CREAT: Census Research Exploration and Analysis Tool

Papers Containing Keywords(s): 'payroll'

The following papers contain search terms that you selected. From the papers listed below, you can navigate to the PDF, the profile page for that working paper, or see all the working papers written by an author. You can also explore tags, keywords, and authors that occur frequently within these papers.
Click here to search again

Frequently Occurring Concepts within this Search

Bureau of Labor Statistics - 71

Longitudinal Employer Household Dynamics - 61

North American Industry Classification System - 56

Center for Economic Studies - 53

Employer Identification Numbers - 49

Longitudinal Business Database - 47

Current Population Survey - 47

Internal Revenue Service - 44

Standard Industrial Classification - 39

National Science Foundation - 39

Census Bureau Disclosure Review Board - 30

American Community Survey - 30

Annual Survey of Manufactures - 29

Quarterly Census of Employment and Wages - 28

Economic Census - 27

Social Security Administration - 25

Alfred P Sloan Foundation - 25

Business Register - 24

Quarterly Workforce Indicators - 24

Protected Identification Key - 24

Metropolitan Statistical Area - 22

Ordinary Least Squares - 22

Census of Manufactures - 21

Unemployment Insurance - 21

Social Security Number - 21

Social Security - 21

Standard Statistical Establishment List - 21

National Bureau of Economic Research - 19

Federal Statistical Research Data Center - 18

Decennial Census - 18

Disclosure Review Board - 18

Cornell University - 18

Census Bureau Business Register - 17

Service Annual Survey - 17

Research Data Center - 17

Department of Labor - 16

Federal Reserve Bank - 15

LEHD Program - 14

Individual Characteristics File - 14

Chicago Census Research Data Center - 13

Bureau of Economic Analysis - 13

University of Maryland - 12

Longitudinal Research Database - 12

County Business Patterns - 11

Employment History File - 11

Total Factor Productivity - 10

Occupational Employment Statistics - 10

Employer Characteristics File - 10

Local Employment Dynamics - 10

Business Dynamics Statistics - 10

W-2 - 10

University of Chicago - 10

International Trade Research Report - 9

Survey of Income and Program Participation - 9

Cornell Institute for Social and Economic Research - 9

Census of Manufacturing Firms - 9

National Institute on Aging - 9

Medical Expenditure Panel Survey - 9

Company Organization Survey - 8

Financial, Insurance and Real Estate Industries - 8

Department of Homeland Security - 8

Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality - 8

Small Business Administration - 8

Business Employment Dynamics - 8

Permanent Plant Number - 8

Office of Personnel Management - 7

Master Address File - 7

Special Sworn Status - 7

Core Based Statistical Area - 7

COVID-19 - 7

Herfindahl Hirschman Index - 7

American Economic Review - 7

Business Master File - 7

Journal of Economic Literature - 7

Retail Trade - 7

Standard Occupational Classification - 6

Composite Person Record - 6

2010 Census - 6

United States Census Bureau - 6

National Center for Health Statistics - 6

AKM - 6

Federal Insurance Contribution Act - 6

Employer-Household Dynamics - 6

Census Bureau Longitudinal Business Database - 6

Successor Predecessor File - 6

Journal of Labor Economics - 6

Business Register Bridge - 6

Characteristics of Business Owners - 5

Postal Service - 5

Management and Organizational Practices Survey - 5

Current Employment Statistics - 5

Labor Turnover Survey - 5

Person Validation System - 5

Personally Identifiable Information - 5

Organization for Economic Cooperation and Development - 5

Bureau of Labor - 5

Sloan Foundation - 5

Labor Productivity - 5

WECD - 5

Survey of Manufacturing Technology - 5

CDF - 4

Cumulative Density Function - 4

Integrated Longitudinal Business Database - 4

Office of Management and Budget - 4

Census Numident - 4

Department of Economics - 4

NBER Summer Institute - 4

Federal Reserve System - 4

Federal Tax Information - 4

Data Management System - 4

Cobb-Douglas - 4

Information and Communication Technology Survey - 4

Kauffman Foundation - 4

North American Industry Classi - 4

American Economic Association - 4

American Housing Survey - 4

Supreme Court - 4

Wholesale Trade - 4

Computer Network Use Supplement - 4

New York Times - 4

Department of Commerce - 4

IQR - 3

Annual Business Survey - 3

Cell Mean Public Use - 3

Agriculture, Forestry - 3

Stanford University - 3

Technical Services - 3

Accommodation and Food Services - 3

Educational Services - 3

Urban Institute - 3

Federal Register - 3

Disability Insurance - 3

Earned Income Tax Credit - 3

SSA Numident - 3

Society of Labor Economists - 3

National Institutes of Health - 3

JOLTS - 3

Probability Density Function - 3

Administrative Records - 3

Center for Administrative Records Research - 3

Journal of Human Resources - 3

Russell Sage Foundation - 3

National Establishment Time Series - 3

National Income and Product Accounts - 3

Adjusted Gross Income - 3

Boston College - 3

University of California Los Angeles - 3

Review of Economics and Statistics - 3

University of Michigan - 3

Department of Defense - 3

Person Identification Validation System - 3

Center for Administrative Records Research and Applications - 3

Center for Research in Security Prices - 3

Census Industry Code - 3

Census 2000 - 3

Federal Poverty Level - 3

Establishment Micro Properties - 3

Sample Edited Detail File - 3

Environmental Protection Agency - 3

Electronic Data Interchange - 3

MIT Press - 3

BLS Handbook of Methods - 3

Consolidated Metropolitan Statistical Areas - 3

American Statistical Association - 3

workforce - 72

employed - 71

employ - 65

labor - 64

employee - 59

earnings - 42

worker - 35

quarterly - 29

survey - 26

economist - 23

recession - 20

job - 20

salary - 20

expenditure - 19

census employment - 19

revenue - 18

report - 18

agency - 18

establishment - 18

hiring - 18

manufacturing - 18

econometric - 18

employment dynamics - 17

incentive - 17

layoff - 17

industrial - 17

employing - 16

estimating - 15

labor statistics - 15

employment data - 15

employment statistics - 14

employee data - 14

hire - 14

endogeneity - 14

employment growth - 14

estimates employment - 14

enterprise - 14

occupation - 13

irs - 13

sector - 13

longitudinal - 13

insurance - 13

statistical - 12

census bureau - 12

longitudinal employer - 12

tax - 12

coverage - 12

respondent - 11

work census - 11

employment estimates - 11

workplace - 11

production - 11

microdata - 11

employment count - 11

growth - 11

data - 11

census data - 10

earner - 10

aggregate - 10

employer household - 10

employment measures - 10

organizational - 10

economic census - 10

data census - 9

macroeconomic - 9

turnover - 9

compensation - 9

estimation - 9

unemployed - 9

workforce indicators - 9

employment flows - 9

research census - 8

demand - 8

federal - 8

employment wages - 8

earn - 8

labor productivity - 8

healthcare - 8

insured - 8

health insurance - 8

tenure - 8

associate - 8

wages productivity - 8

department - 8

accounting - 8

measures employment - 8

proprietorship - 8

regress - 7

shift - 7

wage growth - 7

gdp - 7

unemployment rates - 7

medicare - 7

effect wages - 7

wage data - 7

sale - 7

union - 7

rates employment - 7

clerical - 7

program census - 6

worker demographics - 6

employment trends - 6

wages employment - 6

state - 6

subsidy - 6

heterogeneity - 6

regression - 6

company - 6

information census - 5

welfare - 5

labor markets - 5

wage regressions - 5

employment effects - 5

taxation - 5

earnings growth - 5

productive - 5

premium - 5

manager - 5

wage changes - 5

wage industries - 5

profit - 5

filing - 5

matching - 5

record - 5

acquisition - 5

establishments data - 5

analysis - 5

finance - 5

wage variation - 5

enrollment - 5

proprietor - 5

residential - 5

state employment - 5

discrimination - 5

efficiency - 4

measures productivity - 4

population - 4

views census - 4

censuses surveys - 4

assessed - 4

recessionary - 4

trends employment - 4

employment unemployment - 4

taxpayer - 4

employment earnings - 4

researcher - 4

retirement - 4

productivity measures - 4

insurance employer - 4

insurance premiums - 4

bias - 4

econometrician - 4

medicaid - 4

recession employment - 4

incorporated - 4

business data - 4

businesses census - 4

decline - 4

employment production - 4

wages production - 4

pension - 4

enrollee - 4

insurance coverage - 4

census research - 4

industry employment - 4

metropolitan - 4

wage differences - 4

ssa - 4

manufacturer - 4

policy - 4

uninsured - 4

exemption - 4

unobserved - 4

aging - 4

productivity growth - 4

technology - 4

unemployment insurance - 4

census business - 4

job growth - 4

2010 census - 3

employed census - 3

spillover - 3

employment distribution - 3

benefit - 3

younger firms - 3

firms employment - 3

prospect - 3

firms young - 3

exogeneity - 3

worker wages - 3

workers earnings - 3

rent - 3

firms census - 3

corporate - 3

outsourcing - 3

insurer - 3

market - 3

productivity wage - 3

industry productivity - 3

investment - 3

productivity estimates - 3

managerial - 3

reporting - 3

regressing - 3

database - 3

use census - 3

disclosure - 3

computer - 3

imputation - 3

entrepreneur - 3

entrepreneurship - 3

fiscal - 3

census file - 3

earnings inequality - 3

leverage - 3

surveys censuses - 3

profitability - 3

executive - 3

coverage employer - 3

produce - 3

estimator - 3

regulation - 3

insurance plans - 3

statistician - 3

productivity increases - 3

citizen - 3

housing - 3

merger - 3

Viewing papers 91 through 100 of 128


  • Working Paper

    Social, Economic, Spatial, and Commuting Patterns of Self-Employed Jobholders

    April 2007

    Working Paper Number:

    tp-2007-03

    A significant number of employees within the United States identify themselves as selfemployed, and they are distinct from the larger group identified as private jobholders. While socioeconomic and spatial information on these individuals is readily available in standard datasets, such as the 2000 Decennial Census Long Form, it is possible to gain further information on their wage earnings by using data from administrative wage records. This study takes advantage of firm-based data from Unemployment Insurance administrative wage records linked with the Census Bureau's household-based data in order to examine self-employed jobholders - both as a whole and as subgroups defined according to their earned wage status - by their demographic characteristics as well as their economic, commuting, and spatial location outcomes. Additionally, this report evaluates whether self-employed jobholders and the defined subgroups should be included explicitly in future labor-workforce analyses and transportation modeling. The analyses in this report use the sample of self-employed workers who lived in Los Angeles County, California.
    View Full Paper PDF
  • Working Paper

    Social, Economic, Spatial, and Commuting Patterns of Dual Jobholders

    April 2007

    Working Paper Number:

    tp-2007-01

    Individuals who hold multiple jobs have complex working lives and complex commuting patterns. Economic and spatial information on these individuals is not readily available in standard datasets, such as the 2000 Decennial Census Long Form, because the survey questions were not designed to collect details on multiple jobs. This study takes advantage of firm-based data from the Unemployment Insurance administrative wage records, linked with the Census Bureau's household-based data, to examine multiple jobholders - and specifically a sentinel group of dual jobholders. The study uses a sample from Los Angeles County, California and examines the dual jobholders by their demographic characteristics as well as their economic, commuting, and spatial location outcomes. In addition this report evaluates whether multiple jobholders should be included explicitly in future labor-workforce analyses and transportation modeling.
    View Full Paper PDF
  • Working Paper

    Using linked employer-employee data to investigate the speed of adjustments in downsizing firms

    May 2006

    Working Paper Number:

    tp-2006-03

    When firms are faced with a demand shock, adjustment can take many forms. Firms can adjust physical capital, human capital, or both. The speed of adjustment may differ as well: costs of adjustment, the type of shock, the legal and economic enviroment all matter. In this paper, we focus on firms that downsized between 1992 and 1997, but ultimately survive, and investigate how the human capital distribution within a firm influences the speed of adjustment, ceteris paribus. In other words, when do firms use mass layoffs instead of attrition to adjust the level of employment. We combine worker-level wage records and measures of human capital with firm-level characteristics of the production function, and use levels and changes in these variables to characterize the choice of adjustment method and speed. Firms are described/compared up to 9 years prior to death. We also consider how workers fare after leaving downsizing firms, and analyze if observed differences in post-separation outcomes of workers provide clues to the choice of adjustment speed.
    View Full Paper PDF
  • Working Paper

    Confidentiality Protection in the Census Bureau Quarterly Workforce Indicators

    February 2006

    Working Paper Number:

    tp-2006-02

    The QuarterlyWorkforce Indicators are new estimates developed by the Census Bureau's Longitudinal Employer-Household Dynamics Program as a part of its Local Employment Dynamics partnership with 37 state Labor Market Information offices. These data provide detailed quarterly statistics on employment, accessions, layoffs, hires, separations, full-quarter employment (and related flows), job creations, job destructions, and earnings (for flow and stock categories of workers). The data are released for NAICS industries (and 4-digit SICs) at the county, workforce investment board, and metropolitan area levels of geography. The confidential microdata - unemployment insurance wage records, ES-202 establishment employment, and Title 13 demographic and economic information - are protected using a permanent multiplicative noise distortion factor. This factor distorts all input sums, counts, differences and ratios. The released statistics are analytically valid - measures are unbiased and time series properties are preserved. The confidentiality protection is manifested in the release of some statistics that are flagged as "significantly distorted to preserve confidentiality." These statistics differ from the undistorted statistics by a significant proportion. Even for the significantly distorted statistics, the data remain analytically valid for time series properties. The released data can be aggregated; however, published aggregates are less distorted than custom postrelease aggregates. In addition to the multiplicative noise distortion, confidentiality protection is provided by the estimation process for the QWIs, which multiply imputes all missing data (including missing establishment, given UI account, in the UI wage record data) and dynamically re-weights the establishment data to provide state-level comparability with the BLS's Quarterly Census of Employment and Wages.
    View Full Paper PDF
  • Working Paper

    The LEHD Infrastructure Files and the Creation of the Quarterly Workforce Indicators

    January 2006

    Working Paper Number:

    tp-2006-01

    The Longitudinal Employer-Household Dynamics (LEHD) Program at the U.S. Census Bureau, with the support of several national research agencies, has built a set of infrastructure files using administrative data provided by state agencies, enhanced with information from other administrative data sources, demographic and economic (business) surveys and censuses. The LEHD Infrastructure Files provide a detailed and comprehensive picture of workers, employers, and their interaction in the U.S. economy. Beginning in 2003 and building on this infrastructure, the Census Bureau has published the Quarterly Workforce Indicators (QWI), a new collection of data series that offers unprecedented detail on the local dynamics of labor markets. Despite the fine detail, confidentiality is maintained due to the application of state-of-the-art confidentiality protection methods. This article describes how the input files are compiled and combined to create the infrastructure files. We describe the multiple imputation methods used to impute in missing data and the statistical matching techniques used to combine and edit data when a direct identifier match requires improvement. Both of these innovations are crucial to the success of the final product. Finally, we pay special attention to the details of the confidentiality protection system used to protect the identity and micro data values of the underlying entities used to form the published estimates. We provide a brief description of public-use and restricted-access data files with pointers to further documentation for researchers interested in using these data.
    View Full Paper PDF
  • Working Paper

    The Impact of Minimum Quality Standards on Firm Entry, Exit and Product Quality: The Case of the Child Care Market

    December 2005

    Working Paper Number:

    CES-05-28

    We examine the impact of minimum quality standards on the supply side of the child care market, using a unique panel data set merged from the Census of Services Industries, state regulation data, and administrative accreditation records from the National Association of Education for Young Children. We control for state-specific and time-specific fixed effects in order to mitigate the biases associated with policy endogeneity. We find that the effects of quality standards specifying the labor intensiveness of child care services are strikingly different from those specifying staff qualifications. Higher staff-child ratio requirements deter entry and reduce the number of operating child care establishments. This entry barrier appears to select establishments with better quality into the market and alleviates competition among existing establishments: existing establishments are more likely to receive accreditation and higher profits, and are less likely to exit. By contrast, higher staff-education requirements do not have entry-deterrence effects. They do have the unintended effects of discouraging accreditation, reducing owners' profits, and driving firms out of businesses.
    View Full Paper PDF
  • Working Paper

    Using Census Business Data to Augment the MEPS-IC

    December 2005

    Working Paper Number:

    CES-05-26

    This paper has two aims: first to describe methods, issues, and outcomes involved in matching data from the Insurance Component of the Medical Expenditure Panel Survey (MEPSIC) to other business microdata collected by the U.S. Census Bureau, and second to present some simple results that illustrate the usefulness of such combined data. We present the results of linking the MEPS-IC with data from the 1997 Economic Censuses (EC), but also discuss other possible sources of business data. An issue in any linkage is whether the linked sample remains representative and large enough to be useful. The EC data are attractive because, given the survey's broad coverage and large sample, most of the MEPS-IC sample can be matched to it. We use the combined EC/MEPS-IC data to construct productivity measures that are useful auxiliary data in examining employers' health insurance offering decisions.
    View Full Paper PDF
  • Working Paper

    Wage Dispersion, Compensation Policy and the Role of Firms

    November 2005

    Authors: Bryce Stephens

    Working Paper Number:

    tp-2005-04

    Empirical work in economics stresses the importance of unobserved firm- and person-level characteristics in the determination of wages, finding that these unobserved components account for the overwhelming majority of variation in wages. However, little is known about the mechanisms sustaining these wage di'er- entials. This paper attempts to demystify the firm-side of the puzzle by developing a statistical model that enriches the role that firms play in wage determination, allowing firms to influence both average wages as well as the returns to observable worker characteristics. I exploit the hierarchical nature of a unique employer-employee linked dataset for the United States, estimating a multilevel statistical model of earnings that accounts for firm-specific deviations in average wages as well as the returns to components of human capital - race, gender, education, and experience - while also controlling for person-level heterogeneity in earnings. These idiosyncratic prices reflect one aspect of firm compensation policy; another, and more novel aspect, is the unstructured characterization of the covariance of these prices across firms. I estimate the model's variance parameters using Restricted (or Residual) Maximum Likelihood tech- niques. Results suggest that there is significant variation in the returns to worker characteristics across firms. First, estimates of the parameters of the covariance matrix of firm-specific returns are statistically significant. Firms that tend to pay higher average wages also tend to pay higher than average returns to worker characteristics; firms that tend to reward highly the human capital of men also highly reward the human capital of women. For instance, the correlation between the firm-specific returns to education for men and women is 0.57. Second, the firm-specific returns account for roughly 9% of the variation in wages - approximately 50% of the variation in wages explained by firm-specific intercepts alone. The inclusion of firm-specific returns ties variation in wages, otherwise attributable to firm-specific intercepts, to observable components of human capital.
    View Full Paper PDF
  • Working Paper

    Employer-Provided Benefit Plans, Workforce Composition and Firm Outcomes

    January 2005

    Working Paper Number:

    tp-2005-01

    What do firms gain by offering benefits? Economists have proposed two payoffs: (i) benefits may be a more cost-effective form of compensation than wages for employees facing high marginal tax rates, and (ii) benefits may attract a more stable, skilled workforce. Both should improve firm outcomes, but we have little evidence on this matter. This paper exploits a rich new dataset to examine how firm productivity and survival are related to benefit offering, and finds that benefit-offering firms have higher productivity and higher survival rates. Differences in firm and workforce characteristics explain some but not all of the differences in outcomes.
    View Full Paper PDF
  • Working Paper

    Production Function and Wage Equation Estimation with Heterogenous Labor: Evidence from a New Matched Employer-Employee Dataset

    April 2004

    Working Paper Number:

    CES-04-05

    In this paper, we first describe the 1990 DEED, the most recently constructed matched employeremployee data set for the United States that contains detailed demographic information on workers (most notably, information on education). We then use the data from manufacturing establishments in the 1990 DEED to update and expand on previous findings, using a more limited data set, regarding the measurement of the labor input and theories of wage determination (Hellerstein, et al., 1999). We find that the productivity of women is less than that of men, but not by enough to fully explain the gap in wages, a result that is consistent with wage discrimination against women. In contrast, we find no evidence of wage discrimination against blacks. We estimate that both the wage and productivity profiles are rising but concave to the origin (consistent with profiles quadratic in age), but the estimated relative wage profile is steeper than the relative productivity profile, consistent with models of deferred wages. We find a productivity premium for marriage equal to that of the wage premium, and a productivity premium for education that somewhat exceeds the wage premium. Exploring the sensitivity of these results, we also find that different specifications of production functions do not have any qualitative effects on the these results. Finally, the results indicate that the returns to productive inputs (capital, materials, labor quality) as well as the residual variance are virtually unaffected by the choice of the construction of the labor quality input.
    View Full Paper PDF