CREAT: Census Research Exploration and Analysis Tool

Papers Containing Keywords(s): 'employee'

The following papers contain search terms that you selected. From the papers listed below, you can navigate to the PDF, the profile page for that working paper, or see all the working papers written by an author. You can also explore tags, keywords, and authors that occur frequently within these papers.
Click here to search again

Frequently Occurring Concepts within this Search

Longitudinal Employer Household Dynamics - 105

Longitudinal Business Database - 68

Bureau of Labor Statistics - 68

North American Industry Classification System - 63

Current Population Survey - 60

Employer Identification Numbers - 52

Internal Revenue Service - 50

National Science Foundation - 49

Center for Economic Studies - 47

Alfred P Sloan Foundation - 44

Ordinary Least Squares - 39

Standard Industrial Classification - 37

Census Bureau Disclosure Review Board - 36

Quarterly Census of Employment and Wages - 36

Quarterly Workforce Indicators - 35

Social Security Administration - 33

American Community Survey - 31

Business Register - 28

Unemployment Insurance - 27

Decennial Census - 26

Metropolitan Statistical Area - 26

National Bureau of Economic Research - 25

Protected Identification Key - 23

Cornell University - 23

Federal Statistical Research Data Center - 22

Social Security - 21

Chicago Census Research Data Center - 21

Annual Survey of Manufactures - 20

Economic Census - 20

LEHD Program - 20

Federal Reserve Bank - 19

Social Security Number - 19

International Trade Research Report - 19

Standard Statistical Establishment List - 19

AKM - 18

Census of Manufactures - 18

Disclosure Review Board - 18

Department of Labor - 18

Research Data Center - 18

Survey of Income and Program Participation - 18

Local Employment Dynamics - 17

Business Dynamics Statistics - 16

Employment History File - 16

Individual Characteristics File - 16

Bureau of Economic Analysis - 16

County Business Patterns - 15

Federal Reserve System - 15

Service Annual Survey - 15

National Institute on Aging - 14

Longitudinal Research Database - 14

Census Bureau Business Register - 13

Total Factor Productivity - 13

University of Chicago - 13

Employer Characteristics File - 12

Census Bureau Longitudinal Business Database - 11

Cornell Institute for Social and Economic Research - 11

Special Sworn Status - 11

American Economic Review - 11

Financial, Insurance and Real Estate Industries - 11

Business Employment Dynamics - 10

Department of Homeland Security - 10

Retail Trade - 10

University of Maryland - 9

National Longitudinal Survey of Youth - 9

Census of Manufacturing Firms - 9

Hypothesis 2 - 9

W-2 - 8

University of Michigan - 8

Successor Predecessor File - 8

Characteristics of Business Owners - 8

Business Register Bridge - 8

Labor Turnover Survey - 8

Occupational Employment Statistics - 8

Employer-Household Dynamics - 8

Office of Personnel Management - 8

PSID - 8

Small Business Administration - 7

Survey of Business Owners - 7

2010 Census - 7

Board of Governors - 7

Columbia University - 7

Technical Services - 7

Census Numident - 7

JOLTS - 7

Journal of Labor Economics - 7

Core Based Statistical Area - 7

Kauffman Foundation - 7

Michigan Institute for Teaching and Research in Economics - 6

Herfindahl Hirschman Index - 6

Educational Services - 6

American Economic Association - 6

Department of Economics - 6

Census Industry Code - 6

Master Address File - 6

Quarterly Journal of Economics - 6

Journal of Political Economy - 6

Company Organization Survey - 5

Business Services - 5

Agriculture, Forestry - 5

Multiple Worksite Report - 5

Securities and Exchange Commission - 5

Office of Management and Budget - 5

Boston College - 5

Standard Occupational Classification - 5

Review of Economics and Statistics - 5

Composite Person Record - 5

Federal Tax Information - 5

Department of Health and Human Services - 5

Urban Institute - 5

North American Industry Classi - 5

Harvard University - 5

Business Master File - 5

Probability Density Function - 5

New York Times - 5

Postal Service - 5

Journal of Economic Literature - 5

Department of Commerce - 5

Russell Sage Foundation - 5

Permanent Plant Number - 5

Council of Economic Advisers - 4

Annual Business Survey - 4

NBER Summer Institute - 4

Center for Research in Security Prices - 4

Person Validation System - 4

Health Care and Social Assistance - 4

Ewing Marion Kauffman Foundation - 4

CDF - 4

Cumulative Density Function - 4

Census Bureau Business Dynamics Statistics - 4

Accommodation and Food Services - 4

MIT Press - 4

Cobb-Douglas - 4

Professional Services - 4

Medical Expenditure Panel Survey - 4

University of Minnesota - 4

Journal of Economic Perspectives - 4

BLS Handbook of Methods - 4

University of Toronto - 4

Organization for Economic Cooperation and Development - 4

Wholesale Trade - 4

Public Administration - 4

Integrated Longitudinal Business Database - 4

Department of Defense - 4

Bureau of Labor - 4

Sloan Foundation - 4

American Housing Survey - 4

Census 2000 - 4

Federal Reserve Bank of Chicago - 4

American Statistical Association - 4

Census of Retail Trade - 4

1940 Census - 4

Sample Edited Detail File - 4

Computer Assisted Telephone Interviews and Computer Assisted Personal Interviews - 4

CATI - 4

WECD - 4

National Employer Survey - 4

National Establishment Time Series - 3

Federal Trade Commission - 3

National Center for Science and Engineering Statistics - 3

Data Management System - 3

Management and Organizational Practices Survey - 3

DOB - 3

Arts, Entertainment - 3

Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality - 3

United States Census Bureau - 3

Federal Insurance Contribution Act - 3

Disability Insurance - 3

Health and Retirement Study - 3

UC Berkeley - 3

Federal Reserve Board of Governors - 3

National Income and Product Accounts - 3

Information and Communication Technology Survey - 3

LEHD Origin-Destination Employment Statistics - 3

Initial Public Offering - 3

Indian Health Service - 3

HHS - 3

Ohio State University - 3

Current Employment Statistics - 3

Society of Labor Economists - 3

Housing and Urban Development - 3

Journal of Econometrics - 3

Kauffman Firm Survey - 3

Generalized Method of Moments - 3

National Research Council - 3

Computer Assisted Personal Interview - 3

Consolidated Metropolitan Statistical Areas - 3

Survey of Manufacturing Technology - 3

employed - 121

employ - 108

workforce - 103

labor - 82

worker - 69

payroll - 60

earnings - 59

job - 38

hiring - 37

workplace - 33

hire - 30

salary - 30

establishment - 29

tenure - 29

economist - 29

recession - 28

employing - 27

earner - 26

survey - 26

organizational - 25

econometric - 25

employment dynamics - 25

occupation - 24

census employment - 23

entrepreneurship - 23

entrepreneur - 22

agency - 21

longitudinal employer - 20

quarterly - 19

company - 19

industrial - 19

enterprise - 18

venture - 18

longitudinal - 18

employment statistics - 18

turnover - 17

earn - 17

employment growth - 17

employee data - 17

layoff - 16

employment data - 16

labor statistics - 15

entrepreneurial - 15

census bureau - 15

incentive - 15

manufacturing - 15

employer household - 15

corporate - 13

heterogeneity - 13

production - 13

corporation - 12

unemployed - 12

employment estimates - 12

growth - 12

bias - 12

proprietorship - 12

discrimination - 11

employment count - 11

revenue - 11

employment earnings - 11

shift - 11

employment wages - 11

compensation - 11

ownership - 11

profit - 10

earnings employees - 10

earnings workers - 10

founder - 10

disclosure - 10

acquisition - 10

endogeneity - 10

workers earnings - 10

estimating - 10

manager - 10

report - 10

data - 10

unemployment rates - 9

proprietor - 9

wage variation - 9

effect wages - 9

work census - 9

immigrant - 9

wage industries - 9

wage data - 9

workforce indicators - 9

estimates employment - 9

data census - 9

wages employment - 9

clerical - 9

economic census - 9

employment flows - 9

statistical - 9

census data - 8

executive - 8

department - 8

labor markets - 8

finance - 8

opportunity - 8

matching - 8

associate - 8

sale - 8

aging - 8

minority - 7

sector - 7

irs - 7

startup - 7

startups employees - 7

merger - 7

incorporated - 7

investment - 7

employment effects - 7

worker demographics - 7

worker wages - 7

gdp - 7

woman - 7

microdata - 7

productive - 7

owner - 7

macroeconomic - 7

research census - 7

segregation - 7

expenditure - 6

wage earnings - 6

retirement - 6

record - 6

shareholder - 6

trend - 6

rent - 6

earnings growth - 6

estimation - 6

wage effects - 6

respondent - 6

employment measures - 6

union - 6

labor productivity - 6

prospect - 6

ethnicity - 6

measures employment - 6

recessionary - 6

decline - 5

aggregate - 5

federal - 5

population - 5

tax - 5

socioeconomic - 5

employment firms - 5

effects employment - 5

takeover - 5

investor - 5

employment trends - 5

imputation - 5

leverage - 5

earnings age - 5

statistician - 5

industry wages - 5

wage differences - 5

earnings inequality - 5

wage changes - 5

insurance - 5

metropolitan - 5

accounting - 5

startup firms - 5

employment changes - 5

industry employment - 5

regression - 5

wage regressions - 5

rates employment - 5

residential - 5

hispanic - 5

specialization - 5

managerial - 5

employment production - 5

technological - 5

racial - 4

employment declines - 4

market - 4

establishments data - 4

funding - 4

unobserved - 4

relocation - 4

trends employment - 4

export - 4

financial - 4

exogeneity - 4

impact employment - 4

transition - 4

immigration - 4

outsourcing - 4

analysis - 4

productivity differences - 4

efficiency - 4

medicaid - 4

ssa - 4

census research - 4

state employment - 4

gender - 4

job growth - 4

rural - 4

censuses surveys - 4

researcher - 4

unemployment insurance - 4

owned businesses - 4

business data - 4

endogenous - 4

employees startups - 4

employment entrepreneurship - 4

wages productivity - 4

segregated - 4

technology - 4

declining - 3

census business - 3

disparity - 3

information census - 3

database - 3

subsidiary - 3

firm data - 3

wage gap - 3

earnings gap - 3

spillover - 3

employment distribution - 3

younger firms - 3

firms employment - 3

firms age - 3

firms size - 3

migrant - 3

immigrant workers - 3

expense - 3

outsourced - 3

econometrician - 3

women earnings - 3

wage growth - 3

reporting - 3

stock - 3

coverage employer - 3

linked census - 3

household surveys - 3

datasets - 3

housing - 3

regress - 3

recession employment - 3

innovation - 3

competitor - 3

firms young - 3

demand - 3

growth employment - 3

profitability - 3

use census - 3

nonemployer businesses - 3

career - 3

contract - 3

business owners - 3

heterogeneous - 3

residence - 3

business startups - 3

ethnic - 3

partnership - 3

customer - 3

management - 3

performance - 3

pension - 3

network - 3

insured - 3

insurance employer - 3

white - 3

surveys censuses - 3

citizen - 3

educated - 3

franchising - 3

econometrically - 3

model - 3

poverty - 3

paper census - 3

firm growth - 3

firms plants - 3

Viewing papers 91 through 100 of 174


  • Working Paper

    WHO DO UNIONS TARGET? UNIONIZATION OVER THE LIFE-CYCLE OF U.S. BUSINESSES

    February 2014

    Working Paper Number:

    CES-14-09R

    What type of businesses do unions target for organizing and when? A dynamic model of the union organizing process is constructed to answer this question. A union monitors establishments in an industry to learn about their productivity, and decides which ones to organize and when. An establishment becomes unionized if the union targets it for organizing and wins the union certification election. The model predicts two main selection effects: unions target larger and more productive establishments early in their life-cycles, and among the establishments targeted, unions are more likely to win elections in smaller and less productive ones. These predictions find support in union certification elections data for 1977-2007 matched with data on establishment characteristics.
    View Full Paper PDF
  • Working Paper

    THE OPTION TO QUIT: THE EFFECT OF EMPLOYEE STOCK OPTIONS ON TURNOVER

    January 2014

    Working Paper Number:

    CES-14-06

    We show that in the years following a large broad-based employee stock option (BBSO) grant, employee turnover falls at the granting firm. We find evidence consistent with a causal relation by exploiting unexpected changes in the value of unvested options. A large fraction of the reduction in turnover appears to be temporary with turnover increasing in the 3rd year following the year of the adoption of the BBSO plan. We also find that the effect of BBSO plans is larger at market leaders, identified as firms with high industry-adjusted market-to-book ratios, market share or industry-adjusted profit margins, as measured at the time of the grant.
    View Full Paper PDF
  • Working Paper

    A COMPARISON OF PERSON-REPORTED INDUSTRY TO EMPLOYER-REPORTED INDUSTRY IN SURVEY AND ADMINISTRATIVE DATA

    September 2013

    Working Paper Number:

    CES-13-47

    The Census Bureau collects industry information through surveys and administrative data and creates associated public-use statistics. In this paper, we compare person-reported industry in the American Community Survey (ACS) to employer-reported industry from the Quarterly Census of Employment and Wages (QCEW) that is part of the Census Bureau's Longitudinal Employer-Household Dynamics (LEHD) program. This research provides necessary information on the use of administrative data as a supplement to survey data industry information, and the findings will be useful for anyone using industry information from either source. Our project is part of a larger effort to compare information on jobs from household survey data to employer-reported information. This research is the first to compare ACS job data to firm-based administrative data. We find an overall industry sector match rate of 75 percent, and a 61 percent match rate at the 4-digit Census Industry Code (CIC) level. Industry match rates vary by sector and by whether industry sector is classified using ACS or LEHD industry information. The educational services and health care and social assistance sectors have among the highest match rates. The management of companies and enterprises sector has the lowest match rate, using either ACS-reported or LEHD-reported sector. For individuals with imputed industry data, the industry sector match rate is only 14 percent. Our findings suggest that the industry distribution and the sample in a particular industry sector will differ depending on whether ACS or LEHD data are used.
    View Full Paper PDF
  • Working Paper

    Don't Quit Your Day Job: Using Wage and Salary Earnings to Support a New Business

    September 2013

    Working Paper Number:

    CES-13-45

    This paper makes use of a newly constructed Census Bureau dataset that follows the universe of sole proprietors, employers and non-employers, over 10 years and links their transitions to their activity as employees earning wage and salary income. By combining administrative data on sole proprietors and their businesses with quarterly administrative data on wage and salary jobs held by the same individuals both preceding and concurrent with business startup, we create the unique opportunity to quantify significant workforce dynamics that have up to now remained unobserved. The data allow us to take a first glimpse at these business owners as they initiate business ventures and make the transition from wage and salary work to business ownership and back. We find that the barrier between wage and salary work and self-employment is extremely fluid, with large flows occurring in both directions. We also observe that a large fraction of business owners takeon both roles simultaneously and find that this labor market diversification does have implications for the success of the businesses these owners create. The results for employer transitions to exit and non-employer suggest that there is a 'don't quit your day job' effect that is present for new businesses. Employers are more likely to stay employers if they have a wage and salary job in the year just prior to the transitions that we are tracking. It is especially important to have a stable wage and salary job but there is also evidence that higher earnings from the wage and salary job makes transition less likely. For nonemployers we find roughly similar patterns but there are some key differences. We find that having recent wage and salary income (and having higher earnings from such wage and salary activity) increases the likelihood of survival. Having recent stable wage and salary income decreases the likelihood of a complete exit but increases the likelihood of transiting to be an employer. Having recent wage and salary income in the same industry as the non-employer business has a large and positive impact on the likelihood of transiting to being a non-employer business.
    View Full Paper PDF
  • Working Paper

    WHAT DO I TAKE WITH ME?: THE MEDIATING EFFECT OF SPIN-OUT TEAM SIZE AND TENURE ON THE FOUNDER-FIRM PERFORMANCE RELATIONSHIP

    April 2013

    Working Paper Number:

    CES-13-17

    Our study examines the mediating effect of spin-out team characteristics on the relationship between founder quality and parent and spin-out performance. Since the ability to transfer or recreate complementary assets is a critical determinant of performance, we theorize and show that founders with greater ability impact both parent firm and spin-out performance by assembling teams that represent strong complementary human capital. Using linked employee-employer US Census data from the legal services industry, we find founding team size and tenure mediate the founder quality effect. Our findings have practical implications for both managers of existing firms and aspiring founders as it relates to their human resource strategies: the factor most salient to performance is not the individual quality per se, but the manner in which it impacts the transfer and spillover of complementary human capital.
    View Full Paper PDF
  • Working Paper

    DO LOCAL MANAGERS GIVE LABOR AN EDGE?

    April 2013

    Authors: Scott E. Yonker

    Working Paper Number:

    CES-13-16

    Based on the psychological theory of place attachments, native local managers should be more rooted in their communities than non-locals and should act accordingly. Consistent with this, local managers are 33% less likely to lay of employees than their non-local industry peers following industry distress. Additionally, when managers are forced to lay off employees, establishments near managers' homes are less likely to experience layoffs than those located elsewhere. Locals pay for these higher employment levels by spending cash, cutting investment, and selling assets. While there is no direct evidence that labor-friendly policies of locals have a differential impact on firm performance or value, only locals with weaker incentives implement these policies, suggesting that favoritism by locals may be suboptimal. Taken together these results suggest that managerial preferences impact corporate employment decisions.
    View Full Paper PDF
  • Working Paper

    The Recent Decline in Employment Dynamics

    March 2013

    Working Paper Number:

    CES-13-03

    In recent years, the rate at which workers and businesses exchange jobs has declined in the United States. Between 1998 and 2010, rates of job creation, job destruction, hiring, and separation declined dramatically, and the rate of job-to-job flows fell by about half. Little is known about the nature and extent of these changes, and even less about their causes and implications. In this paper, we document and attempt to explain the recent decline in employment dynamics. Our empirical work relies on the four leading datasets of quarterly employment dynamics in the United States ' the Longitudinal Employer-Household Dynamics (LEHD), the Business Employment Dynamics (BED), the Job Openings and Labor Turnover Survey (JOLTS), and the Current Population Survey (CPS). We find that changes in the composition of the labor force and of employers explain relatively little of the decline. Exploiting some identities that relate the different measures to each other, we find that job creation and destruction could explain as much of a third of the decline in hires and separations, while job-to-job flows may explain more of the decline. We end our paper with a discussion of different possible explanations and their relative merits.
    View Full Paper PDF
  • Working Paper

    Management in America

    January 2013

    Working Paper Number:

    CES-13-01

    The Census Bureau recently conducted a survey of management practices in over 30,000 plants across the US, the first large-scale survey of management in America. Analyzing these data reveals several striking results. First, more structured management practices are tightly linked to better performance: establishments adopting more structured practices for performance monitoring, target setting and incentives enjoy greater productivity and profitability, higher rates of innovation and faster employment growth. Second, there is a substantial dispersion of management practices across the establishments. We find that 18% of establishments have adopted at least 75% of these more structured management practices, while 27% of establishments adopted less than 50% of these. Third, more structured management practices are more likely to be found in establishments that export, who are larger (or are part of bigger firms), and have more educated employees. Establishments in the South and Midwest have more structured practices on average than those in the Northeast and West. Finally, we find adoption of structured management practices has increased between 2005 and 2010 for surviving establishments, particularly for those practices involving data collection and analysis.
    View Full Paper PDF
  • Working Paper

    Testing for Wage Discrimination in U.S. Manufacturing

    September 2012

    Authors: Joyce Burnette

    Working Paper Number:

    CES-12-23

    In spite of the large literature on labor market discrimination, the quantity of solid evidence on discrimination is relatively limited. This is because evidence of discrimination is difficult to obtain. Two individuals may be treated equally, but this does not prove discrimination unless we can show that the differences in treatment were not justified by differences in productivity. The method most commonly used to identify wage discrimination, the Oaxaca decomposition, is flawed because any omitted variables that are correlated with gender will contribute to the unexplained portion of the wage gap, leading to an over- or under-estimation of wage discrimination. Audit studies provide more direct evidence of differential treatment, but are costly to carry out. Only a small number of studies attempt to measure worker productivity to see if wage differences are justified. This may be because the data needed to measure productivity are difficult to obtain. This paper tests for wage discrimination by gender and race by estimating relative productivity from 2002 Census of Manufacturing data linked to demographic information on workers from Longitudinal Employer-Household Dynamics (LEHD) files. Comparing the estimated productivity ratios to the observed wage ratios, I conclude that females and blacks face wage discrimination in US manufacturing.
    View Full Paper PDF
  • Working Paper

    Dynamically Consistent Noise Infusion and Partially Synthetic Data as Confidentiality Protection Measures for Related Time Series

    July 2012

    Working Paper Number:

    CES-12-13

    The Census Bureau's Quarterly Workforce Indicators (QWI) provide detailed quarterly statistics on employment measures such as worker and job flows, tabulated by worker characteristics in various combinations. The data are released for several levels of NAICS industries and geography, the lowest aggregation of the latter being counties. Disclosure avoidance methods are required to protect the information about individuals and businesses that contribute to the underlying data. The QWI disclosure avoidance mechanism we describe here relies heavily on the use of noise infusion through a permanent multiplicative noise distortion factor, used for magnitudes, counts, differences and ratios. There is minimal suppression and no complementary suppressions. To our knowledge, the release in 2003 of the QWI was the first large-scale use of noise infusion in any official statistical product. We show that the released statistics are analytically valid along several critical dimensions { measures are unbiased and time series properties are preserved. We provide an analysis of the degree to which confidentiality is protected. Furthermore, we show how the judicious use of synthetic data, injected into the tabulation process, can completely eliminate suppressions, maintain analytical validity, and increase the protection of the underlying confidential data.
    View Full Paper PDF