CREAT: Census Research Exploration and Analysis Tool

Papers Containing Keywords(s): 'produce'

The following papers contain search terms that you selected. From the papers listed below, you can navigate to the PDF, the profile page for that working paper, or see all the working papers written by an author. You can also explore tags, keywords, and authors that occur frequently within these papers.
Click here to search again

Frequently Occurring Concepts within this Search

Center for Economic Studies - 60

Total Factor Productivity - 56

Longitudinal Research Database - 53

Annual Survey of Manufactures - 49

Census of Manufactures - 45

Standard Industrial Classification - 43

Bureau of Economic Analysis - 33

Ordinary Least Squares - 32

National Science Foundation - 31

Longitudinal Business Database - 28

National Bureau of Economic Research - 28

Cobb-Douglas - 26

Bureau of Labor Statistics - 24

Census of Manufacturing Firms - 24

North American Industry Classification System - 23

Chicago Census Research Data Center - 17

Economic Census - 16

Environmental Protection Agency - 14

Metropolitan Statistical Area - 13

Special Sworn Status - 13

Federal Reserve Bank - 12

Federal Statistical Research Data Center - 11

Census Bureau Longitudinal Business Database - 11

Federal Reserve System - 9

Internal Revenue Service - 9

Pollution Abatement Costs and Expenditures - 9

Census Bureau Disclosure Review Board - 8

Generalized Method of Moments - 8

TFPQ - 8

Manufacturing Energy Consumption Survey - 8

University of Chicago - 8

Current Population Survey - 8

Administrative Records - 8

Organization for Economic Cooperation and Development - 7

Energy Information Administration - 7

Department of Agriculture - 7

Commodity Flow Survey - 7

TFPR - 6

Department of Commerce - 6

Standard Statistical Establishment List - 6

North American Free Trade Agreement - 6

PAOC - 6

New England County Metropolitan - 6

World Trade Organization - 5

New York University - 5

UC Berkeley - 5

Survey of Manufacturing Technology - 5

World Bank - 5

Insurance Information Institute - 5

Journal of Economic Literature - 5

Permanent Plant Number - 5

Schools Under Registration Review - 5

Longitudinal Firm Trade Transactions Database - 4

Labor Productivity - 4

American Economic Association - 4

Harmonized System - 4

County Business Patterns - 4

Economic Research Service - 4

International Standard Industrial Classification - 4

Department of Energy - 4

International Trade Commission - 4

Toxics Release Inventory - 4

Department of Economics - 4

National Income and Product Accounts - 4

Boston Research Data Center - 4

Research Data Center - 4

Columbia University - 4

Wholesale Trade - 3

Princeton University - 3

United States Census Bureau - 3

Social Security Administration - 3

Review of Economics and Statistics - 3

National Ambient Air Quality Standards - 3

Michigan Institute for Teaching and Research in Economics - 3

NBER Summer Institute - 3

Value Added - 3

Retirement History Survey - 3

E32 - 3

Small Business Administration - 3

Chicago RDC - 3

American Economic Review - 3

Computer Aided Design - 3

Office of Management and Budget - 3

Quarterly Journal of Economics - 3

Harvard University - 3

production - 109

manufacturing - 76

industrial - 57

growth - 53

efficiency - 37

expenditure - 36

econometric - 34

market - 31

manufacturer - 28

revenue - 28

macroeconomic - 28

export - 27

productive - 27

demand - 26

sale - 24

plant productivity - 23

economist - 22

sector - 22

economically - 21

productivity growth - 21

profit - 21

investment - 20

estimating - 20

producing - 20

gdp - 19

industry productivity - 18

product - 17

exporter - 16

productivity plants - 16

factory - 16

profitability - 16

technological - 15

consumption - 15

emission - 15

estimation - 14

monopolistic - 14

depreciation - 14

productivity dispersion - 14

plants industry - 14

regulation - 14

pollution - 13

import - 12

exporting - 12

innovation - 12

labor - 12

regulatory - 12

epa - 12

environmental - 12

efficient - 12

recession - 11

factor productivity - 11

agriculture - 11

technology - 11

commodity - 11

plant - 11

quantity - 11

firms productivity - 10

company - 10

manufacturing plants - 10

productivity measures - 10

heterogeneity - 10

pollutant - 10

polluting - 10

cost - 10

growth productivity - 9

multinational - 9

aggregate productivity - 9

dispersion productivity - 9

regression - 9

competitor - 9

tariff - 9

endogeneity - 9

exported - 8

spillover - 8

agricultural - 8

rates productivity - 8

fuel - 8

plants industries - 8

refinery - 8

price - 8

shipment - 7

enterprise - 7

productivity dynamics - 7

industry concentration - 7

measures productivity - 7

productivity estimates - 7

good - 7

manufacturing industries - 7

pricing - 7

industry variation - 7

aggregate - 6

productivity analysis - 6

productivity firms - 6

manufacturing productivity - 6

labor productivity - 6

econometrically - 6

estimates production - 6

meat - 6

specialization - 6

analysis productivity - 6

environmental regulation - 6

observed productivity - 6

firms plants - 5

plant investment - 5

reallocation productivity - 5

productivity variation - 5

plant employment - 5

supplier - 5

regional - 5

inventory - 5

estimator - 5

gain - 5

yield - 5

innovate - 5

energy - 5

spending - 5

merger - 5

acquisition - 5

endogenous - 5

exogenous - 5

consumer - 5

regulation productivity - 5

pollution abatement - 5

level productivity - 5

estimates productivity - 5

organizational - 5

export growth - 5

industry output - 5

profitable - 5

textile - 5

investing - 4

stock - 4

externality - 4

firms grow - 4

industry growth - 4

employment growth - 4

establishment - 4

regressing - 4

country - 4

farm - 4

management - 4

strategic - 4

monopolistically - 4

electricity - 4

custom - 4

restructuring - 4

prices products - 4

firms export - 4

utilization - 4

capital - 4

earnings - 4

productivity shocks - 4

regulated - 4

impact - 4

heterogeneous - 4

productivity impacts - 4

subsidy - 3

conglomerate - 3

consolidated - 3

retailer - 3

warehouse - 3

sourcing - 3

region - 3

tech - 3

sectoral - 3

average - 3

manager - 3

managerial - 3

innovative - 3

workforce - 3

industry heterogeneity - 3

inflation - 3

energy prices - 3

statistical - 3

regional economic - 3

industrialized - 3

downstream - 3

trading - 3

exporting firms - 3

payroll - 3

abatement expenditures - 3

wholesale - 3

employ - 3

practices productivity - 3

capital productivity - 3

polluting industries - 3

compliance - 3

aggregation - 3

oligopolistic - 3

international trade - 3

firms exporting - 3

globalization - 3

quarterly - 3

death - 3

budget - 3

econometrician - 3

costs pollution - 3

diversification - 3

performance - 3

Viewing papers 91 through 100 of 122


  • Working Paper

    Exporting and Productivity

    May 2000

    Working Paper Number:

    CES-00-07

    Exporting is often touted as a way to increase economic growth. This paper examines whether exporting has played any role in increasing productivity growth in U.S. manufacturing. Contemporaneous levels of exports and productivity are indeed positively correlated across manufacturing industries. However, tests on industry data show causality from productivity to exporting but not the reverse. While exporting plants have substantially higher productivity levels, we find no evidence that exporting increases plant productivity growth rates. However, within the same industry, exporters do grow faster than non-exporters in terms of both shipments and employment. We show that exporting is associated with the reallocation of resources from less efficient to more efficient plants. In the aggregate, these reallocation effects are quite large, making up over 40 percent of total factor productivity growth in the manufacturing sector. Half of this reallocation to more productive plants occurs within industries and the direction of the reallocation is towards exporting plants. The positive contribution of exporters even shows up in import-competing industries and non-tradable sectors. The overall contribution of exporters to manufacturing productivity growth far exceeds their shares of employment and output.
    View Full Paper PDF
  • Working Paper

    Technological Change and Economies of Scale in U.S. Poultry Slaughter

    April 2000

    Working Paper Number:

    CES-00-05

    This paper uses a unique data set provided by the Census Bureau to empirically examine technological change and economies of scale in the chicken and turkey slaughter industries. Results reveal substantial scale economies that show no evidence of diminishing with plant size and that are much greater than those realized in cattle and hog slaughter. Additionally, it is shown that controlling for plant product mix is critical to cost estimation and animal inputs are much more elastic to prices than in either cattle or hogs. Results suggest that consolidation is likely to continue, particularly if demand growth diminishes.
    View Full Paper PDF
  • Working Paper

    Scale Economies and Consolidation in Hog Slaughter

    March 2000

    Working Paper Number:

    CES-00-03

    We use establishment based panel data to estimate a cost function which identifies the role of scale economies in hog slaughter consolidation. We find modest by extensive technological scale economies in the 1990s, and they became more important over time. But wages rose sharply with plant size through the 1970s and those wage premiums generated a pecuniary scale diseconomy that largely offset the effects of technological scale economies. The size-wage relation disappeared in the 1980; with growing technological scale economies and disappearing pecuniary diseconomies, large plants realized growing cost advantages over smaller plants, and production shifted to larger plants.
    View Full Paper PDF
  • Working Paper

    Are Some Firms Better at IT? Differing Relationships between Productivity and IT Spending

    October 1999

    Working Paper Number:

    CES-99-13

    Although recent studies have found a positive relationship between spending on information technology and firm productivity, the magnitude of this relationship has not been as dramatic as one would expect given the anecdotal evidence. Data collected by the Bureau of the Census is analyzed to investigate the relationship between plant-level productivity and spending on IT. This relationship is investigated by separating the manufacturing plants in the sample along two dimensions, total factor productivity and IT spending. Analysis along these dimensions reveals that there are significant differences between the highest and lowest productivity plants. The highest productivity plants tend to spend less on IT while the lowest productivity plants tend to spend more on IT. Although there is support for the idea that lower productivity plants are spending more on IT to compensate for their productivity shortcomings, the results indicate that this is not the only difference. The robustness of this finding is strengthened by investigating changes in productivity and IT spending over time. High productivity plants with the lowest amounts of IT spending tend to remain high productivity plants with low IT spending while low productivity plants with high IT spending tend to remain low productivity plants with high IT spending. The results show that management skill, as measured by the overall productivity level of a firm, is an additional factor that must be taken into consideration when investigating the IT "productivity paradox."
    View Full Paper PDF
  • Working Paper

    Aggregate Productivity Growth: Lessons From Microeconomic Evidence

    September 1998

    Working Paper Number:

    CES-98-12

    In this study we focus on the role of the reallocation of activity across individual producers for aggregate productivity growth. A growing body of empirical analysis yields striking patterns in the behavior of establishment-level reallocation and productivity. Nevertheless, a review of existing studies yields a wide range of findings regarding the contribution of reallocation to aggregate productivity growth. Through our review of existing studies and our own sensitivity analysis, we find that reallocation plays a significant role in the changes in productivity growth at the industry level and that the impact of net entry is disproportionate since entering plants tend to displace less productive exiting plants, even after controlling for overall average growth in productivity. However, an important conclusion of our sensitivity analysis is that the quantitative contribution of reallocation to the aggregate change in productivity is sensitive to the decomposition methodology employed. Our findings also confirm and extend others in the literature that indicate that both learning and selection effects are important in this context. A novel aspect of our analysis is that we have examined the role of reallocation for aggregate productivity growth to a selected set of service sector industries. Our analysis considers the 4-digit industries that form the 3-digit industry automobile repair shops. We found tremendous churning in this industry with extremely large rates of entry and exit. Moreover, we found that productivity growth in the industry is dominated establishment data at Census, the results are quite striking and clearly call for further analysis.
    View Full Paper PDF
  • Working Paper

    Manufacturing Extension And Productivity Dynamics

    June 1998

    Authors: Ron Jarmin

    Working Paper Number:

    CES-98-08

    This paper presents results from an investigation of the effects of manufacturing extension on the productivity dynamics of client plants. Previous econometric studies of manufacturing extension had very little time series information. This limited what researchers could say about the relative timing of extension services and performance improvements. In turn, this makes it difficult to attribute performance improvements to the receipt of extension services. In this paper, I use a panel of client and nonclient plants to more carefully analyze the dynamics of extension and productivity. The results suggest that the timing of observed productivity improvements at client plants is consistent with a positive impact of manufacturing extension. Estimated program impacts are within the range of those found in previous studies.
    View Full Paper PDF
  • Working Paper

    Factor Substitution In U.S. Manufacturing: Does Plant Size Matter

    April 1998

    Working Paper Number:

    CES-98-06

    We use micro data for 10,412 U.S. manufacturing plants to estimate the degrees of factor substitution by industry and by plant size. We find that (1) capital, labor, energy and materials are substitutes in production, and (2) the degrees of substitution among inputs are quite similar across plant sizes in a majority of industries. Two important implications of these findings are that (1) small plants are typically as flexible as large plants in factor substitution; consequently, economic policies such energy conservation policies that result in rising energy prices would not cause negative effects on either large or small U.S. manufacturing plants; and (2) since energy and capital are found to be substitutes; the 1973 energy crisis is unlikely to be a significant factor contributing to the post 1973 productivity slowdown. of Substitution
    View Full Paper PDF
  • Working Paper

    The Structure of Firm R&D and the Factor Intensity of Production

    October 1997

    Authors: James D Adams

    Working Paper Number:

    CES-97-15

    This paper studies the influence of the structure of firm R&D, industry R&D spillovers, and plant level physical capital on the factor intensity of production. By the structure of firm R&D we mean its distribution across states and products. By factor intensity we mean the cost shares of variable factors, which in this paper are blue collar labor, white collar labor, and materials. We characterize the effect of the structure of firm R&D on factor intensity using a Translog cost function with quasi-fixed factors. This cost function gives rise to a system of variable cost shares that depends on factor prices, firm and industry R&D, and physical capital.
    View Full Paper PDF
  • Working Paper

    Output Price And Markup Dispersion In Micro Data: The Roles Of Producer And Heterogeneity And Noise

    August 1997

    Working Paper Number:

    CES-97-10

    This paper provides empirical evidence on the extent of producer heterogeneity in the output market by analyzing output price and price-marginal cost markups at the plant level for thirteen homogeneous manufactured goods. It relies on micro data from the U.S. Census of Manufactures over the 1963-1987 period. The amount of price heterogeneity varies substantially across products. Over time, plant transition patterns indicate more persistence in the pricing of individual plants than would be generated by purely random movements. High-price and low-price plants remain in the same part of the price distribution with high frequency, suggesting that underlying time-invariant structural factors contribute to the price dispersion. For all but two products, large producers have lower output prices. Marginal cost and the markups are estimated for each plant. The markup remains unchanged or increases with plant size for all but four of the products and declining marginal costs play an important role in generating this pattern. The lower production costs for large producers are, at least partially, passed on to purchasers as lower output prices. Plants with the highest and lowest markups tend to remain so over time, although overall the persistence in markups is less than for output price, suggesting a larger role for idiosyncratic shocks in generating markup variation.
    View Full Paper PDF
  • Working Paper

    Productivity Races I: Are Some Productivuty Measures Better Than Others?

    January 1997

    Authors: Douglas W Dwyer

    Working Paper Number:

    CES-97-02

    In this study we construct twelve different measures of productivity at the plant level and test which measures of productivity are most closely associated with direct measures of economic performance. We first examine how closely correlated these measures are with various measures of profits. We then evaluate the extent to which each productivity measure is associated with lower rates of plant closure and faster plant growth (growth in employment, output, and capital). All measures of productivity considered are credible in the sense that highly productive plants, regardless of measure, are clearly more profitable, less likely to close, and grow faster. Nevertheless, labor productivity and measures of total factor productivity that are based on regression estimates of production functions are better predictors of plant growth and survival than factor share-based measures of total factor productivity (TFP). Measures of productivity that are based on several years of data appear to outperform measures of productivity that are based solely on data from the most recent year.
    View Full Paper PDF