CREAT: Census Research Exploration and Analysis Tool

Papers Containing Keywords(s): 'estimating'

The following papers contain search terms that you selected. From the papers listed below, you can navigate to the PDF, the profile page for that working paper, or see all the working papers written by an author. You can also explore tags, keywords, and authors that occur frequently within these papers.
Click here to search again

Frequently Occurring Concepts within this Search

Center for Economic Studies - 61

Ordinary Least Squares - 53

Annual Survey of Manufactures - 51

National Science Foundation - 49

North American Industry Classification System - 48

Longitudinal Research Database - 42

Total Factor Productivity - 39

Bureau of Labor Statistics - 38

Longitudinal Business Database - 37

Bureau of Economic Analysis - 36

Current Population Survey - 35

Standard Industrial Classification - 34

Census of Manufactures - 32

Internal Revenue Service - 32

Census Bureau Disclosure Review Board - 27

Longitudinal Employer Household Dynamics - 25

American Community Survey - 24

Economic Census - 22

National Bureau of Economic Research - 22

Federal Statistical Research Data Center - 21

Cobb-Douglas - 21

Federal Reserve Bank - 21

Employer Identification Numbers - 20

Social Security Administration - 20

Protected Identification Key - 20

Disclosure Review Board - 20

Chicago Census Research Data Center - 20

Metropolitan Statistical Area - 19

Census Bureau Longitudinal Business Database - 17

Social Security Number - 16

Decennial Census - 16

Alfred P Sloan Foundation - 16

Census of Manufacturing Firms - 15

Research Data Center - 15

Special Sworn Status - 15

Cornell University - 15

Social Security - 14

Census Bureau Business Register - 13

Business Register - 13

Department of Economics - 12

Survey of Income and Program Participation - 11

Quarterly Workforce Indicators - 11

Environmental Protection Agency - 11

Federal Reserve System - 11

Service Annual Survey - 11

Quarterly Census of Employment and Wages - 10

Energy Information Administration - 9

University of Chicago - 9

Standard Statistical Establishment List - 9

Generalized Method of Moments - 9

Manufacturing Energy Consumption Survey - 8

2010 Census - 8

Business Dynamics Statistics - 8

National Income and Product Accounts - 8

Organization for Economic Cooperation and Development - 8

Cornell Institute for Social and Economic Research - 8

Journal of Economic Literature - 8

Person Validation System - 7

Department of Labor - 7

Department of Housing and Urban Development - 7

Small Business Administration - 7

County Business Patterns - 7

Unemployment Insurance - 7

Establishment Micro Properties - 6

COVID-19 - 6

W-2 - 6

Social and Economic Supplement - 6

Detailed Earnings Records - 6

Indian Health Service - 6

Duke University - 6

Personally Identifiable Information - 6

Master Address File - 6

Housing and Urban Development - 6

LEHD Program - 6

United States Census Bureau - 6

European Union - 6

Department of Commerce - 6

PAOC - 6

Pollution Abatement Costs and Expenditures - 6

Permanent Plant Number - 6

ASEC - 5

Department of Homeland Security - 5

Person Identification Validation System - 5

IQR - 5

Office of Management and Budget - 5

AKM - 5

MIT Press - 5

Individual Characteristics File - 5

University of Maryland - 5

CDF - 5

Cumulative Density Function - 5

International Trade Research Report - 5

Local Employment Dynamics - 5

Census Bureau Center for Economic Studies - 5

New England County Metropolitan - 5

Business Formation Statistics - 4

Maximum Likelihood Estimation - 4

Individual Taxpayer Identification Numbers - 4

SSA Numident - 4

CPS ASEC - 4

Annual Business Survey - 4

Supplemental Nutrition Assistance Program - 4

Statistics Canada - 4

1940 Census - 4

Columbia University - 4

American Housing Survey - 4

Centers for Disease Control and Prevention - 4

Accommodation and Food Services - 4

Michigan Institute for Teaching and Research in Economics - 4

Office of Personnel Management - 4

Business Employment Dynamics - 4

Geographic Information Systems - 4

Retirement History Survey - 4

TFPR - 4

Financial, Insurance and Real Estate Industries - 4

American Immigration Council - 4

Composite Person Record - 4

State Energy Data System - 4

TFPQ - 4

Retail Trade - 4

North American Industry Classi - 4

Employment History File - 4

Federal Government - 4

New York University - 4

Center for Administrative Records Research and Applications - 4

Employer Characteristics File - 4

Core Based Statistical Area - 4

Boston Research Data Center - 4

American Statistical Association - 4

Limited Liability Company - 3

Linear Probability Models - 3

COVID - 3

National Academy of Sciences - 3

University of Texas - 3

University of Michigan - 3

Social Science Research Institute - 3

Census Bureau Person Identification Validation System - 3

Disability Insurance - 3

Master Earnings File - 3

Journal of Labor Economics - 3

Census Numident - 3

NUMIDENT - 3

General Accounting Office - 3

Census Bureau Business Dynamics Statistics - 3

Federal Reserve Bank of Chicago - 3

Department of Energy - 3

National Center for Science and Engineering Statistics - 3

Postal Service - 3

Department of Health and Human Services - 3

Wholesale Trade - 3

Arts, Entertainment - 3

National Ambient Air Quality Standards - 3

IZA - 3

Economic Research Service - 3

Business Research and Development and Innovation Survey - 3

Ohio State University - 3

Urban Institute - 3

Board of Governors - 3

National Institute on Aging - 3

Company Organization Survey - 3

MTO - 3

Educational Services - 3

Agriculture, Forestry - 3

Bureau of Labor - 3

Harvard University - 3

Employer-Household Dynamics - 3

Department of Agriculture - 3

Center for Administrative Records Research - 3

Public Use Micro Sample - 3

Kauffman Foundation - 3

Chicago RDC - 3

Survey of Industrial Research and Development - 3

Labor Turnover Survey - 3

Review of Economics and Statistics - 3

Commodity Flow Survey - 3

PSID - 3

American Economic Review - 3

Survey of Manufacturing Technology - 3

National Longitudinal Survey of Youth - 3

estimation - 73

econometric - 65

expenditure - 46

production - 45

economist - 41

growth - 41

survey - 34

earnings - 33

statistical - 33

demand - 29

macroeconomic - 28

employ - 27

manufacturing - 27

respondent - 26

labor - 26

estimator - 25

investment - 25

regression - 25

recession - 24

market - 23

data - 23

efficiency - 22

employed - 22

census bureau - 21

revenue - 21

gdp - 21

aggregate - 20

industrial - 20

produce - 20

sale - 18

endogeneity - 18

population - 17

sector - 16

workforce - 16

quarterly - 15

imputation - 15

payroll - 15

productivity growth - 14

data census - 14

productivity measures - 13

consumption - 13

estimates production - 13

productive - 13

unobserved - 12

salary - 12

technological - 12

economically - 12

trend - 12

depreciation - 12

econometrician - 11

measures productivity - 11

spillover - 11

datasets - 11

employment growth - 11

average - 10

percentile - 10

innovation - 10

report - 10

state - 10

census data - 10

microdata - 10

analysis - 10

housing - 10

employee - 10

industry productivity - 10

plant productivity - 10

cost - 10

longitudinal - 10

bias - 9

sampling - 9

estimates productivity - 9

regress - 9

census employment - 9

disclosure - 9

emission - 9

estimates employment - 9

use census - 9

resident - 9

econometrically - 9

regulation - 9

metropolitan - 9

neighborhood - 9

productivity plants - 9

inference - 9

technology - 9

aggregation - 8

entrepreneur - 8

entrepreneurship - 8

socioeconomic - 8

factory - 8

rates productivity - 8

assessed - 8

regressing - 8

statistician - 8

autoregressive - 8

poverty - 8

efficient - 8

empirical - 8

impact - 8

analyst - 7

finance - 7

forecast - 7

inventory - 7

imputation model - 7

growth productivity - 7

productivity dynamics - 7

energy - 7

epa - 7

record - 7

incentive - 7

indicator - 7

employment dynamics - 7

census research - 7

residential - 7

job - 7

worker - 7

establishment - 7

research census - 7

entrepreneurial - 6

household surveys - 6

earner - 6

survey data - 6

survey income - 6

company - 6

electricity - 6

country - 6

exogeneity - 6

economic census - 6

residence - 6

enterprise - 6

utilization - 6

elasticity - 6

productivity dispersion - 6

productivity estimates - 6

industries estimate - 6

endogenous - 6

aging - 6

spending - 6

merger - 6

regulatory - 6

pollution - 6

environmental - 6

profit - 6

analysis productivity - 6

profitability - 5

hiring - 5

matching - 5

linkage - 5

labor statistics - 5

sample - 5

productivity impacts - 5

specialization - 5

subsidy - 5

fuel - 5

employment estimates - 5

assessing - 5

rural - 5

regional - 5

privacy - 5

earn - 5

yearly - 5

quantity - 5

agency - 5

imputed - 5

wage data - 5

factor productivity - 5

employer household - 5

census years - 5

model - 5

budget - 5

layoff - 5

regulated - 5

environmental regulation - 5

pollutant - 5

abatement expenditures - 5

pollution abatement - 5

capital - 5

technical - 5

regulation productivity - 5

irs - 4

aggregate productivity - 4

productivity analysis - 4

productivity variation - 4

paper census - 4

ssa - 4

population survey - 4

manufacturer - 4

patent - 4

federal - 4

policy - 4

income survey - 4

citizen - 4

city - 4

rent - 4

employment statistics - 4

ethnicity - 4

research - 4

turnover - 4

refinery - 4

renewable - 4

researcher - 4

observed productivity - 4

geographically - 4

productivity shocks - 4

confidentiality - 4

monopolistic - 4

competitor - 4

startup - 4

employment data - 4

disadvantaged - 4

unemployed - 4

proprietorship - 4

wage changes - 4

economic statistics - 4

consumer - 4

firm dynamics - 4

inflation - 4

heterogeneity - 4

area - 4

geographic - 4

productivity size - 4

development - 4

employment changes - 4

employee data - 4

workforce indicators - 4

tax - 4

earns - 4

coverage - 4

costs pollution - 4

tenure - 4

longitudinal employer - 4

labor productivity - 4

investment productivity - 4

employment wages - 4

polluting - 4

workplace - 4

oligopolistic - 3

strategic - 3

2010 census - 3

innovate - 3

wages productivity - 3

innovating - 3

patenting - 3

externality - 3

census survey - 3

census records - 3

census responses - 3

urban - 3

locality - 3

relocation - 3

income data - 3

venture - 3

classified - 3

industrial classification - 3

classification - 3

rate - 3

utility - 3

incorporated - 3

regional economic - 3

larger firms - 3

tariff - 3

distribution - 3

energy efficiency - 3

gain - 3

yield - 3

wage regressions - 3

medicaid - 3

prevalence - 3

price - 3

department - 3

statistical disclosure - 3

public - 3

census use - 3

businesses grow - 3

declining - 3

mobility - 3

earnings mobility - 3

region - 3

dispersion productivity - 3

regressors - 3

product - 3

pricing - 3

investing - 3

insurance - 3

enrollment - 3

employment count - 3

acquisition - 3

financial - 3

household income - 3

employment flows - 3

compensation - 3

district - 3

substitute - 3

productivity differences - 3

plants industry - 3

plant investment - 3

employing - 3

industry growth - 3

performance - 3

plant - 3

textile - 3

Viewing papers 101 through 110 of 170


  • Working Paper

    Building New Plants or Entering by Acquisition? Estimation of an Entry Model for the U.S. Cement Industry

    April 2010

    Working Paper Number:

    CES-10-08

    In many industries, firms usually have two choices when expanding into new markets: They can either build a new plant (greenfield entry) or they can acquire an existing incumbent. The U.S. cement industry is a clear example. For this industry, I study the effect of two policies on the entry behavior and industry equilibrium: An asymmetric environmental policy that creates barriers to greenfield entry and a policy that creates barriers to entry by acquisition (like an antitrust policy). In the U.S. cement industry, the comparative advantage (e.g., TFP or size) of entrants versus incumbents and the regulatory entry barriers are important factors that determine the means of expansion. To model this industry, I use a perfect information static entry game. To estimate the supply and demand primitives of my model, I apply a recent estimator of discrete games to a rich database of the U.S. Census of Manufactures for the years 1963-2002. In my counterfactual analyses, I find that a less favorable environment for mergers during the Reagan-Bush administration would decrease the acquired plants by 70% and increase the new plants by 20%. Also, I find that the Clean Air Act Amendments of 1990 increased the number of acquisitions by 7.8%. Furthermore, my simulations suggest that regulations that create barriers to greenfield entry are less favorable in terms of welfare than regulations that create barriers to entry by acquisition. Finally, I demonstrate how my parameter estimates change when I apply the traditional approach in the entry literature where entry by acquisition is not considered, and when using a simple OLS estimation.
    View Full Paper PDF
  • Working Paper

    Euler-Equation Estimation for Discrete Choice Models: A Capital Accumulation Application

    January 2010

    Working Paper Number:

    CES-10-02

    This paper studies capital adjustment at the establishment level. Our goal is to characterize capital adjustment costs, which are important for understanding both the dynamics of aggregate investment and the impact of various policies on capital accumulation. Our estimation strategy searches for parameters that minimize ex post errors in an Euler equation. This strategy is quite common in models for which adjustment occurs in each period. Here, we extend that logic to the estimation of parameters of dynamic optimization problems in which non-convexities lead to extended periods of investment inactivity. In doing so, we create a method to take into account censored observations stemming from intermittent investment. This methodology allows us to take the structural model directly to the data, avoiding time-consuming simulation based methods. To study the effectiveness of this methodology, we first undertake several Monte Carlo exercises using data generated by the structural model. We then estimate capital adjustment costs for U.S. manufacturing establishments in two sectors.
    View Full Paper PDF
  • Working Paper

    On Spatial Heterogeneity in Environmental Compliance Costs

    September 2009

    Authors: Randy Becker

    Working Paper Number:

    CES-09-25R

    This paper examines the extent of variation in regulatory stringency below the state level, using establishment-level data from the U.S. Census Bureau's Pollution Abatement Costs and Expenditures (PACE) survey to estimate a county-level index of environmental compliance costs (ECC). County-level variation is found to explain 11-18 times more of the variation in ECC than state-level variation alone, and the range of ECC within a state is often large. At least 34% of U.S. counties have ECC that are statistically different from their states'. Results suggest that important spatial variation is lost in state-level studies of environmental regulation.
    View Full Paper PDF
  • Working Paper

    Long Term Effects of Military Service on the Distribution of Earnings

    August 2009

    Authors: Brigham Frandsen

    Working Paper Number:

    CES-09-17

    I estimate the long term effect of military service on quantiles of earnings and education using the Vietnam draft lottery eligibility status as an instrument. I compare the local quantile treatment effect estimator studied by Abadie, Angrist, and Imbens (2002) to the instrumental variables quantile regression technique developed by Chernozhukov and Hansen (2008). Ordinary quantile regression shows a large negative association between service in Vietnam and earnings of white men, with the effect increasing in magnitude for the upper quantiles. Quantile treatment effects estimates show the opposite pattern, although much smaller in magnitude, with a small negative effect at the lower end of the distribution, and a small positive effect at the upper end. This suggests the ordinary quantile result is due to heterogeneous selection effects. The two methods of quantile treatment effects estimation give similar results.
    View Full Paper PDF
  • Working Paper

    Estimating the "True" Cost of Job Loss: Evidence Using Matched Data from Califormia 1991-2000

    June 2009

    Working Paper Number:

    CES-09-14

    Estimates of the cost of job displacement from survey and administrative data differ markedly. This paper uses a unique match of data between the Displaced Worker Survey (DWS) and administrative wage records from California to examine the sources of this discrepancy. When we use similar estimation methods and account for measurement error in survey wages correlated with worker demographics, estimates of earnings losses at displacement are similar from both datasets and significantly larger than those based on the DWS alone. Also correcting for measurement errors in reported displacements suggests both sources of such estimates may yield lower bounds for the true cost of displacement.
    View Full Paper PDF
  • Working Paper

    Measuring Inequality Using Censored Data: A Multiple Imputation Approach

    April 2009

    Working Paper Number:

    CES-09-05

    To measure income inequality with right censored (topcoded) data, we propose multiple imputation for censored observations using draws from Generalized Beta of the Second Kind distributions to provide partially synthetic datasets analyzed using complete data methods. Estimation and inference uses Reiter's (Survey Methodology 2003) formulae. Using Current Population Survey (CPS) internal data, we find few statistically significant differences in income inequality for pairs of years between 1995 and 2004. We also show that using CPS public use data with cell mean imputations may lead to incorrect inferences about inequality differences. Multiply-imputed public use data provide an intermediate solution.
    View Full Paper PDF
  • Working Paper

    Measuring Labor Earnings Inequality Using Public-Use March Current Population Survey Data: The Value of Including Variances and Cell Means When Imputing Topcoded Values

    November 2008

    Working Paper Number:

    CES-08-38

    Using the Census Bureau's internal March Current Population Surveys (CPS) file, we construct and make available variances and cell means for all topcoded income values in the publicuse version of these data. We then provide a procedure that allows researchers with access only to the public-use March CPS data to take advantage of this added information when imputing its topcoded income values. As an example of its value we show how our new procedure improves on existing imputation methods in the labor earnings inequality literature.
    View Full Paper PDF
  • Working Paper

    Linking Investment Spikes and Productivity Growth: U.S. Food Manufacturing Industry

    October 2008

    Working Paper Number:

    CES-08-36

    We investigate the relationship between productivity growth and investment spikes using Census Bureau's plant-level data set for the U.S. food manufacturing industry. We find that productivity growth increases after investment spikes suggesting an efficiency gain or plants' learning effect. However, efficiency and the learning period associated with investment spikes differ among plants' productivity quartile ranks implying the differences in the plants' investment types such as expansionary, replacement or retooling. We find evidence of both convex and non-convex types of adjustment costs where lumpy plant-level investments suggest the possibility of non-convex adjustment costs and hazard estimation results suggest the possibility of convex adjustment costs. The downward sloping hazard can be due to the unobserved heterogeneity across plants such as plants' idiosyncratic obsolescence caused by different R&D capabilities and implies the existence of convex adjustment costs. Food plants frequently invest during their first few years of operation and high productivity plants postpone investing due to high fixed costs.
    View Full Paper PDF
  • Working Paper

    Productivity Dispersion and Input Prices: The Case of Electricity

    September 2008

    Working Paper Number:

    CES-08-33

    We exploit a rich new database on Prices and Quantities of Electricity in Manufacturing (PQEM) to study electricity productivity in the U.S. manufacturing sector. The database contains nearly 2 million customer-level observations (i.e., manufacturing plants) from 1963 to 2000. It allows us to construct plant-level measures of price paid per kWh, output per kWh, output per dollar spent on electric power and labor productivity. Using this database, we first document tremendous dispersion among U.S. manufacturing plants in electricity productivity measures and a strong negative relationship between price per kWh and output per kWh hour within narrowly defined industries. Using an IV strategy to isolate exogenous price variation, we estimate that the average elasticity of output per kWh with respect to the price of electricity is about 0.6 during the period from 1985 to 2000. We also develop evidence that this price-physical efficiency tradeoff is stronger for industries with bigger electricity cost shares. Finally, we develop evidence that stronger competitive pressures in the output market lead to less dispersion among manufacturing plants in price per kWh and in electricity productivity measures. The strength of competition effects on dispersion is similar for electricity productivity and labor productivity.
    View Full Paper PDF
  • Working Paper

    Using the P90/P10 Index to Measure U.S. Inequality Trends with Current Population Survey Data: A View From Inside the Census Bureau Vaults

    June 2007

    Working Paper Number:

    CES-07-17

    The March Current Population Survey (CPS) is the primary data source for estimation of levels and trends in labor earnings and income inequality in the USA. Time-inconsistency problems related to top coding in theses data have led many researchers to use the ratio of the 90th and 10th percentiles of these distributions (P90/P10) rather than a more traditional summary measure of inequality. With access to public use and restricted-access internal CPS data, and bounding methods, we show that using P90/P10 does not completely obviate time inconsistency problems, especially for household income inequality trends. Using internal data, we create consistent cell mean values for all top-coded public use values that, when used with public use data, closely track inequality trends in labor earnings and household income using internal data. But estimates of longer-term inequality trends with these corrected data based on P90/P10 differ from those based on the Gini coefficient. The choice of inequality measure matters.
    View Full Paper PDF