscal - 6

data census - 6

manufacturing productivity - 6

development - 6

housing - 6

multinational - 6

capital productivity - 6

economic growth - 6

salary - 6

renewable - 6

fuel - 6

productivity dispersion - 6

econometrically - 6

data - 6

impact - 6

insurance plans - 6

report - 6

acquisition - 6

estimates production - 6

firms productivity - 6

census data - 6

rates productivity - 6

imputation - 5

inventory - 5

aggregate productivity - 5

productivity variation - 5

gain - 5

patent - 5

rent - 5

employment growth - 5

schooling - 5

corporate - 5

employee - 5

energy efficiency - 5

utility - 5

study - 5

research - 5

pollution regulation - 5

commodity - 5

wages productivity - 5

taxation - 5

state - 5

regional - 5

enrollee - 5

uninsured - 5

quantity - 5

dispersion productivity - 5

analysis - 5

product - 5

estimator - 5

tariff - 5

plants industry - 5

productivity impacts - 5

plant - 5

average - 4

occupation - 4

labor statistics - 4

regress - 4

export - 4

productivity shocks - 4

sector productivity - 4

family - 4

corporation - 4

leverage - 4

disadvantaged - 4

productivity size - 4

practices productivity - 4

metropolitan - 4

city - 4

funding - 4

education - 4

microdata - 4

research census - 4

researcher - 4

financing - 4

patenting - 4

exogeneity - 4

valuation - 4

trend - 4

taxable - 4

taxpayer - 4

regional economic - 4

utilization - 4

health - 4

economic statistics - 4

dependent - 4

pension - 4

benefit - 4

insurer - 4

regressing - 4

coverage employer - 4

use census - 4

resident - 4

merger - 4

wholesale - 4

equilibrium - 4

management - 4

retiree - 4

manufacturing plants - 4

compliance - 4

productivity differences - 4

industry concentration - 4

specialization - 4

census years - 4

computer - 4

observed productivity - 4

imputation model - 3

information census - 3

commerce - 3

percentile - 3

good - 3

purchase - 3

prospect - 3

disparity - 3

maternal - 3

sectoral - 3

residential - 3

exogenous - 3

entry productivity - 3

larger firms - 3

firms size - 3

school - 3

level productivity - 3

outsourcing - 3

innovative - 3

earns - 3

externality - 3

industry heterogeneity - 3

region - 3

technical - 3

statistician - 3

imputed - 3

surveys censuses - 3

subsidized - 3

incorporated - 3

fund - 3

investor - 3

firm innovation - 3

census business - 3

geographically - 3

policymakers - 3

estimates employment - 3

insurance employer - 3

manager - 3

estimates pollution - 3

recessionary - 3

concentration - 3

industry output - 3

competitor - 3

aging - 3

substitute - 3

endowment - 3

performance - 3

strategic - 3

Viewing papers 101 through 110 of 174


  • Working Paper

    Productivity Dispersion and Input Prices: The Case of Electricity

    September 2008

    Working Paper Number:

    CES-08-33

    We exploit a rich new database on Prices and Quantities of Electricity in Manufacturing (PQEM) to study electricity productivity in the U.S. manufacturing sector. The database contains nearly 2 million customer-level observations (i.e., manufacturing plants) from 1963 to 2000. It allows us to construct plant-level measures of price paid per kWh, output per kWh, output per dollar spent on electric power and labor productivity. Using this database, we first document tremendous dispersion among U.S. manufacturing plants in electricity productivity measures and a strong negative relationship between price per kWh and output per kWh hour within narrowly defined industries. Using an IV strategy to isolate exogenous price variation, we estimate that the average elasticity of output per kWh with respect to the price of electricity is about 0.6 during the period from 1985 to 2000. We also develop evidence that this price-physical efficiency tradeoff is stronger for industries with bigger electricity cost shares. Finally, we develop evidence that stronger competitive pressures in the output market lead to less dispersion among manufacturing plants in price per kWh and in electricity productivity measures. The strength of competition effects on dispersion is similar for electricity productivity and labor productivity.
    View Full Paper PDF
  • Working Paper

    A Comparison of Employee Benefits Data from the MEPS-IC and Form 5500

    September 2008

    Authors: Kristin McCue

    Working Paper Number:

    CES-08-32

    This paper compares data on employers\u2019 health and pension offerings from the two sources: publicly available administrative data from Form 5500 filings and survey data from the Insurance Component of the Medical Expenditure Panel Survey (MEPS-IC). The basic findings are that the 5500 filings cover too few health plans to be very useful as a substitute or supplement to the MEPS-IC measure of whether or not employers offer health insurance. The pension information in the 5500 filings is potentially more useful as a supplement to the MEPSIC for research purposes where additional pension information would be useful in studying employers\u2019 decisions to offer health insurance.
    View Full Paper PDF
  • Working Paper

    Health-Related Research Using Confidential U.S. Census Bureau Data

    August 2008

    Working Paper Number:

    CES-08-21

    Economic studies on health-related issues have the potential to benefit all Americans. The approaches for dealing with the growth of health care costs and health insurance coverage are ever changing and information is needed on their efficacy. Research on health-related topics has been conducted for about a decade at the Census Bureau\u2019s Center for Economic Studies and the Research Data Centers. This paper begins by describing the confidential business and demographic Census Bureau data products used in this research. The discussion continues with summaries of nearly 30 papers, including how this work has benefited the Census Bureau and its research findings. Some focus on data linkages and assessing data quality, while others address important questions in the employer, public, and individual insurance markets. This research could not have been accomplished with public-use data. The newly available data from the Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality and National Center for Health Statistics, as well as additional Census Bureau data now available in the Research Data Centers are also discussed.
    View Full Paper PDF
  • Working Paper

    The Going Public Decision and the Product Market

    July 2008

    Working Paper Number:

    CES-08-20

    At what point in a firm's life should it go public? How do a firm's ex ante product market characteristics relate to its going public decision? Further, what are the implications of a firm going public on its post-IPO operating and product market performance? In this paper, we answer the above questions by conducting the first large sample study of the going public decisions of U.S. firms in the literature. We use the Longitudinal Research Database (LRD) of the U.S. Census Bureau, which covers the entire universe of private and public U.S. manufacturing firms. Our findings can be summarized as follows. First, a private firm's product market characteristics (market share, competition, capital intensity, cash flow riskiness) significantly affect its likelihood of going public. Second, private firms facing less information asymmetry and those with projects that are cheaper for outsiders to evaluate are more likely to go public (consistent with Chemmanur and Fulghieri (1999)). Third, IPOs of firms occur at the peak of their productivity cycle (consistent with Clementi (2002)): the dynamics of total factor productivity (TFP) and sales growth exhibit an inverted U-shaped pattern. Finally, sales, capital expenditures, and other performance variables exhibit a consistently increasing pattern over the years before and after the IPO. The last two findings are consistent with the widely documented post-IPO operating underperformance of firms being due to the real investment effects of a firm going public, and inconsistent with underperformance being solely due to earnings management immediately prior to the IPO.
    View Full Paper PDF
  • Working Paper

    The Efficiency of Internal Capital Markets: Evidence from the Annual Capital Expenditure Survey

    April 2008

    Working Paper Number:

    CES-08-08

    We empirically examine whether greater firm diversity results in the inefficient allocation of capital. Using both COMPUSTAT and the Annual Capital Expenditure Survey (ACES) we find firm diversity to be negatively related to the efficiency of investment. However once we distinguish between capital expenditure for structures and equipment, we find that while firms do inefficiently allocate capital for equipment, they efficiently allocate capital for structures. These results suggest that when the decision will have long-lasting repercussions, headquarters will, more often than not, make the correct choice.
    View Full Paper PDF
  • Working Paper

    Electricity Pricing to U.S. Manufacturing Plants, 1963-2000

    October 2007

    Working Paper Number:

    CES-07-28

    We construct a large customer-level database and use it to study electricity pricing patterns from 1963 to 2000. The data show tremendous cross-sectional dispersion in the electricity prices paid by manufacturing plants, reflecting spatial price differences and quantity discounts. Price dispersion declined sharply between 1967 and 1977 because of erosion in quantity discounts. To estimate the role of cost factors and markups in quantity discounts, we exploit differences among utilities in the purchases distribution of their customers. The estimation results reveal that supply costs per watt-hour decline by more than half over the range of customer-level purchases in the data, regardless of time period. Prior to the mid 1970s, marginal price and marginal cost schedules with respect to annual purchase quantity are remarkably similar, in line with efficient pricing. In later years, marginal supply costs exceed marginal prices for smaller manufacturing customers by 10% or more. The evidence provides no support for a standard Ramsey-pricing interpretation of quantity discounts on the margin we study. Spatial dispersion in retail electricity prices among states, counties and utility service territories is large, rises over time for smaller purchasers, and does not diminish as wholesale power markets expand in the 1990s.
    View Full Paper PDF
  • Working Paper

    Issues and Challenges in Measuring Environmental Expenditures by U.S. Manufacturing: The Redevelopment of the PACE Survey

    July 2007

    Working Paper Number:

    CES-07-20

    The Pollution Abatement Costs and Expenditures (PACE) survey is the most comprehensive source of information on U.S. manufacturing's capital expenditures and operating costs associated with pollution abatement. In 2003, the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency began a significant initiative to redevelop the survey, guided by the advice of a multi-disciplinary workgroup consisting of economists, engineers, survey design experts, and experienced data users, in addition to incorporating feedback from key manufacturing industries. This paper describes some of these redevelopment efforts. Issues discussed include the approach to developing the new survey instrument, methods used to evaluate (and improve) its performance, innovations in sampling, and the special development and role of outside expertise. The completely redesigned PACE survey was first administered in early 2006.
    View Full Paper PDF
  • Working Paper

    Older Workers' Access to Employer-Sponsored Retiree Health Insurance, 2000-2004

    April 2007

    Working Paper Number:

    CES-07-12

    Using a multivariate framework, we analyze recent trends in employer provision of retiree health insurance (RHI), eligibility for new retirees, and retiree contribution requirements. We also explore whether local labor market characteristics such as the unemployment rate influence RHI provision. Finally, we examine whether the Medicare Modernization Act (MMA) was associated with diverging trends in RHI access for Medicare-eligible and early retirees. Data come for the Medical Expenditure Panel Survey'Insurance Component (MEPS-IC). We find that, while RHI provision to existing retirees remained stable, eligibility for new retirees declined, and contribution requirements increased between 2000 and 2004. The local labor market had no effect on RHI provision. While early retiree coverage was more common than coverage for Medicare-eligible retirees, we did not find a divergence subsequent to MMA. These results suggest growing financial instability for retirees, both because RHI contribution requirements increased, and because businesses dropped coverage for new retirees.
    View Full Paper PDF
  • Working Paper

    Using the MEPS-IC to Study Retiree Health Insurance

    April 2006

    Authors: Alice Zawacki

    Working Paper Number:

    CES-06-13

    This paper discusses using the restricted-access Medical Expenditure Panel Survey- Insurance Component (MEPS-IC) to study employer-sponsored retiree health insurance (RHI). This topic is particularly interesting given current events such as the aging of baby boomers, rising health care costs, new prescription drug coverage under Medicare, and changes in accounting standards for reporting liabilities related to RHI offerings. Consequently, employers are grappling with an aging workforce, evaluating Medicare subsidies to employers for offering retiree drug plans, facing rising premium costs as a result of rising health care costs, and trying to show profitability on financial reports. This paper provides technical information on using the MEPS-IC to study RHI and points out data issues with some of the measures in the database. Descriptive statistics are provided to illustrate the types of retiree estimates possible using the MEPS-IC and to show some of the trends in this subject area. Not surprising, these estimates show that employer offers of RHI have declined, greater numbers of retirees are enrolling in these plans, and expenditures for employer-sponsored RHI have been rising.
    View Full Paper PDF
  • Working Paper

    Measuring Poverty in the United States: History and Current Issues

    April 2006

    Authors: Daniel Weinberg

    Working Paper Number:

    CES-06-11

    Formal measurement of poverty in the United States is now about 40 years old. This paper first briefly describes the origins and basis of the official poverty thresholds adopted by the federal government in the late 1960s. Then, it discusses in some detail some of the more current issues that observers suggest must be addressed if changes are to be made. The final sections discuss recent efforts to propose alternates to the current official approach.
    View Full Paper PDF