CREAT: Census Research Exploration and Analysis Tool

Papers Containing Keywords(s): 'payroll'

The following papers contain search terms that you selected. From the papers listed below, you can navigate to the PDF, the profile page for that working paper, or see all the working papers written by an author. You can also explore tags, keywords, and authors that occur frequently within these papers.
Click here to search again

Frequently Occurring Concepts within this Search

Bureau of Labor Statistics - 73

Longitudinal Employer Household Dynamics - 64

North American Industry Classification System - 60

Center for Economic Studies - 55

Employer Identification Numbers - 51

Longitudinal Business Database - 49

Current Population Survey - 48

Internal Revenue Service - 47

Standard Industrial Classification - 40

National Science Foundation - 39

Census Bureau Disclosure Review Board - 32

American Community Survey - 31

Annual Survey of Manufactures - 30

Economic Census - 29

Quarterly Census of Employment and Wages - 28

Social Security Administration - 26

Alfred P Sloan Foundation - 26

Business Register - 24

Quarterly Workforce Indicators - 24

Protected Identification Key - 24

Ordinary Least Squares - 23

Social Security - 22

Metropolitan Statistical Area - 22

Census of Manufactures - 21

Unemployment Insurance - 21

Social Security Number - 21

Standard Statistical Establishment List - 21

National Bureau of Economic Research - 20

Federal Statistical Research Data Center - 19

Disclosure Review Board - 19

Department of Labor - 18

Census Bureau Business Register - 18

Decennial Census - 18

Cornell University - 18

Service Annual Survey - 17

Research Data Center - 17

Individual Characteristics File - 15

Federal Reserve Bank - 15

LEHD Program - 14

Chicago Census Research Data Center - 13

Bureau of Economic Analysis - 13

Employment History File - 12

University of Maryland - 12

Longitudinal Research Database - 12

W-2 - 11

Total Factor Productivity - 11

County Business Patterns - 11

Occupational Employment Statistics - 10

Employer Characteristics File - 10

Local Employment Dynamics - 10

Business Dynamics Statistics - 10

University of Chicago - 10

International Trade Research Report - 9

Survey of Income and Program Participation - 9

Cornell Institute for Social and Economic Research - 9

Census of Manufacturing Firms - 9

National Institute on Aging - 9

Medical Expenditure Panel Survey - 9

Herfindahl Hirschman Index - 8

Company Organization Survey - 8

Financial, Insurance and Real Estate Industries - 8

Department of Homeland Security - 8

Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality - 8

Small Business Administration - 8

Business Employment Dynamics - 8

Permanent Plant Number - 8

Federal Insurance Contribution Act - 7

AKM - 7

Office of Personnel Management - 7

Master Address File - 7

Special Sworn Status - 7

Core Based Statistical Area - 7

COVID-19 - 7

American Economic Review - 7

Business Master File - 7

Journal of Economic Literature - 7

Retail Trade - 7

Form W-2 - 6

Current Employment Statistics - 6

Management and Organizational Practices Survey - 6

Standard Occupational Classification - 6

Composite Person Record - 6

2010 Census - 6

Multiple Worksite Report - 6

United States Census Bureau - 6

National Center for Health Statistics - 6

Employer-Household Dynamics - 6

Census Bureau Longitudinal Business Database - 6

Successor Predecessor File - 6

Journal of Labor Economics - 6

Business Register Bridge - 6

Cobb-Douglas - 5

Wholesale Trade - 5

Characteristics of Business Owners - 5

Postal Service - 5

Labor Turnover Survey - 5

Person Validation System - 5

Personally Identifiable Information - 5

Organization for Economic Cooperation and Development - 5

Bureau of Labor - 5

Sloan Foundation - 5

Labor Productivity - 5

WECD - 5

Survey of Manufacturing Technology - 5

Federal Register - 4

Disability Insurance - 4

Earned Income Tax Credit - 4

University of California Los Angeles - 4

CDF - 4

Cumulative Density Function - 4

Integrated Longitudinal Business Database - 4

Office of Management and Budget - 4

Census Numident - 4

Department of Economics - 4

NBER Summer Institute - 4

Federal Reserve System - 4

Federal Tax Information - 4

Data Management System - 4

Information and Communication Technology Survey - 4

Kauffman Foundation - 4

North American Industry Classi - 4

American Economic Association - 4

American Housing Survey - 4

Supreme Court - 4

Computer Network Use Supplement - 4

New York Times - 4

Department of Commerce - 4

Department of Agriculture - 3

Michigan Institute for Teaching and Research in Economics - 3

IQR - 3

Annual Business Survey - 3

Agriculture, Forestry - 3

LODES - 3

Stanford University - 3

Technical Services - 3

Accommodation and Food Services - 3

Educational Services - 3

Urban Institute - 3

SSA Numident - 3

Society of Labor Economists - 3

National Institutes of Health - 3

JOLTS - 3

Affordable Care Act - 3

DOB - 3

Probability Density Function - 3

Administrative Records - 3

Center for Administrative Records Research - 3

Journal of Human Resources - 3

Russell Sage Foundation - 3

National Establishment Time Series - 3

National Income and Product Accounts - 3

LEHD Origin-Destination Employment Statistics - 3

Adjusted Gross Income - 3

Boston College - 3

Review of Economics and Statistics - 3

University of Michigan - 3

Department of Defense - 3

Federal Emergency Management Agency - 3

Person Identification Validation System - 3

Center for Administrative Records Research and Applications - 3

Center for Research in Security Prices - 3

Census Industry Code - 3

Census 2000 - 3

Federal Poverty Level - 3

Establishment Micro Properties - 3

Sample Edited Detail File - 3

Environmental Protection Agency - 3

Electronic Data Interchange - 3

MIT Press - 3

BLS Handbook of Methods - 3

Consolidated Metropolitan Statistical Areas - 3

American Statistical Association - 3

employed - 73

workforce - 73

employ - 66

labor - 66

employee - 60

earnings - 45

worker - 35

quarterly - 32

survey - 27

economist - 23

revenue - 21

expenditure - 20

recession - 20

job - 20

salary - 20

agency - 19

hiring - 19

report - 19

census employment - 19

incentive - 18

establishment - 18

manufacturing - 18

econometric - 18

employment dynamics - 17

layoff - 17

industrial - 17

irs - 16

estimating - 16

employment data - 16

employing - 16

tax - 15

endogeneity - 15

employment statistics - 15

labor statistics - 15

longitudinal - 14

employee data - 14

hire - 14

employment growth - 14

estimates employment - 14

enterprise - 14

occupation - 13

sector - 13

insurance - 13

statistical - 12

census bureau - 12

longitudinal employer - 12

coverage - 12

earner - 11

respondent - 11

work census - 11

employment estimates - 11

workplace - 11

production - 11

microdata - 11

employment count - 11

growth - 11

data - 11

unemployed - 10

census data - 10

aggregate - 10

employer household - 10

employment measures - 10

organizational - 10

economic census - 10

measures employment - 9

accounting - 9

data census - 9

macroeconomic - 9

turnover - 9

compensation - 9

estimation - 9

workforce indicators - 9

employment flows - 9

sale - 8

unemployment rates - 8

regress - 8

gdp - 8

research census - 8

demand - 8

federal - 8

employment wages - 8

earn - 8

labor productivity - 8

healthcare - 8

insured - 8

health insurance - 8

tenure - 8

associate - 8

wages productivity - 8

department - 8

proprietorship - 8

heterogeneity - 7

shift - 7

wage growth - 7

medicare - 7

effect wages - 7

wage data - 7

union - 7

rates employment - 7

clerical - 7

proprietor - 6

profit - 6

wage variation - 6

state employment - 6

productive - 6

record - 6

worker demographics - 6

employment trends - 6

wages employment - 6

state - 6

subsidy - 6

regression - 6

company - 6

taxpayer - 5

employment firms - 5

unobserved - 5

bias - 5

unemployment insurance - 5

efficiency - 5

information census - 5

welfare - 5

labor markets - 5

wage regressions - 5

employment effects - 5

taxation - 5

earnings growth - 5

premium - 5

manager - 5

wage changes - 5

wage industries - 5

filing - 5

matching - 5

acquisition - 5

establishments data - 5

analysis - 5

finance - 5

enrollment - 5

residential - 5

discrimination - 5

disclosure - 4

reporting - 4

taxable - 4

measures productivity - 4

population - 4

censuses surveys - 4

assessed - 4

recessionary - 4

trends employment - 4

employment unemployment - 4

employment earnings - 4

researcher - 4

retirement - 4

productivity measures - 4

insurance employer - 4

insurance premiums - 4

econometrician - 4

medicaid - 4

recession employment - 4

incorporated - 4

business data - 4

businesses census - 4

decline - 4

employment production - 4

wages production - 4

pension - 4

enrollee - 4

insurance coverage - 4

census research - 4

industry employment - 4

metropolitan - 4

wage differences - 4

ssa - 4

manufacturer - 4

policy - 4

uninsured - 4

exemption - 4

aging - 4

productivity growth - 4

technology - 4

census business - 4

job growth - 4

average - 3

restaurant - 3

socioeconomic - 3

wage earnings - 3

earnings workers - 3

financial - 3

paper census - 3

2010 census - 3

employed census - 3

spillover - 3

employment distribution - 3

benefit - 3

younger firms - 3

firms employment - 3

prospect - 3

firms young - 3

exogeneity - 3

worker wages - 3

workers earnings - 3

rent - 3

firms census - 3

corporate - 3

outsourcing - 3

insurer - 3

market - 3

productivity wage - 3

industry productivity - 3

investment - 3

productivity estimates - 3

managerial - 3

regressing - 3

database - 3

use census - 3

computer - 3

imputation - 3

entrepreneur - 3

entrepreneurship - 3

fiscal - 3

census file - 3

earnings inequality - 3

leverage - 3

surveys censuses - 3

profitability - 3

executive - 3

coverage employer - 3

produce - 3

firm data - 3

estimator - 3

regulation - 3

insurance plans - 3

statistician - 3

productivity increases - 3

citizen - 3

housing - 3

merger - 3

Viewing papers 91 through 100 of 132


  • Working Paper

    A Comparison of Employee Benefits Data from the MEPS-IC and Form 5500

    September 2008

    Authors: Kristin McCue

    Working Paper Number:

    CES-08-32

    This paper compares data on employers\u2019 health and pension offerings from the two sources: publicly available administrative data from Form 5500 filings and survey data from the Insurance Component of the Medical Expenditure Panel Survey (MEPS-IC). The basic findings are that the 5500 filings cover too few health plans to be very useful as a substitute or supplement to the MEPS-IC measure of whether or not employers offer health insurance. The pension information in the 5500 filings is potentially more useful as a supplement to the MEPSIC for research purposes where additional pension information would be useful in studying employers\u2019 decisions to offer health insurance.
    View Full Paper PDF
  • Working Paper

    An Analysis of Key Differences in Micro Data: Results from the Business List Comparison Project

    September 2008

    Working Paper Number:

    CES-08-28

    The Bureau of Labor Statistics and the Bureau of the Census each maintain a business register, a universe of all U.S. business establishments and their characteristics, created from independent sources. Both registers serve critical functions such as supplying aggregate data inputs for certain national statistics generated by the Bureau of Economic Analysis. This paper examines key micro-level differences across these two business registers.
    View Full Paper PDF
  • Working Paper

    Business Volatility, Job Destruction, and Unemployment

    August 2008

    Working Paper Number:

    CES-08-26

    Unemployment inflows fell from 4 percent of employment per month in the early 1980s to 2 percent or less by the mid 1990s and thereafter. U.S. data also show a secular decline in the job destruction rate and the volatility of firm-level employment growth rates. We interpret this decline as a decrease in the intensity of idiosyncratic labor demand shocks, a key parameter in search and matching models of unemployment. According to these models, a lower intensity of idiosyncratic shocks produces less job destruction, fewer workers flowing through the unemployment pool and less frictional unemployment. To evaluate the importance of this theoretical mechanism, we relate industry-level unemployment flows from 1977 to 2005 to industry-level indicators for the intensity of idiosyncratic shocks. Unlike previous research, we focus on the lower frequency relationship of job destruction and business volatility to unemployment flows. We find strong evidence that declines in the intensity of idiosyncratic labor demand shocks drove big declines in the incidence and rate of unemployment. This evidence implies that the unemployment rate has become much less sensitive to cyclical movements in the job-finding rate.
    View Full Paper PDF
  • Working Paper

    Employment that is not covered by state unemployment insurance Laws

    April 2007

    Authors: David W. Stevens

    Working Paper Number:

    tp-2007-04

    View Full Paper PDF
  • Working Paper

    Social, Economic, Spatial, and Commuting Patterns of Self-Employed Jobholders

    April 2007

    Working Paper Number:

    tp-2007-03

    A significant number of employees within the United States identify themselves as selfemployed, and they are distinct from the larger group identified as private jobholders. While socioeconomic and spatial information on these individuals is readily available in standard datasets, such as the 2000 Decennial Census Long Form, it is possible to gain further information on their wage earnings by using data from administrative wage records. This study takes advantage of firm-based data from Unemployment Insurance administrative wage records linked with the Census Bureau's household-based data in order to examine self-employed jobholders - both as a whole and as subgroups defined according to their earned wage status - by their demographic characteristics as well as their economic, commuting, and spatial location outcomes. Additionally, this report evaluates whether self-employed jobholders and the defined subgroups should be included explicitly in future labor-workforce analyses and transportation modeling. The analyses in this report use the sample of self-employed workers who lived in Los Angeles County, California.
    View Full Paper PDF
  • Working Paper

    Social, Economic, Spatial, and Commuting Patterns of Dual Jobholders

    April 2007

    Working Paper Number:

    tp-2007-01

    Individuals who hold multiple jobs have complex working lives and complex commuting patterns. Economic and spatial information on these individuals is not readily available in standard datasets, such as the 2000 Decennial Census Long Form, because the survey questions were not designed to collect details on multiple jobs. This study takes advantage of firm-based data from the Unemployment Insurance administrative wage records, linked with the Census Bureau's household-based data, to examine multiple jobholders - and specifically a sentinel group of dual jobholders. The study uses a sample from Los Angeles County, California and examines the dual jobholders by their demographic characteristics as well as their economic, commuting, and spatial location outcomes. In addition this report evaluates whether multiple jobholders should be included explicitly in future labor-workforce analyses and transportation modeling.
    View Full Paper PDF
  • Working Paper

    Using linked employer-employee data to investigate the speed of adjustments in downsizing firms

    May 2006

    Working Paper Number:

    tp-2006-03

    When firms are faced with a demand shock, adjustment can take many forms. Firms can adjust physical capital, human capital, or both. The speed of adjustment may differ as well: costs of adjustment, the type of shock, the legal and economic enviroment all matter. In this paper, we focus on firms that downsized between 1992 and 1997, but ultimately survive, and investigate how the human capital distribution within a firm influences the speed of adjustment, ceteris paribus. In other words, when do firms use mass layoffs instead of attrition to adjust the level of employment. We combine worker-level wage records and measures of human capital with firm-level characteristics of the production function, and use levels and changes in these variables to characterize the choice of adjustment method and speed. Firms are described/compared up to 9 years prior to death. We also consider how workers fare after leaving downsizing firms, and analyze if observed differences in post-separation outcomes of workers provide clues to the choice of adjustment speed.
    View Full Paper PDF
  • Working Paper

    Confidentiality Protection in the Census Bureau Quarterly Workforce Indicators

    February 2006

    Working Paper Number:

    tp-2006-02

    The QuarterlyWorkforce Indicators are new estimates developed by the Census Bureau's Longitudinal Employer-Household Dynamics Program as a part of its Local Employment Dynamics partnership with 37 state Labor Market Information offices. These data provide detailed quarterly statistics on employment, accessions, layoffs, hires, separations, full-quarter employment (and related flows), job creations, job destructions, and earnings (for flow and stock categories of workers). The data are released for NAICS industries (and 4-digit SICs) at the county, workforce investment board, and metropolitan area levels of geography. The confidential microdata - unemployment insurance wage records, ES-202 establishment employment, and Title 13 demographic and economic information - are protected using a permanent multiplicative noise distortion factor. This factor distorts all input sums, counts, differences and ratios. The released statistics are analytically valid - measures are unbiased and time series properties are preserved. The confidentiality protection is manifested in the release of some statistics that are flagged as "significantly distorted to preserve confidentiality." These statistics differ from the undistorted statistics by a significant proportion. Even for the significantly distorted statistics, the data remain analytically valid for time series properties. The released data can be aggregated; however, published aggregates are less distorted than custom postrelease aggregates. In addition to the multiplicative noise distortion, confidentiality protection is provided by the estimation process for the QWIs, which multiply imputes all missing data (including missing establishment, given UI account, in the UI wage record data) and dynamically re-weights the establishment data to provide state-level comparability with the BLS's Quarterly Census of Employment and Wages.
    View Full Paper PDF
  • Working Paper

    The LEHD Infrastructure Files and the Creation of the Quarterly Workforce Indicators

    January 2006

    Working Paper Number:

    tp-2006-01

    The Longitudinal Employer-Household Dynamics (LEHD) Program at the U.S. Census Bureau, with the support of several national research agencies, has built a set of infrastructure files using administrative data provided by state agencies, enhanced with information from other administrative data sources, demographic and economic (business) surveys and censuses. The LEHD Infrastructure Files provide a detailed and comprehensive picture of workers, employers, and their interaction in the U.S. economy. Beginning in 2003 and building on this infrastructure, the Census Bureau has published the Quarterly Workforce Indicators (QWI), a new collection of data series that offers unprecedented detail on the local dynamics of labor markets. Despite the fine detail, confidentiality is maintained due to the application of state-of-the-art confidentiality protection methods. This article describes how the input files are compiled and combined to create the infrastructure files. We describe the multiple imputation methods used to impute in missing data and the statistical matching techniques used to combine and edit data when a direct identifier match requires improvement. Both of these innovations are crucial to the success of the final product. Finally, we pay special attention to the details of the confidentiality protection system used to protect the identity and micro data values of the underlying entities used to form the published estimates. We provide a brief description of public-use and restricted-access data files with pointers to further documentation for researchers interested in using these data.
    View Full Paper PDF
  • Working Paper

    The Impact of Minimum Quality Standards on Firm Entry, Exit and Product Quality: The Case of the Child Care Market

    December 2005

    Working Paper Number:

    CES-05-28

    We examine the impact of minimum quality standards on the supply side of the child care market, using a unique panel data set merged from the Census of Services Industries, state regulation data, and administrative accreditation records from the National Association of Education for Young Children. We control for state-specific and time-specific fixed effects in order to mitigate the biases associated with policy endogeneity. We find that the effects of quality standards specifying the labor intensiveness of child care services are strikingly different from those specifying staff qualifications. Higher staff-child ratio requirements deter entry and reduce the number of operating child care establishments. This entry barrier appears to select establishments with better quality into the market and alleviates competition among existing establishments: existing establishments are more likely to receive accreditation and higher profits, and are less likely to exit. By contrast, higher staff-education requirements do not have entry-deterrence effects. They do have the unintended effects of discouraging accreditation, reducing owners' profits, and driving firms out of businesses.
    View Full Paper PDF